Virtual psychoeducation for improvement of pain catastrophizing in pediatric presurgical patients and caregivers: a proof-of-concept study.

PURPOSE: Pain catastrophizing (PC) is the tendency to magnify the threat value of pain sensations and is associated with greater postsurgical pain intensity, functional disability, and pain chronicity. Higher parental PC predicts higher chronic postsurgical pain in youth. Treating PC in caregivers and youth prior to surgery may improve recovery and surgical outcomes. We developed and evaluated a psychoeducational workshop addressing PC for presurgical youth and their parents/caregivers. We hypothesized that parent/caregiver and youth PC scores would decrease over time. We also explored preintervention levels of youth anxiety and depression as moderators of outcome. METHODS: Youth (n = 43) and caregivers (n = 41) attended a virtual, group-based single-session intervention (SSI). Single-session intervention content addressed pain neuroscience, PC, and adaptive coping strategies for managing pain and PC drawn from cognitive-behavioural, acceptance and commitment, and dialectical behaviour therapy approaches. Participants completed questionnaires assessing PC at preintervention, postintervention, and two weeks postsurgery. Youth mood and anxiety were assessed at preintervention. RESULTS: Caregiver PC scores decreased from pre- to postintervention (P = 0.006), and this was maintained at postsurgery (P = 0.002). Youth PC scores decreased from preintervention to postsurgery, but only for those with higher preintervention anxiety (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results provide proof-of-concept support for a virtual SSI targeting caregivers and youth PC during the perioperative period. The present findings highlight the possible need to screen presurgical candidates for symptoms of anxiety. Replication with larger and more diverse samples, and a more robust design are warranted.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le terme de dramatisation de la douleur décrit la tendance à amplifier la valeur de menace des sensations de douleur et est associée à une plus grande intensité de la douleur postopératoire, à une incapacité fonctionnelle et à une chronicité de la douleur. Une dramatisation parentale plus élevée de la douleur prédit une douleur postopératoire chronique plus élevée chez les jeunes. Le traitement de la dramatisation de la douleur chez les soignant·es et les jeunes avant la chirurgie peut améliorer le rétablissement et les devenirs chirurgicaux. Nous avons mis au point et évalué un atelier psychoéducatif sur la dramatisation de la douleur destiné aux jeunes en période préchirurgicale et à leurs parents/soignant·es. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des parents/soignant·es et des jeunes diminueraient avec le temps. Nous avons également exploré les niveaux d'anxiété et de dépression des jeunes avant l'intervention en tant qu'éléments modérateurs des résultats. MéTHODE: Des jeunes (n = 43) et les personnes en prenant soin (n = 41) ont participé à une seule intervention virtuelle en groupe. Le contenu de l'intervention unique portait sur les neurosciences de la douleur, la dramatisation de la douleur et les stratégies d'adaptation pour la prise en charge de la douleur et la dramatisation de la douleur tirées des approches cognitivo-comportementales, d'acceptation et d'engagement, et de thérapie comportementale dialectique. Les participant·es ont rempli des questionnaires évaluant la dramatisation de la douleur avant l'intervention, après l'intervention et deux semaines après la chirurgie. L'humeur et l'anxiété des jeunes ont été évaluées avant l'intervention. RéSULTATS: Les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des soignant·es ont diminué de la période précédant à la période suivant l'intervention (P = 0,006), et cela s'est maintenu après la chirurgie (P = 0,002). Les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des jeunes ont diminué de la période précédant l'intervention à la période postchirurgie, mais seulement chez les jeunes présentant une anxiété pré-intervention plus élevée (P = 0,01). CONCLUSION: Nos résultats appuient la preuve de concept pour une intervention virtuelle unique ciblant la dramatisation de la douleur chez les soignant·es et les jeunes en période périopératoire. Ces résultats soulignent la nécessité potentielle de dépister les symptômes d'anxiété chez les candidat·es avant la chirurgie. La réplication avec des échantillons plus grands et plus diversifiés et une conception plus robuste est justifiée.

A Quality Improvement Project on Pain Management at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.

To assess and improve pain management practices for hospitalized children in an urban tertiary pediatric teaching hospital. METHODS: Health Quality Ontario Quality Improvement (QI) framework informed this study. A pre (T1) - post (T2) intervention assessment included chart reviews and children/caregiver surveys to ascertain pain management practices. Information on self-reported pain intensity, painful procedures, pain treatment and satisfaction were obtained from children/caregivers. Documented pain assessment, pain scores, and pharmacological/non-pharmacological pain treatments were collected by chart review. T1 data was fed back to pediatric units to inform their decisions and pain management targets. RESULTS: At T1, 51 (58% of eligible participants) children/caregivers participated. At T2, 86 (97%) chart reviews and 51 (54%) children/caregivers surveys were completed. Most children/caregivers at T1 (78%) and T2 (80%) reported moderate to severe pain during their hospitalization. A mean of 2.6 painful procedures were documented in the previous 24 h, with the most common being needle-related procedures at both T1 and T2. Pain management strategies were infrequently used during needle-related procedures at both time points. CONCLUSION: No improvements in pain management as measured by the T1 and T2 data occurred. Findings informed further pain management initiatives in the participating hospital.

Be Sweet to Hospitalized Toddlers During Venipuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sucrose Compared With Water.

OBJECTIVES: High-quality evidence demonstrates analgesic effects of sweet-tasting solutions for infants during painful procedures. However, evidence of the analgesic effects of sucrose beyond 12 months of age is less certain. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of oral sucrose in hospitalized toddlers (ages 12 to 36 mo) compared with placebo (water) during venipuncture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blinded, 2-armed randomized controlled trial including hospitalized toddlers aged 12 to 36 months. Toddlers were randomized to either 25% sucrose or water before venipuncture, stratified by age (12 to 24 mo and more than 24 to 36 mo). Standard of care included topical anesthetics for both groups. Pain assessment included cry duration and FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scores. Descriptive statistics and linear models were used to report the percentage of time crying and mean differences in FLACC scores. Data analysis was performed using R, version 3.6.3. RESULTS: A total of 95 toddlers were randomized and 85 subsequently studied. The median percentage of time spent crying between insertion of the first needle and 30 seconds after the end of procedure in both groups was 81% (interquartile range=66%). There was no significant difference in crying time and FLACC scores between groups (P>0.05). When examining effects of sucrose for the younger toddlers (less than 24 mo of age) there was a reduction in crying time of 10% and a 1.2-point reduction in mean FLACC scores compared with the toddlers older than 24 months. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight that toddlers become highly distressed during venipuncture, despite the standard care of topical anesthetics. In addition, sucrose does not effectively reduce distress especially in the older group of toddlers.

Development and Pilot Evaluation of an Educational Tool for the FLACC Pain Scale.

BACKGROUND: The FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scale is commonly used for pediatric pain assessment; however, no online educational tool exists to facilitate the use of the scale. AIMS: This study aimed to develop an online educational tool and evaluate its effect on nurse knowledge, user confidence, and scoring accuracy. DESIGN AND METHODS: In phase 1, semistructured interviews were conducted to identify preferred educational features and content. Eight informants were interviewed in phase 1. Recommendations informed the development of the educational tool. Data were analyzed via conventional content analysis. Phase 2 involved a pre-post evaluation of the tool through online surveys. Posteducational data were collected immediately after the tool was completed. Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar-Bowker tests were used to compare pre- and post-training knowledge, confidence, and FLACC scores. Scoring accuracy was examined using percentage agreement and consensus analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four nurses participated in phase 2. The educational tool significantly improved knowledge (p < .0001) and increased user confidence, although not to a significant level (p = .06). There was a significant improvement in correct assessment of moderate pain (p = .04). Almost all nurses correctly assessed severe pain before and after education (91%). However, there was a decrease in accurate assessment of mild pain (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Because the intervention improved knowledge, user confidence, and assessment accuracy of moderate pain, it would be useful to implement such a tool as part of clinician education. However, further modifications will be needed to improve assessment of mild pain.

Improved practices for safe administration of intravenous bolus morphine in a pediatric setting.

Postoperative pain control is a clinical imperative, for which morphine is a preferred opioid. However, interpatient variability and drug accumulation with repeated doses, as well as medication errors, may result in respiratory arrest with this medication. Early detection of respiratory depression is essential for safe use of morphine, following both initial and repeated doses. A multidisciplinary team contributed to development of an intravenous (IV) bolus morphine monitoring guideline that reflects current knowledge of morphine pharmacokinetics. Monitoring over a 22-week period in a postsurgical unit was then assessed via record review. A total of 270 postsurgical patients received a first dose of IV bolus morphine, with 784 subsequent doses also administered. Complete monitoring (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, sedation score, oxygen saturation, and pain score) after the morphine bolus was documented at baseline and 10 and 20 minutes for 34%, 30%, and 23%, respectively, of the patients; partial monitoring (respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) was documented for an additional 22%, 15%, and 9% of patients; 43% of subsequent morphine doses were followed with complete monitoring, and an additional 30% with at least partial monitoring. Adherence to the monitoring procedure fluctuated over the study period with no consistent upward or downward trend. A small number of children exhibited a reduced respiratory rate potentially indicating respiratory depression, but no child required antidote or respiratory support. Despite suboptimal guideline adherence, potential signs of respiratory depression were detected that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. This validates the improved guideline and suggests that some incidents may have remained undetected. Front-line staff must be involved to optimize change, champion the initiative, and promote patient safety.

Review of prescribing practices for intermittent bolus administration of morphine.

BACKGROUND: Several changes to medication safety practices were proposed in a pediatric hospital, including changing the period of patient observation after administration of opioids and limiting the availability of various concentrations of morphine in the patient care unit. OBJECTIVE: To document and review postoperative pain management for children on a surgical ward, specifically with regard to intermittent IV bolus administration of morphine, to help in assessing the impact of the proposed nursing practice changes. METHODS: Data were collected from records for narcotics and controlled drugs for the surgical ward over a 3-month period (April to June 2006). For each patient, data had been recorded for up to 7 consecutive days after surgery. A patient's data were included in the review if he or she had received at least 2 doses of morphine by IV bolus, except for the review of weight-based dosing pattern (mg/kg), for which all patients who had received at least one dose of IV morphine were included. RESULTS: Charts for 193 patients were audited. Of these, 163 patients (84.5%) had recieved up to 0.1 mg/kg per dose, and 53 (27.5%) had received only one dose of morphine. Among patients who received more than one dose, the median dose was 0.080 mg/kg on day 1, with a decrease by day 5 to 0.065 mg/kg. Most patients received morphine over the first 2 days after surgery. The median time elapsed between doses was 4.3 h on day 1 and 6.2 h on day 2. Of the 1020 doses included in the analysis, most (801 [78.5%]) were 4 mg or less. CONCLUSION: The intermittent administration of IV bolus doses of morphine at the study hospital followed common standards for the treatment of postoperative pain. Most doses were no more than 4 mg. On the basis of this information, only 2-mg vials of morphine are now stocked on the ward. The hospital's change in monitoring practices will increase the surveillance of patients receiving IV bolus doses of morphine.

Evaluation of a continuous epidural analgesia program for postoperative pain in children.

A continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) program was developed for pediatric patients cared for outside of a critical care environment. Stable patients can be successfully monitored in the inpatient areas provided sufficient education and support is offered to allow for safe administration, monitoring, and evaluation of patient outcomes. The CEA program was developed in collaboration with the departments of nursing, anesthesiology, and pharmacy and was introduced on a 1-year trial basis on the surgical patient service unit. A retrospective record review was conducted of patients offered CEA over the first 2 years of the program to determine the safety and efficacy of the program. This article describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of the CEA program for surgical patients in a tertiary pediatric hospital. The safety and efficacy of the program as well as the benefits, challenges, and lessons learned are discussed.