Older Drivers Reduced Engagement in Distracting Behaviors Over a Six-Year Period: Findings From the Candrive Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVES: Baltes and Baltes' "selective optimization with compensation" model is pertinent to driving but evidence about the use of compensation using longitudinal designs is scarce. Therefore, we sought to determine if older drivers reduced their engagement in distracting behaviors while driving, over a 6-year period. METHODS: We used data captured over several annual assessments from a cohort of 583 drivers aged 70 and older to determine if their engagement in 12 distracting behaviors (e.g., listening to the radio, talking with passengers) declined over time. We adjusted our multivariable model for several potential confounders of the association between our outcome variable and time. RESULTS: Overall, and after adjustment for potential confounders, the participants reduced their engagement in distracting behaviors over the study period (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-0.97). Baseline age was negatively associated with engagement in distracting behaviors (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.94-0.96). Men engaged in more distracting behaviors than women (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03-1.27), as did participants living in the largest urban centers compared to participants living in the smallest areas (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.41). The number of kilometers driven per year (for every 10,000 km) was positively associated with the proportion of distracting behaviors drivers engaged in (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08-1.19). DISCUSSION: Drivers in our cohort reduced their engagement in distracting behaviors over the study period. This suggests that older drivers adjust their driving over time, which aligns with age-related theories and models about compensation.

The Impact of Two Telerehabilitation Supervision Schedules on Physical Activity, Mobility, and Balance Among People with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mixed-Method Single-Subject Design.

Background: Many individuals who experience a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) have long-term deficits in physical activity, balance, and mobility requiring specialized care. New delivery models are being investigated for interventions to address challenges caused by living in remote communities, difficulties with transportation, and/or physical distancing requirements. Determining the effectiveness of telerehabilitation is critical given the current movement toward remote health care delivery. Objective: We investigated the effectiveness of two teletherapy supervision schedules used to deliver a home-based, intensive exercise programme on 1) physical activity, mobility, balance, participation, and 2) concerns with falling, and satisfaction with life. Methods: A mixed methods approach with alternating single subject design (SSD) and interviews was used. Five individuals who experienced a moderate or severe TBI completed two intensive home-based telerehabilitation programmes. Programmes differed only by supervision schedule - daily or weekly. Impacts on objective and patient-reported outcomes were measured. Results: Four individuals demonstrated clinically significant improvements in physical activity level, balance, and mobility. One individual experienced less concerns with falling after both schedules, while two other individuals showed a trend in that direction after the weekly remote supervision. Important functional gains (i.e., improved balance and decreased fatigue) were also perceived and reported by family partners regardless of supervision schedule. Conclusion: Although the study has limitations, the findings indicate that exercise programmes delivered via telerehabilitation can improve balance and mobility as well as positively affect concerns with falling and physical activity levels for this population. No clear differences were seen between the two telerehabilitation supervision schedules.

Historique : de nombreuses personnes qui sont victimes d'un traumatisme crânien (TC) modéré ou grave ont des déficits à long terme en matière d'activité physique, d'équilibre et de mobilité et doivent recevoir des soins spécialisés. De nouveaux modèles de prestation sont en cours d'étude afin que les interventions relèvent les problèmes liés à la vie en région éloignée, au transport ou à la distanciation physique. Il est essentiel de déterminer l'efficacité de la téléréadaptation en raison du mouvement actuel vers la prestation des soins à distance. Objectif : examiner l'efficacité de deux horaires de supervision de la téléthérapie utilisés pour fournir un programme d'exercice intensif à domicile sur 1) l'activité physique, la mobilité, l'équilibre et la participation et 2) les craintes de chutes et la satisfaction de vivre. Méthodologie : méthodologie mixte faisant appel à une alternance entre la méthodologie individuelle et les entrevues. Cinq personnes qui avaient été victimes d'un TC modéré ou grave ont suivi deux programmes intensifs de téléréadaptation à domicile. Les programmes différaient seulement en fonction de l'horaire de supervision, qui était quotidien ou hebdomadaire. Les chercheurs ont mesuré les répercussions sur les résultats cliniques objectifs et déclarés par les patients. Résultats : quatre personnes ont démontré des améliorations cliniquement significatives au taux d'activité physique, à l'équilibre et à la mobilité. Une personne craignait moins les chutes après les deux programmes tandis que les deux autres ressentaient une tendance dans cette direction après la supervision hebdomadaire à distance. Des gains fonctionnels importants (amélioration de l'équilibre et diminution de la fatigue) étaient également perçus et déclarés par les partenaires familiaux, quel que soit l'horaire de supervision. Conclusion : même si l'étude comporte des limites, les observations indiquent que les programmes d'exercices donnés en téléréadaptation peuvent améliorer l'équilibre et la mobilité et avoir des effets positifs sur les craintes de tomber et les taux d'activité physique dans cette population. Il n'y avait pas de différences évidentes entre les deux horaires de supervision de la téléréadaptation.

Remotely Supervised Exercise Programmes to Improve Balance, Mobility, and Activity Among People with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Description and Feasibility.

Purpose: Further investigation into the feasibility of using videoconferencing and activity tracking devices to provide high-intensity home-based exercise programmes for people with a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is needed to inform clinical implementation and patient adoption. This study aimed to (1) determine if home-based telerehabilitation exercise programmes were feasible for people with a moderate or severe TBI and (2) better understand the lived experience of people with a TBI and their family partners with this programme. Methods: A mixed-methods approach consisting of measures of feasibility and semi-structured interviews was used. Five participants with moderate to severe TBI and their family partners completed two high-intensity home-based exercise programmes delivered remotely by a physiotherapist (i.e., daily and weekly). Results: Telerehabilitation services in home-based settings were feasible for this population. Adherence and engagement were high. Dyads were satisfied with the use of technology to deliver physiotherapy sessions. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation provides a delivery option that allows people with TBI to spend energy on therapy rather than on travelling. A pre-programme training on key components, such as the use of technology, safety precautions, and communication methods, likely improved the overall feasibility. Further research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of such a programme on balance, mobility, and physical activity levels.

Objectif : des recherches plus approfondies s'imposent sur la faisabilité d'utiliser les visioconférences et les dispositifs de suivi des activités pour fournir des programmes d'exercices à domicile à haute intensité aux personnes atteintes d'un traumatisme crânien (TC) modéré à grave qui éclaireront la mise en œuvre clinique et l'adoption par le patient. Cette étude visait à 1) déterminer s'il était faisable d'offrir des programmes d'exercices en téléréadaptation à domicile pour les personnes atteintes d'un TC modéré à grave et 2) mieux comprendre l'expérience vécue des personnes atteintes d'un TC et de leurs partenaires familiaux au sein de ce programme. Méthodologie : les chercheurs ont utilisé une approche mixte composée de mesures de faisabilité et d'entrevues semi-structurées. Cinq participants atteints d'un TC modéré à grave et leurs partenaires familiaux ont effectué deux programmes d'exercices à domicile à haute intensité donnés à distance par un physiothérapeute (quotidiennement et hebdomadairement). Résultats : les services de téléréadaptation à domicile étaient faisables pour cette population. L'adhésion et la participation étaient élevées. Les dyades étaient satisfaites par l'utilisation de la technologie pour la prestation des séances de physiothérapie. Conclusion : la téléréadaptation fournit un mode de prestation qui permet aux personnes atteintes d'un TC à consacrer leur énergie au traitement plutôt qu'aux déplacements. Une formation avant le programme portant sur les principaux éléments, tels que le recours à la technologie, les mesures de précaution et les modes de communication, améliorait probablement la faisabilité globale. D'autres recherches seront réalisées pour mieux comprendre l'efficacité de ce programme sur l'équilibre, la mobilité et les taux d'activité physique.

Physical Frailty and Functional Status in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Background: With an aging population and growing number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), integrating the latest risk factors when deciding on a treatment plan can result in better patient care. Frailty remains a prevalent syndrome in CKD resulting in adverse health outcomes. However, measures of frailty and functional status remain excluded from clinical decision making. Objective: To examine the degree to which different measures of frailty and functional status are associated with mortality, hospitalization, and other clinical outcomes in patients with advanced CKD. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Observation studies including cohort study, case-control study, or cross-sectional study examining frailty and functional status on clinical outcomes. There were no restrictions on type of setting or country of origin. Patients: Adults with advanced CKD, including both types of dialysis patients. Measurements: Data including demographic information (e.g., sample size, follow-up time, age, country), assessments of frailty or functional status and their domains, and outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, cardiovascular events, kidney function, and composite outcomes were extracted. Methods: A search was conducted using databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. Studies were included from inception to March 17, 2021. The eligibility of studies was screened by 2 independent reviewers. Data were presented by instrument and clinical outcome. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals from the fully adjusted statistical model were reported or calculated from the raw data. Results: A total of 117 unique instruments were found among 140 studies. The median sample size of studies was 319 (interquartile range, 161-893). Most studies focused on incident and chronic dialysis patient populations, with only 15% of studies examining non-dialysis CKD patients. Frailty and lower functional status were associated with an increased risk for adverse clinical outcomes such as mortality and hospitalization. The 5 individual domains of frailty were also found to be associated with poor health outcomes. Limitations: Meta-analysis could not be performed due to significant heterogeneity between studies and methods used to measure frailty and functional status. Many studies had issues with methodological rigor. Selection bias and the validity of data collection could not be ascertained for some studies. Conclusion: Frailty and functional status measures should be integrated to help guide clinical care decision making for a comprehensive assessment of risk for adverse outcomes among patients with advanced CKD. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42016045251.

Contexte: Compte tenu du vieillissement de la population et du nombre croissant de patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC), l'intégration des plus récents facteurs de risque dans le processus de prise de décision d'un plan de traitement pourrait améliorer les soins aux patients. La fragilité demeure un syndrome prévalant en contexte d'IRC, qui entraîne des effets néfastes sur la santé. Pourtant, les mesures de la fragilité et de l'état fonctionnel demeurent exclues de la prise de décisions cliniques. Objectif: Déterminer à quel point les différentes mesures de la fragilité et de l'état fonctionnel sont associées à la mortalité, à l'hospitalisation et à d'autres résultats cliniques chez les patients atteints d'IRC avancée. Type d'étude: Examen systématique. Sources: Des études d'observation, y compris des études de cohorte, des études cas-témoins ou des études transversales examinant le rôle de la fragilité et de l'état fonctionnel sur les résultats cliniques. Il n'y avait pas de restrictions quant au cadre ou au pays d'origine de l'étude. Sujets: Des adultes atteints d'IRC avancée, y compris les deux types de patients sous dialyse. Mesures: Les données suivantes ont été extraites : les données démographiques (taille de l'échantillon, temps de suivi, âge des patients, pays), les évaluations de la fragilité ou de l'état fonctionnel et de leurs domaines, et les résultats cliniques (mortalité, hospitalisation, événements cardiovasculaires, fonction rénale et résultats composites). Méthodologie: Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données Medline, embase et Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials pour répertorier les études de la création jusqu'au 17 mars 2021. L'admissibilité des études a été déterminée par deux examinateurs indépendants. Les données ont été présentées par instrument et par résultat clinique. Des estimations ponctuelles et des intervalles de confiance à 95 % du modèle statistique ajusté ont été rapportés ou calculés à partir des données brutes. Résultats: Parmi les 140 études répertoriées, 117 instruments uniques ont été trouvés. La taille médiane des échantillons était de 319 patients (ÉIQ : 161 à 893). La plupart des études portaient sur des populations de patients incidents et sous dialyse chronique, seulement 15 % des études portaient sur des patients atteints d'IRC non dialysés. La fragilité et un faible état fonctionnel ont été associés à un risque accru de résultats cliniques défavorables comme une hospitalisation ou le décès. Les cinq domaines individuels de la fragilité ont également été associés à de mauvais résultats de santé. Limites: L'hétérogénéité significative entre les études et les méthodes utilisées pour mesurer la fragilité et l'état fonctionnel ne permettait pas de procéder à une méta-analyse. De nombreuses études n'étaient pas rigoureuses sur le plan méthodologique. Les biais de sélection et la validité de la collecte des données n'ont pas pu être vérifiés pour certaines études. Conclusion: Les mesures de la fragilité et de l'état fonctionnel devraient être intégrées au processus de prise de décision afin d'orienter les soins cliniques et de permettre une évaluation complète du risque d'effets indésirables chez les patients atteints d'IRC avancée. Enregistrement PROSPERO: CRD42016045251.

Candrive-Development of a Risk Stratification Tool for Older Drivers.

BACKGROUND: Assessing an older adult's fitness-to-drive is an important part of clinical decision making. However, most existing risk prediction tools only have a dichotomous design, which does not account for subtle differences in risk status for patients with complex medical conditions or changes over time. Our objective was to develop an older driver risk stratification tool (RST) to screen for medical fitness-to-drive in older adults. METHODS: Participants were active drivers aged 70 and older from 7 sites across 4 Canadian provinces. They underwent in-person assessments every 4 months with an annual comprehensive assessment. Participant vehicles were instrumented to provide vehicle and passive Global Positioning System (GPS) data. The primary outcome measure was police-reported, expert-validated, at-fault collision adjusted per annual kilometers driven. Predictor variables included physical, cognitive, and health assessment measures. RESULTS: A total of 928 older drivers were recruited for this study beginning in 2009. The average age at enrollment was 76.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.8) with 62.1% male participants. The mean duration for participation was 4.9 (SD = 1.6) years. The derived Candrive RST included 4 predictors. Out of 4 483 person-years of driving, 74.8% fell within the lowest risk category. Only 2.9% of person-years were in the highest risk category where the relative risk for at-fault collisions was 5.26 (95% confidence interval = 2.81-9.84) compared to the lowest risk group. CONCLUSIONS: For older drivers whose medical conditions create uncertainty regarding their fitness-to-drive, the Candrive RST may assist primary health care providers when initiating a conversation about driving and to guide further evaluation.

The Association between Psychological Resilience and Driving Behavior among Older Drivers in Australia.

This study compared a sample of Australian drivers aged 77 years and older to participants from an older driver longitudinal cohort study (Ozcandrive) and examined the relationship between resilience and self-reported driving measures within these samples. Using a survey with a subset of questions from Ozcandrive, data were collected from 237 older drivers throughout Australia. The two samples were analyzed for differences in demographics, health, resilience, and self-reported driving behavior. A series of multiple regression models were fit for each driving outcome measure for both samples. The two samples had both similarities and differences, with the largest difference observed for resilience. Strong and consistent associations were found between resilience and driving comfort, abilities, and frequency for the Australian sample. Across samples, resilience remained a significant variable in seven of 10 regression models, more than any other independent variable.

INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods, Overview, and Principles.

INTRODUCTION: Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in complex cognitive sequelae. Despite hundreds of clinical trials in cognitive rehabilitation, the translation of these findings into clinical practice remains a challenge. Clinical practice guidelines are one solution. The objective of this initiative was to reconvene the international group of cognitive researchers and clinicians (known as INCOG) to develop INCOG 2.0: Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following TBI. METHODS: The guidelines adaptation and development cycle was used to update the recommendations and derive new ones. The team met virtually and reviewed the literature published since the original INCOG (2014) to update the recommendations and decision algorithms. The team then prioritized the recommendations for implementation and modified the audit tool accordingly to allow for the evaluation of adherence to best practices. RESULTS: In total, the INCOG update contains 80 recommendations (25 level A, 15 level B, and 40 level C) of which 27 are new. Recommendations developed for posttraumatic amnesia, attention, memory, executive function and cognitive-communication are outlined in other articles, whereas this article focuses on the overarching principles of care for which there are 38 recommendations pertaining to: assessment (10 recommendations), principles of cognitive rehabilitation (6 recommendations), medications to enhance cognition (10 recommendations), teleassessment (5 recommendations), and telerehabilitation intervention (7 recommendations). One recommendation was supported by level A evidence, 7 by level B evidence, and all remaining recommendations were level C evidence. New to INCOG are recommendations for telehealth-delivered cognitive assessment and rehabilitation. Evidence-based clinical algorithms and audit tools for evaluating the state of current practice are also provided. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation guided by these recommendations should be offered to individuals with TBI. Despite the advancements in TBI rehabilitation research, further high-quality studies are needed to better understand the role of cognitive rehabilitation in improving patient outcomes after TBI.

INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part I: Posttraumatic Amnesia.

INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) is a common occurrence following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and emergence from coma. It is characterized by confusion, disorientation, retrograde and anterograde amnesia, poor attention and frequently, agitation. Clinicians and family need guidelines to support management practices during this phase. METHODS: An international team of researchers and clinicians (known as INCOG) met to update the INCOG guidelines for assessment and management of PTA. Previous recommendations and audit criteria were updated on the basis of review of the literature from 2014. RESULTS: Six management recommendations were made: 1 based on level A evidence, 2 on level B, and 3 on level C evidence. Since the first version of INCOG (2014), 3 recommendations were added: the remainder were modified. INCOG 2022 recommends that individuals should be assessed daily for PTA, using a validated tool (Westmead PTA Scale), until PTA resolution. To date, no cognitive or pharmacological treatments are known to reduce PTA duration. Agitation and confusion may be minimized by a variety of environmental adaptations including maintaining a quiet, safe, and consistent environment. The use of neuroleptic medications and benzodiazepines for agitation should be minimized and their impact on agitation and cognition monitored using standardized tools. Physical therapy and standardized activities of daily living training using procedural and errorless learning principles can be effective, but delivery should be tailored to concurrent levels of cognition, agitation, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Stronger recommendations regarding assessment of PTA duration and effectiveness of activities of daily living training have been made. Evidence regarding optimal pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of confusion and agitation during PTA remains limited, with further research needed. These guidelines aim to enhance evidence-based care and maximize consistency of PTA management.

A physiotherapist's perception of their own behavior compared to the perception of their behavior by persons with TBI within the context of telerehabilitation: A self-determination theory perspective.

BACKGROUND: According to Self-Determination Theory, the fulfillment of basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness plays an important role in one's motivation, engagement, and well-being. How a therapist is perceived to support or thwart these needs can impact adherence to treatment, thus influencing the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. OBJECTIVES: This alternating single-subject design explores how the physiotherapist self-reports interpersonal behaviors, how the person living with a disability (PwD) perceives the physiotherapist's supportive/thwarting interpersonal behaviors, and how the two align in the context of telerehabilitation. METHODS: Five PwD and their physiotherapist completed two telerehabilitation exercise programs. The PwD completed the Interpersonal Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ) to examine how they perceived the physiotherapist interpersonal behaviors. The physiotherapist completed the Interpersonal Behavior Questionnaire-Self (IBQ-Self) to document how they self-reported these same behaviors. Descriptive statistics were used to document self-reports and perceptions of behaviors. RESULTS: Each PwD perceived the physiotherapist as being more supportive than thwarting. The supportive/thwarting behaviors varied across relationships. Greater alignment of the perceptions of therapist and the PwD was observed at the end of the programme when compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Assessing how therapist support/thwart psychological needs and how these behaviors are perceived by PwD is recommended as it may influence the therapist's behavior and the PwD's adherence to future telerehabilitation exercise programs.

Identification of Clinical Measures to Use in a Virtual Concussion Assessment: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Workplace concussions can have a significant impact on workers. The impact of concussion symptoms, combined with challenges associated with clinical environments that are loud, bright, and busy, create barriers to conducting effective in-person assessments. Although the opportunity for remote care in rural communities has long been recognized, the COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the transition to virtual assessments and care into the mainstream. With this rapid shift, many clinicians have been completing remote assessments. However, the approaches and measures used in these assessments have not yet been standardized. Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the assessments when completed remotely using videoconference have not yet been documented. OBJECTIVE: Through this mixed methods study, we aim to (1) identify the concussion assessment measures clinicians are currently using in person and are most relevant to the following 5 physical domains: neurological examination (ie, cranial nerve, coordination, motor, and sensory skills), cervical spine, vestibular, oculomotor, and effort assessment; (2) document the psychometric properties of the measures identified; (3) identify measures that appear feasible in a virtual context; and (4) identify practical and technical barriers or challenges, facilitators, and benefits to conducting or engaging in virtual concussion assessments. METHODS: This study will follow a sequential mixed methods design using a survey and Delphi approach, working groups with expert clinicians, and focus groups with experienced clinicians and people living with concussions. Our target sample sizes are 50 clinicians for the Delphi surveys, 4 clinician-participants for the working group, and 5-7 participants for each focus group (roughly 6-10 total groups being planned with at least two groups consisting of people living with concussions). The results from this study will inform the decision regarding the measures that should be included in a virtual assessment tool kit to be tested in a future planned prospective evaluation study. RESULTS: The study is expected to be completed by January 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This mixed methods study will document the clinical measures that are currently used in person and will identify those that are most relevant to assessing the physical domains impacted by concussions. Potential feasibility of using these measures in a virtual context will be explored. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40446.

Enhancing COVID Rehabilitation with Technology (ECORT): protocol for an open-label, single-site randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of electronic case management for individuals with persistent COVID-19 symptoms.

BACKGROUND: As of May 2022, Ontario has seen more than 1.3 million cases of COVID-19. While the majority of individuals will recover from infection within 4 weeks, a significant subset experience persistent and often debilitating symptoms, known as "post-COVID syndrome" or "Long COVID." Those with Long COVID experience a wide array of symptoms, with variable severity, including fatigue, cognitive impairment, and shortness of breath. Further, the prevalence and duration of Long COVID is not clear, nor is there evidence on the best course of rehabilitation for individuals to return to their desired level of function. Previous work with chronic conditions has suggested that the addition of electronic case management (ECM) may help to improve outcomes. These platforms provide enhanced connection with care providers, detailed symptom tracking and goal setting, and access to relevant resources. In this study, our primary aim is to determine if the addition of ECM with health coaching improves Long COVID outcomes at 3 months compared to health coaching alone. METHODS: The trial is an open-label, single-site, randomized controlled trial of ECM with health coaching (ECM+) compared to health coaching alone (HC). Both groups will continue to receive usual care. Participants will be randomized equally to receive health coaching (± ECM) for a period of 8 weeks and a 12-week follow-up. Our primary outcome is the WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS), 36-item self-report total score. Participants will also complete measures of cognition, fatigue, breathlessness, and mental health. Participants and care providers will be asked to complete a brief qualitative interview at the end of the study to evaluate acceptability and implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: There is currently little evidence about the optimal treatment of Long COVID patients or the use of digital health platforms in this population. The results of this trial could result in rapid, scalable, and personalized care for people with Long COVID which will decrease morbidity after an acute infection. Results from this study will also inform decision making in Long COVID and treatment guidelines at provincial and national levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05019963. Registered on 25 August 2021.

Examining the contribution of psychological resilience on self-reported and naturalistic driving behavior of older adults.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the contribution of psychological resilience on self-reported driving comfort, abilities, and restrictions, and on naturalistic driving (ND) behavior of older adults at two time points, five years apart (N = 111; Male: 65.8%, Mean age = 86.1 years). METHOD: Participants from the Ozcandrive older driver cohort study completed a demographic questionnaire, functional assessments, psychosocial driving questionnaires, and a resilience scale. Participants' vehicles were equipped with a recording device to monitor driving behavior throughout the study. Over 1.7 million kilometers of ND data were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in resilience over time, and both self-reported and ND measures revealed reduced driving across five years. Hierarchical regression analyses using age, sex, driving exposure, functional measures, and resilience showed that adding resilience into the models at the final step resulted in statistically significant increases in the amount of variance explained for driving comfort during the day and night, perceived driving abilities, number of trips, trip distance, and proportion of night trips. CONCLUSIONS: This research leveraged the longitudinal nature of the Ozcandrive study to provide the first insights into the role of resilience and ND. The observed patterns of reduced driving, captured by both subjective and objective measures, are suggestive of increased levels of self-regulation. As resilience is associated with adaptive coping skills, older adults with higher resilience may be able to more effectively engage in appropriate coping behaviors with regard to driving behavior, safety, and mobility. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Effective methods of increasing resilience in the context of driving is worthy of future research as it will provide valuable information about how older drivers navigate the process of aging as it relates to driving and may assist stakeholders in developing suitable measures to support older driver safety.

Protocol for a living systematic review for the management of concussion in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) often presents initially with disabling symptoms that resolve, but for an unfortunate minority some of these symptoms may become prolonged. Although research into diagnosis and interventions for concussion is increasing, study quality overall remains low. A living systematic review that is updated as evidence becomes available is the ideal research activity to inform a living guideline targeting clinicians and patients. The purpose of this paper is to present the protocol of an ongoing living systematic review for the management of adult concussion that will inform living guidelines building off the Guideline for Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Persistent Symptoms: third Edition. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol guidelines were followed in the reporting of this systematic review protocol. We are including English peer-reviewed observational studies, trials, qualitative studies, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines related to diagnosis/assessment or treatment of adult concussion. Future searches will be conducted at minimum every 6 months using the following databases: MEDLINE ALL, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo and CINAHL. The data are managed in the Covidence website. Screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments are being done through multiple raters working independently. Multiple validated tools are being used to assess risk of bias, and the tool applied matches the document or study design (eg, Downs and Black Scale for healthcare interventions). Many concussion experts in various clinical disciplines from across North America have volunteered to examine the evidence in order to make recommendations for the living guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is necessary because primary data are not collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and on the living guidelines website once built. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022301786.

Perceived Community Age-friendliness is Associated With Quality of Life Among Older Adults.

We examined the positive association between perceived community age-friendliness and self-reported quality of life for older adults. A total of 171 participants, aged 77-96 years, completed a mail-in questionnaire package that included measures of health (SF-36 Physical), social participation (Social Participation Scale), community age-friendliness (Age-Friendly Survey [AFS]), and quality of life (WHO Quality of Life). Hierarchical regression models including age, gender, driving status, finances, health, social participation, and AFS scores explained 8 to 21 per cent of the variance in quality of life scores. Community age-friendliness was a statistically significant variable in all models, accounting for three to six and a half per cent of additional variance in quality of life scores. Although the proportion of variance explained by age-friendliness was small, our findings suggest that it is worthwhile to further investigate whether focused, age-friendly policies, interventions, and communities could play a role towards successful and healthy aging.

Effect of Moderate vs Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia on Mortality and Neurologic Outcomes in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The CAPITAL CHILL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest experience high rates of death and severe neurologic injury. Current guidelines recommend targeted temperature management at 32 °C to 36 °C for 24 hours. However, small studies suggest a potential benefit of targeting lower body temperatures. Objective: To determine whether moderate hypothermia (31 °C), compared with mild hypothermia (34 °C), improves clinical outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-center, double-blind, randomized, clinical superiority trial carried out in a tertiary cardiac care center in eastern Ontario, Canada. A total of 389 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were enrolled between August 4, 2013, and March 20, 2020, with final follow-up on October 15, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to temperature management with a target body temperature of 31 °C (n = 193) or 34 °C (n = 196) for a period of 24 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or poor neurologic outcome at 180 days. Neurologic outcome was assessed using the Disability Rating Scale, with poor neurologic outcome defined as a score greater than 5 (range, 0-29, with 29 being the worst outcome [vegetative state]). There were 19 secondary outcomes, including mortality at 180 days and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: Among 367 patients included in the primary analysis (mean age, 61 years; 69 women [19%]), 366 (99.7%) completed the trial. The primary outcome occurred in 89 of 184 patients (48.4%) in the 31 °C group and in 83 of 183 patients (45.4%) in the 34 °C group (risk difference, 3.0% [95% CI, 7.2%-13.2%]; relative risk, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.86-1.33]; P = .56). Of the 19 secondary outcomes, 18 were not statistically significant. Mortality at 180 days was 43.5% and 41.0% in patients treated with a target temperature of 31 °C and 34 °C, respectively (P = .63). The median length of stay in the intensive care unit was longer in the 31 °C group (10 vs 7 days; P = .004). Among adverse events in the 31 °C group vs the 34 °C group, deep vein thrombosis occurred in 11.4% vs 10.9% and thrombus in the inferior vena cava occurred in 3.8% and 7.7%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a target temperature of 31 °C did not significantly reduce the rate of death or poor neurologic outcome at 180 days compared with a target temperature of 34 °C. However, the study may have been underpowered to detect a clinically important difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02011568.

Mitigating Long-Term COVID-19 Consequences on Brain Health.

COVID-19 is increasingly being linked to brain health impacts. The emerging situation is consistent with evidence of immunological injury to the brain, which has been described as a resulting "brain fog." The situation need not be medicalized but rather clinically managed in terms of improving resilience for an over-stressed nervous system. Pre-existing comparisons include managing post-concussion syndromes and/or brain fog. The objective evaluation of changes in cognitive functioning will be an important clinical starting point, which is being accelerated through pandemic digital health innovations. Pre-morbid brain health can significantly optimize risk factors and existing clinical frameworks provide useful guidance in managing over-stressed COVID-19 nervous systems.