ABSTRACT
Background: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) impose a burden on patients with advanced cancer near the end of their lives. However, only a few studies have addressed factors associated with PIMs in such patients. Objective: To examine polypharmacy and factors associated with PIMs in end-of-life patients with advanced cancer. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting/Subjects: We analyzed 265 patients with advanced cancer who died in a palliative care unit (PCU) or at home in a home medical care (HMC) from April 2018 to December 2022 in Japan. Measurements: Sociodemographic, clinical, and prescription data at the time of PCU admission or HMC initiation were collected from electronic medical records. PIMs were assessed using OncPal Deprescribing Guidelines. Results: Patients with advanced cancer with an average age of 76.3 years and median survival days of 20 were included in the analyses. The average number of medications was 6.4 (standard deviation = 3.4), and PIMs were prescribed to 50.2%. Frequent PIMs included antihypertensive medications, peptic ulcer prophylaxis, and dyslipidemia medications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥75 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-4.05), referral from an outpatient setting compared with inpatient setting (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.12-3.80), more than two comorbidities (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.08-3.29), and more than five medications (aOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.03-3.28) were associated with PIMs. Conclusions: Medication reconciliation is recommended at the time of transition to a PCU or HMC, especially for older patients with advanced cancer who were referred from an outpatient setting and present more comorbidities and prescriptions.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Polypharmacy , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Terminal Care , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Japan , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Palliative CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: There is growing consensus on the benefits of initiating palliative care early in the disease trajectory; however, palliative care needs for non-cancer patients remain to be elucidated. We investigated the trajectory of unresolved palliative care needs of non-cancer patients at home and explored associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of elderly non-cancer patients at home in Japan between Jan 2020 and Dec 2020. Physicians assessed their palliative care needs using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS). Unresolved palliative care needs were defined as IPOS symptoms above 2 (moderate). RESULTS: In total, 785 patients were enrolled. The most frequent unresolved palliative care needs at enrollment were poor mobility (n = 438, 55.8%), followed by weakness/lack of energy (n = 181, 23.1%) and poor appetite (n = 160, 20.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female and musculoskeletal disease were significantly positively associated with pain at starting home visits (OR = 1.89, P = .015; OR = 2.69, P = .005). In addition, neurological diseases were significantly positively associated with constipation and poor mobility 3 months after starting home visits (OR = 3.75, P = .047; OR = 3.04, P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The order of the prevalence of unresolved palliative care needs may remain relatively stable over time, even for those receiving home-based palliative care services. We identified several specific diseases and conditions that were significantly associated with unresolved palliative care needs.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Physicians , Humans , Female , Aged , Palliative Care , Prospective Studies , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/diagnosis , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Self-medication using over-the-counter (OTC) medicines is one of the effective self-care measures in dealing with daily health problems. Health literacy (HL) is critical to ensuring the appropriate use of OTC medicines. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between HL and comprehension of medication package inserts among adults who use OTC medicines. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire and interviews at 14 drugstores in the Kanto region in Japan from January to February 2020. The study participants were adults aged 20 years or older who purchased OTC medicines. HL was measured using the 14-item HL scale for Japanese adults (Japanese version of HLS-14), and comprehension of medication package inserts was evaluated using an interview survey (label comprehension study [LCS] form). The association between HL and LCS correct response rate and that between HL and attitude toward reporting adverse drug events (ADEs) were assessed using multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The analysis included the data of 140 adults, 50 men (35.7%) and 90 women (64.3%), with an average age of 55.2 years. The average HLS-14 score was 51.6, and the overall correct answer rate for reading comprehension was 57.5%. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a higher HLS-14 score was associated a higher LCS correct response rate (ß = 1.01, p = 0.001). In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed that higher HL was associated with positive attitude towards reporting ADEs to health professionals (adjusted odds ratio = 1.06, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with higher HL had higher comprehension of OTC package inserts, and higher HL was associated with positive attitude toward reporting ADEs to healthcare professionals. These results indicate that optimal self-medication with OTC medicines requires improving HL among the general public through health education and effective health information provision from pharmacists and registered sales clerks at drug stores.
ABSTRACT
Background: Few studies have examined whether family caregivers' own primary care providers can affect caregiving-specific well-being, such as caregiver stress. In this pilot study, we explored whether primary care experiences when family caregivers report as patients were associated with the stress of caregiving. Methods: We used cross-sectional data from a survey conducted in Japan between November and December 2020. We recruited family caregivers aged 40-74 years who were caring for community-dwelling adults with chronic conditions. We assessed primary care experience using the Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form (JPCAT-SF) and caregiver stress using the Japanese short version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview. Results: In total, 406 family caregivers were included in the analysis. The mean JPCAT-SF total score was 42.1 out of 100 points. The proportion of caregivers who had higher caregiver stress was 48.8%. After adjusting for possible confounders, the JPCAT-SF score was found to be significantly associated with caregiver stress (lower stress = 0 vs. higher stress = 1; adjusted prevalence ratio per 1 SD increase in JPCAT-SF score = 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98). Among the subscales of the JPCAT-SF, longitudinality, and comprehensiveness (services available) were associated with caregiver stress. Conclusions: Better primary care experiences when family caregivers reported as patients were associated with lower caregiver stress. Longitudinality, which includes focusing attention on the individual as a whole person, and comprehensiveness in the context of building provider-patient relationships that make consultation easier when needed, were associated with lower stress.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the usefulness of assertiveness by healthcare professionals in improving patient safety, few studies have evaluated the assertiveness of community pharmacists. Community pharmacists' assertiveness might be associated with pharmacist-initiated prescribing changes to improve medication safety. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to examine which types of assertiveness-related self-expression are associated with community pharmacist-initiated prescribing changes while adjusting for possible confounding factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Japan between May and October 2022 in 10 prefectures. Community pharmacists belonging to a large pharmacy chain were recruited. The outcome variable was the frequency of community pharmacist-initiated prescription changes over 1 month. Community pharmacists' assertiveness was assessed using the Interprofessional Assertiveness Scale (IAS) and 3 sub-domains (nonassertive, assertive, and aggressive self-expression). Participants were classified into 1 of 2 categories based on medians. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared by group with univariate analysis. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to investigate the association between pharmacist-initiated prescription changes as an ordinal variable and pharmacists' assertiveness. RESULTS: Of 3346 community pharmacists invited, 963 were included in the analysis. Participants with high assertive self-expression scores had a significantly higher frequency of pharmacist-initiated prescription changes. There was no association between nonassertive or aggressive self-expression and pharmacist-initiated prescription changes. After adjustments, high assertive self-expression remained associated with a high frequency of community pharmacist-initiated prescription changes (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.74; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Higher assertive self-expression among community pharmacists is associated with higher frequency of pharmacist-initiated prescription changes.
Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacists , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Assertiveness , Prescriptions , JapanABSTRACT
Background: For family caregivers, who are generally regarded as a vulnerable population, having regular checkups is a desirable health behavior. This study examined family caregivers' habit of having regular checkups prior to becoming involved with professionals who care for patients, and whether they had had recent checkups. We then examined the association between family caregivers' experience with professionals and their participation in checkups after adjusting for the past habit. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional survey in Japan between November and December 2020. We recruited family caregivers who were aged 40-74 years and caring for community-dwelling adult patients. The outcome variable was whether family caregivers had undergone any health checkups since April 2019. We assessed family caregivers' experience using the Japanese version of the Caregivers' Experience Instrument (J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS). Results: Of the 1091 recruited family caregivers, 629 were included in the analysis. Of these, 358 had previously undergone regular checkups, and 158 had no checkups or selected the option "unknown." Outcome rates in each group were 74.6% and 43.0%, respectively, and 62.0% for all 629 caregivers. Multivariate modified Poisson regression analysis revealed that among the J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS scores, only the domain score for attention for the caregiver was significantly associated with family caregivers' participation in checkups (adjusted prevalence ratio per 1 SD increase = 1.07; 95% CI 1.01-1.14). Conclusions: Among family caregivers' experience with professionals, the factor that focused on caregivers themselves was significantly associated with their participation in checkups. This finding underscores the significance of caregiver-focused care.
ABSTRACT
The development of allergic diseases is common in the young but rare in the elderly. We encountered an elderly patient with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA). An 82-year-old man was rushed to the hospital for symptoms of anaphylaxis. Because the symptoms occurred after ingestion of wheat products and exercise, we made a diagnosis of FDEIA based on a high ω5-gliadin IgE level and a positive exercise test. Based on our review of the existing literature, this was the oldest patient to ever be diagnosed with FDEIA in Japan. This case suggests that physicians should keep in mind that older adults can develop FDEIA.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Exercise-Induced Allergies , Food Hypersensitivity , Male , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Allergens , Exercise , GliadinABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although healthcare professionals pay attention to the drugs prescribed by physicians, few studies have assessed self-medication by family caregivers. Family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care in the care of patients can influence caregivers' health behaviors. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe self-medication among family caregivers of community-dwelling adult patients, and to assess association between family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care and their self-medication, adjusting for possible confounding factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from November to December 2020 in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Family caregivers between 40 and 74 years old and caring for community-dwelling adult patients with chronic conditions were recruited. The use of any self-medication in the last 2 weeks by family caregivers was the outcome variable. The explanatory variable was family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care in the care of patients, using the Japanese version of the Caregivers' Experience Instrument (J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS). Adjusted covariates were age, gender, educational attainment, annual household income, self-rated health, and caregiving time of family caregivers. RESULTS: Of 1091 recruited family caregivers, 750 were included in the analysis. A total of 258 (34.4%) family caregivers reported having used self-medication in the past 2 weeks. Logistic regression analysis showed that having a higher score on the J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS (odds ratio 0.80 per 1 standard deviation increase) was associated with less use of self-medication by caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that about one-third of family caregivers self-medicate, and this practice is associated with a less positive experience of interprofessional care. These results suggest that it is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the health condition of family caregivers and to provide appropriate advice regarding self-medication.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Self Medication , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Chronic Disease , JapanABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Home care is one of the essential community health care services; thus, identifying changes of home care utilization before and during the COVID-19 pandemic would be useful for researchers and policymaker to reconsider the home care system, the support needed for home care staff, and the collaborative system with hospitals in the COVID-19 era. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional web-based anonymous survey of the directors of home visit facilities in Japan in August 2021. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants from 37 facilities responded to the survey. The number of patients dying at home and newly requested home visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (74.2%, 71.0%). One possible reason was the restricted visitation of inpatient facilities (93.5%). The underlying disease that the largest number of participants perceived as having increased compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic was cancer (51.6%). There were no significant differences in being in a rural area or the number of doctors in perceived changes in home visit utilization. Our study indicated that the director of home visit facilities thought the number of patients dying at home and newly requested home visits had increased compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , House Calls , Humans , Internet , PandemicsABSTRACT
AIM: To examine the relationship between the use of home-visit nursing services (VNS) for patients and their family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care, which is an indicator of the care process. METHODS: We used data from a cross-sectional survey in Japan, 2020. Family caregivers 40-74 years old and caring for community-dwelling patients with chronic conditions were recruited. The outcome variable was family caregivers' experience, reflecting the quality of interprofessional care for patients and their caregivers. We used the Japanese version of the Caregivers' Experience Instrument (J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS), which includes two domains: attention for the patient and attention for the caregiver. The main factor was the use of VNS, and covariates were socioeconomic factors of the caregivers and the use of other health and social care services. J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS scores were divided into two groups by median values and analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 566 caregivers were included in the analysis. The median age was 62 years old. VNS was used in 86 cases (15.2%). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the use of VNS was significantly associated with a higher total score group for J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS (odds ratio = 3.02; 95% confidence interval 1.54-5.91). Of the J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS domains, attention for the patient was significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the use of VNS was likely to provide a better experience among family caregivers. Our findings suggest that visiting nurses fulfill their expected role as core members of a multidisciplinary team.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Nursing Services , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Japan , Social SupportABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused home health care workers (home-HCWs) to experience anxiety. The mental health of home-HCWs and related factors during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been clarified; therefore, we aimed to investigate the status and associated factors of fear of COVID-19 infection, anxiety, and depression among home-HCWs in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional web-based anonymous survey of home-HCWs in August 2021, during the fifth wave of the pandemic in Japan. We surveyed members of facilities that provided home visit services during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured the Japanese version of the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S-J) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) as objective variables, and the Japanese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II (J-AITCS-II) as an explanatory variable. RESULTS: A total of 328 members of 37 facilities responded to the survey, and we ultimately analyzed 311 participants. The most frequent occupation was nurse (32.8%), followed by doctor (24.8%) and medical office staff (18.0%). The mean score of the FCV-19S-J was 16.5 ± 5.0 (7.0 - 31.0), and the prevalences of definitive anxiety and depression were 7.4% and 15.7%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the J-AITCS-II teamwork subscale was significantly negatively associated with FCV-19S-J, HADS-anxiety, and HADS-depression (ß = -0.171, p = 0.004; ß = -0.151, p = 0.012; ß = -0.225, p < 0.001, respectively). Medical office staff showed significant positive associations with FCV-19S-J and HADS-depression (ß = 0.219, p = 0.005; ß = 0.201, p = 0.009, respectively), and medical social workers with HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression (ß = -0.166, p = 0.011; ß = -0.214, p < 0.001, respectively) compared with doctors. The unmet support need for expert lectures on COVID-19 was significantly positively associated with FCV-19S-J (ß = 0.131, p = 0.048), and the unmet support need for support systems for psychological stress and emotional exhaustion was significantly positively associated with HADS-anxiety (ß = 0.141, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Fear of COVID-19 infection and depression of nurses, medical office staff, and other occupations was significantly higher than those of doctors. These findings suggest that non-physicians were more likely to be fearful and depressed during the COVID-19 pandemic; thus, it is necessary to tailor mental health support based on occupation in the home care setting.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Health Aides , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Internet , Japan/epidemiology , Mental Health , PandemicsABSTRACT
Background: Most patients receiving home care have multimorbidity and tend to be prescribed multiple drugs with the complicated regimen. Family physicians (FPs) are responsible for patients' prescriptions after transition to home care. This study aimed to assess changes in medication regimen complexity and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) made by FPs before and after transition to home care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in six home care clinics in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from patients aged 65 years and older taking any medication who initiated home care between April 2018 and March 2019 were collected using medical records. The medication regimen complexity index-Japanese version (MRCI-J) score and the presence of PIMs were assessed before and 3 months after transition to home care. Results: The mean age of 169 patients was 84.0 years. MRCI-J score and percentage of PIMs remained unchanged between before and 3 months after home care initiation. However, MRCI-J score significantly decreased among patients with polypharmacy, but significantly increased among patients with nonpolypharmacy. In multiple regression analysis, a greater number of medications before home care initiation was associated with a decreasing MRCI-J score, but pharmacist home visit services were not associated with changes in MRCI-J score. Conclusions: Our results suggest that FPs involved in home care are trying to adjust prescriptions by simplifying the medication regimen of patients with polypharmacy, and adding symptomatic drugs to those with nonpolypharmacy.
ABSTRACT
Background Medication regimen complexity includes various aspects of a regimen, including the dosage form, number of medications and need for additional information for use. Complicated medication regimens cause non-adherence to prescribed medications, making it essential to evaluate medication regimen complexity in older adults to improve adherence to prescribed medications and clinical outcomes. The medication regimen complexity index is currently the most widely used scale for quantifying regimen complexity; however, it has yet to be adopted in Japan. Objective This study aimed to translate the medication regimen complexity index to Japanese and assess its reliability and validity for application in elderly patients in Japan. Setting This study was conducted in a clinic that provides home medical care to patients in the southern part of Ibaraki prefecture, Japan. Method The validation process consisted of translation of the original English version of the medication regimen complexity index to Japanese followed by back-translation to English, comparison of the back-translated and original versions, pilot testing, and assessment of the Japanese version by two raters using the medication regimens of 72 patients with chronic diseases. Main outcome measure The psychometric properties of the index were evaluated according to inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. Results The mean age of the 72 patients was 84.3 years. The scale showed high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.946) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.991) for total scores. The number of medications was positively correlated with total medication regimen complexity index score (rs = 0.930, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index and medication regimen complexity index score (P > 0.05). Conclusions The Japanese version of the medication regimen complexity index is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the complexity of medication regimen in Japanese elderly patients.
Subject(s)
Translations , Aged , Chronic Disease , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Japan , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Improving individuals' experience of care is now a critical goal of health care systems. Although a number of instruments have been developed to measure experience of care, few instruments measure family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care for patients and families. OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the Caregivers' Experience Instrument (J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS) and to investigate its validity in assessing quality of integrated care for both patients with chronic conditions and their family caregivers, from the caregivers' perspective, in Japan. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to test the validity and internal consistency of J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS. Four hundred family caregivers were recruited in three municipalities. We evaluated the feasibility, structural validity, internal consistency and hypothesis testing for construct validity of the scale. RESULTS: A total of 274 (68.5%) questionnaires were analysed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit for the hypothesized two-factor model according to fit indices, as identified for the original version: attention for the patient and attention for the caregiver. Cronbach's alpha for score in J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS with 12 items was high (0.92). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between overall caregiver satisfaction and J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS score was 0.71. Family caregivers who experienced home-visit services had significantly (P = 0.001) higher total scores than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that the J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS is valid and reliable. This scale can be useful for evaluating quality of integrated care, with focus on family caregivers and patients with chronic conditions in Japan.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Japan , Pilot Projects , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of family caregivers has been vital, especially in superaging societies like Japan's. The caregivers' experience of interprofessional care is a key aspect in their evaluation of the quality of integrated care. We sought to explore whether family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care is associated with their own participation in health checkups as preventive health behaviors. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data obtained during the development of the Japanese version of the Caregivers' Experience Instrument (J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS). Participants who had provided care for at least one year were surveyed (n = 251). We assessed family caregivers' experience of interprofessional care using J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS and their participation in health checkups. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS total score was significantly associated with the caregivers' participation in health checkups [odds ratio per 1-point increase = 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.09]. Two domain scores (attention for the patient and attention for the caregiver) of J-IEXPAC CAREGIVERS were significantly associated with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers with more positive experiences of interprofessional care were more likely to participate in health checkups. These results support the significance of family caregivers' experience of care, which may promote preventive health behaviors.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Health Behavior , Preventive Health Services , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIM: To assess factors associated with home deaths in non-cancer elderly patients receiving home medical care by general practitioners. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out in a primary care clinic in Tokyo. Patients who received home medical care and died between January 2010 and September 2017 were included in the analysis. Data from 119 non-cancer patients aged ≥65 years were collected between September and December 2017 using medical records. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, cognitive impairment, duration of home medical care, number of household members, patient's relationship with their primary caregiver, use of home care nursing services, and patient and family preference on place of death were obtained as independent variables. The main outcome was the place of death. RESULTS: Among the analyzed patients, 59.7% had impaired cognition and 47.1% expressed a preference for place of death. Patient-family congruence on the preferred place of death was 57.1% (kappa coefficient 0.39). Multivariate analysis showed that family preference for home death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 137.0, 95% CI 13.0-1443.8), cognitive impairment (aOR 4.26, 95% CI 1.12-16.2), death by non-infectious diseases (aOR 13.7, 95% CI 2.50-74.7) and living with more than two family members (aOR 4.79, 95%CI 1.38-16.7) were significantly associated with home deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Family preference, rather than patient preference, was a facilitating factor for home death among non-cancer older patients receiving home medical care. As many patients receiving home medical care have impaired cognition, early end-of-life discussions with patients and decision-making support for caregivers should be promoted to realize their preferences on place of death. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1231-1235.
Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Death , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Death , Cohort Studies , Dementia/epidemiology , Family Relations/psychology , Female , General Practitioners , Humans , Male , Patient Preference , Retrospective Studies , TokyoABSTRACT
AIM: We aimed to evaluate whether potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) increase the risk for adverse clinical outcomes including falls, emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospitalizations in older Japanese patients with chronic diseases, comparing the difference between patients with and without polypharmacy. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in a Japanese outpatient primary care clinic. Baseline data was collected from January to March 2016. A total of 740 patients aged ≥65 years with chronic diseases were enrolled and were followed up at 1 year; falls, ED visits and unplanned hospitalizations were recorded. A questionnaire and review of the patients' medical records were used to collect information regarding sociodemographic status, comorbidities and medication prescriptions. PIMs were defined using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria version 2. Using logistic regression analysis, the incidence of falls, and ED visits and hospitalizations were compared between patients with and without PIMs, stratifying by number of prescriptions: those with five or more prescriptions and those with fewer than five prescriptions. RESULTS: PIMs were identified in 32.3% of enrolled patients. After stratification by number of prescriptions, PIMs were significantly associated with falls in the group with polypharmacy (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.11-3.69). This association was not seen in the group without polypharmacy. PIMs were not associated with ED visits or hospitalizations at the 1-year follow up upon multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PIMs and polypharmacy might increase the risk of falls, therefore clinicians need to pay attention to both PIMs and polypharmacy. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1064-1070.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Inappropriate Prescribing/adverse effects , Patient Safety , Polypharmacy , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Japan , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of dietary supplements and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs is increasing, and there is adequate concern about potential harmful effects. However, there are limited reports on the concurrent use of nonprescription medications with prescription medications in elderly patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to describe the use of dietary supplements and OTC drugs, and to identify predictors for their use in elderly patients using medications prescribed for chronic diseases. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 729 patients aged ≥65 years with chronic diseases, between January and March 2016. Data regarding socio-demographic status, medical condition, number of prescriptions, use of nonprescription medications, and psychological status were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and by review of medical records. Data regarding use of dietary supplements and OTC drugs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors associated with the use of dietary supplements and OTC drugs. RESULTS: The regular use of nonprescription drugs was reported by 32.5% of patients. Vitamins were the most commonly used dietary supplements in elderly patients. Female sex, higher educational qualifications, and good economic status were identified as predictors for the use of nonprescription medications. Concurrent use of nonprescription medications with more than 5 prescription medications was detected in 12.2% of participants. The disclosure rate of the use of nonprescription medications by patients to the physician was 30.3%. CONCLUSION: The use of dietary supplements and OTC drugs was common in elderly patients with chronic diseases, and its use is associated with sex, education, and economic status. General practitioners (GPs) need to recognize the potential use of nonprescription medications, considering that polypharmacy was common and disclosure rate was low in this study.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Polypharmacy , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIM: The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older patients is a major public health problem. However, there is little information regarding PIMs in Japanese primary care settings, and the association between psychological problems and PIMs is unknown. The present study was carried out to explore the prevalence of PIMs among older patients in a primary care setting in Tokyo, and to assess the association between PIMs and depression and anxiety. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in a Japanese outpatient clinic providing primary care was carried out. Data were collected from January 2016 to March 2016. A total of 740 patients aged ≥65 years with chronic diseases were enrolled. Information regarding sociodemographic status, comorbidities, and prescription and psychological status was collected using a questionnaire that patients were required to complete, and by reviewing the patients' medical records. RESULTS: The Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria version 2 revealed PIM prescription for 32.3% of patients. Benzodiazepines, hypnotic Z-drugs and proton pump inhibitors accounted for a majority of PIMs. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, estimated glomerular filtration rate and the number of medications, anxiety was identified as a predictor for PIMs. CONCLUSIONS: PIMs among older patients are common in Japanese primary care settings, and prescription of benzodiazepines or hypnotic Z-drugs and proton pump inhibitors was frequent as PIMs. PIMs might be associated with anxiety; therefore, their association should be focused on and addressed to reduce PIMs. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2520-2526.