Description of a Cohort with a New Truncating MYBPC3 Variant for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Northern Spain.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenicity of the different genetic variants causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the genotype/phenotype correlations are difficult to assess in clinical practice, as most mutations are unique or identified in non-informative families. Pathogenic variants in the sarcomeric gene MYBPC3 inherited with an autosomal dominant pattern, whereas incomplete and age-dependent penetrance are the most common causes of HCM. METHODS: We describe the clinical characteristics of a new truncating MYBPC3 variant, p.Val931Glyfs*120, in 75 subjects from 18 different families from northern Spain with the p.Val931Glyfs*120 variant. RESULTS: Our cohort allows us to estimate the penetrance and prognosis of this variant. The penetrance of the disease increases with age, whereas 50% of males in our sample developed HCM by the age of 36 years old, and 50% of women developed the disease by the time they reached 48 years of age (p = 0.104). Men have more documented arrhythmias with potential risk of sudden death (p = 0.018), requiring implantation of cardioverter defibrillators (p = 0.024). Semi-professional/competitive sport among males is related to earlier onset of HCM (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The p.Val931Glyfs*120 truncating variant in MYBPC3 is associated with a moderate phenotype of HCM, with a high penetrance, onset in middle age, and a worse outcome in males due to higher risk of sudden death due to arrhythmias.

Clinical outcomes after intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. Propensity score matching of large cohorts from two institutions with a differential approach.

AIMS: Assessment of intermediate coronary lesions can be done with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). There are no randomised trials and only a small registry from one centre is available but this is subject to important bias. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of an FFR strategy compared with an IVUS strategy for intermediate lesion assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the outcome of patients assessed with FFR and IVUS in two centres with a differential approach. After propensity score matching 400 pairs of patients were included. Revascularisation was done when FFR was <0.75 or minimum lumen area was <4 mm2 in vessels >3 mm, and <3.5 mm2 in vessels 2.5-3 mm, along with plaque burden >50%. After FFR and IVUS, 72% and 51.2% of lesions, respectively, were left untreated (p<0.001). At one and two years no significant differences in MACE-free survival were observed in overall groups (97.7% at one year and 93.1% at two years in the FFR group and 97.7% at one year and 95.6% at two years in the IVUS group; p=0.35) and among those with deferred intervention (97.9% at one year and 94.2% at two years in the FFR group and 96.5% at one year and 93.6% at two years in the IVUS group; p=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS and FFR may be safely used to defer revascularisation of intermediate lesions. IVUS induces a higher degree of revascularisation but much lower than previously reported and does not affect the clinical outcome.