Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Can Reduce Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke: ELETRON Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation top-down techniques based on brain stimulation present variable outcomes in unilateral spatial neglect (USN) after stroke. This study aimed to examine the effects of physical therapy after anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS and C-tDCS, respectively) to improve visuospatial and functional impairments in individuals with USN after stroke. METHODS: This double-blinded, pilot randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with USN after ischemic stroke. Randomization was stratified according to the Behavior Inattention Test-Conventional (BIT-C) and Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS). Outpatient physical therapy was conducted for 7.5 weeks after 20 minutes of tDCS. The primary outcome was the USN degree evaluated by the BIT-C. Secondary outcomes were the difference in CBS score, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), disability (modified Rankin Scale), autonomy (Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure), and quality of life (EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire). Outcomes were analyzed using an analysis of covariance model corrected by age, baseline NIHSS, and baseline BIT-C. Pairwise post hoc comparisons were performed using Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: In the primary outcomes, A-tDCS led to greater improvement in BIT-C after intervention (mean difference [MD] = 18.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.9-32.8, p = 0.008) compared to sham. However, no significant differences were observed between A-tDCS and C-tDCS (MD = 13.9, 95% CI = -0.3 to 28.1, p = 0.057), or C-tDCS and sham (MD = 4.5, 95% CI = -9.7 to 18.8, p = 0.99). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of secondary outcomes. INTERPRETATION: A-tDCS associated with physical therapy can decrease the severity of USN after stroke. However, these preliminary findings must be confirmed by collecting additional evidence in a larger phase 3 trial. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:400-410.

Clinical factors associated with trunk control after stroke: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Poor trunk control after stroke can impact recovery of global functional abilities. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical and functional data from stroke participants can be used to predict trunk control at 90 days. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 37 participants with stroke. The variables evaluated at hospital discharge were stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale - NIHSS); functional capacity (modified Rankin scale - mRS); handgrip; and cognitive function. At 90 days, the variables evaluated were autonomy (Functional Independence Measure - FIM, Barthel Index); gait mobility (Tinetti mobility test -TMT); quality of life (European Quality of Life Scale - EuroQol-5D) and trunk control (trunk impairment scale - TIS). The participants were considered to have satisfactory (TIS³14) or non-satisfactory trunk control (TIS≤13), and the differences between them were assessed by chi-square test (categorical variables) and Mann-Whitney/unpaired t-test (continuous variables). A ROC curve was used to show cut-off value of clinical variables to predict trunk control. RESULTS: The unsatisfactory trunk control group presented ahigher NIHSS at discharge (p=0.01), higher mRS at discharge (p=0.00), lower Barthel Index at 90 days (p=0.03), lower FIM at 90 days (p=0.01) and lower TMT at 90 days (p=0.00) than the satisfactory trunk control group. The best cut-off points for the NIHSS and mRS scores at discharge for predicting unsatisfactory trunk control are ≥6 and ≥3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Greater NIHSS and mRS scores at hospital discharge increase the chance of unsatisfactory trunk control at 90 days after stroke.

Clinical factors associated with the development of nonuse learned after stroke: a prospective study.

Background: Upper extremity impairment is present in most of people with stroke. The use of the affected upper extremity can be impacted not only by physical impairment but also by abehavioral phenomenon called learned nonuse. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate which clinical factors in the acute phase are associated with the development of learned nonuse in the upper extremity after stroke. Methods: This cohort study included 38 patients with ischemic stroke. Hospital discharge data were collected for clinical aspects, scales of severity, incapacity and autonomy, as well as for neuromuscular and sensory evaluations. At 90 days after hospital discharge, the score on the Motor Activity Log scale for detecting learned nonuse was obtained, and life quality was evaluated by the EuroQol. The individuals with and without learned nonuse were compared by attest for univariate analysis, and ageneralized linear model was employed to find possible predictors, which were considered significant p <0.05. Results: In the statistical model, age (p= .006), severity at discharge (p= .036), handgrip strength (p= .000), altered sensitivity (p= .011), incapacity at discharge (p= .009) and autonomy at discharge (p= .011) were found to be associated with learned nonuse. In relation to quality of life, mobility, personal care, usual activities, anxiety, depression and perception had lower mean values in the learned nonuse group. Conclusion: Age, severity of stroke, incapacity and neuromuscular and sensory compromises are associated with upper extremity learned nonuse in stroke patients.