Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 45(7): 613-20, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16928838

ABSTRACT

A sixth dose of tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in adolescents might produce a differing reactogenicity and/or immunogenicity response depending on the composition of the 5 prior doses of DTaP or DT-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine. Reactions and immune responses following receipt of the Sanofi Pasteur (Adacel) and GlaxoSmithKline (Boostrix) Tdap vaccines were assessed in 229 adolescents. No differences were observed for reactions to either Tdap vaccine regardless of the prior DTaP/DTwP vaccination history. Seroprotective levels and antibody concentrations were comparable regardless of prior DTaP/DTwP vaccine history. A sixth sequential dose of Tdap after 5 doses of DTaP appears safe and immunogenic.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Immunization, Secondary , Adolescent , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria Toxoid/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Tetanus/prevention & control , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage , Tetanus Toxoid/immunology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control
2.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 42(6): 519-26, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12921453

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral cephalexin twice vs. three times daily vs. cefadroxil once daily as therapy for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. A prospective open-label, observational cohort study was conducted over 18 months (January 2000-June 2001). Children enrolled had an acute onset of symptoms and signs of a tonsillopharyngeal illness and a laboratory-documented GABHS infection. Follow-up examination and laboratory testing occurred 21 +/- 4 days following enrollment. Two hundred seventy-one patients were enrolled (intent to treat group): 63 received cephalexin twice daily, 124 received cephalexin three times daily, and 84 received cefadroxil once daily. Fifty-three children did not return for the follow-up visit, leaving 218 patients in the per-protocol group: 54 cephalexin twice-daily treated, 94 cephalexin 3-times daily treated, and 70 cefadroxil once-daily treated. In the per-protocol group, bacteriologic cure for those treated with cephalexin twice daily was 87%, for cephalexin 3 times daily, it was 81% and for cefadroxil once daily it was 81% (p = 0.61). The clinical cure rate for cephalexin twice-daily treatment was 91%; for three-times daily, it was 86%; and for cefadroxil once daily, it was 84% (p = 0.56). Because treatment allocation was not randomized, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for treatment group differences. Younger age of patient was significantly associated with bacteriologic (p = 0.04) and clinical (p = 0.01) failure independent of treatment group but in the adjusted logistic model no differences were found among the 3 treatment regimens. Cephalexin dosed twice daily or three times daily and cefadroxil dosed once daily appear equivalent in bacteriologic and clinical cure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cefadroxil/administration & dosage , Cephalexin/administration & dosage , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsillitis/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 42(3): 219-25, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12739920

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of oral penicillin versus amoxicillin as first-line therapy for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. The prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months (January 2000-June 2001). Children enrolled had acute onset of symptoms and signs and a laboratory-documented GABHS tonsillopharyngitis illness. Follow-up examination and laboratory testing occurred 10 +/- 4 days following completion of treatment. In total, 389 patients were enrolled (intent-to-treat group): 195 received penicillin V and 194 received amoxicillin. Fifty-six of the penicillin-treated and 57 amoxicillin-treated patients refused to take the drug, or were noncompliant, or did not return for the follow-up visit, leaving 276 patients in the per-protocol group: 139 penicillin-treated and 137 amoxicillin-treated. Bacteriologic cure for amoxicillin-treated children occurred in 76% versus 64% in the penicillin-treated children (p = 0.04). The clinical cure rate for amoxicillin-treated children was 84% compared to 73% in the penicillin-treated children (p = 0.03). Since treatment allocation was not randomized, logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for treatment group differences. The odds ratio (OR) estimate for cure for patients in the amoxicillin versus penicillin V treatment group remained significant (OR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.29); the same was true for dinical cure (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.02-3.87). Amoxicillin may be superior to penicillin for bacteriologic and clinical cure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Penicillin V/therapeutic use , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Tonsillitis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Tonsillitis/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 42(2): 113-9, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12659383

ABSTRACT

Fifty percent or more of children with upper respiratory infections (URIs) and nonspecific febrile illnesses (e.g., children febrile, anorexic, decreased activity, irritable) receive unnecessary antibiotics from community-based physicians. This study was undertaken to show that white blood cell (WBC) count testing can aid physicians in avoiding antibiotic prescribing when managing children with URIs, and nonspecific febrile illnesses. A prospective, 3-year study was conducted in a community-based pediatric practice. A weekly convenience sample (Tuesdays) of acute URI and febrile patients ages 3 months to 21 years was studied. Data collected on enrollment included: age, gender, duration of illness, recent/current antibiotic use, temperature, symptoms, signs, laboratory testing (WBC count, cultures), diagnosis and treatment. Similar data on any illness visits in the previous 2 weeks and the subsequent 2 weeks after enrollment were collected. Viral culture specimens were obtained on a subset. The use of the WBC count was assessed, including obviating antibiotic prescription, frequency of related follow-up visits, and the occurrence of subsequent bacterial infections. Of 1,956 patients with respiratory or febrile illness enrolled, 1,219 (62%) had a diagnosis established by history and examination (e.g., acute otitis media) and 737 (38%) did not. Of the 737 patients without an established diagnosis, 386 (52%) did not receive an antibiotic because they did not appear particularly ill, their temperature was less than 101 degrees F, and parents were not demanding antibiotics, leaving 351 (48%) patients who appeared ill, had a temperature greater than 101 degrees F, and parents were demanding an antibiotic or physicians were inclined to give an antibiotic. A WBC count was performed on these 351 children; 337 children (96%) had a WBC count less than 15,000/mm3, and 14 (4%) had a WBC 15,000/mm3 or greater. An antibiotic was prescribed for 13 of the 14 children with a WBC count greater than 15,000/mms. With this approach, return office visits in the following 2 weeks were infrequent (13% of 737 patients), and no child had significant bacterial illness that was missed. With selective use of WBC count testing


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Fever/blood , Fever/drug therapy , Leukocyte Count , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Infections/blood , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...