ABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease often associated with a significant impairment in the quality of life of affected patients. The Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (SIDeMaST) planned a national information campaign, providing direct access to 27 dermatologic centers dedicated to the management of AD. The aim of this study aimed was to outline critical aspects related to AD in the general population. Overall, 643 adult subjects were included in this study, and in 44.2% (284/643) of cases, a diagnosis of AD was confirmed, whereas about 55% of subjects were affected by other pruritic cutaneous diseases. Higher intensity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, as well as an increased interference in sport, work, and social confidence was reported in the AD group compared to the non-AD group. In the AD subgroup, the mean duration of disease was of 15.3 years, with a mean eczema area and severity index (EASI) score of 11.2, and investigator global assessment (IGA) score of 1.9 and an itch numeric rating scale (NRS) of 6.9. Almost 32% of patients were untreated, either with topical or systemic agents, whereas 44.3% used routine topical compounds (topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors), and only 7.0% of patients were systemically treated. Only 2.8% of patients reported complete satisfaction with the treatment received for AD to date. This study reveals a profound unmet need in AD, showing a poorly managed and undertreated patient population despite a high reported burden of disease. This suggests the usefulness of information campaigns with the goal of improving patient awareness regarding AD and facilitating early diagnosis and access to dedicated healthcare institutions.
ABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a common chronic skin disease characterized by a worldwide distribution and a natural tendency towards progression. According to the many clinical forms, the extension of the disease and the many comorbidities, almost the 20% of the patients require a systemic treatment. Biologics have greatly changed the ongoing of psoriasis and the quality of life of psoriasis patients. After the anti-TNF-alpha, which were the first biologics in use for psoriasis, the improvement in knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the disease has led to the development of a series of more specific therapies for psoriasis. This "second generation" of biologics includes the interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab, IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab and ixekizumab), the IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) antagonist brodalumab, and the IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab. This study represents an update of the Tuscany consensus focused on the use of new drugs, such as anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 in moderate-to-severe psoriasis and their correct place in therapy according to specific clinical requests and in full respect of the current financial restrictions.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Psoriasis , Humans , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Consensus , Interleukin-23/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Interleukin-17/immunologyABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease with a chronic-relapsing course that is intensely itchy. A correct diagnosis of AD in adults and consequently appropriate clinical therapeutic management is a critical issue for extreme clinical expression heterogeneity and various grades of disease severity. In order to ensure high levels of care and standardization of clinical therapeutic management of Adult AD, the decision was taken to create an AD Tuscan Consensus Group (the Group), to work on and validate a consensus based regional clinical-therapeutic management model. The aims of the Group were to find agreement on the criteria for diagnosis, scoring of severity, multidisciplinary approach and treatment of adult atopic dermatitis and to create an easier way for patients to access specialized dermatology outpatient services and importantly to reduce waiting lists and costs related to the management of AD. The Tuscan Consensus Group adopted a simplified Delphi method, in three principal steps: 1) literature metanalysis and critical review of patient's clinical experience to identify the main areas considered questionable or uncertain; 2) discussion of those areas requiring consensus and statement definition through four different sub-committees (diagnosis, severity evaluation, scoring and comorbidities); 3) a consensus based simplified process with final approval of each statement by plenary vote with approval >80% of the participants. The Group here presents and discusses the consensus based recommendation statements on adult atopic dermatitis.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Interdisciplinary Communication , Adult , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Humans , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Psoriasis (PSO) is traditionally defined as an immune-mediated, inflammatory dermatological disease characterized by a chronic-relapsing course and associated with multifactorial inheritance (genetic predisposition and influence of various environmental factors). Considered until recently a dermatological disease only, today PSO is correctly known as a systemic one because of the involvement of multiple organs with important impact on social life and relationships. PSO is found in the 0.3-4.6% of the world's population, while its prevalence in the Italian population is estimated at 2.8%. Therefore, if we consider that in Tuscany more than 100,000 people out of 3,672,202 suffer of psoriasis, it is of paramount importance to focus on a shared clinical and therapeutic protocol to manage the disease. With the aim of ensuring diagnostic-therapeutic suitability, high levels of care and standardization of treatment, a unique clinical-therapeutic management model has been developed and validated in Tuscany, involving all accredited regional dermatological centers. Among the possible alternatives to be implemented in the treatment of patients with mild, moderate-severe psoriasis, UVBnb phototherapy is widely used alone or in association with other systemic and non-systemic devices. Despite this, there is still no universally shared therapeutic protocol. In this context the CO.FO.TO working group (Consensus Fototerapia Toscana) is born with the aim of defining and validating the main guidelines in the use of phototherapy with UVBnb in psoriasis; the guidelines are based both on the real-life experience of the different centers of reference in the region and on the revision of the recent literature.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis/therapy , Ultraviolet Rays , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Humans , Italy , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease, clinically characterized by erythematous and scaly plaques. Treatment approach is mainly driven by disease severity, though several factors should be considered in order to identify the optimal therapeutic choice. Mild psoriasis may be treated with a wide array of topical agents including corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, keratolytics, and calcipotriol/betamethasone propionate compound. Because guidelines may not provide practical indications regarding the therapeutic approach, the use of topical agents in psoriasis is more individually tailored. In order to homogenize the standard of care, at least in a local setting, we collected the real-life-based recommendations for the use of topical therapies from an expert panel, the Tuscany Consensus Group on Psoriasis, representing all leading centers for psoriasis established in Tuscany. With this document, this consensus group sought to define principles guiding the selection of therapeutic agents with straightforward recommendations derived from a real-life setting.
Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/standards , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Skin/drug effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/immunology , Skin/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis arthritis will develop during cutaneous psoriasis in a significant percentage. The aim of this study was to improve assistance to patients and to provide the most individualized care possible. METHODS: Patients: all consecutive subjects with psoriasis accessing the outpatients facilities of five dermatologic centers of excellence in the Tuscany region of Italy between December 2014 and February 2015. All subjects were screened for the presence of a previous diagnosis of arthritis and symptoms affecting the articular system, using some questions chosen and shared by dermatologists in charge of the centers. RESULTS: In the chosen three months period, 134 patients affected with psoriasis had been observed, 32 (24%) of which answered "yes" to the question "Have you ever been diagnosed with arthritis?". There have been differences in the characteristics of patients in the two groups, with and without arthritis. In particular, in the arthritis patients a statistically significant higher mean age, more ungueal psoriasis, less body surface cutaneous psoriasis extension, and a statistically significant higher percentage of patients treated with biological drugs (57% vs. 24.5%) have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results were consistent with the scientific literature in the field. The experience seems to confirm the opportunity of screening programs on arthropathy in cutaneous psoriasis patients. About a quarter of psoriasis patients had relevant arthropathic features, and more than half of these required challenging therapies like biologics.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic/epidemiology , Dermatology/methods , Precision Medicine/methods , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Arthritis, Psoriatic/therapy , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psoriasis/pathology , Psoriasis/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is traditionally defined as an inflammatory chronic-relapsing disease of the skin. As widely demonstrated, this disease is also associated with multiple comorbidities: arthropathy, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic, cardiovascular, ocular and psychological disorders. The disease also has a significant impact on patients' quality of life, whose work ability decreases considerably with clear consequences for the social costs. Therefore, if we consider that in Tuscany, more than 100,000 people out of 3,672,202 suffer from psoriasis, it is of paramount importance focusing the attention on a rational model of clinical and therapeutic management of the disease. All the leading experts in Tuscany have come together with the aim of defining unanimously accepted regional guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and management of psoriasis, and of providing practical guidance/protocol on diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and management of special cases of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In a working group formed ad hoc, the main topics have been discussed and approved by plenary vote. RESULTS: Diagnosis must include a proper general health condition overview, a careful evaluation of skin and joints, the assessment and management of other comorbidities and the definition of disease severity. With regards to the therapy the best time to start a systemic treatment, the therapeutic goal, the most appropriate drug and blood tests to be performed in case of moderate severe-psoriasis have been taken into account. During follow-up, proper monitoring of systemic therapy and its management in the long term has also been suggested. Eventually, the experts have addressed the problem of how to manage the disease in special conditions, such as during surgery, pregnancy, in children and in case of infections (HBV, HCV, HIV). CONCLUSIONS: The main aim of this Consensus was to find agreement on the criteria for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of psoriasis, shared by all the Dermatologic Therapy Units of Tuscany. A need to create an easier way for the patient to access specialized dermatology outpatient services, and to reduce the waiting list and costs related to the management of psoriasis has been stressed. Most importantly, during the Consensus all of the participants agreed on the central role of the patient, and on the need of a multidisciplinary management of the disease which requires communication among specialists and regional centers in order to build on existing experience.
Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psoriasis/therapy , Quality of Life , Comorbidity , Consensus , Dermatology/methods , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Italy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/pathology , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Although no study has definitively shown that unfocused screening of skin cancer is effective, many campaigns have been organized with the aim of increasing awareness on melanoma risk factors. The objective of this study was to analyse the results of the Skin Cancer Screening Day in Italy during the period 2005-2007, to determine the priorities for melanoma control plans in a Mediterranean country. A total of 5002 patients were screened by dermatologists in 31 cities. Individuals who considered themselves to have many naevi and those with a family history of melanoma showed a higher number of common and atypical naevi. Ten melanomas, 20 basal cell carcinomas and two squamous cell carcinomas were histopathologically confirmed. Our observations provide the following suggestions for melanoma prevention strategies: (a) an unfocused campaign is suitable to inform the public about the importance of self-examination of the skin, but is not useful to identify a larger number of melanomas; and (b) melanoma screening campaigns should focus on a selected population, which meets rigorous risk criteria to maintain higher cost-effectiveness. The financial support to effective melanoma screening programmes could be increased, especially in southern populations where lower levels of self-surveillance and socioeconomic conditions represent risk factors for late identification of melanoma.