MicroRNA-based diagnostic tools for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C.

Staging fibrosis is crucial for the prognosis and to determine the rapid need of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and C (CHC). The expression of 13 fibrosis-related microRNAs (miRNAs) (miR-20a, miR-21, miR-27a, miR-27b, miR-29a, miR-29c, miR-92a, miR-122, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-224) was analyzed in 194 serums and 177 liver biopsies of patients with either CHB or CHC to develop models to diagnose advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (Metavir F3-F4). In CHB patients, the model (serum miR-122, serum miR-222, platelet count and alkaline phosphatase) was more accurate than APRI and FIB-4 to discriminate in between mild and moderate fibrosis (F1-F2) and F3-F4 (AUC of CHB model: 0.85 vs APRI: 0.70 and FIB-4: 0.81). In CHC patients, the model (hepatic miR-122, hepatic miR-224, platelet count, albumin and alanine aminotransferase) was more accurate than both APRI and FIB-4 to discriminate in between patients with F3-F4 and F1-F2 (AUC of the CHC model = 0.93 vs APRI: 0.86 and FIB-4: 0.79). Most of the miRNAs tested were differentially expressed in patients with CHB and CHC. In particular, serum miR-122 was 28-fold higher in patients with CHB than in those with CHC. Both CHB and CHC models may help for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (F3-F4).

Repeated Measurements of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Identify Carriers of Inactive HBV During Long-term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Measurements of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA might help to identify carriers of inactive HBV. We assessed the performance of repeated measurements of HBsAg over a median time period of 8 years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 292 HBe antigen-negative patients with chronic HBV infection, normal levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), levels of HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL, and no cirrhosis who visited the outpatient clinics at 8 tertiary care centers in Europe, Asia, and Australia from 1990 through 2011. Patients were determined to be carriers of inactive HBV (level of HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and serum levels of ALT that remained normal) or to have HBV activity (level of HBV DNA fluctuating >2000 IU/mL and/or abnormal levels of ALT) after each year of follow-up. Patients were followed for a median time of 8 years (range, 4-9 years). Dynamic regression analysis was used to study changes in level of HBsAg and HBV phase and to update the risk of HBV activity. RESULTS: One year after study enrollment, 189 patients (65%) had inactive HBV and 103 patients (35%) had HBV activity. Based on dynamic analysis, the probability that a patient would have HBV at any following year differed according to level of HBsAg; odds were 97% for patients with initial level of HBsAg <100 IU/mL, 85% for patients with initial levels 100-1000 IU/mL, and 76% for patients with initial levels >1000 IU/mL (P < .001). Having inactive virus for any 2 consecutive years predicted having inactive virus in any third year. However, 15% of patients with level of HBsAg >100 IU/mL had HBV activity in the third year. The combination of HBsAg level <100 IU/mL and HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL identified patients whose virus remained inactive for the entire follow-up period, with 98% specificity and a positive predictive value of 97%, for all HBV genotypes. Patients with HBV activity who had levels of HBV DNA <5000 IU/mL and decreases in HBsAg of 0.5 log IU/mL or more for 1 year had a high probability of becoming carriers of inactive HBV in the next year. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective, dynamic analysis of almost 300 patients with chronic HBV infection, we found that levels of HBsAg <100 IU/mL identify patients with inactive virus with a high level of specificity. HBsAg levels should therefore be used to define phases of HBV infection in HBe antigen-negative patients.

Virological and serological tools to optimize the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Molecular biology techniques are routinely used to diagnose and monitor treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). These tools can detect and quantify viral genomes and analyse their sequences to determine genotype. The increasing use of these tools to monitor patients has greatly improved the management of CHB infection by maximizing the potential for individualized treatment. HBV genotyping has become increasingly important and provides additional information to predict a response to therapy. More sensitive methods to determine HBV DNA levels are now available and the units of measurements have been standardized. HBsAg levels in serum have been shown to reflect active intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and to have additional value in treatment decisions, especially as an on-treatment marker.

The Usefulness of Defining Rapid Virological Response by a Very Sensitive Assay (TMA) during Treatment of HCV Genotype 2/3 Infection.

The aim of this study was to determine in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 the performance at week 4 of two assays with different sensitivities for HCV RNA detection, for the prediction of SVR and stratification for treatment duration (14 and 24 weeks). Recruitment was from two trials comparing 14 and 24 weeks treatment to patients with rapid virological response (RVR) (n = 550). RVR was originally defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/ml at week 4. Patients with an available frozen plasma sample drawn at week 4 and with follow-up data week 24 post-treatment were included (n = 429). HCV-RNA was prospectively measured with COBAS Amplicor V2, Roche (CA) (lower detection limit 50 IU/ml) and retrospectively assessed with VERSANT HCV-RNA Qualitative Assay, Siemens (TMA) (lower limit detection 10 IU/ml). Genotype 3 was present in 80% and genotype 2 in 20%. A SVR was achieved in 82%. At week 4 HCV-RNA was undetectable in 74.8% and 63% of serum samples tested with CA and TMA, respectively. CA undetectable/TMA positive was observed in 61/341 (18%) of the samples. In genotype 3 patients a relapse was seen in 9% of the patients with both CA and TMA undetectable and in 25% of the patients who were CA undetectable/TMA positive (p = 0.006). In patients allocated to 14 weeks treatment a relapse was observed in 11% of TMA undetectable patients and 26% of TMA positive (p = 0.031). In genotype 2 patients treated for 14 weeks relapse was observed in 6% of the patients with both CA and TMA undetectable week 4. Assays with high sensitivity for HCV RNA identifies patients at week 4 with high risk of virological relapse. We recommend that patients with genotype 3 and detectable HCV RNA at levels below 50 IU/ml do not receive truncated therapy with pegIFN and ribavirin.

IFI35, mir-99a and HCV genotype to predict sustained virological response to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.

Although, the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) greatly improved with the use of direct antiviral agents, pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin remains an option for many patients, worldwide. The intra-hepatic level of expression of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) and the rs12979860 CC genotype located within IFNL3 have been associated with sustained virological response (SVR), in patients with CHC. The aim of the study was to identify micro-RNAs associated with SVR and to build an accurate signature to predict SVR. Pre-treatment liver biopsies from 111 patients, treated with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin, were studied. Fifty-seven patients had SVR, 36 non-response (NR) and 18 relapse (RR). The expression of 851 human miRNAs and 30 selected mRNAs, including ISGs, was assessed by RT-qPCR. In the first group of patients (screen), 20 miRNAs out of the 851 studied were deregulated between NRs and SVRs. From the 4 miRNAs validated (mir-23a, mir-181a*, mir-217 and mir-99a), in the second group of patients (validation), 3 (mir-23a, mir-181a* and mir-99a) were down-regulated in NRs as compared to SVRs. The ISGs, studied, were accumulated in SVRs and IFNL3 rs12979860 CT/TT carriers compared respectively to NRs and CC carriers. Combining, clinical data together with the expression of selected genes and micro-RNAs, we identified a signature (IFI35, mir-99a and HCV genotype) to predict SVR (AUC:0.876) with a positive predictive value of 86.54% with high sensibility (80%) and specificity (80.4%). This signature may help to characterize patients with low chance to respond to PEG-IFN/ribavirin and to elucidate mechanisms of NR.

Precore/Core promoter variants to predict significant fibrosis in both HBeAg positive and negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Assessing fibrosis is essential in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The objective was to investigate the relationship between fibrosis, host and viral factors to identify non-invasive markers of significant fibrosis in a large cohort of unselected, well-characterized, treatment-naïve CHB patients. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-seven HBsAg-positive patients (97 HBeAg-positive and 280 HBeAg-negative, genotypes A to E) who had liver biopsy were consecutively included. Host and viral factors (ALT, HBsAg and HBV-DNA levels, HBV genotype and precore (PC)/basal core promoter (BCP) variants) were determined on the day of the biopsy. Fibrosis stage was assessed using METAVIR score. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the patients had significant fibrosis (METAVIR F ≥ 2). On univariate analysis, the stages of fibrosis F ≥ 2 were associated with older age (P < 0.0001), male gender (P = 0.01), higher ALT and HBV-DNA levels (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0003, respectively), the presence of BCP (P < 0.0001) and BCP/PC variants (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age (P < 0.0001), the presence of HBV variants (P < 0.0001), HBV-DNA level (P = 0.0006) and ALT level (P = 0.02) were independently associated with significant fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the combination (age, ALT, HBV-DNA, HBV variants) in predicting fibrosis F ≥ 2 was evidenced by a c-index of 0.76 (CI 95% 0.71-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: We identified strong independent risk factors (age, ALT, HBV-DNA, HBV variants) predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) independently of HBeAg status in patients with CHB. Patients with BCP variants have a higher risk of severe liver disease. The detection of these mutants may help to predict significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2).

Patients with chronic hepatitis C without advanced fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective clinical-pathological study.

BACKGROUND: There are very few studies on the incidence and risk factors of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the absence of advanced fibrosis. Our objective was to identify the clinical-pathological features of these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients admitted to our hospital for HCV-related HCC between 2000 and 2010. Patients with hepatitis of other aetiologies, human immunodeficiency virus co-infection, or treated with interferon were excluded. We compared demographic, laboratory, clinical and outcome parameters of patients with and without advanced fibrosis. RESULTS: 137 patients had advanced fibrosis (85%). Median age was higher in the advanced fibrosis vs. the non-advanced fibrosis group (62 vs. 65 years, respectively; p = 0.025). Steatosis was significantly more frequent in patients with advanced fibrosis compared to those without advanced fibrosis (43% vs. 20%, respectively; p = 0.032). Independent predictors associated to the occurrence of HCC in patients without advanced fibrosis were hepatitis B core antigen (odds ratio: 3.86; p = 0.044) and duration of hepatitis C infection (odds ratio: 1.21; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors such as steatosis or diabetes were not frequent in patients without advanced fibrosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of occult hepatitis B and the duration of hepatitis infection in patients with HCC and chronic hepatitis C without advanced fibrosis.

HBsAg quantification to optimize treatment monitoring in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in serum have been shown to reflect active intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and to have additional value as a marker of on-treatment efficacy. In the past few years, immunoassays to quantify HBsAg have been developed to monitor HBsAg kinetics during treatment. Although HBsAg quantification cannot replace HBV DNA measurement in clinical practice, the combined use of HBsAg quantification and HBV DNA measurements could help predict treatment outcome. One of the most important results of the studies in this new marker is that a decline in HBsAg titres during pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment is a strong predictor of response so that a 'week 12 stopping rule' could be established for both Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) for a sustained viral response (SVR) remains low. The role of HBsAg measurements during nucloes(t)ides analogue (NAs) treatment is unclear. It may be a useful marker for stopping NAs by limiting the chance of relapse or for add-on strategies. Monitoring serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients during treatment may provide significant complementary information to HBV DNA measurements.

Impact of treatment against hepatitis C virus on overall survival of naive patients with advanced liver disease.

The beneficial effect of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral treatment against hepatitis C virus is well established. However, it remains unclear whether unsuccessful treatment (non-SVR) also improves patient survival, especially in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of death or liver transplantation in the 427 naive patients with a Child-Pugh score of A and advanced fibrosis newly admitted to the Hospital Beaujon between 2000 and 2010. Patients were followed for a median time of 5.5 years. The baseline characteristics of untreated (n=102) and treated (n=325) patients were largely similar, and there was no evidence of a bias of indication. Treated patients received a combination of interferon and ribavirin and had an SVR rate of 32%. The incidence of death or liver transplantation per 100 person-years was 1.00, 3.20, and 5.44 in SVR, non-SVR, and untreated patients, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in SVR than in non-SVR patients and in non-SVR than in untreated patients (hazard ratios, 0.35 and 0.51, respectively; P=0.019 and 0.038, respectively). The effect of treatment in non-SVR patients was higher in patients who had a virological or a biochemical response than in those who did not have a virological or a biochemical response. The risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in treated than in untreated patients. Moreover, there was a gradient of mortality between patients with SVRs, virological or biochemical responders, and untreated patients, suggesting that treatment, even in the absence of viral eradication, has a beneficial effect on survival.

Serum Levels of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Predict Severity of Fibrosis in Patients With E Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Noninvasive techniques are needed to assess hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. We developed a scoring system to determine the degree of fibrosis in patients with genotype B or genotype C hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and positive for the hepatitis B e antigen. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to identify baseline variables associated with the severity of fibrosis (METAVIR scores, F0-F4) in a large phase 3 clinical trial of predominantly Asian patients (n = 710), using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Significant variables were used to construct predictive models using optimal cut-off values. The final model was validated in similar patients from a large phase 4 clinical trial (n = 465). RESULTS: We developed 2 prediction scoring systems (PSs). PS1 analyzed data on HBV genotype (B vs. C), patient age (<30 vs. ≥30 y), level of hepatitis B surface antigen (≤17,500 vs. >17,500 IU/mL), and level of alanine aminotransferase (≤3-fold vs. >3-fold the upper limit of normal). PS2 analyzed data on only age and level of hepatitis B surface antigen. PS1 identified patients with F0 to F1 vs. F2 to F4 fibrosis with more than 87% specificity and a positive predictive value greater than 75; it identified patients with F0 to F2 vs. F2 to F4 fibrosis with approximately 95% specificity and a positive predictive value (PPV) of approximately 97%. PS2 identified patients with F0 to F1 fibrosis with less accuracy than PS1, but identified patients with F0 to F2 fibrosis with an almost identical level of sensitivity and PPV. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple scoring system to determine the severity of fibrosis in patients with genotypes B or C HBV infection who are hepatitis B e antigen positive. Our system differentiated patients with no or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) from those with marked or severe (F2-F4) fibrosis with a high PPV. The high level of specificity for the identification of nonsevere fibrosis (F0-F2) limits the risk of overlooking patients with severe fibrosis (F3-F4).

Using pharmacokinetic and viral kinetic modeling to estimate the antiviral effectiveness of telaprevir, boceprevir, and pegylated interferon during triple therapy in treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus-infected cirrhotic patients.

Triple therapy combining a protease inhibitor (PI) (telaprevir or boceprevir), pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), and ribavirin (RBV) has dramatically increased the chance of eradicating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, the efficacy of this treatment remains suboptimal in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients. Here, we aimed to better understand the origin of this impaired response by estimating the antiviral effectiveness of each drug. Fifteen HCV genotype 1-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis, who were nonresponders to prior PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, were enrolled in a nonrandomized study. HCV RNA and concentrations of PIs, PEG-IFN, and RBV were frequently assessed in the first 12 weeks of treatment and were analyzed using a pharmacokinetic/viral kinetic model. The two PIs achieved similar levels of molar concentrations (P=0.5), but there was a significant difference in the 50% effective concentrations (EC50) (P=0.008), leading to greater effectiveness for telaprevir than for boceprevir in blocking viral production (99.8% versus 99.0%, respectively, P=0.002). In all patients, the antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN was modest (43.4%), and there was no significant contribution of RBV exposure to the total antiviral effectiveness. The second phase of viral decline, which is attributed to the loss rate of infected cells, was slow (0.19 day(-1)) and was higher in patients who subsequently eradicated HCV (P=0.03). The two PIs achieved high levels of antiviral effectiveness. However, the suboptimal antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN/RBV and the low loss of infected cells suggest that a longer treatment duration might be needed in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients and that a future IFN-free regimen may be particularly beneficial in these patients.

Reduction of microRNA 122 expression in IFNL3 CT/TT carriers and during progression of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

UNLABELLED: The microRNA miR-122 is highly expressed in the liver and stimulates hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in vitro. IFNL3 (lambda-3 interferon gene) polymorphisms and the expression of miR-122 have been associated with sustained virological response (SVR) to treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). We investigated, in vivo, the relationship between miR-122 expression, IFNL3 polymorphism, fibrosis, and response to PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. Pretreatment liver biopsy specimens and serum samples from 133 patients with CHC were included. Sixty-six patients achieved SVR, and 64 failed to respond to the treatment (43 nonresponders [NR] and 21 relapsers [RR]). All stages of fibrosis were represented, with 39, 50, 23, and 19 patients, respectively, having Metavir scores of F1, F2, F3, and F4. miR-122 expression was assessed by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and IFNL3 rs12979860 by direct sequencing. Hepatic miR-122 expression was higher in patients with the IFNL3 CC genotype than in those with the IFNL3 CT or TT genotype, in all patients (P = 0.025), and in NRs plus RRs (P = 0.013). Increased hepatic miR-122 was more strongly associated with complete early virological response (cEVR) (P = 0.003) than with SVR (P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, increased hepatic miR-122 was only associated with the IFNL3 CC genotype. miR-122 was decreased in patients with advanced fibrosis (Metavir scores of F3 and F4) compared to its levels in patients with mild and moderate fibrosis (F1 and F2) (P = 0.01). Serum and hepatic expression of miR-122 were not associated. The association between miR-122 and IFNL3 was stronger than the association between miR-122 and response to treatment. miR-122 may play a role in the early viral decline that is dependent on IFNL3 and the innate immune response. IMPORTANCE: miR-122 plays a crucial role during HCV infection. Moreover, it was reported that miR-122 binding within the HCV genome stimulates its replication. Moreover, miR-122 is highly expressed within hepatocytes, where it regulates many cellular pathways. A reduction of miR-122 expression has been suggested to be associated with responsiveness to IFN-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Several independent genome-wide association studies reported a strong association between IFNL3 polymorphism and responsiveness to IFN-based therapy. We report here a strong association between the expression of miR-122 and IFNL3 polymorphism that is independent of the response to the treatment. Our data suggest that modification of miR-122 expression may play an important role in the molecular mechanism associated with IFNL3 polymorphism. Moreover, we report a reduction of miR-122 at more advanced stages of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

HBsAg quantification: useful for monitoring natural history and treatment outcome.

The template of hepatitis B virus transcription, the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), plays a key role in the life cycle of the virus and permits the persistence of infection. It has been suggested that hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification reflects the concentration of cccDNA in the liver. In hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B, HBsAg levels are higherduring the immune tolerance phase than during the immune clearance phase. During the natural history of chronic hepatitis B, serum HBsAg declines progressively from the immune-tolerant to the low replicative phase. In HBeAg negative patients, the combination of low hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (<2000 IU/ml) and low HBsAg levels (<1000 IU/ml) can predict inactive carrier status, low risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and the probability of HBsAg loss. HBsAg in combination with HBV DNA predicts the outcome of Peg-Interferon therapy: An absence of decline at week 12 is a good predictor of non-response and to stop therapy. Any decline at week 24, suggests that therapy should be continued to 48 weeks. Although the decrease in HBsAg decline slow with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, a rapid decline can predict future HBsAg seroclearance. A level <100 IU/ml during six consecutive months could be a marker of a sustained response after treatment cessation.

[Hepatitis B: clinical application of HBsAg quantification]. / Hépatite B: intérêt clinique de la quantification de l'AgHBs.

Since its discovery by Blumberg in 1965, hepatitis B virus antigen (HBsAg) is used as the fingerprint of hepatitis B infection. HBsAg level reflects the transcriptional activity of the cccDNA. It is an important marker that might not only indicate active hepatitis B infection, but may also predict clinical and treatment outcomes. Assays for HBsAg quantification are fully automated with a high output capacity. HBsAg titer is higher in HBe antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B than in HBeAg negative patients and is negatively correlated with liver fibrosis in HBeAg positive patients. In HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B, an HBsAg level < 1,000 IU/mL and an HBV DNA titer < 2,000 IU/mL allow the accurate identification of inactive carriers. On pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment, HBsAg quantification allows identifying, as early as week 12 PEG-IFN therapy, patients that will not benefit from therapy and thus stop or switch treatment "week 12 stopping rule". Genotype A and D: stop at week 12 if no HBsAg decrease; Genotype B and C: stop at week 12 if titer > 20,000 UI/mL. With regards to nucleos[t]ides analogues therapy the role of HBsAg quantification remains to be clarified. Several studies indicate that baseline and on-treatment HBsAg levels might allow identifying patients that can end up with treatment with no subsequent risk of reactivation. In clinical practice, HBsAg quantification is a simple and reproducible worthwhile tool that can be used in association with HBV DNA to classify patients during HBV infection and to monitor therapy.

Prediction of disease reactivation in asymptomatic hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients using baseline serum measurements of HBsAg and HBV-DNA.

UNLABELLED: Differentiating 'inactive carriers' (ICs) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from hepatitis B e antigen-negative (HBeAg[-]) patients in remission is challenging. We investigated whether serum-based monitoring of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV-DNA in asymptomatic HBeAg(-) patients could distinguish these groups. DESIGN: 129 HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (HBV genotypes A-E) with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at baseline were classified after 1 year of follow-up as either IC (HBV-DNA ≤2000 IU/mL) or 'active carrier' (AC, HBV-DNA >2000 IU/mL) if they exhibited normal ALT throughout, or classified as 'reactivation patient' (RP) if they exhibited marked, transient increases in ALT and HBV-DNA. RESULTS: There were 64%, 18%, and 19% patients in the IC, AC, and RP groups, respectively. Combined HBsAg and HBV-DNA cutoffs (>1000 IU/mL and >200 IU/mL, respectively) differentiated RPs with 92% sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%. HBsAg sero-clearance was associated with baseline HBsAg <1000 IU/mL, annual decrease of ≥0.3 log IU/mL (NPV 95%: PPV 89%) and IFNL3 genotype CC. CONCLUSION: Applying combined HBsAg and HBV-DNA cutoffs to baseline measurements accurately differentiated RPs. These results suggest that HBsAg should be included in the monitoring of asymptomatic HBeAg(-) CHB patients.

HBsAg quantification to predict natural history and treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis B patients.

There is a growing interest in serum HBsAg quantification (qHbsAg). HBsAg titers are negatively correlated with liver fibrosis in HBeAg(+) patients. In HBeAg(-) HBsAg level <1000 IU/ml and HBV-DNA titer <2000 IU/ml accurately identify inactive carriers. During PEG-IFN treatment qHBsAg identifies patients with no benefit from therapy at week 12, allowing stopping or switched- "week 12 stopping rule". During nucleos(t)ide analogues the role of qHBsAg need to be clarified. In clinical practice qHBsAg is a simple and reproducible tool that may be used in association with HBV-DNA to classify patients during the natural history of HBV and to monitor therapy.

Hepatitis B surface antigen serum level is associated with fibrosis severity in treatment-naïve, e antigen-positive patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is currently known about the association between serum HBsAg or HBV DNA levels and the severity of liver disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Therefore, we investigated these relationships in a large cohort of unselected, well-characterized, treatment-naïve CHB patients. METHODS: CHB patients were assessed at the Hôpital Beaujon in Paris, France, between 2000 and 2008. Serum samples and liver biopsies were obtained on the same day. HBsAg, HBV DNA, and HBV genotype were investigated using commercial diagnostic assays and liver histology was scored using the METAVIR system. RESULTS: 406 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in hepatitis B e antigen-positive (HBeAg[+]) patients showed strong correlation (r=0.44, p<0.0001), as did serum HBsAg levels and fibrosis severity (r=0.43, p<0.0001). HBeAg(+) patients with moderate to severe fibrosis exhibited significantly lower serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels compared with patients with no or mild fibrosis. Modeling analysis suggested a serum HBsAg cut-off of 3.85 logIU/ml would provide a theoretical sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0-100), theoretical specificity of 86% (95% CI: 50-100), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 67-100) in HBeAg(+) patients infected with HBV genotype B or C. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between low serum HBsAg levels and moderate to severe fibrosis in HBeAg(+) CHB patients. Furthermore, we described a serum HBsAg cut-off for the prediction of fibrosis severity in CHB patients infected with HBV genotype B or C.

Quantification of hepatitis B e antigen between Elecsys HBeAg and Architect HBeAg assays among patients infected with hepatitis B virus.

BACKGROUND: Among patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), quantification of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) is accruing substantial clinical relevance as a marker for HBeAg-loss during treatment. No direct comparison has been made between assays that quantify HBeAg. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of HBeAg quantification (qHBeAg) between Architect and Elecsys HBeAg assays among 183 patients with chronic HBV infection (94 treatment-naïve HBV-monoinfected and 89 antiretroviral-experienced HIV-HBV co-infected). STUDY DESIGN: qHBeAg was determined in Paul Erlich Institute Units (PEIU)/mL using previously designed protocols. Values were compared with correlation and linear regression. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare mean differences (d¯) between Elecsys and Architect assays and limits of agreement (LOA) (±2 standard deviations [SD]). RESULTS: Between-assay correlation was significant overall (r = 0.970), yet stronger for qHBeAg < 1000 (n = 131) versus > 1000PEIU/mL (n = 52) as determined by the Elecsys assay (r = 0.969 vs. 0.880, respectively). On average, the Elecsys assay reported qHBeAg at 13.3PEIU/mL lower than the Architect assay (LOA: -415.9, 389.3), while LOA between assays were much wider at higher levels (< 1000: -198.2, 147.9; ≥ 1000PEIU/mL: -688.4, 721.5). Further analysis indicated that d¯ did not change substantially with respect to HBV genotype, precore mutation, and CD4+ cell count, regardless of HBeAg-level. Nevertheless, seven of eight patients with highly divergent between-assay results had HBV-DNA> 2000IU/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Elecsys and Architect assays report similar qHBeAg units with high correlation. Since qHBeAg was performed using an in-house approach, a commercially-available assay could reduce between-assay discrepancies, especially at higher HBeAg-levels.

The role of HBsAg quantification for monitoring natural history and treatment outcome.

Since its discovery by Blumberg in 1965, the hepatitis B virus antigen (HBsAg) is used as the fingerprint of hepatitis B infection. The HBsAg level is a reflection of the transcriptional activity of cccDNA. It is an important marker that not only indicates active hepatitis B infection but can also predict clinical and treatment outcomes. Assays for HBsAg quantification are fully automated and have high output. HBsAg titres are higher in HBe antigen (HBeAg)(+) than in HBeAg(-) patients and are negatively correlated with liver fibrosis in HBeAg(+) patients. In HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B, an HBsAg level <1000 IU/ml and an HBV DNA titre <2000 IU/ml accurately identify inactive carriers. During PEG-IFN treatment, HBsAg quantification is used to identify patients who will not benefit from therapy as early as week 12 on therapy, so that treatment may be stopped or switched- 'week 12 stopping rule'. With nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA), the role of HBsAg quantification must be clarified. Several studies show that baseline and on-treatment HBsAg levels might identify patients that can be treated with no subsequent risk of reactivation. In clinical practice, HBsAg quantification is a simple and reproducible tool that can be used in association with HBV DNA to classify patients during the natural history of HBV and to monitor therapy.

Impact of ribavirin dose on retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients.

AIM: To study the efficacy and factors associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) relapsing patients. METHODS: Out of 1228 CHC patients treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), 165 (13%) had a relapse. Among these, 62 patients were retreated with PEG-IFN-α2a or -α2b and RBV. Clinical, biological, virological and histological data were collected. Initial doses and treatment modifications were recorded. The efficacy of retreatment and predictive factors for SVR were analyzed. RESULTS: An SVR was achieved in 42% of patients. SVR was higher in young (< 50 years) (61%) than old patients (27%) (P = 0.007), and in genotype 2 or 3 (57%) than in genotype 1 or 4 (28%) patients (P = 0.023). Prolonging therapy for at least 24 wk more than the previous course was associated with higher SVR rates (53% vs 28%, P = 0.04). Also, a better SVR rate was observed with RBV dose/body weight > 15.2 mg/kg per day (70% vs 35%, P = 0.04). In logistic regression, predictors of a response were age (P = 0.018), genotype (P = 0.048) and initial RBV dose/body weight (P = 0.022). None of the patients without a complete early virological response achieved an SVR (negative predictive value = 100%). CONCLUSION: Retreatment with PEG-IFN/RBV is eff-ective in genotype 2 or 3 relapsers, especially in young patients. A high dose of RBV seems to be important for the retreatment response.