ABSTRACT
Generative design is a system that automates part of the design process, but it cannot evaluate psychological issues related to shapes, such as "beauty" and "liking". Designers therefore evaluate and choose the generated shapes based on their experience. Among the design features, "complexity" is considered to influence "aesthetic preference". Although feature descriptors calculated from curvature can be used to quantify "complexity", the selection guidelines for curvature and feature descriptors have not been adequately discussed. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a systematic classification of curvature and a feature descriptor of 3D shapes and to apply the results to the "complexity" quantification. First, we surveyed the literature on curvature and feature descriptors and conducted a systematic classification. To quantify "complexity", we used five curvatures (Gaussian curvature, mean curvature, Casorati curvature, shape index, and curvature index) and a feature descriptor (entropy of occurrence probability) obtained from the classification and compared them with the sensory evaluation values of "complexity". The results showed that the determination coefficient between the quantified and sensory evaluation values of "complexity" was highest when the mean curvature was used. In addition, the Casorati curvature tended to show the highest signal-to-noise ratio (i.e., a high determination coefficient irrespective of the parameters set in the entropy calculation). These results will foster the development of generative design of 3D shapes using psychological evaluation.
