Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Circulation ; 147(25): 1933-1944, 2023 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335828

ABSTRACT

Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment to prevent thrombotic or ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and those treated medically for an acute coronary syndrome. The use of antiplatelet therapy comes at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding complications. Defining the optimal intensity of platelet inhibition according to the clinical presentation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and individual patient factors is a clinical challenge. Modulation of antiplatelet therapy is a medical action that is frequently performed to balance the risk of thrombotic or ischemic events and the risk of bleeding. This aim may be achieved by reducing (ie, de-escalation) or increasing (ie, escalation) the intensity of platelet inhibition by changing the type, dose, or number of antiplatelet drugs. Because de-escalation or escalation can be achieved in different ways, with a number of emerging approaches, confusion arises with terminologies that are often used interchangeably. To address this issue, this Academic Research Consortium collaboration provides an overview and definitions of different strategies of antiplatelet therapy modulation for patients with coronary artery disease, including but not limited to those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and consensus statements on standardized definitions.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Thrombosis , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Blood Platelets , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy/adverse effects , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 9905, 2018 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29967389

ABSTRACT

The electrical impedance of cell membranes is important for excitable cells, such as neurons, because it strongly influences the amount of membrane potential change upon a flow of ionic current across the membrane. Here, we report on an investigation of how neuronal morphology affects membrane impedance of cultured hippocampal neurons. Microfabricated substrates with patterned scaffolding molecules were used to restrict the neurite growth of hippocampal neurons, and the impedance was measured via whole-cell patch-clamp recording under the inhibition of voltage-dependent ion channels. Membrane impedance was found to depend inversely on the dendrite length and soma area, as would be expected from the fact that its electrical property is equivalent to a parallel RC circuit. Moreover, we found that in biological neurons, the membrane impedance is homeostatically regulated to impede changes in the membrane area. The findings provide direct evidence on cell-autonomous regulation of neuronal impedance and pave the way towards elucidating the mechanism responsible for the resilience of biological neuronal networks.


Subject(s)
Cell Membrane/physiology , Hippocampus/cytology , Neurons/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Computer Simulation , Dendrites/physiology , Electric Impedance , Female , Hippocampus/embryology , Patch-Clamp Techniques , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL