Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 60(4): E300-E310, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967087

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to provide an affordable method of computing socio-economic (SE) deprivation indices at the regional level, in order to reveal the specific aspects of the relationship between SE inequalities and health outcomes. The Umbria Region Socio-Health Index (USHI) was computed and compared with the Italian National Deprivation Index at the Umbria regional level (NDI-U). METHODS: The USHI was computed by applying factor analysis to census tract SE variables correlated with general mortality and validated through comparison with the NDI-U. RESULTS: Overall mortality presented linear positive trends in USHI, while trends in NDI-U proved non-linear or non-significant. Similar results were obtained with regard to specific causes of death according to deprivation groups, gender and age. CONCLUSIONS: The USHI better describes a local population in terms of health-related SE status. Policy-makers could therefore adopt this method in order to obtain a better picture of SE-associated health conditions in regional populations and to target strategies for reducing health inequalities.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Mortality , Public Health , Residence Characteristics , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cause of Death , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Resources , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Vaccine ; 36(23): 3368-3374, 2018 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29729995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy is a considerable issue in European countries and leads to low coverage rates. After a long debate, Italy has made vaccination mandatory for admission to its schools. METHODS: In the NAVIDAD study (a cross-sectional multicentre study), a 63-item questionnaire was administered to 1820 pregnant women from 15 Italian cities. The questionnaire assessed the interviewee's opinion on mandatory vaccines, as well as their socioeconomic status, sources of information about vaccines, confidence in the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS), and intention to vaccinate their newborn. RESULTS: Information sources play a key role in determining the opinion on restoration of mandatory vaccines; in particular, women who obtained information from anti-vaccination movements are less likely to accept the vaccines (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.21-0.58, p < 0.001). Women who had confidence in healthcare professional information agreed more on mandatory vaccination than did the other women (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.62-4.36, p < 0.001); those who perceived that healthcare professionals have economic interest in child immunization and who declared that healthcare providers inform only on vaccinations benefits not on risks were less likely to agree on compulsory vaccination (OR: 0.66, CI 95%: 0.46-0.96, p = 0.03; OR: 0.66, CI 95%: 0.46-0.95, p = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: Information sources and confidence towards health professionals are the main determinants of acceptance of mandatory vaccine restoration. To increase the acceptability of the restoration and reduce vaccine hesitancy, these aspects need to be strengthened.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Immunization Programs , Mandatory Programs , Pregnant Women/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins , Humans , Italy , Mandatory Programs/organization & administration , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 58(1): E72-E78, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28515635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals should work against smoking habit to promote a correct life style. This study aimed to evaluate smoking prevalence and attitudes towards tobacco among Umbrian hospital professionals in a period between 2006 and 2015, since the approbation of the law that ban smoking in hospitals and all public areas in 2003. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire administered in 2006, 2011 and 2015 to healthcare professionals. It consists of 53 multiple-choice questions. Potential predictors of current smoking habits were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The sample included 475 healthcare professionals. Current smokers constituted 34.53% of the sample and no significant difference (p = 0.257) emerged in prevalence over time (33.74% in 2006; 36.02% in 2011 and 33.77% in 2015). The risk of being a smoker increased by not considering the smoking habit as the main cause of preventable deaths (OR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.47- 3.45). The strongest risk factor, which was significant in both models (p < 0.01), was being against the "No Smoking" law (OR = 18.90; 95% CI: 2.43-147.71; adjusted OR = 22.10; 95% CI: 1.85-264.78). CONCLUSIONS: The hospital staff has higher prevalence of smoking than the general population. The No Smoking law alone has been shown to be inadequate. Effective results can be achieved only by a common strategy and shared intervention programmes that are based on a workplace health promotion strategy. That for the moment has demonstrated to give interesting outcomes in modifying deep-rooted behaviour patterns.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Smoking Cessation , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Ann Oncol ; 25(11): 2251-2260, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25149707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persons living after a cancer diagnosis represent 4% of the whole population in high-income countries. The aim of the study was to provide estimates of indicators of long-term survival and cure for 26 cancer types, presently lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 818 902 Italian cancer patients diagnosed at age 15-74 years in 1985-2005 were included. Proportions of patients with the same death rates of the general population (cure fractions) and those of prevalent patients who were not at risk of dying as a result of cancer (cure prevalence) were calculated, using validated mixture cure models, by cancer type, sex, and age group. We also estimated complete prevalence, conditional relative survival (CRS), time to reach 5- and 10-year CRS >95%, and proportion of patients living longer than those thresholds. RESULTS: The cure fractions ranged from >90% for patients aged <45 years with thyroid and testis cancers to <10% for liver and pancreatic cancers of all ages. Five- or 10-year CRS >95% were both reached in <10 years by patients with cancers of the stomach, colon-rectum, pancreas, corpus and cervix uteri, brain, and Hodgkin lymphoma. For breast cancer patients, 5- and 10-year CRSs reached >95% after 19 and 25 years, respectively, and in 15 and 18 years for prostate cancer patients. Five-year CRS remained <95% for >25 years after cancer diagnosis in patients with liver and larynx cancers, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, myeloma, and leukaemia. Overall, the cure prevalence was 67% for men and 77% for women. Therefore, 21% of male and 31% of female patients had already reached 5-year CRS >95%, whereas 18% and 25% had reached 10-year CRS >95%. CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of Italian cancer patients can be considered cured. This observation has a high potential impact on health planning, clinical practice, and patients' perspective.


Subject(s)
Demography , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Prevalence
5.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 47(2): 37-41, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17066901

ABSTRACT

In this paper the Authors describe the development of workplace health promotion in Europe and show how, despite the fact that they have developed independently of one other the professional disciplines of Occupational Safety and Health together with Public Health have provided a common platform from which has emerged this new philosophy--Workplace Health Promotion (WHP). Whilst the paper draws on the experience of countries throughout Europe, particular attention is paid to the developmental process in Italy.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/history , Occupational Health/history , Europe , Health Promotion/organization & administration , History, 20th Century , Humans , Italy , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , State Medicine/history , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL