The OMERACT whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (WIPE) in spondyloarthritis - reference image atlas for the knee region.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reference image atlas for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (OMERACT MRI-WIPE) of the knee region. METHODS: Image examples of each pathology, location and grade, were collected and discussed at web-based, interactive meetings within the OMERACT MRI in Arthritis Working Group. Subsequently, reference images were selected by consensus. RESULTS: Reference images for each grade, pathology and location are depicted, along with definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences. CONCLUSION: The atlas guides scoring whole-body MRIs for inflammation in joints and entheses of the knee region according to MRI-WIPE methodology in clinical trials and cohorts.

Hip and pelvis region MRI reference image atlas for scoring inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses according to the OMERACT-MRI WIPE scoring system in patients with spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reference image atlas for scoring the hip/pelvis region according to the OMERACT whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (MRI-WIPE). METHODS: We collected image examples of each pathology, location and grade, discussed them at web-based, interactive meetings and, finally, selected reference images by consensus. RESULTS: Reference images for each grade and location of osteitis, synovitis and soft tissue inflammation are provided, as are definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences. CONCLUSION: A reference image atlas was created to guide scoring whole-body MRIs for arthritis and enthesitis in the hip/pelvis region in spondyloarthritis/psoriatic arthritis clinical trials and cohorts.

Validation of SPARCC MRI-RETIC e-tools for increasing scoring proficiency of MRI sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) developers have created web-based calibration modules for the SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint (SIJ) scoring methods. We aimed to test the impact of applying these e-modules on the feasibility and reliability of these methods. METHODS: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules contain cases with baseline and follow-up scans and an online scoring interface. Visual real-time feedback regarding concordance/discordance of scoring with expert readers is provided by a colour-coding scheme. Reliability is assessed in real time by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), cases being scored until ICC targets are attained. Participating readers (n=17) from the EuroSpA Imaging project were randomised to one of two reader calibration strategies that each comprised three stages. Baseline and follow-up scans from 25 cases were scored after each stage was completed. Reliability was compared with a SPARCC developer, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) assessed feasibility. RESULTS: The reliability of readers for scoring bone marrow oedema was high after the first stage of calibration, and only minor improvement was noted following the use of the inflammation module. Greater enhancement of reader reliability was evident after the use of the structural module and was most consistently evident for the scoring of erosion (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.42/0.20) to stage 3 (0.50/0.38)) and backfill (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.51/0.19) to stage 3 (0.69/0.41)). The feasibility of both e-modules was evident by high SUS scores. CONCLUSION: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules are feasible, effective knowledge transfer tools, and their use is recommended before using the SPARCC methods for clinical research and tria.

Pattern of disease expression in SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: data from Indian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Inception cohort (INSPIRE).

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are present in one-third of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and they are associated with both criteria and non-criteria manifestations. We studied the prevalence, clinical associations, and impact on mortality of APLA in SLE patients from India. Among the Indian SLE inception cohort (INSPIRE), patients who had data on all five routinely performed APLAs [lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I(ß2GPI)] at enrolment were selected. Patients were divided into four categories based on the presence/absence of APLA associated manifestations and presence/absence of the APLA viz SLE-APS, SLE-APLA, SLE: events but no APLA, and SLE: no events, no APLA (reference group). 1035 SLE patients at least 1 APLA antibody was detected in 372 (35.9%). LA was present in 206 (19.9%), aCL in 126 (12.2%) and ß2-GPI in 178 (17.2%). There were 88 thrombotic events in 83 patients (8.0%); 73 (82.9%) being arterial; APLA positivity was present in 37 (44.6%) [AOR 1.70 (1.054, 2.76)]. SLE-APS patients were younger and had higher mortality [AOR 4.11 (1.51, 11.3)], neuropsychiatric and hematologic disease. SLE-APLA also had a higher mortality rate [AOR 2.94 (1.06, 8.22)] than the reference group. The mortality was highest in the subset of patients with thrombotic events in the presence of APLA [AOR 7.67 (1.25, 46.9)]. The mere presence of APLA also conferred higher mortality even in the absence of thrombotic events [AOR 3.51 (1.43, 8.63)]. Hematologic manifestations (36.1%) were the most common non-criteria-manifestation. One-third of SLE patients have APLA and its presence is associated with non-criteria hematologic manifestations, arterial thrombosis and higher mortality rate.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from an Indian Multi-institutional Inception (INSPIRE) Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence, correlates, and outcomes of GI manifestations in a prospectively enrolled nationwide cohort of SLE in India (INSPIRE). METHODS: It is an observational cohort study with analysis of the baseline database of the INSPIRE cohort with early outcomes assessed till April 10, 2023. Cases with GI manifestations as per the BILAG index were selected, pertinent clinical and laboratory data were retrieved for analysis. Patients with GI manifestations were compared with the rest of the cohort and factors associated with death were determined. RESULTS: Of the 2503 patients with SLE enrolled in the INSPIRE cohort, 243(9.7%) had GI manifestations observed early in the disease course(1,0-3 months). Ascites(162,6.5%), followed by enteritis(41,1.6%), pancreatitis(35,1.4%) and hepatitis(24,0.9%) were the most prevalent manifestations.All patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and four patients required surgery. Twenty-nine patients died(11.9%), with uncontrolled disease activity(17,58.6%) and infection(6,20.7%) accounting for the majority of deaths. Low socioeconomic class[lower(Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence intervals- CI) 2.8(1.1-7.9); upper lower 7.5(2-27.7); reference as upper class] and SLEDAI 2K[1.06(1.02-1.11)] were associated with death in the GI group.GI manifestations were significantly associated with age[Odds Ratio & 95% CI 0.97(0.96-0.99)], pleural effusion[4.9(3.6-6.7)], thrombocytopenia[1.7(1.2-2.4)], myositis[1.7(1.1-2.7)], albumin[0.7(0.5-0.8)], alkaline phosphatase(ALP)[1.01(1.0-1.002)], low C3[1.9(1.3-2.5)], total bilirubin[1.2(1.03-1.3)], alopecia[0.62(0.5-0.96], elevated anti-dsDNA[0.5(0.4-0.8)], and anti-U1RNP antibody[0.8(0.5-0.7)] in model one; and age[0.97(0.96-0.99)], creatinine[1.2(1.03-1.4)], total bilirubin[1.2(1.03-1.3)], ALP[1.01(1.0-1.002)], albumin[0.6(0.5-0.7)], andanti-U1RNP antibody[0.6(0.5-0.8)] in model two in multivariate analysis compared with patients without GI features. The mortality was higher in the GI group(11.9% and 6.6%, p= 0.01) as compared with controls. CONCLUSION: GI manifestations were observed in 9.7% of the cohort and were always associated with systemic disease activity and had higher mortality.

Psoriatic Arthritis and COVID-19: Patient Perspectives in a Large Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), understand patients' perspectives regarding their risk of COVID-19 infection, and evaluate the standard of virtual care offered during the early phases of the pandemic. METHODS: An online survey was conducted between June 2021 and September 2021 in patients with PsA who had consented to email contact. The survey was completed by 152/193 (79%) patients who had consented to the study. RESULTS: There were 86 (56.6%) men and 66 (43.4%) women with a mean age of 58 years and mean disease duration of 19 years. During the pandemic, the mean patient-reported symptom severity was 4.10, 3.24, and 3.72 for joint, skin, and overall symptom severity, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents would accept the effect of their PsA over the past month for the next few months. Of 79 patients who were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, 4 tested positive. All 4 were admitted to hospital; 2 required oxygen. One hundred fifty-one patients (99%) had received at least 1 vaccine dose. Fifty-nine (38.8%) participants believed their PsA medications increased their COVID-19 infection risk. Of the 130 patients who had a telemedicine assessment, 83.1% were happy with their virtual consultations. Most were happy to continue with virtual consultations until the pandemic resolved. The average satisfaction level regarding pandemic care was 7.87 on a sliding 10-point scale. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 prevalence was low among our patients. Patients were satisfied with their care during the pandemic. Most patients would happily continue with virtual care for the duration of the pandemic.

Severe thrombocytopenia is associated with high mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus-analysis from Indian SLE Inception cohort for Research (INSPIRE).

Thrombocytopenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. We report frequency, associations and short-term outcome of moderate-severe thrombocytopenia in a prospective inception cohort from India (INSPIRE). We evaluated consecutive SLE patients classified per SLICC2012 for the occurrence of thrombocytopenia and its associations. The outcomes assessed included bleeding manifestations, kinetics of thrombocytopenia recovery, mortality and recurrence of thrombocytopenia. Among a total of 2210 patients in the cohort, 230 (10.4%) had incident thrombocytopenia, of whom moderate (platelet count [PC] 20-50 × 109/L) and severe thrombocytopenia (PC < 20 × 109/L) were noted in 61 (26.5%) and 22 (9.5%), respectively. Bleeding manifestations were generally limited to the skin. Compared to controls, cases had a higher proportion of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (p < 0.001), leukopenia (p < 0.001), lymphopenia (p < 0.001), low complement (p < 0.05), lupus anticoagulant (p < 0.001), higher median SLEDAI 2 K (p < 0.001) and lower proportion of anti-RNP antibody (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in these variables between moderate and severe thrombocytopenia. There was a sharp rise in PC by 1 week that was sustained in the majority through the period of observation. There was three times higher mortality in the severe thrombocytopenia group as compared to moderate thrombocytopenia and controls. The thrombocytopenia relapse and lupus flare rates were similar across categories. We report a low occurrence of major bleeds and higher mortality in those with severe thrombocytopenia as compared to moderate thrombocytopenia and controls. Key Points • Severe thrombocytopenia occurs in 1% of patients with SLE; however, major bleeds are uncommon. • Thrombocytopenia has a strong association with other lineage cytopenias and lupus anticoagulants. • Response to initial glucocorticoids therapy is quick and is well sustained with additional immunosuppressants. • Severe thrombocytopenia increases mortality threefold in SLE.

Clusters based on demography, disease phenotype, and autoantibody status predicts mortality in lupus: data from Indian lupus cohort (INSPIRE).

OBJECTIVES: SLE is associated with significant mortality, and data from South Asia is limited. Thus, we analysed the causes and predictors of mortality and hierarchical cluster-based survival in the Indian SLE Inception cohort for Research (INSPIRE). METHODS: Data for patients with SLE was extracted from the INSPIRE database. Univariate analyses of associations between mortality and a number of disease variables were conducted. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was undertaken using 25 variables defining the SLE phenotype. Survival rates across clusters were assessed using non-adjusted and adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Among 2072 patients (with a median follow-up of 18 months), there were 170 deaths (49.2 deaths per 1000 patient-years) of which cause could be determined in 155 patients. 47.1% occurred in the first 6 months. Most of the mortality (n = 87) were due to SLE disease activity followed by coexisting disease activity and infection (n = 24), infections (n = 23), and 21 to other causes. Among the deaths in which infection played a role, 24 had pneumonia. Clustering identified four clusters, and the mean survival estimates were 39.26, 39.78, 37.69 and 35.86 months in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CI) were significant for cluster 4 [2.19 (1.44, 3.31)], low socio-economic-status [1.69 (1.22, 2.35)], number of BILAG-A [1.5 (1.29, 1.73)] and BILAG-B [1.15 (1.01, 1.3)], and need for haemodialysis [4.63 (1.87,11.48)]. CONCLUSION: SLE in India has high early mortality, and the majority of deaths occur outside the health-care setting. Clustering using the clinically relevant variables at baseline may help identify individuals at high risk of mortality in SLE, even after adjusting for high disease activity.

Management of Enthesitis in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Literature Review Informing the 2021 GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: Enthesitis is a key pathological and clinical feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in children and adults. Enthesitis is typically assessed clinically using several validated enthesitis scoring systems that have been used in clinical trials. Enthesitis treatment response has been reported as change in the total enthesitis score or the proportion of patients who achieved complete resolution. The majority of trials in PsA did not require patients to have enthesitis at study entry since enthesitis was evaluated only as a secondary outcome. Despite the inherent limitations of the clinical assessment of enthesitis, imaging of the entheses using ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging has rarely been used in clinical trials to assess response to treatment of enthesitis. This systematic review summarizes existing evidence regarding pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical interventions for enthesitis in patients with PsA to facilitate an evidence-based update of the Group for Research and Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for PsA. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review to identify 41 randomized clinical trials that reported enthesitis treatment response in patients with PsA. For each intervention, the response effect size was summarized and the quality of evidence was graded. Recommendations were then formulated for the various pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. RESULTS: We included 41 randomized clinical trials in our review and graded each intervention. CONCLUSION: Several classes of systemic conventional and advanced therapies and local measures were recommended for active enthesitis in patients with PsA.

Effectiveness of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Enthesitis in a Prospective Longitudinal Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of conventional and targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs and tDMARDs, respectively) in treating enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with active enthesitis, defined as ≥ 1 tender entheses (of the 29 enthesis sites included in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, the Leeds Enthesitis Index, and the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score), who were enrolled in a large PsA cohort were included. Medications at baseline were classified into 3 mutually exclusive categories: (1) no treatment or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only; (2) cDMARDs ± NSAIDs; and (3) tDMARDs ± cDMARDs/NSAIDs. Complete resolution of enthesitis (no tender enthesis) at 12 months was the primary outcome. Logistic regression models were developed to determine the association between medication category and enthesitis resolution. RESULTS: Of the 1270 patients studied, 628 (49.44%) had enthesitis. Of these, 526 patients (51.71% males; mean [SD] age 49.02 [13.12] years; mean enthesitis score 2.13 [2.16]; median enthesitis score 2 [IQR 1-2]), with adequate follow-up were analyzed. Complete resolution of enthesitis was noted in 453 (86.12%) patients, within a mean period of 8.73 (3.48) months from baseline. In the regression analysis, though not significant, DMARDs (categories II and III) had higher odds ratios (ORs) compared to category 1 for resolution of enthesitis. Enthesitis resolution was associated with lower joint activity (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99; P = 0.01) and male sex (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.97-2.84; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Resolution of enthesitis was observed in 86% of patients in an observational setting regardless of the medication used. Future effectiveness studies may warrant evaluation of enthesitis using advanced imaging.

Plain Radiographic Instruments for Structural Damage in Peripheral Joints in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Report From the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Set working group is focused on the development of a core set of instruments used to assess the domains described in the 2016 PsA Core Domain Set. At the 2021 annual meeting, the group presented an update on the domain of structural damage. In this report, we discuss the steps taken to assess the domain match and feasibility of plain radiographic instruments in the assessment of structural damage in PsA.

Enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis - data from the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the registration, pattern and burden of clinical enthesitis among routine-care patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. METHODS: In patients with PsA and axSpA in DANBIO, prospectively registered data from 2010 to 2020 on clinical entheseal assessment using SPARCC score were compared with demographic, clinical and patient-reported-outcome (PRO) data. RESULTS: 6582 PsA and 5547 axSpA patients had their first registration in DANBIO in 2010 or later ("incident cohort"). At these registrations, 1037 (16%) PsA and 1188 (21%) axSpA patients had entheseal assessments, with ≥1 enthesitis being found in 66% and 39%, respectively. Mean enthesitis scores were 2.5 (PsA) and 1.3 (axSpA). Most common sites were: Achilles tendon (right/left/symmetrical: PsA:24.4%/23.3%/17.1%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), lateral epicondyle (PsA:22.2%/20.1%/16.2%; axSpA:.4%/9.7%/7.6%), plantar fascia (PsA:17.1%/17.0%/12.6%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), greater trochanter (PsA:14.2%/15.4%/11.7%; axSpA:9.9%/11.2%/8.2%). Enthesitis was more frequent in women (PsA/axSpA 61%/62%) than men (39%/37%). Patients with vs without enthesitis had higher overall burden (higher physician global, swollen/tender joint counts, pain, fatigue, patient global; fewer in patient-acceptable-symptom-state (PASS)) (all p < 0.05). Comparable demographic, clinical and PRO-results in patients with missing entheseal assessments, support the data being representative. In an "overall" cohort of all patients with ≥1 entheseal assessments after 2010, results on enthesitis were comparable. CONCLUSION: Entheseal assessments were only performed at a minority of clinical visits. Clinical enthesitis was frequent, particularly in women, often symmetrical and associated with a higher physician- and patient-reported disease burden in patients with PsA and axSpA treated in routine practice, emphasizing the need for systematic assessment in routine care.

OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection for physical function domain in psoriatic arthritis: Provisional endorsement for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF.

OBJECTIVES: Physical function is one of the core domains to be measured in all trials in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to evaluate two instruments for physical function in PsA: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and the physical functioning subscale of the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 items (SF-36 PF). METHODS: We followed guidelines set out by the OMERACT Filter 2.1. A working group was formed to evaluate each instrument for domain match and feasibility to reach consensus. Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were conducted to identify the relevant articles supporting measurement properties of both instruments. Five additional measurement properties were appraised: construct validity, test-retest reliability, longitudinal construct validity, clinical trial discrimination, and threshold of meaning. New evidence was synthesized to fill the gap. Data were presented to the OMERACT technical advisory group (TAG) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) community for endorsement. RESULTS: The results for seven measurement properties for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF were presented in Summary of Measurement Property (SOMP) tables. The working group proposed "Provisional Endorsement" for both instruments. The body of evidence was approved by the OMERACT TAG. In two Delphi exercises among GRAPPA members, HAQ-DI received 93.9% and 97.5% endorsement votes, while that for SF-36 PF were 86.7% and 77.3%. CONCLUSION: Both HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF were provisionally endorsed for the measurement of physical function in PsA trials, using the OMERACT Filter 2.1.

Instruments Measuring Physical Function for Psoriatic Arthritis Endorsed at GRAPPA 2020 Annual Meeting: Updates of the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Working Group provided updates at the 2020 GRAPPA annual meeting on its work toward developing a core outcome set for PsA. Working groups were set up for the 4 prioritized domains: enthesitis, fatigue, structural damage, and physical function. Two instruments for measurement of physical function were provisionally endorsed: (1) the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and (2) the physical functioning domain in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey.

Arthritis and enthesitis in the hip and pelvis region in spondyloarthritis - OMERACT validation of two whole-body MRI methods.

OBJECTIVE: To validate reliability, correlation and responsiveness of two whole-body MRI scores for the hip/pelvis region in spondyloarthritis. METHODS: Assessment of hip/pelvis inflammation in 4 multi-reader exercises using the OMERACT MRI Whole-body score for Inflammation in Peripheral joints and Entheses (MRI-WIPE) and Hip Inflammation Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (HIMRISS). RESULTS: In exercises 3-4 (11/20 cases, respectively; 9 readers) reliability was mostly good for the 3 best calibrated readers. Median pairwise single-measure ICC for status were 0.58-0.65 (WIPE-osteitis), 0.10-0.88 (HIMRISS-osteitis) and for status/change 0.38-0.72/0.52-0.60 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion) and 0.68-0.89/0.78-0.85 (HIMRISS-synovitis/effusion). SRM was 1.23 for WIPE-osteitis, while lower for WIPE-synovitis/effusion and HIMRISS. CONCLUSION: MRI-WIPE and HIMRISS may after further validation be useful in future spondyloarthritis trials.

Joint and entheseal inflammation in the knee region in spondyloarthritis - reliability and responsiveness of two OMERACT whole-body MRI scores.

OBJECTIVE: To perform region-based development of whole-body MRI through validation of knee region scoring systems in spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Assessment of knee inflammatory pathologies using 2 systems, OMERACT MRI Whole-body score for Inflammation in Peripheral joints and Entheses (MRI-WIPE) and Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS), in 4 iterative multi-reader exercises. RESULTS: In the final exercise, reliability was mostly good for readers with highest agreement in previous exercise. Median pairwise single-measure ICCs for osteitis and synovitis/effusion status/change were 0.71/0.48 (WIPE-osteitis), 0.48/0.77 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion), 0.59/0.91 (KIMRISS-osteitis) and 0.92/0.97 (KIMRISS-synovitis/effusion). SRMs were 0.74 (WIPE-synovitis/effusion) and 0.78 (KIMRISS-synovitis/effusion). CONCLUSION: MRI-WIPE and KIMRISS may both be useful in SpA whole-body evaluation studies.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging evidence of Inflammation at Interphalangeal joint of Thumb - A distinct entity in psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare inflammation at the interphalangeal (IP) joint of thumb in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis (UIA), and in psoriasis patients without clinical arthritis (PsO) using low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Age-matched and disease duration-matched patients with inflammatory arthritis (RA, PsA, and UIA) and psoriasis patients without clinical arthritis (PsO), who had undergone MRI of hands were included in this study. The presence or absence of MRI inflammatory lesions including synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone marrow edema was assessed by three independent readers. Agreement between the readers was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Risk ratio of MRI global inflammation around thumb IP joints among patients with PsA was compared with the other groups. RESULTS: Clinical parameters and MRI inflammation were studied in 161 patients (42 PsA, 28 RA, 29 UIA, and 62 PsO). Global MRI inflammation at the IP joint of the thumb was observed in 33.3% of PsA patients compared with 14.3% in RA, and 10.3% in UIA. Subclinical MRI inflammation was observed in 8.1% of patients with PsO. The risk ratios of MRI global inflammation at the IP joint of the thumb in PsA patients were 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-6.36) and 3.2 (95% CI 1.02-10.21) compared with RA and UIA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Global MRI inflammation around the IP joint of the thumb is significantly more common in patients with PsA as compared to individuals with UIA.

Imaging in psoriatic arthritis: Status and recent advances.

The heterogeneous nature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), encompassing several domains, with varied presentations brings about considerable challenges in disease evaluation. Prompt diagnosis and targeted therapy have resulted in disease remission being accepted as an attainable goal in PsA. Imaging has played a pivotal role in early diagnosis, better understanding of pathogenesis, monitoring of disease, and as an outcome measurement tool in clinical trials in PsA. Conventional radiography has been the cornerstone of assessing structural damage. With the advent of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, better delineation of the various structures involved in the disease process is possible, thus enabling sensitive assessment of inflammatory and structural pathologies together. In this review, imaging modalities used in routine assessment and clinical trials in PsA will be discussed in detail, focusing on advances over the past 5 years.

Test-retest Reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF for the Measurement of Physical Function in Psoriatic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Due to no existing data, we aimed to derive evidence to support test-retest reliability for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short Form Health Survey physical functioning domain (SF-36 PF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We identified datasets that collected relevant data for test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF, and evaluated them using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 methodology. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) as a measure of test-retest reliability. We then conducted a quality assessment and evaluated the adequacy of test-retest reliability performance. RESULTS: Two datasets were identified for HAQ-DI and 1 for SF-36 PF in PsA. The quality of the datasets was good. The ICCs for HAQ-DI were good and excellent in study 1 (0.90, 95% CI 0.79-0.95) and study 2 (0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.97). The ICC for SF-36 PF was excellent (0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.98). The performance of test-retest reliability for both instruments was judged to be adequate. CONCLUSION: The new data derived support good and reasonable test-retest reliability for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF in PsA.

Instruments Measuring Physical Function for Psoriatic Arthritis Endorsed at GRAPPA 2020 Annual Meeting: Updates of the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group.

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Working Group provided updates at the 2020 GRAPPA annual meeting on its work toward developing a core outcome set for PsA. Working groups were set up for the 4 prioritized domains: enthesitis, fatigue, structural damage, and physical function. Two instruments for measurement of physical function were provisionally endorsed: (1) the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and (2) the physical functioning domain in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey.