ABSTRACT
Vaccination against COVID-19 and influenza provides the best defense against morbidity and mortality. Administering both vaccines concurrently may increase vaccination rates and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of healthcare workers in Israel who were co-administered with the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and the 2022-2023 quadrivalent influenza vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers were measured via microneutralization while influenza antibody titers were measured via hemagglutination inhibition. No immunogenic interference was observed by either vaccine when co-administered. Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 variants increased significantly in the cohort receiving the COVID-19 vaccine alone and in combination with the influenza vaccine. Antibody titers against the A/H1N1 influenza strain increased significantly in the cohort receiving the influenza vaccine alone and in combination with the COVID-19 vaccine. Antibody titers against B/Victoria increased significantly in the cohort that received both vaccines. This study has important public health implications for the 2023-2024 winter season, and supports co-administration of both vaccines as a viable immunization strategy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Estudio Vacuna de Influenza Peru (VIP) cohort aims to describe the frequency of influenza virus infection, identify predictors of vaccine acceptance, examine the effects of repeated influenza vaccination on immunogenicity, and evaluate influenza vaccine effectiveness among HCP. METHODS: The VIP cohort prospectively followed HCP in Lima, Peru, during the 2016-2018 influenza seasons; a fourth year is ongoing. Participants contribute blood samples before and after the influenza season and after influenza vaccination (for vaccinees). Weekly surveillance is conducted to identify acute respiratory or febrile illnesses (ARFI). When an ARFI is identified, participants self-collect nasal swabs that are tested for influenza viruses by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Influenza vaccination status and 5-year vaccination history are ascertained. We analyzed recruitment and enrollment results for 2016-2018 and surveillance participation for 2016-2017. RESULTS: In the first 3 years of the cohort, VIP successfully contacted 92% of potential participants, enrolled 76% of eligible HCP, and retained >90% of participants across years. About half of participants are medical assistants (54%), and most provide "hands-on" medical care (76%). Sixty-nine percent and 52% of participants completed surveillance for >70% of weeks in years 1 and 2, respectively. Fewer weeks of completed surveillance was associated with older age (≥50 years), being a medical assistant, self-rated health of fair or poor, and not receiving the influenza vaccine during the current season (P-values < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The VIP cohort provides an opportunity to address knowledge gaps about influenza virus infection, vaccination uptake, effectiveness and immunogenicity among HCP.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccine Potency , Adolescent , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Health Personnel/classification , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/immunology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Peru/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Seasons , Vaccination , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) poses significant challenges for antibiotic therapy. We characterized the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) co-colonization that may facilitate resistance transfer and vancomycin-resistant S aureus emergence among nursing facility patients. METHODS: We cultured newly admitted patient hands, nares, oropharynx, groin, and perianal region plus wounds and device insertion sites, if applicable, upon enrollment at day 14, day 30, and monthly follow-up up to 6 months. Demographic, comorbidity, and antimicrobial use data were collected. Functional status was assessed at each visit using the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to determine factors predictive of co-colonization. RESULTS: Five hundred eight patients were enrolled, with an average follow-up time of 28.5days. Prevalence of MRSA/VRE co-colonization, MRSA alone, and VRE alone was 8.7%, 8.9%, and 23.4%, respectively. Independent predictors of co-colonization included indwelling device use (odds ratio [OR]â¯=â¯5.5 [2.2-13.7]), recent antibiotic use (ORâ¯=â¯2.5 [1.4-4.2]), diabetes (ORâ¯=â¯1.9 [1.0-3.8]), and the presence of open wounds (ORâ¯=â¯1.9 [1.0-3.6]). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of VRE are driving co-colonization with MRSA in nursing facilities. Indwelling device use, recent antibiotic use, diabetes, and open wounds predicted patient co-colonization.
Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , Clinical Decision Rules , Coinfection/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Nursing Homes , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carrier State/microbiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Follow-Up Studies , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Study of Healthcare Personnel with Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses in Israel (SHIRI) prospectively follows a cohort of healthcare personnel (HCP) in two hospitals in Israel. SHIRI will describe the frequency of influenza virus infections among HCP, identify predictors of vaccine acceptance, examine how repeated influenza vaccination may modify immunogenicity, and evaluate influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing influenza illness and missed work. METHODS: Cohort enrollment began in October, 2016; a second year of the study and a second wave of cohort enrollment began in June 2017. The study will run for at least 3 years and will follow approximately 2000 HCP (who are both employees and members of Clalit Health Services [CHS]) with routine direct patient contact. Eligible HCP are recruited using a stratified sampling strategy. After informed consent, participants complete a brief enrollment survey with questions about occupational responsibilities and knowledge, attitudes, and practices about influenza vaccines. Blood samples are collected at enrollment and at the end of influenza season; HCP who choose to be vaccinated contribute additional blood one month after vaccination. During the influenza season, participants receive twice-weekly short message service (SMS) messages asking them if they have acute respiratory illness or febrile illness (ARFI) symptoms. Ill participants receive follow-up SMS messages to confirm illness symptoms and duration and are asked to self-collect a nasal swab. Information on socio-economic characteristics, current and past medical conditions, medical care utilization and vaccination history is extracted from the CHS database. Information about missed work due to illness is obtained by self-report and from employee records. Respiratory specimens from self-collected nasal swabs are tested for influenza A and B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and coronaviruses using validated multiplex quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. The hemagglutination inhibition assay will be used to detect the presence of neutralizing influenza antibodies in serum. DISCUSSION: SHIRI will expand our knowledge of the burden of respiratory viral infections among HCP and the effectiveness of current and repeated annual influenza vaccination in preventing influenza illness, medical utilization, and missed workdays among HCP who are in direct contact with patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03331991 . Registered on November 6, 2017.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Absenteeism , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Basins used for patient bathing have been shown to be contaminated with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and have prompted the evaluation of alternatives to soap and water bathing methods. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label interventional crossover study to assess the impact of replacing traditional bath basins with prepackaged washcloths on the incidence of hospital-associated infections (HAIs), MDROs, and secondarily, rates of skin deterioration. Unit-wide use of disposable washcloths over an 8-month period was compared with an 8-month period of standard care using basins. RESULTS: A total of 2,637 patients were included from 2 medical-surgical units at a single tertiary medical center, contributing 16,034 patient days. During the study period, there were a total of 33 unit-acquired infections, the rates of which were not statistically different between study phases (incidence rate ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.23; P = .88). However, occurrence of skin integrity deterioration was significantly less in the intervention group (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to demonstrate a significant reduction in HAI or MDRO acquisition, we found a decrease in skin deterioration with the use of disposable washcloths and confirmed earlier findings of MDRO contamination of wash basins.
Subject(s)
Baths/methods , Bedding and Linens , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Cross-Over Studies , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/transmissionABSTRACT
Traditional methods for confirming the identity of herpes simplex virus (HSV) isolates use restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). However, RFLP is less amenable to high-throughput analyses of many samples, and the extent to which small differences in RFLP patterns distinguish between different viral strains remains unclear. Viral HSV type 2 (HSV-2) DNA isolates from 14 persons experiencing a primary HSV-2 infection and from their sexual partners were analyzed by RFLP and heteroduplex mobility assays. We also compared the HSV-2 sequences from seven regions, including noncoding regions between UL19 and UL20, UL24 and UL25, UL37 and UL38, and UL41 and UL42 and coding segments of the gC, gB, and gG genes. Although the resulting RFLP patterns of the couples were almost identical, minor banding differences existed between the source and susceptible partners in five couples. Heteroduplex mobility assays were unable to distinguish between unrelated strains. Overall, 22 sites of sequence variation were found in 1,482 bp of analyzed sequence. The DNA sequences differentiated between all unrelated infections, and epidemiologically related isolates had identical sequences in all but two pairs. Our results suggest that a multilocus assay based on several DNA sequences has the potential to be an informative tool for identifying epidemiologically related HSV-2 strains.