Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiographics ; 43(11): e230064, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883305

ABSTRACT

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common neoplasm in children, but it may mimic other types of vascular anomalies or nonvascular benign and malignant tumors. In most cases, the clinical appearance, time of onset, and pattern of involution facilitate its diagnosis. Imaging evaluation is not always needed since the IH features at clinical presentation are usually characteristic, but when needed, US and frequently MRI are the imaging modalities of choice. Clinical photography or photographic documentation plays a central role in monitoring these lesions over their clinical course. Photographic documentation can also add confidence and alert the radiologist when interpreting imaging studies. Some vascular anomalies, especially vascular malformations, are a frequent source of confusion, as these may resemble IHs clinically and at imaging. The lack of uniform terminology also hinders an accurate diagnosis. To unify the terminology and minimize confusion, the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies created a helpful classification in 1994. In addition, radiologists need to be aware of and become familiar with other neoplasms in children that may resemble IH to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary procedures. Fibrous and lipomatous tumors are examples of benign tumors that can mimic IHs clinically and at imaging, whereas rhabdomyosarcoma, infantile fibrosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoproliferative disorders are examples of malignant neoplasms. The authors review the features of IH at clinical presentation and imaging evaluation, highlighting its different phases of evolution and stressing the importance of photographic documentation. The authors also review pitfalls of IH with helpful pearls for differentiation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Khanna and Briones in this issue.


Subject(s)
Hemangioma , Vascular Malformations , Child , Humans , Infant , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Imaging , Diagnostic Errors , Hemangioma/diagnostic imaging
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 53(2): 313-323, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36151218

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn is a self-limited disorder predominantly affecting full-term and post-term neonates during the first 6 weeks after birth. Subcutaneous fat necrosis can be focal or multifocal and affect one or both sides with a predilection for areas of pressure in certain anatomical areas. Subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn is associated with perinatal asphyxia and other neonatal and maternal risk factors. Subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn presents as a self-limited area of dermal edema followed by indurated subcutaneous plaques, or nontender and mobile nodules, sometimes with skin discoloration [1-3]. The diagnosis is based on the child's history and physical examination, but when in doubt, imaging is helpful. US is the imaging modality of choice to confirm the diagnosis of subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn because it provides the best resolution of superficial lesions, requires no sedation and lacks ionizing radiation. US can also help evaluate and characterize other pathologies affecting the superficial subcutaneous soft tissues at this age. Familiarity with subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn is important to make a prompt and precise diagnosis and avoid unnecessary imaging tests or invasive procedures.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Fat Necrosis , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Subcutaneous Fat/diagnostic imaging , Fat Necrosis/diagnostic imaging , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Emotions
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL