Recommendations in the management of epithelial appendiceal neoplasms and peritoneal dissemination from mucinous tumours (pseudomyxoma peritonei)

The epithelial appendiceal neoplasms are uncommon and are usually detected as an unexpected surgical finding. The general surgeon should be aware of the diversity of its clinical manifestations and biological behaviors along with the significance of the surgical treatment on the progression of the illness and the prognosis of the patients. The operative findings and, especially, tumor histology, determine the type of surgery. Intestinal histologic subtype behaves and should be treated similarly to the right colon neoplasms; while mucinous tumors, often discordant between histology and its aggressiveness, can be treated with a simple appendectomy or require complex oncological surgeries. Mucinous tumors are often associated with the presence of mucin or tumor implants in the abdominal cavity, being the clinical syndrome known as pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). PMP tends to present an indolent but deadly evolution and requires a multimodal approach as a single treatment with curative potential: complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CCRS ? HIPEC) now considered the standard of care in this pathology. The general surgeon should be aware of the governing principles of the treatment of appendiceal neoplasms with or without peritoneal dissemination, know the therapeutic frontiers in every situation (avoiding unnecessary or counterproductive surgeries) and sending early these patients to specialised centres in the radical management of malignant diseases of the peritoneum in the conditions and with the necessary information to facilitate a possible radical treatment (AU)

No disponible

Recommendations in the management of epithelial appendiceal neoplasms and peritoneal dissemination from mucinous tumours (pseudomyxoma peritonei).

The epithelial appendiceal neoplasms are uncommon and are usually detected as an unexpected surgical finding. The general surgeon should be aware of the diversity of its clinical manifestations and biological behaviors along with the significance of the surgical treatment on the progression of the illness and the prognosis of the patients. The operative findings and, especially, tumor histology, determine the type of surgery. Intestinal histologic subtype behaves and should be treated similarly to the right colon neoplasms; while mucinous tumors, often discordant between histology and its aggressiveness, can be treated with a simple appendectomy or require complex oncological surgeries. Mucinous tumors are often associated with the presence of mucin or tumor implants in the abdominal cavity, being the clinical syndrome known as pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). PMP tends to present an indolent but deadly evolution and requires a multimodal approach as a single treatment with curative potential: complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic Intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (CCRS + HIPEC) now considered the standard of care in this pathology. The general surgeon should be aware of the governing principles of the treatment of appendiceal neoplasms with or without peritoneal dissemination, know the therapeutic frontiers in every situation (avoiding unnecessary or counterproductive surgeries) and sending early these patients to specialised centres in the radical management of malignant diseases of the peritoneum in the conditions and with the necessary information to facilitate a possible radical treatment.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common form of tumour metastasis stemming from gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers. For a long time, PC has been considered a terminal clinical condition treated only with palliative systemic chemotherapy and associated with very limited results. During the last decade, the treatment of advanced colorectal disease has greatly improved with the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and biological agents. However, the median survival rates still do not surpass 24 months, even though most of these studies correspond to groups of patients with metastatic disease to the liver and/or lung. The approach and development of cytoreductive radical surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on performing radical surgery of the entire visible tumour within the abdomen/peritoneum, followed immediately by HIPEC, which acts upon microscopic tumour that remains present after surgery and which is responsible for the persistence or relapse of peritoneal disease. Peritonectomy procedures are demanding surgical techniques that permit elimination of the tumour present in the peritoneal lining and any other organs and/or structures that are infiltrated. The synergistic effect of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has been well documented. Hyperthermia increases the cytotoxicity of some cytostatic agents and increases the penetration of certain drugs into the neoplastic cells. The prognosis for patients with PC who undergo combined treatment correlates with the volume of PC (tumour burden) measured as the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the ability to perform a CRS, to completely eliminate the gross tumour. At least one phase III study and an important number of phase II studies have shown that CRS + HIPEC provides important survival benefits for patients with PC of colorectal origin. The combination of CRS + HIPEC is indicated for patients with good general health, a low PCI, absence of extra-abdominal metastasis and who can, technically, undergo CRS. The early identification of this group of patients, rapid referral to centres specialised in CRS + HIPEC, together with the correct application of this treatment, are key in achieving the best results (AU)

No disponible

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common form of tumour metastasis stemming from gastrointestinal and colorectal cancers. For a long time, PC has been considered a terminal clinical condition treated only with palliative systemic chemotherapy and associated with very limited results. During the last decade, the treatment of advanced colorectal disease has greatly improved with the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and biological agents. However, the median survival rates still do not surpass 24 months, even though most of these studies correspond to groups of patients with metastatic disease to the liver and/or lung. The approach and development of cytoreductive radical surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on performing radical surgery of the entire visible tumour within the abdomen/peritoneum, followed immediately by HIPEC, which acts upon microscopic tumour that remains present after surgery and which is responsible for the persistence or relapse of peritoneal disease. Peritonectomy procedures are demanding surgical techniques that permit elimination of the tumour present in the peritoneal lining and any other organs and/or structures that are infiltrated. The synergistic effect of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has been well documented. Hyperthermia increases the cytotoxicity of some cytostatic agents and increases the penetration of certain drugs into the neoplastic cells. The prognosis for patients with PC who undergo combined treatment correlates with the volume of PC (tumour burden) measured as the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the ability to perform a CRS, to completely eliminate the gross tumour. At least one phase III study and an important number of phase II studies have shown that CRS + HIPEC provides important survival benefits for patients with PC of colorectal origin. The combination of CRS + HIPEC is indicated for patients with good general health, a low PCI, absence of extra-abdominal metastasis and who can, technically, undergo CRS. The early identification of this group of patients, rapid referral to centres specialised in CRS + HIPEC, together with the correct application of this treatment, are key in achieving the best results.

UFT plus or minus calcium folinate for metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients.

Two studies were carried out to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio (UFT) plus or minus calcium folinate in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In one study, 106 patients received a fixed dose of UFT 400 mg/day in two daily doses every 12 hours continuously, plus calcium folinate 45 mg/day administered in three divided doses every 8 hours continuously. In study 2, calcium folinate was omitted, and the dose of UFT was increased to 400 mg/m2/day in two daily doses administered every 12 hours continuously to 95 patients. Treatments for both studies were administered until grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity occurred or disease progressed. The response rate among the 96 available patients in study 1 was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 27%); 41 patients (43%) achieved an objective response or stable disease. Overall survival was 13.7 months with a statistically significant difference between patients with no progressive disease and patients with progressive disease (P < .01). In study 2, 62 of 95 patients have now been evaluated for response. The response rate was 21% (95% CI, 13% to 30%); 38 patients (61%) experienced an objective response or stable disease. The overall survival for study 2 has not yet been evaluated. Toxicity was generally mild, consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting (6% in study 1 and 2% in study 2), grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea (11% in study 1 and 7% in study 2), plus one case of grade 3 mucositis in study 1. These findings suggest that chemotherapy with UFT (with or without modulation with calcium folinate) is feasible for elderly patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with weekly high-dose 48-hour continuous-infusion fluorouracil for advanced colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy (TTD) study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by bolus injection together with intravenous leucovorin (LV) versus high-dose 5-FU in continuous infusion (CI) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 306 patients were randomized to receive either 5-FU 425 mg/m2 given by bolus injection on days 1-5 plus intravenous (i.v.) LV 20 mg/m2 every four to five weeks or 5-FU 3.5 g/m2/week in a 48-hour CI. Therapy was continued until disease progression. Second-line chemotherapy was allowed in both arms. RESULTS: The response rates in 306 patients with measurable lesions were 19.2% (modulated arm) and 30.3% (CI arm, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival times were 23.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 25 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). Median survival times were 42.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 48 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). There were no significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity profiles but if we consider all grades we observed more mucositis in the modulated arm and more hand-foot syndrome in the CI arm. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of response rate, the continuous infusion regimen was more effective than the modulated regimen. There was no significant difference in survival and time to progression, and none in grade 3-4 toxicity.

Outpatient weekly high-dose continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil plus oral leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II trial. Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy (TTD).

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase I-II trial we showed that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a weekly 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) was 3.5 g/m2. In a subsequent confirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5% response rate was obtained, and a median survival of 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin. On this basis we attempted to modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 g/m2) with oral leucovorin (LV) but the regimen was too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. A new phase II trial with 2 g/m2/week plus oral leucovorin was planned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to June 1994, 110 previously untreated patients with advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were included in a multicenter study. The patients received, on an outpatient basis, 5-FU 2 g/m2 by continuous infusion for 48 hours once a week until progression or the appearance of toxic effects. Oral leucovorin (60 mg every six hours) was also given during the 5-FU infusion. RESULTS: Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m2/week (range 0.9-2). Three complete responses and 36 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 28% to 46.8%), the median time to progression 7.4 months and median survival 14.5 months. W.H.O. grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 27 patients (24.5%); grade 3 mucositis was observed in 9 (8.1%) patients and grade 4 in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was reported in 13 (11.7%) patients, while grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%). Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in one patient and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in two. CONCLUSIONS: Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU at 2 g/m2 is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositis as the main limiting toxic effects. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.

The Spanish experience with high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer. The Spanish Cooperative Group For Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy (TTD).

Background In a previous phase I to II trial, we have shown that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) weekly was 3.5 gr/m2. In a subsequent confirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5% response rate was obtained and the median survival reached was 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with Leucovorin. On this basis we tried to modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 gr/m2) with oral leucovorin (LV) but the regimen was too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. A new phase II trial with 2 g/m2/week plus oral leucovorin was planned. Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m2/week (range 0.9-2). Three complete responses and 36 partial responses were observed. Overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 28% to 46.8%). Median time to progression has been 7.4 months, and median survival 14.4 months. WHO grade 3 diarrhea was seen in 27 patients (24.5%). Grade 3 mucositis was also seen in 9 (8.1%) patients, and grade 4 was observed in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was reported in 13 (11.7%) patients. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%) patients. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 1 case and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in two cases, respectively. Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU at 2 g/m2 is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositis as main limiting toxicities. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48 hour continuous infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.