Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 62(12): 1578-1585, 2016 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27126346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that routine CD4 cell count monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-monoinfected patients with suppressed viral loads and CD4 cell counts >300 cell/µL could be reduced to annual. HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is frequent, but evidence supporting similar reductions in CD4 cell count monitoring is lacking for this population. We determined whether CD4 cell count monitoring could be reduced in monoinfected and coinfected patients by estimating the probability of maintaining CD4 cell counts ≥200 cells/µL during continuous HIV suppression. METHODS: The PISCIS Cohort study included data from 14 539 patients aged ≥16 years from 10 hospitals in Catalonia and 2 in the Balearic Islands (Spain) since January 1998. All patients who had at least one period of 6 months of continuous HIV suppression were included in this analysis. Cumulative probabilities with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator stratified by the initial CD4 cell count at the period of continuous suppression initiation. RESULTS: A total of 8695 patients were included. CD4 cell counts fell to <200 cells/µL in 7.4% patients, and the proportion was lower in patients with an initial count >350 cells/µL (1.8%) and higher in those with an initial count of 200-249 cells/µL (23.1%). CD4 cell counts fell to <200 cells/µL in 5.7% of monoinfected and 11.1% of coinfected patients. Of monoinfected patients with an initial CD4 cell count of 300-349 cells/µL, 95.6% maintained counts ≥200 cells/µL. In the coinfected group with the same initial count, this rate was lower, but 97.6% of coinfected patients with initial counts >350 cells/µL maintained counts ≥200 cells/µL. CONCLUSIONS: From our data, it can be inferred that CD4 cell count monitoring can be safely performed annually in HIV-monoinfected patients with CD4 cell counts >300 cells/µL and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with counts >350 cells/µL.


Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/immunology , Coinfection/virology , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1 , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Viral Load , Young Adult
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 19(7): 646-53, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22967234

ABSTRACT

In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we analysed specific prognostic factors and the impact of timing of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on disease progression and death among 625 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected, treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with an AIDS-defining disease. HAART was classified as early (<30 days) or late (30-270 days). Deferring HAART was significantly associated with faster progression to a new AIDS-defining event/death overall (p 0.009) and in patients with Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (p 0.017). In the multivariate analysis, deferring HAART was associated with a higher risk of a new AIDS-defining event/death (p 0.002; hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.25-2.68). Other independent risk factors for poorer outcome were baseline diagnosis of AIDS-defining lymphoma, age >35 years, and low CD4(+) count (<50 cells/µL).


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Anti-Retroviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
J Infect ; 57(1): 64-71, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18572247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to characterize the ways in which older HIV-infected people differ from younger HIV-infected people. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. PISCIS cohort includes newly attended HIV-infected subjects since January 1, 1998. Naive patients were selected. Two groups were defined: G1 (>or=50 years at time of diagnosis, n=493) and G2 (18-49 years, n=4511). Statistical analysis was performed using chi(2), Student's t test, Cox regression and linear mixed models. RESULTS: G1 had different features: males (G1: 84% vs. G2: 75%, p<0.001), sexual transmission (52% vs. 32%, p<0.001), AIDS at first visit (38% vs. 22%, p<0.001). The follow-up was 6 years. Ninety-five percent of patients in G1 and 92% in G2 presented a detectable viral load (>or=500 copies/mm(3)) at the first visit (p=0.016). G1 presented lower CD4 levels with respect to G2 throughout the period but the increase of CD4 in G1 at the end of the study period was 254 cells/mm(3) whereas for G2 it was 196 cells/mm(3) (p<0.001). Mortality was 9% for G1 and 4% for G2 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected people diagnosed at the age of 50 years or older showed different features. They showed good viral and immunological response to HAART.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , HIV-1/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , RNA, Viral/blood , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL