Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 41(12): 1532-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23041255

ABSTRACT

Orofacial pain is a common complaint with multiple diagnoses. There is controversy about the effectiveness of antidepressants for the management of orofacial pain disorders. In order to be able to make a best evidence choice between available antidepressants for the treatment of orofacial pain, a systematic review was conducted of existing randomized controlled trials of antidepressants. Trials were identified from the Pubmed database up to March 2012, from references in retrieved reports and from references in review articles. Six articles were found and included in this review. Four studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials and two studies were randomized active-controlled trials. Two independent investigators reviewed these articles using a 15-item checklist. All six trials were of high quality according to the 15-item criteria. Nevertheless there was limited evidence to support the effectiveness of antidepressants in orofacial pain disorders, because of the heterogeneity of treatment modalities and the low number of randomized controlled trials per diagnose. More randomized controlled trials are needed to come to a firm conclusion for the use of antidepressants for orofacial pain disorders.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Facial Pain/drug therapy , Humans , Placebos , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 41(8): 1010-3, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22446069

ABSTRACT

This study describes the comparison of multiple and single pain ratings in patients after surgical removal of the third molar. Correlation and agreement analysis were performed between the average pain intensity measured three times a day over a period of 7 days and one single pain rating (designated the 'recalled average' pain, as assessed by the patient) after surgical removal of the lower third molar. The study population consisted of patients participating in three randomized trials. The results show that both measurement correlated good to excellent, but there was a large variation in agreement between the ratings. In conclusion, in patients with surgical third molar removal a single pain rating is not an accurate predictor of the average pain measured by a multiple pain-rating test. A single pain rating cannot replace a multiple pain assessment.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third/surgery , Pain Measurement/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Pain, Postoperative/classification , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self Report , Tooth Extraction , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL