ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze if there is any difference between the arthroscopic reparation of full-thickness supraspinatus tears with simple row technique versus suture bridge technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We accomplished a retrospective study of 123 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears between January 2009 and January 2013 in our hospital. There were 60 simple row reparations, and 63 suture bridge ones. RESULTS: The mean age in the simple row group was 62.9, and in the suture bridge group was 63.3 years old. There were more women than men in both groups (67%). All patients were studied using the Constant test. The mean Constant test in the suture bridge group was 76.7, and in the simple row group was 72.4. We have also accomplished a statistical analysis of each Constant item. Strength was higher in the suture bridge group, with a significant statistical difference (p 0.04). The range of movement was also greater in the suture bridge group, but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Suture bridge technique has better clinical results than single row reparations, but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.298).
OBJETIVO: Analizar si existen diferencias clínicas entre las técnicas «hilera simple¼; versus «. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: suture bridge¼; en la reparación artroscópica de roturas de espesor completo del supraespinoso. Estudio retrospectivo de 123 pacientes con rotura de espesor completo del supraespinoso, intervenidos entre Enero de 2009 y Enero de 2013 (60 hilera simple y 63. RESULTADOS: suture bridge). La edad media en el grupo suture bridge fue 63.3 años y en el grupo hilera simple, 62.9. Predominio de mujeres (67%) en ambos grupos. En todos los casos, se reparó la hilera medial con anclajes Bio-Corkscrew y la hilera lateral con implantes Bio-PushLock (Arthrex, Naples, FL). El valor del test de Constant medio en individuos intervenidos mediante. CONCLUSIONES: suture bridge fue 76.7 (ponderado 96.5). En hilera simple, fue 72.4 (ponderado 92.8). Se realizó también un análisis estadístico comparativo de cada ítem del test de Constant por separado. La fuerza es el único parámetro del test de Constant estadísticamente significativo y es mayor en el grupo suture bridge. La reparación de las roturas de espesor completo del supraespinoso mediante.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the first cases that underwent arthroscopic surgery at our center due to relapsing glenohumeral stability of the shoulder. The objective of this paper is to analyze the influence of the learning curve on the results obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 137 patients who underwent surgery at Hospital 12 de Octubre in Madrid, Spain between.February 1999 and March 2010. A total of 101 patients met the inclusion criteria, and these patients were divided into two groups using a chronological order, the first 50 patients and the second 50 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age and laterality between both groups (p = 0.51, p = 0.15 and p = 0.23, respectively), so the groups were comparable. We compared the following between both groups: clinical outcomes, number of dislocations, reoperations and complications, i.e., implant migration, arthrosis and axillary nerve neuropathy. We also compared the functional results, which were measured using the Constant and Rowe scales. RESULTS: Four episodes of redislocation occurred in group 1 and 6 in group 2. Three reoperations were performed in group 1 and 6 in group 2. No statistically significant differences were found in the number of redislocations and reoperations (p = 50 and p = 0.48, respectively).
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Learning Curve , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , RecurrenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion has become the treatment of choice of anterior shoulder instability. Our objective is to analyze the medium-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and November 2007, 86 shoulders of 85 patients with diagnosis of relapsing shoulder dislocation were treated arthroscopically. After a mean 62-month follow-up (minimum 24 months) the results obtained were retrospectively assessed according the Rowe and Constant functional scales. A statistical analysis was done of the relation between functional results and age, sex, the side operated, capsulorrhaphy, rehabilitation and postoperative immobilization in our series. Moreover, the validity of MRI for diagnosing Bankart lesion was assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients had good or excellent results according to the Rowe scale. The mean Constant scale score was 90.6. There-dislocation rate in our series was 9%. The statistical analysis showed that female sex and immobilization time were related with worse results according to the Constant scale. CONCLUSIONS: In our hands, arthroscopic Bankart repair provides results similar to those in other published series. MRI is a useful diagnostic test in our setting, albeit its important implications for the diagnosis of Bankart lesion. Female sex and prolonged immobilization were related with worse functional results.