Clinical course and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Although patients with haemophilia are known to develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a lower age than patients without, there are few reports on the clinical course and prognosis of HCC. AIM: We aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognosis of patients with HCC and haemophilia. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with haemophilia, who were initially diagnosed with HCC between 2003 and 2021, were included. Their clinical courses and prognoses were retrospectively analysed. The results were compared with those of the 24th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer. RESULTS: All 22 patients were male; of these, 20 patients had haemophilia A, and 2 had haemophilia B. The mean age of diagnosis was 63 years (range 45-78 years) which is lower than the mean of 72 years reported in the Nationwide Survey. The mean diameter of the largest tumour was 30 mm (range 11-70 mm), and 18 tumours (82%) were solitary at the initial diagnosis. Standard treatments for HCC were performed in all patients. Sixty-one transarterial chemoembolisation, 28 RFA, 10 hepatectomies, and 2 radiation treatments were performed, and molecular-targeted agents were administered to 5 patients during their clinical courses. No deaths were associated with complications of HCC treatments. The median survival time after initial treatment was 6.4 years (range 0.9-18.7 years) which did not differ much from the median survival time of 5.8 years in the Nationwide Survey. CONCLUSION: Standard treatment for HCC could improve the prognosis of patients with HCC and haemophilia.

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Conventional Endoscopy for Prediction of Tumor Depth in Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The utility of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in predicting tumor depth among superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is unclear. The aim was to compare EUS with conventional endoscopy (CE) for the evaluation of tumor invasion of SNADETs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive 174 lesions/169 patients with duodenal dysplasia or adenocarcinoma with invasion up to submucosa who underwent both CE and EUS before endoscopic (n = 133) or surgical (n = 41) treatment. Endoscopic staging by CE was performed based on the characteristic endoscopic criteria of submucosal invasion (irregular surface, submucosal tumor [SMT]-like marginal elevation, and fusion of converging folds). The diagnostic performance of each test was compared with the final histology. RESULTS: The sensitivity and accuracy of estimating the depth were higher for CE compared to that of EUS (99.4% vs. 89.4%, p < 0.01 and 97.7% vs. 87.9%, p < 0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis of endoscopic factors revealed that tumor diameter, red color, SMT-like appearance, and hypoechogenicity were factors related to advanced histology. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of SMT-like appearance based on CE was an independent factor to predict submucosal invasion (p = 0.025). Gross morphology of the combined type was associated to incorrect diagnosis of EUS (p = 0.007). Among 3 cases in which EUS overestimated the tumor depth, carcinoma extension in submucosal Brunner's gland or nontumorous submucosal cystic dilation was observed. CONCLUSION: EUS may not be necessary, and CE may be sufficient for determining the optimal therapeutic strategy for SNADETs.

Progression After Molecular Targeted Agents: Hepatic Arterial Changes and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine changes in the hepatic arteries after treatment with a molecular targeted agent (MTA), and evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a post-MTA treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cases of 33 patients with intermediate HCC treated with MTA and TACE were studied retrospectively. The hepatic arteries, and the safety and efficacy of TACE were evaluated before and after MTA treatment. RESULTS: Following long-term MTA treatment, the diameters of hepatic arteries decreased significantly, while there was no difference in the diameters of the splenic artery or the portal vein. No significant adverse events were observed due to TACE after MTA; however, the therapeutic effect of TACE was limited after MTA treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the diameters of hepatic arteries were significantly smaller than those before MTA induction, suggesting ischemic effects and tumor vessel "normalization" by MTA treatment. Although TACE can be performed as a post-MTA treatment without lowering the hepatic reserve or causing serious complications, its therapeutic effect is limited.