Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Global Spine J ; 11(2): 249-255, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875874

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following discectomy and anterior cervical fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disorder performed with stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in the MEDLINE, LILACS, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, with no language or date restriction. The review was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109180. RESULTS: Six randomized clinical trials were selected, which evaluated at least one of the objectives of this work, such as pain control, bone consolidation, neurological symptoms, and cervical lordosis, thus satisfying the inclusion criteria. Articles that did not directly compare the 2 surgical techniques were excluded. A total of 309 patients were included and the results showed no significant difference in clinical (visual analogue scale and neck disability index) or radiological (cervical lordosis and fusion) outcome between the 2 groups. The operative time was shorter in the group with stand-alone cages (mean difference = -18.40; 95% CI = [-24.89, -11.92]; P < .66). CONCLUSION: The stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plate techniques have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite the significantly shorter operative time for one group, other randomized clinical trials are needed to establish conclusive evidence in favor of one of the comparative treatments.

2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(6): 812-817, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696877

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of COVID-19 on medical students' internships in public and private institutions in Brasil, in addition to estimating the quality of the measures taken by their respective Universities in the face of the problem and the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative analysis study carried out with 317 students undergoing medical internship from March 31, 2020, to April 12, 2020. The survey was conducted through an online questionnaire using the SurveyMonkey tool with 20 questions. Interns from the fourth to the sixth year of medical schools in the country were randomly included in the study through a survey sent by Whatsapp application. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-Square, considering p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS Four main topics were identified in the research: student demographic data; how classes and courses are being taught; the use and ease of access to personal protective equipment and the students' fears and perspectives for the future. CONCLUSION The study clarified that although half of the students still have some degree of content and, in their majority, they are satisfied, there is still a lot of difficulty in obtaining personal protective equipment, which prevents students from returning safely to their internships.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Internship and Residency , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Students, Medical , Betacoronavirus , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Research/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 66(6): 812-817, June 2020. graf
Article in English | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136290

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of COVID-19 on medical students' internships in public and private institutions in Brasil, in addition to estimating the quality of the measures taken by their respective Universities in the face of the problem and the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative analysis study carried out with 317 students undergoing medical internship from March 31, 2020, to April 12, 2020. The survey was conducted through an online questionnaire using the SurveyMonkey tool with 20 questions. Interns from the fourth to the sixth year of medical schools in the country were randomly included in the study through a survey sent by Whatsapp application. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-Square, considering p <0.05 as significant. RESULTS Four main topics were identified in the research: student demographic data; how classes and courses are being taught; the use and ease of access to personal protective equipment and the students' fears and perspectives for the future. CONCLUSION The study clarified that although half of the students still have some degree of content and, in their majority, they are satisfied, there is still a lot of difficulty in obtaining personal protective equipment, which prevents students from returning safely to their internships.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Avaliar o impacto da Covid-19 durante o internato dos alunos de medicina em escolas públicas e particulares no Brasil, além de estimar a qualidade das medidas tomadas pelas respectivas universidades diante do agravo e da disponibilização de equipamento de proteção individual. MÉTODO Um estudo de análise quantitativa transversal, com caráter descritivo, foi realizado com 317 alunos cursando o internato médico durante o período de 31 de março de 2020 a 12 de abril de 2020. A pesquisa foi realizada por meio de um questionário on-line com 20 perguntas pela ferramenta SurveyMonkey. Os internos do 4o ao 6o ano das faculdades de medicina do País foram incluídos no estudo de forma randômica ao receberem a pesquisa pelo aplicativo WhatsApp. A análise estatística foi realizada por meio do Qui-quadrado, considerando p<0,05 como significante. RESULTADOS Quatro temas principais foram identificados na pesquisa: dados demográficos dos alunos; como as aulas e estágios do curso estão sendo ministrados; a utilização e facilidade de aquisição do equipamento de proteção individual e medos e perspectivas futuras dos estudantes. CONCLUSÕES O estudo mostrou que apesar de metade dos alunos continuarem tendo algum grau de conteúdo e, na maioria, estarem satisfeitos, ainda há muita dificuldade em se obter equipamento de proteção individual, o que impede que os alunos retornem com segurança aos seus campos de estágio, além de causar medo de contaminação e de continuar atendendo os pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Students, Medical , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Research/trends , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Coronavirus Infections , Betacoronavirus
4.
Eur Spine J ; 28(6): 1413-1422, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069526

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to analyze the layers of yellow ligament in lumbar canal stenosis and disk herniation. METHODS: Eighteen ligaments were harvested from patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Twenty-nine normal samples from lumbar spine disk herniation patients served as control. All surgical procedures were the same. Ligaments were stained in hematoxylin and eosin; picrosirius-hematoxylin for collagen; Weigert's resorcin-fuchsin for elaunin, oxytalan and elastic fibers; and transmission electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry was performed for Il-6; Il-10; and CD-31, PGP9.5. Results are described in means and standard error (mean ± SE), and all analyses adopted the significance level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Spinal stenosis ligaments were 2.5 × thicker. Control superficial ligaments presented a large number of thick, compact collagen fibers and a significant amount of oxytalan and mature elastic fibers. The deep layer presented a large number of mature elastic fibers. In the stenosis group, collagen was thinner and compacted in both layers. There was no difference in the interleukin profile among groups. The deep portion of the stenosis group presented a higher number of vessels and nerves. CONCLUSION: Two layers compose the elastic system of the normal ligamentum flavum, where the deep portion is mainly responsible for its elasticity (elaunin fibers), while its resistance depends on the concentration of oxytalan fibers, which are more present in the superficial layer. Ligamentum flavum in the stenosis samples presents more mononuclear infiltrate and more degraded elastic fibers with a higher number of vessels in its deep portion. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/metabolism , Ligamentum Flavum/chemistry , Lumbar Vertebrae/chemistry , Spinal Stenosis/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contractile Proteins/analysis , Elastic Tissue/chemistry , Elastic Tissue/pathology , Elastic Tissue/ultrastructure , Elasticity , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/analysis , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/pathology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/metabolism , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/pathology , Ligamentum Flavum/ultrastructure , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Male , Microscopy, Electron , Middle Aged , Spinal Stenosis/pathology , Young Adult
5.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 28(4): 362-367, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30543559

ABSTRACT

To evaluate fat infiltration in the multifidus muscle close to the scoliotic curve as seen in MRI compared with the histological evaluation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The evaluation of fatty infiltration in the multifidus muscle of patients with AIS by MRI was compared with biopsy. Fatty infiltration was greater in concave side than in the convex side in both MRI (P=0.005) and biopsy evaluation (P=0.026). There was no correlation between the fatty infiltration findings evaluated through MRI and biopsy. The MRI measurements do not express accurately the tissue changes observed in the biopsy.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Paraspinal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Biopsy , Child , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Young Adult
6.
BMJ Open ; 7(11): e017930, 2017 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29151051

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain and vertebral endplate abnormalities are common conditions within the population. Subclinical infection caused by indolent pathogens can potentially lead to these findings, with differentiation between them notably challenging from a clinical perspective. Progressive infection of the intervertebral disc has been extensively associated with increasing low back pain, with Propionibacterium acnes specifically implicated with in relation to sciatica. The main purpose of this study is to identify if the presence of an infective pathogen within the intervertebral disc is primary or is a result of intraoperative contamination, and whether this correlates to low back pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An open prospective cohort study will be performed. Subjects included within the study will be between the ages of 18 and 65 years and have a diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation requiring open decompression surgery. Excised herniated disc fragments, muscle and ligamentum flavum samples will be collected during surgery and sent to microbiology for tissue culture and pathogen identification. Score questionnaires for pain, functionality and quality of life will be given preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. A MRI will be performed 12 months after surgery for analysis of Modic changes and baseline comparison. The primary endpoint is the rate of disc infection in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease. The secondary endpoints will be performance scores, Modic incidence and volume. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and was only initiated after it (CAAE 65102617.2.0000.0071). Patients agreeing to participate will sign an informed consent form before entering the study. Results will be published in a peer reviewed medical journal irrespective of study findings. If shown to be the case, this would have profound effects on the way physicians treat chronic low back pain, even impacting health costs. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0315876; Pre-results.


Subject(s)
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/microbiology , Lumbar Vertebrae , Propionibacterium acnes/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Incidence , Intervertebral Disc/microbiology , Low Back Pain/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Young Adult
7.
Global Spine J ; 5(2): 130-4, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844286

ABSTRACT

Study Design Case report. Objective The purpose of this report is to discuss the management of a disk herniation during pregnancy and the indication and particularities of surgery in this situation. Methods We describe a case of diskectomy performed in a 35-year-old woman at 18 weeks of gestation. After 4 weeks of trying to manage the disk herniation with rest and medications without success, the muscle strength of the L5 right root decreased to grade 4, and the patient was not responding to intravenous analgesia. After discussion with the patient and family, a decision was made to perform the diskectomy. Results After surgery, the patient's pain lessened, and the Lasegue test became negative. Two weeks after the procedure, the patient's muscle strength was normal. In the 40th week of pregnancy, the patient gave birth without any complications. Conclusion When necessary, diskectomy can be indicated and performed during pregnancy. However, appropriate precautions must be taken. Awareness of these precautions is important for the success of the procedure and for the well-being of the mother and the newborn.

8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD008129, 2014 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25354696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical approach for the management of subaxial cervical spine facet dislocations is a controversial subject amongst spine surgeons. Reasons for this include differences in the technical familiarity and experience of surgeons with the different surgical approaches, and variable interpretation of image studies regarding the existence of a traumatic intervertebral disc herniation and of the neurological status of the patient. Moreover, since the approaches are dissimilar, important variations are likely in neurological, radiographical and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects (benefits and harms) of the different surgical approaches used for treating adults with acute cervical spine facet dislocation. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (9 May 2014), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2014 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1946 to April Week 5 2014), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (8 May 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2014 Week 18), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (9 May 2014), trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles to May 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared surgical approaches for the management of adults with acute cervical spine facet dislocations with and without spinal cord injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We included one randomised and one quasi-randomised controlled trial involving a total of 94 participants and reporting results for a maximum of 84 participants. One trial included patients with spinal cord injuries and the other included patients without spinal cord injuries. Both trials compared anterior versus posterior surgical approaches. Both trials were at high risk of bias, including selection bias (one trial), performance bias (both trials) and attrition bias (one trial). Data were pooled for one outcome only: non-union. Reflecting also the imprecision of the results, the evidence was deemed to be of very low quality for all outcomes; which means that our level of uncertainty about the estimates is high.Neither trial found differences between the two approaches in neurological recovery or status, as shown in one study by small clinically insignificant differences in NASS (Northern American Spine Society) neurological scores (0 to 100: optimal score) at one year of follow-up: anterior mean score: 85.23 versus posterior mean score: 83.86; mean difference (MD) 1.37 favouring anterior approach, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.76 to 12.50; 33 participants; 1 study). The same trial found no relevant between-approach differences at one year in patient-reported quality of life measured using the 36-item Short Form Survey physical (MD -0.08, 95% CI -7.26 to 7.10) and mental component scores (MD 2.88, 95% CI -3.32 to 9.08). Neither trial found evidence of significant differences in long-term pain, or non-union (2/38 versus 2/46; risk ratio (RR) 1.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 34.91). One trial found better sagittal and more 'normal' alignment after the anterior approach (MD -10.31 degrees favouring anterior approach, 95% CI -14.95 degrees to -5.67 degrees), while the other trial reported no significant differences in cervical alignment. There was insufficient evidence to indicate between-group differences in medical adverse events, rates of instrumentation failure and infection. One trial found that the several participants had voice and swallowing disorders after anterior approach surgery (11/20) versus none (0/22) in the posterior approach group: RR 25.19, 95% CI 1.58 to 401.58); all had recovered by three months. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Very low quality evidence from two trials indicated little difference in long-term neurological status, pain or patient-reported quality of life between anterior and posterior surgical approaches to the management of individuals with subaxial cervical spine facet dislocations. Sagittal alignment may be better achieved with the anterior approach. There was insufficient evidence available to indicate between-group differences in medical adverse events, rates of instrumentation failure and infection. The disorders of the voice and swallowing that occurred exclusively in the anterior approach group all resolved by three months. We are very uncertain about this evidence and thus we cannot say whether one approach is better than the other. There was no evidence available for other approaches. Further higher quality multicentre randomised trials are warranted.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Zygapophyseal Joint/injuries , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL