ABSTRACT
No therapies have been proven to increase survival after a hepatic encephalopathy (HE) episode. We hypothesize that two doses of albumin could improve 90-day survival rates after a HE episode. METHODS: (1) A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BETA) was conducted in 12 hospitals. The effect of albumin (1.5 g/kg at baseline and 1 g/kg on day 3) on 90-day survival rates after a HE episode grade II or higher was evaluated. (2) A meta-analysis of individual patient's data for survival including two clinical trials (BETA and ALFAE) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 82 patients were included. Albumin failed to increase the 90-day transplant-free survival (91.9% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.3). A competing risk analysis was performed, observing a 90-day cumulative incidence of death of 9% in the albumin group vs. 20% in the placebo (p = 0.1). The meta-analysis showed a benefit in the albumin group, with a lower rate of clinical events (death or liver transplant) than patients in the placebo (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.82), when analyzed by a competing risk analysis (90-days mortality rate of 11% in the albumin group vs. 30% in the placebo, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated doses of albumin might be beneficial for patient's survival as an add-on therapy after an HE episode, but an adequately powered trial is needed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) commonly develop complications that may preclude them from reaching LT. Circulatory dysfunction leading to effective arterial hypovolemia and activation of vasoconstrictor systems is a key factor in the pathophysiology of complications of cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with midodrine, an alpha-adrenergic vasoconstrictor, together with intravenous albumin improves circulatory dysfunction and prevents complications of cirrhosis in patients awaiting LT. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00839358) was conducted, including 196 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and ascites awaiting LT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive midodrine (15-30â¯mg/day) and albumin (40â¯g/15â¯days) or matching placebos for one year, until LT or drop-off from inclusion on the waiting list. The primary endpoint was incidence of any complication (renal failure, hyponatremia, infections, hepatic encephalopathy or gastrointestinal bleeding). Secondary endpoints were mortality, activity of endogenous vasoconstrictor systems and plasma cytokine levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both groups in the probability of developing complications of cirrhosis during follow-up (pâ¯=â¯0.402) or one-year mortality (pâ¯=â¯0.527). Treatment with midodrine and albumin was associated with a slight but significant decrease in plasma renin activity and aldosterone compared to placebo (renin -4.3 vs. 0.1â¯ng/ml.h, pâ¯<â¯0.001; aldosterone -38 vs. 6â¯ng/dl, pâ¯=â¯0.02, at week 48 vs. baseline). Plasma norepinephrine only decreased slightly at week 4. Neither arterial pressure nor plasma cytokine levels changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT, treatment with midodrine and albumin, at the doses used in this study, slightly suppressed the activity of vasoconstrictor systems, but did not prevent complications of cirrhosis or improve survival. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with cirrhosis who are on the liver transplant waiting list often develop complications which prevent them from receiving a transplant. Circulatory dysfunction is a key factor behind a number of complications. This study was aimed at investigating whether treating patients with midodrine (a vasoconstrictor) and albumin would improve circulatory dysfunction and prevent complications. This combined treatment, at least at the doses administered in this study, did not prevent the complications of cirrhosis or improve the survival of these patients.
Subject(s)
Albumins/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Liver Transplantation , Midodrine/therapeutic use , Shock/prevention & control , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Albumins/administration & dosage , Aldosterone/blood , Ascites , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyponatremia/etiology , Hyponatremia/prevention & control , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Midodrine/administration & dosage , Norepinephrine/blood , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Renal Insufficiency/prevention & control , Renin/blood , Treatment Outcome , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Las enfermedades vasculares hepáticas, a pesar de su relativamente baja prevalencia, representan un problema de salud importante en el campo de las enfermedades hepáticas. Una característica común a muchas de estas enfermedades es que pueden causar hipertensión portal, con la elevada morbimortalidad que ello conlleva. Con frecuencia estas enfermedades se diagnostican en pacientes jóvenes y el retraso en su diagnóstico y/o un tratamiento inadecuado pueden reducir de forma importante la esperanza de vida. El presente artículo revisa la evidencia actual en el síndrome de Budd-Chiari, la trombosis venosa portal en pacientes no cirróticos, la hipertensión portal idiopática, el síndrome de obstrucción sinusoidal, las malformaciones vasculares hepáticas en la telangiectasia hemorrágica hereditaria, la trombosis portal en la cirrosis, otras patologías vasculares menos frecuentes como las fístulas arterioportales, así como un apartado sobre el diagnóstico por imagen de las enfermedades vasculares hepáticas y su tratamiento desde el punto de vista hematológico (estudio de la diátesis trombótica y tratamiento anticoagulante). Las recomendaciones se han realizado de acuerdo a los estudios publicados extraídos de Pubmed. La calidad de la evidencia y la intensidad de las recomendaciones fueron graduadas de acuerdo al sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Cuando no existían evidencias suficientes, las recomendaciones se basaron en la opinión del comité que redactó la guía (AU)
Despite their relatively low prevalence, vascular diseases of the liver represent a significant health problem in the field of liver disease. A common characteristic shared by many such diseases is their propensity to cause portal hypertension together with increased morbidity and mortality. These diseases are often diagnosed in young patients and their delayed diagnosis and/or inappropriate treatment can greatly reduce life expectancy. This article reviews the current body of evidence concerning Budd-Chiari syndrome, non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, hepatic vascular malformations in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis and other rarer vascular diseases including arterioportal fistulas. It also includes a section on the diagnostic imaging of vascular diseases of the liver and their treatment from a haematological standpoint (study of thrombotic diathesis and anticoagulation therapy). All recommendations are based on published studies extracted from PubMed. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated in accordance with the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation). In the absence of sufficient evidence, recommendations were based on the opinion of the committee that produced the guide (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/diagnosis , Budd-Chiari Syndrome/therapy , Portal Vein , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Hypertension, Portal/diagnosis , Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/diagnosis , Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic/diagnosis , Arteriovenous Fistula/diagnosis , Liver Failure, Acute/etiology , Hepatitis, Chronic/etiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivo: En 2010 publicamos que en España el 53% de los carcinomas hepatocelulares (CHC) se diagnostican fuera de programas de cribado, lo que conlleva una menor supervivencia. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la situación actual y las causas del diagnóstico fuera de cribado. Material y métodos: Registro prospectivo entre el 1 de octubre de 2014 y el 31 de enero de 2015 en 73 centros asistenciales españoles de segundo/tercer nivel. Se registraron las características basales y el primer tratamiento de los tumores primarios hepáticos incidentales de ese período. Resultados: Se incluyeron 720 pacientes: CHC (n=686), colangiocarcinoma intrahepático (n=29), hepatocolangiocarcinoma (n=2), otros (n=3). Los pacientes con CHC fueron varones en el 82% de los casos; media de 67 años; cirrosis en el 87%; etiología: alcohol 35%, VHC 30%, alcohol y VHC 15%, enfermedad hepática por depósito de grasa 6%; estadio tumoral: BCLC-0 11%, A 43%, B 19%, C 16% y D 11%; tratamiento inicial: quimioembolización transarterial (23%), ablación percutánea (22%), tratamiento sintomático (20%), resección (11%), sorafenib (11%). Se diagnosticaron fuera de cribado 356 pacientes (53%). Los motivos principales fueron la ausencia de diagnóstico previo de hepatopatía (76%) y la mala adherencia al cribado (18%). Estos pacientes eran predominantemente varones (p<0,001), de etiología alcohólica (p<0,001), con consumo activo de alcohol (p<0,001) y se diagnosticaron en estadios más avanzados (p<0,001), recibiendo menos tratamientos radicales (p<0,001). Conclusiones: En España, la principal causa del diagnóstico de CHC fuera del cribado es la ausencia de diagnóstico previo de enfermedad hepática, principalmente en varones con consumo de alcohol. La detección de hepatopatía en población asintomática y la mejora de la adherencia al cribado son los principales aspectos para mejorar la detección precoz (AU)
Background and objective: In 2010 we published that 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detected in Spain were diagnosed outside the context of standard screening programs, which consequently leads to lower survival rates. The aim of this study was to analyze the current situation and the causes of diagnosis out of screening programs. Material and methods: Prospective registry of 73 second- and third-level Spanish healthcare centers carried out between October 1, 2014 and January 31, 2015. The baseline characteristics of the disease and the first treatment administered for the incidental primary liver tumors during such period were recorded. Results: A total of 720 patients were included in the study: HCC (n=686), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=29), hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=2), other (n=3). HCC characteristics: male 82%; mean age 67 years; cirrhosis 87%; main etiologies: alcohol 35%, HCV 30%, alcohol and HCV 15%, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 6%; tumor stage: BCLC-0 11%, A 43%, B 19%, C 16% and D 11%; first treatment: transarterial chemoembolization (23%), percutaneous ablation (22%), symptomatic treatment (20%), resection (11%), sorafenib (11%). Three hundred and fifty-six patients (53%) were diagnosed outside of screening programs, mainly owing to the fact that they suffered from an undiagnosed liver disease (76%) and to the poor adherence to the screening program (18%). These patients were mainly male (P<.001), with an alcoholic etiology (P<.001) and active alcohol consumption (P<.001). Moreover, the disease was predominantly diagnosed at more advanced stages (P<.001) and was addressed with less radical treatments (P<.001). Conclusions: In Spain, the main cause of diagnosis of a HCC outside the context of a screening program is the absence of a prior diagnosis of a liver disease, particularly in alcohol-consuming men. Detecting a liver disease in asymptomatic populations and improving adherence to screening programs are the main areas that must be subject to improvement in order to improve the early detection of HCC (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cholangiocarcinoma/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Neoplasm Staging/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'ABSTRACT
Despite their relatively low prevalence, vascular diseases of the liver represent a significant health problem in the field of liver disease. A common characteristic shared by many such diseases is their propensity to cause portal hypertension together with increased morbidity and mortality. These diseases are often diagnosed in young patients and their delayed diagnosis and/or inappropriate treatment can greatly reduce life expectancy. This article reviews the current body of evidence concerning Budd-Chiari syndrome, non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, hepatic vascular malformations in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis and other rarer vascular diseases including arterioportal fistulas. It also includes a section on the diagnostic imaging of vascular diseases of the liver and their treatment from a haematological standpoint (study of thrombotic diathesis and anticoagulation therapy). All recommendations are based on published studies extracted from PubMed. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated in accordance with the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation). In the absence of sufficient evidence, recommendations were based on the opinion of the committee that produced the guide.
Subject(s)
Liver Diseases , Vascular Diseases , Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/therapy , Prognosis , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In 2010 we published that 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detected in Spain were diagnosed outside the context of standard screening programs, which consequently leads to lower survival rates. The aim of this study was to analyze the current situation and the causes of diagnosis out of screening programs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective registry of 73 second- and third-level Spanish healthcare centers carried out between October 1, 2014 and January 31, 2015. The baseline characteristics of the disease and the first treatment administered for the incidental primary liver tumors during such period were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 720 patients were included in the study: HCC (n=686), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=29), hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=2), other (n=3). HCC characteristics: male 82%; mean age 67 years; cirrhosis 87%; main etiologies: alcohol 35%, HCV 30%, alcohol and HCV 15%, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 6%; tumor stage: BCLC-0 11%, A 43%, B 19%, C 16% and D 11%; first treatment: transarterial chemoembolization (23%), percutaneous ablation (22%), symptomatic treatment (20%), resection (11%), sorafenib (11%). Three hundred and fifty-six patients (53%) were diagnosed outside of screening programs, mainly owing to the fact that they suffered from an undiagnosed liver disease (76%) and to the poor adherence to the screening program (18%). These patients were mainly male (P<.001), with an alcoholic etiology (P<.001) and active alcohol consumption (P<.001). Moreover, the disease was predominantly diagnosed at more advanced stages (P<.001) and was addressed with less radical treatments (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the main cause of diagnosis of a HCC outside the context of a screening program is the absence of a prior diagnosis of a liver disease, particularly in alcohol-consuming men. Detecting a liver disease in asymptomatic populations and improving adherence to screening programs are the main areas that must be subject to improvement in order to improve the early detection of HCC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , SpainABSTRACT
Los pacientes cirróticos presentan frecuentemente complicaciones graves de su enfermedad que requieren ingreso en la UCI. La encefalopatía hepática gradoIII-IV, el shock séptico, el fracaso agudo sobre crónico y la hemorragia variceal son descompensaciones que precisan un tratamiento intensivo específico en el paciente cirrótico. La mayor eficacia de los tratamientos empleados en cuidados intensivos y la generalización de los programas de trasplante hepático han mejorado de manera sustancial el pronóstico del paciente cirrótico crítico, hecho que ha facilitado su ingreso en las unidades de terapia intensiva. Sin embargo, el conocimiento de digestólogos e intensivistas sobre la patogenia, diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas complicaciones y sobre la evaluación pronóstica del paciente cirrótico crítico es limitado. Las alteraciones hemodinámicas y en la coagulación características de estos pacientes y la disfunción inmune que presentan aumentan la complejidad del tratamiento, el riesgo de presentar nuevas complicaciones y su mortalidad en comparación con la población general. Estas características diferenciales tienen implicaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas clínicamente relevantes que deben ser conocidas por los intensivistas generales. En este contexto, la Sociedad Catalana de Digestología encomendó a un grupo de expertos la redacción de un documento de posicionamiento sobre la evaluación y el tratamiento del paciente cirrótico crítico. El presente artículo describe las recomendaciones acordadas en las reuniones de consenso y sus principales conclusiones
Cirrhotic patients often develop severe complications requiring ICU admission. Grade III-IV hepatic encephalopathy, septic shock, acute-on-chronic liver failure and variceal bleeding are clinical decompensations that need a specific therapeutic approach in cirrhosis. The increased effectiveness of the treatments currently used in this setting and the spread of liver transplantation programs have substantially improved the prognosis of critically ill cirrhotic patients, which has facilitated their admission to critical care units. However, gastroenterologists and intensivists have limited knowledge of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of these complications and of the prognostic evaluation of critically ill cirrhotic patients. Cirrhotic patients present alterations in systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics, coagulation and immune dysfunction what further increase the complexity of the treatment, the risk of developing new complications and mortality in comparison with the general population. These differential characteristics have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications that must be known by general intensivists. In this context, the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology requested a group of experts to draft a position paper on the assessment and treatment of critically ill cirrhotic patients. This article describes the recommendations agreed upon at the consensus meetings and their main conclusions
Subject(s)
Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Shock, Septic/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Liver Failure, Acute/etiology , Critical Care/methods , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Cirrhotic patients often develop severe complications requiring ICU admission. Grade III-IV hepatic encephalopathy, septic shock, acute-on-chronic liver failure and variceal bleeding are clinical decompensations that need a specific therapeutic approach in cirrhosis. The increased effectiveness of the treatments currently used in this setting and the spread of liver transplantation programs have substantially improved the prognosis of critically ill cirrhotic patients, which has facilitated their admission to critical care units. However, gastroenterologists and intensivists have limited knowledge of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of these complications and of the prognostic evaluation of critically ill cirrhotic patients. Cirrhotic patients present alterations in systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics, coagulation and immune dysfunction what further increase the complexity of the treatment, the risk of developing new complications and mortality in comparison with the general population. These differential characteristics have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications that must be known by general intensivists. In this context, the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology requested a group of experts to draft a position paper on the assessment and treatment of critically ill cirrhotic patients. This article describes the recommendations agreed upon at the consensus meetings and their main conclusions.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Care/methods , Disease Management , Early Diagnosis , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Fluid Therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostatic Techniques , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy/therapy , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Failure/etiology , Liver Failure/therapy , Liver Transplantation , Respiration, Artificial , Shock, Septic/etiology , Shock, Septic/therapyABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Type-1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a common complication of bacterial infections in cirrhosis, but its natural history remains undefined. To assess the outcome of kidney function and survival of patients with type-1 HRS associated with infections, 70 patients diagnosed during a 6-year period were evaluated prospectively. Main outcomes were no reversibility of type-1 HRS during treatment of the infection and 3-month survival. Forty-seven (67%) of the 70 patients had no reversibility of type-1 HRS during treatment of the infection. [Correction to previous sentence added March 10, 2014, after first online publication: "Twenty-three (33%)" was changed to "Forty-seven (67%)."] The main predictive factor of no reversibility of type-1 HRS was absence of infection resolution (no reversibility: 96% versus 48% in patients without and with resolution of the infection; P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of no reversibility of type-1 HRS were age, high baseline serum bilirubin, nosocomial infection, and reduction in serum creatinine <0.3 mg/dL at day 3 of antibiotic treatment. No reversibility was also associated with severity of circulatory dysfunction, as indicated by more marked activity of the vasoconstrictor systems. In the whole series, 3-month probability of survival was only 21%. Factors associated with poor prognosis were baseline serum bilirubin, no reversibility of type-1 HRS, lack of resolution of the infection, and development of septic shock after diagnosis of type-1 HRS. CONCLUSION: Type-1 HRS associated with infections is not reversible in two-thirds of patients with treatment of infection only. No reversibility of type-1 HRS is associated with lack of resolution of the infection, age, high bilirubin, and no early improvement of kidney function and implies a poor prognosis. These results may help advance the management of patients with type-1 HRS associated with infections.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/complications , Hepatorenal Syndrome/etiology , Hepatorenal Syndrome/mortality , Kidney/physiopathology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/microbiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bilirubin/blood , Creatinine/blood , Disease Management , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatorenal Syndrome/physiopathology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prognostic value of the different causes of renal failure in cirrhosis is not well established. This study investigated the predictive value of the cause of renal failure in cirrhosis. METHODS: Five hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with cirrhosis and renal failure (as defined by serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL on 2 successive determinations within 48 hours) hospitalized over a 6-year period in a single institution were included in a prospective study. The cause of renal failure was classified into 4 groups: renal failure associated with bacterial infections, renal failure associated with volume depletion, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and parenchymal nephropathy. The primary end point was survival at 3 months. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-three patients (82.4%) had renal failure that could be classified in 1 of 4 groups. The most frequent was renal failure associated with infections (213 cases; 46%), followed by hypovolemia-associated renal failure (149; 32%), HRS (60; 13%), and parenchymal nephropathy (41; 9%). The remaining patients had a combination of causes or miscellaneous conditions. Prognosis was markedly different according to cause of renal failure, 3-month probability of survival being 73% for parenchymal nephropathy, 46% for hypovolemia-associated renal failure, 31% for renal failure associated with infections, and 15% for HRS (P < .0005). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for potentially confounding variables, cause of renal failure was independently associated with prognosis, together with MELD score, serum sodium, and hepatic encephalopathy at time of diagnosis of renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: A simple classification of patients with cirrhosis according to cause of renal failure is useful in assessment of prognosis and may help in decision making in liver transplantation.
Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Renal Insufficiency/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Aged , Bacterial Infections/complications , Creatinine/blood , Female , Hepatorenal Syndrome/complications , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency/mortality , Sodium/bloodABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Terlipressin is frequently used in acute variceal bleeding due to its powerful effect on vasopressin V1 receptors. Although terlipressin is also a partial agonist of renal vasopressin V2 receptors, its effects on serum sodium concentration have not been specifically investigated. To examine the effects of terlipressin on serum sodium concentration in patients with acute portal-hypertensive bleeding, 58 consecutive patients with severe portal-hypertensive bleeding treated with terlipressin were investigated. In the whole population, serum sodium decreased from 134.9 ± 6.6 mEq/L to 130.5 ± 7.7 mEq/L (P = 0.002). Thirty-nine patients (67%) had a decrease in serum sodium ≥ 5 mEq/L during treatment: in 18 patients (31%), between 5 and 10 mEq/L and in 21 patients (36%), greater than 10 mEq/L. In this latter group, serum sodium decreased from 137.2 ± 5 to 120.5 ± 5 mEq/L (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the reduction in serum sodium was related to baseline serum sodium and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score; patients with low MELD and normal or near-normal baseline serum sodium had the highest risk of hyponatremia. Serum sodium returned to baseline values in most patients shortly after cessation of therapy. Three of the 21 patients with marked reduction in serum sodium developed neurological manifestations, including osmotic demyelination syndrome in one patient due to a rapid recovery of serum sodium (serum sodium in these three patients decreased from 135, 130, and 136 to 117, 114, and 109 mEq/L, respectively). CONCLUSION: An acute reduction in serum sodium concentration is common during treatment with terlipressin for severe portal-hypertensive bleeding. It develops rapidly after start of therapy, may be severe in some patients and is associated with neurological complications, and is usually reversible after terlipressin withdrawal.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Hyponatremia/chemically induced , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Lypressin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Bilirubin/blood , Creatinine/blood , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/blood , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/blood , Hyponatremia/blood , International Normalized Ratio , Liver Cirrhosis/etiology , Lypressin/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Serum Albumin/metabolism , Sodium/blood , TerlipressinABSTRACT
Hyponatraemia is common in patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with remarkable changes in brain cells, particularly a reduction in myoinositol and other intracellular organic osmolytes related to the hypo-osmolality of the extracellular fluid. It has been recently suggested that hyponatraemia may be an important factor associated with the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE). To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively analysed the incidence and predictive factors of overt HE using a database of 70 patients with cirrhosis included in a prospective study comparing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) vs large-volume paracentesis in the management of refractory of ascites. Variables used in the analysis included age, sex, previous history of HE, treatment assignment (TIPS vs large volume paracentesis plus albumin), treatment with diuretics, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine and serum sodium concentration. Laboratory parameters were measured at entry, at 1 month and every 3 months during follow-up and at the time of development of HE in patients who developed this complication. During a mean follow-up of 10 months, 50 patients (71%) developed 117 episodes of HE. In the whole population of patients, the occurrence of HE was independently associated with serum hyponatraemia, serum bilirubin and serum creatinine. In conclusion, in patients with refractory ascites, the occurrence of HE is related to the impairment of liver and renal function and presence of hyponatraemia.
Subject(s)
Ascites/complications , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hyponatremia/etiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Sodium/blood , Adult , Aged , Bilirubin/blood , Creatinine/blood , Female , Hepatic Encephalopathy/blood , Humans , Hyponatremia/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Terlipressin plus albumin is an effective treatment for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), but approximately only half of the patients respond to this therapy. The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors of response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in patients with type 1 HRS. Thirty-nine patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS were treated prospectively with terlipressin and albumin. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables obtained before the initiation of treatment as well as changes in arterial pressure during treatment were analyzed for their predictive value. Response to therapy (reduction in serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL at the end of treatment) was observed in 18 patients (46%) and was associated with an improvement in circulatory function. Independent predictive factors of response to therapy were baseline serum bilirubin and an increase in mean arterial pressure of >or=5 mm Hg at day 3 of treatment. The cutoff level of serum bilirubin that best predicted response to treatment was 10 mg/dL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; P < 0.0001; sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 61%). Response rates in patients with serum bilirubin <10 mg/dL or >or=10 mg/dL were 67% and 13%, respectively (P = 0.001). Corresponding values in patients with an increase in mean arterial pressure >or=5 mm Hg or <5 mm Hg at day 3 were 73% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Serum bilirubin and an early increase in arterial pressure predict response to treatment with terlipressin and albumin in type 1 HRS. Alternative treatment strategies to terlipressin and albumin should be investigated for patients with type 1 HRS and low likelihood of response to vasoconstrictor therapy.
Subject(s)
Albumins/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatorenal Syndrome/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Lypressin/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Lypressin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , TerlipressinABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether hyponatremia is a risk factor of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 61 patients with cirrhosis were evaluated prospectively for 1 year and all episodes of overt HE were recorded. Predictive factors of HE were analyzed using a conditional model (Prentice, Williams, and Peterson) for recurrent events to assess the relationship between HE and time-dependent covariates. The effects of hyponatremia on the brain concentration of organic osmolytes were analyzed in 25 patients using 1 H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 61 patients developed 57 episodes of overt HE during follow-up. Among a number of clinical and laboratory variables analyzed, the only independent predictive factors of overt HE were hyponatremia (serum sodium < 130 mEq / l), history of overt HE, serum bilirubin,and serum creatinine. Hyponatremia was associated with low brain concentration of organic osmolytes, particularly myo-inositol (MI). Furthermore, patients with low brain MI levels had a higher probability of development of overt HE compared with that of patients with high brain MI levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, the existence of hyponatremia is a major risk factor of the development of overt HE. Treatment of hyponatremia may be a novel therapeutic approach to preventing HE in cirrhosis.
Subject(s)
Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hyponatremia/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Sodium/blood , Adult , Aged , Aspartic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Aspartic Acid/analysis , Bilirubin/blood , Brain Chemistry/physiology , Creatine/analysis , Creatinine/blood , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glutamic Acid/analysis , Glutamine/analysis , Hepatic Encephalopathy/diagnosis , Hepatic Encephalopathy/metabolism , Humans , Hyponatremia/blood , Hyponatremia/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/blood , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Parietal Lobe , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatorenal syndrome is common in patients with advanced cirrhosis and constitutes a major problem in liver transplantation. There is no effective medical treatment for hepatorenal syndrome. METHODS: Forty-six patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome, hospitalized in a tertiary care center, were randomly assigned to receive either terlipressin (1-2 mg/4 hour, intravenously), a vasopressin analogue, and albumin (1 g/kg followed by 20-40 g/day) (n = 23) or albumin alone (n = 23) for a maximum of 15 days. Primary outcomes were improvement of renal function and survival at 3 months. RESULTS: Improvement of renal function occurred in 10 patients (43.5%) treated with terlipressin and albumin compared with 2 patients (8.7%) treated with albumin alone (P = .017). Independent predictive factors of improvement of renal function were baseline urine volume, serum creatinine and leukocyte count, and treatment with terlipressin and albumin. Survival at 3 months was not significantly different between the 2 groups (terlipressin and albumin: 27% vs albumin 19%, P = .7). Independent predictive factors of 3-month survival were baseline model for end-stage liver disease score and improvement of renal function. Cardiovascular complications occurred in 4 patients treated with albumin alone and in 10 patients treated with terlipressin and albumin, yet permanent terlipressin withdrawal was required in only 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with albumin, treatment with terlipressin and albumin is effective in improving renal function in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. Further studies with large sample sizes should be performed to test whether the improvement of renal function translates into a survival benefit.
Subject(s)
Albumins/administration & dosage , Hepatorenal Syndrome/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Lypressin/analogs & derivatives , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatorenal Syndrome/etiology , Hepatorenal Syndrome/mortality , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Kidney Function Tests , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Lypressin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Septic , Survival Rate/trends , Terlipressin , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The presence of dilutional hyponatremia has a poor prognosis for survival in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Effective and safe treatments are needed to improve prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and dilutional hyponatremia. The initial approach to management includes fluid restriction, low sodium diet, and minimizing the use of diuretics. In addition, the use of hypertonic saline should be avoided in patients with cirrhosis and dilutional hyponatremia. Furthermore, patients should be placed on the top of the list for liver transplantation if they are appropriate candidates. Although V2 arginine vasopressin receptor antagonists that selectively enhance solute-free water excretion in patients with cirrhosis seem very promising, two points must be considered in relation to the available data. First, although the results of phase-2 studies are encouraging, the efficacy and safety of these compounds should be further evaluated. Second, the clinical utility of these agents in cirrhosis has only been assessed in short-term studies. The long-term effects of these drugs remain unknown. Future research with these compounds should not only focus on the effects on serum sodium, but also on treatment and prevention of recurrence of ascites. In addition, the possible beneficial effects of these drugs in the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy would be worth studying.
Subject(s)
Hyponatremia/etiology , Hyponatremia/therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists , Ascites/etiology , Ascites/prevention & control , Ascites/therapy , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Brain/physiopathology , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Creatinine/blood , Forecasting , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy/prevention & control , Humans , Hyponatremia/blood , Hyponatremia/diagnosis , Hyponatremia/drug therapy , Hyponatremia/metabolism , Hyponatremia/physiopathology , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Liver Transplantation , Prognosis , Research , Risk Factors , Sodium/blood , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although renal failure is a common complication of sepsis and patients with cirrhosis frequently develop sepsis, there have been no studies specifically assessing renal function in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis unrelated to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the frequency, characteristics, and outcome of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis unrelated to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. METHODS: One hundred six consecutive patients with cirrhosis and sepsis were studied prospectively. Patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-nine out of 106 patients (27%) with cirrhosis and sepsis developed acute renal failure as compared with only 8 of 100 patients (8%) from a control group of cirrhotic patients without infection (P < .0001). Renal failure in the sepsis group was reversible in 22 (76%; 21% of all patients) patients and nonreversible in 7 (24%; 6% of all patients) patients. Renal failure was associated with impairment of effective arterial blood volume, without evidence of tubular damage. The occurrence and type of renal failure correlated strongly with mortality (mortality at 3 months: nonreversible renal failure, 100%; reversible renal failure, 55%; no renal failure, 13%). Among variables obtained at diagnosis of sepsis, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was the only independent predictive factor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure is common in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis unrelated to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and is associated with arterial underfilling and renal vasoconstriction. Outcome is poor, even in the setting of reversible renal failure. The MELD score is the best prognostic marker of patients with cirrhosis and sepsis.