Assessing the impact of a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia protocol on patient management, outcomes and cost.

Establishing the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging as laboratory tests for HIT vary in specificity and availability. As HIT suspicion far exceeds confirmation of diagnosis, overtreatment is an emerging concern. This pilot study evaluated the impact of a HIT Recognition and Management Protocol on direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) prescribing, outcomes, and cost. The primary endpoint was DTI cessation within 12 hours of receipt of negative HIT serology. An observational cohort study using a pre-post design was performed. Sixty-one patients were in the pre-period (before implementation) and 46 in the post-period (after implementation). DTI therapy was discontinued within 12 hours of negative serology in 19.4% of pre-period patients compared to 40% of post-period patients, p=.058. DTI therapy was discontinued within 24 hours of receipt of a negative PF4/heparin ELISA more often in the post-period; 7/23 (30.4%) pre-period patients versus 16/26 (61.5%) post-period patients, p <0.05. Protocol implementation resulted in a significant improvement in timely initiation of DTI therapy (within 12 hours of HIT antibody testing) in those with a moderate to high suspicion of HIT; 8/31 (25.8%) of pre-period patients versus 24/31 (77.4%) of post-period patients, p <0.0001. Thrombotic events occurred in significantly more patients in the pre-period as compared to the post-period; 21/61 (34.4%) versus 6/46 (13%), respectively, p = 0.01. Major bleeding was reduced by 6.6 % after protocol implementation. The projected annual cost savings from decreased inappropriate DTI use was over $450,000. Protocol implementation had a positive impact on DTI prescribing, outcomes and cost.

Strategies for managing heparin therapy in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is a common acquired thrombophilia. The diagnosis of APS is based on both clinical and laboratory criteria. The clinical criteria include vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. The laboratory criteria include a positive test for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, or anti-ß(2)-glycoprotein I (anti-ß(2)GPI) antibodies on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Antiphospholipid antibodies with lupus anticoagulant activity may prolong phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the activated clotting time (ACT). This prolongation adds a level of complexity to monitoring heparin therapy in patients with APS who have thrombosis. A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted for relevant articles published from 1995-April 2011. The usual management approach in nonsurgical patients with APS is to switch to low-molecular-weight heparin. In patients in whom heparin remains the agent of choice, management options include monitoring heparin antifactor Xa levels, determining an individualized therapeutic aPTT range, targeting an aPTT goal of 2 times the baseline aPTT, or using an aPTT reagent insensitive to lupus anticoagulant. An algorithm for anticoagulation management in nonsurgical patients with APS who require heparin is provided. The strategies to monitor intraoperative heparin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery include measuring heparin concentrations by an automated protamine titration device, targeting twice the baseline ACT, using preoperative in vitro heparin-ACT titration curves, and measuring heparin antifactor Xa levels. The available published case reports on the use of these strategies are reviewed. Each institution should determine an approach to managing heparin in patients with APS that best meets its needs and resources.

Argatroban dosage requirements and outcomes in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of reduced-dose argatroban therapy in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with those of non-ICU patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Large, academic, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight ICU patients and 43 non-ICU patients who received the institutional protocol of argatroban 0.8 microg/kg/minute and 1.2 microg/kg/minute, respectively, between March 2004 and September 2005. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on patient demographics, argatroban dosing, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody results, activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), new thrombotic events, and major bleeding events were extracted from medical records. Time-weighted mean +/- SD doses of argatroban were 0.82 +/- 0.3 microg/kg/minute for ICU patients and 1.25 +/- 0.29 microg/kg/minute for non-ICU patients. Mean aPTT ratios were similar between groups: 2.07 +/- 0.53 for ICU patients and 2.00 +/- 0.45 for non-ICU patients. More than 70% of all aPTT ratios were therapeutic. More than 95% of patients in both groups achieved a therapeutic aPTT ratio during therapy. Fewer ICU patients than non-ICU patients had all therapeutic aPTT ratios during argatroban therapy (29% vs 51%, p=0.07). Thrombotic events occurred in six (16%) ICU patients versus none of the non-ICU patients (p=0.009). Thrombotic events occurred in 4 (31%) of the 13 ICU patients with confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Major bleeding occurred in four (11%) ICU patients versus none of the non-ICU patients (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Both ICU and non-ICU patients require less than the manufacturer-recommended initial dosage of argatroban. However, ICU patients appear to be at an increased risk for bleeding and thrombotic events despite their attainment of therapeutic aPTTs.

The financial impact of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction that increases patient morbidity and mortality. The financial impact of HIT to an institution is thought to be significant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of HIT. METHODS: A case-control study was employed. Case patients were identified as newly diagnosed HIT patients. Control subjects were matched by diagnosis-related group, primary diagnosis code, primary procedure code, and hospital admission date. The financial/decision support database of the hospital was queried to identify the matched control subjects, total cost, and reimbursement. The determination of financial impact included the total profit or (total loss) and the backfill effect (ie, the lost operating margin resulting from increased length of stay). Length of stay and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Data from 22 case patients and 255 control subjects were analyzed. On average, HIT case patients incurred a financial loss of $14,387 per patient and an increase in length of stay of 14.5 days. When confining the analysis to only Medicare case patients (n = 17) and Medicare control subjects, case patients incurred a financial loss of $20,170 per case and an increase in length of stay of 15.8 days. Depending on the occupancy rate of the institution, additional financial loss could result from the backfill effect. Mortality was not significantly affected. CONCLUSION: For an institution that sees 50 new cases of HIT per year, the projected annual financial impact ranges from approximately $700,000 to $1 million. Institutions with high bed occupancy rates may see an additional loss from the backfill effect.

The incidence of recognized heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a large, tertiary care teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is estimated to occur in up to 5% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin. The goal was to determine the incidence of HIT within our 1,061-bed tertiary care institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of three hospital database systems (ie, admission, pharmacy, and laboratory) was undertaken for a 1-year period ending in March 2004. The pharmacy database was queried to identify patients who received heparin and those who received a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI). The medical records of patients receiving a DTI were reviewed to categorize the indication for DTI therapy. The laboratory system database was queried to retrieve heparin platelet factor 4 immunoassay results. RESULTS: A total of 58,814 patient admissions occurred with an estimated 24,068 patients being exposed to unfractionated heparin. DTI therapy was administered to 133 patients. Of these, 49 new HIT cases and 15 cases of suspected HIT (unconfirmed) were identified. The overall incidence of recognized new HIT was 0.2%. New HIT occurred in 0.76% of patients receiving therapeutic-dose IV heparin and in < 0.1% of patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis (subcutaneous heparin). Forty-nine percent of all new HIT cases were in coronary artery bypass and/or valve replacement surgery patients, while no cases were identified in hip/knee arthroplasty patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of recognized HIT in a large teaching institution was 0.2%, with a 0.76% incidence in those patients receiving therapeutic-dose IV heparin. The low incidence likely reflects a brief duration of heparin exposure for many patients. Approximately half of all new HIT cases were recognized in the cardiovascular surgery population.

A comparison of lepirudin and argatroban outcomes.

Although both argatroban and lepirudin are used for the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), data comparing these agents are lacking. The objective of this project was to compare the clinical outcomes of lepirudin vs argatroban therapy. Patients who received a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) from January 2000 to December 2001 were identified. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed and relevant data extracted. The primary efficacy outcome was effective anticoagulation and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Data were analyzed using the t test and Fisher's exact test. Sixty-one lepirudin patients and 29 argatroban patients received a DTI during the study period. A new diagnosis of HIT was the indication for DTI therapy in 44.8% of argatroban patients and 57.4% of lepirudin patients. Effective anticoagulation was achieved in 77.8% of argatroban patients and 69.5% of lepirudin patients (p = .61). Major bleeding occurred in 10.3% and 11.5% of argatroban and lepirudin patients, respectively (p = 1.0). Argatroban and lepirudin demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy outcomes.

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a syndrome in which thrombocytopenia and thrombosis begin several days after heparin discontinuation. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by immunoglobulin G antibodies that are reactive against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex in the absence of circulating heparin. We describe 2 patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented to the emergency department. An 88-year-old man and a 62-year-old man experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis 9 or more days after heparin cessation and demonstrated a further decrease in platelet count on reexposure to heparin. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be included in the differential diagnosis of a patient with recent heparin exposure who presents with thrombosis or thrombocytopenia.

Effect of lepirudin on the international normalized ratio.

BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy require transition to warfarin. This transition may be complicated by DTI-induced elevations in the international normalized ratio (INR). While the effect of argatroban on the INR has been characterized, data assessing the effect of lepirudin on the INR are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lepirudin on the INR. METHODS: Patients receiving lepirudin therapy between January 2000 and May 2001 were identified using the pharmacy database, and a retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients were included for analysis if they had paired activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and INR data while receiving lepirudin monotherapy. RESULTS: Fifty-three paired aPTT and INR data points from 8 patients receiving lepirudin monotherapy were collected. The Organon MDA 180 instrument was used for aPTT and prothrombin time (PT) determination. Organon MDA Platelin L reagent was used for the aPTT and Organon Simplastin L reagent was used for the PT. The international sensitivity index (ISI) of the Simplastin L thromboplastin was 2.0. The mean +/- SD lepirudin dose was 0.05 +/- 0.04 mg/kg/h. Linear regression was used to identify the INRs that correspond to a therapeutic aPTT value of 45-75 seconds (1.5-2.5 times mean laboratory normal of 30 sec). The correlation between aPTT and INR was 0.77. An aPTT of 45-75 seconds with lepirudin correlated to an INR of 1.6-3.2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on laboratory results, when using a thromboplastin with an ISI of 2, lepirudin appears to elevate the INR in the absence of warfarin.

Case report: mantle cell lymphoma, prolymphocytoid variant, with leukostasis syndrome.

A 76-year-old man presented with leukostasis syndrome, including oculodynia, blurred vision, and visual field defects, due to mantle cell lymphoma, prolymphocytoid variant, with marked leukocytosis, 1227 x 10(9)/l. He had splenomegaly but no lymphadenopathy or hepatomegaly. The tumor cells were CD5+, CD19+, CD20+, FMC-7+, and kappa light chain restricted. Immunohistochemistry showed expression of p53 and of cyclin D1. Fluorescent in situ hybridization demonstrated t(11;14) with translocation between CYCLIN D1 and the immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes. The patient received leukapheresis and aggressive chemotherapy, but the leukocyte count remained above 100 x 10(9)/l. The patient's condition rapidly deteriorated with lymphomatous infiltration of his lungs and soft tissues, and he expired 6 months after diagnosis. While it is known that mantle cell lymphoma may have a leukemic phase, the degree of leukocytosis in this case exceeds that previously reported in the literature and resulted in a clinical syndrome of leukostasis.

Comparing methods of establishing the aPTT therapeutic range of heparin.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends that the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) therapeutic range for unfractionated heparin be defined as the aPTT corresponding to a heparin concentration of 0.3-0.7 micro/mL by heparin anti-factor Xa assay. This recommendation suggests that a therapeutic range defined in this manner should be superior to traditional empiric therapeutic ranges of 1.5-2.5 times the control. A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the ACCP recommendation for heparin monitoring. OBJECTIVE: To compare heparin dosage adjustments guided by a heparin concentration-derived therapeutic range (HCDTR) with those influenced by traditional empiric therapeutic ranges for the aPTT. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1, the various aPTT therapeutic ranges were established and/or defined. The first empiric therapeutic range (E1) was established by performing an aPTT test on healthy volunteers. This E1 was defined as 1.5-2.5 times the mean normal aPTT. A second empiric therapeutic range (E2) was defined as 1.5-2.5 times the patient's baseline aPTT. The aPTT HCDTR had been defined in a previous study as 48-61 seconds. In phase 2, heparin dosage adjustment decisions guided by each empiric range and the HCDTR for the aPTT were compared with heparin dosage adjustment decisions guided by actual heparin concentrations. Decisions were in agreement when both the aPTT result and plasma heparin concentration indicated the same dosage change. Forty patients had a bedside aPTT determined prior to receiving continuous infusion heparin and again within 48 hours of heparin initiation. Plasma heparin concentration by anti-factor Xa assay was performed on the blood samples obtained after heparin initiation. Heparin dosage adjustment decisions were evaluated by determining the agreement of each aPTT test result with the corresponding plasma heparin concentration. An overall level of agreement (defined as the % of decisions that were in agreement) for each aPTT therapeutic range was determined. RESULTS: The level of agreement in dosage adjustment decisions between heparin concentration and E1, E2, and HCDTR was 28/40 (70%), 28/39 (72%), and 23/40 (58%), respectively (p = 0.34). Heparin dosage adjustment decisions based on an aPTT HCDTR did not significantly differ from heparin dosage adjustment decisions guided by traditional empiric therapeutic ranges for a bedside aPTT. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed similar heparin dosage adjustment decisions using an empiric aPTT therapeutic range versus a heparin concentration-derived aPTT therapeutic range.

Venous limb gangrene during overlapping therapy with warfarin and a direct thrombin inhibitor for immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

We report two patients with deep-vein thrombosis complicating immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who developed venous limb gangrene during overlapping therapy with a direct thrombin inhibitor (lepirudin or argatroban) and warfarin. In both patients, therapy with the direct thrombin inhibitor was interrupted during persisting severe athrombocytopenia while warfarin administration continued. Both patients exhibited the typical feature of a supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INRs, 5.9 and 7.3) that has been linked previously with warfarin-associated venous limb gangrene. These data suggest that warfarin anticoagulation be postponed in patients with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia until substantial recovery of the platelet count has occurred.

A variant of the Sebastian platelet syndrome with unique neutrophil inclusions.

The Sebastian platelet syndrome (SPS) is a hereditary giant platelet disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia and the presence of neutrophil inclusions identical to those present in neutrophils of patients with another giant platelet disorder, the Fechtner platelet syndrome (FPS). Patients with SPS differ from those with FPS in that they lack the clinical features of the Alport syndrome (high frequency hearing loss, congenital cataracts and chronic interstitial nephritis). The present study has evaluated six patients who resemble individuals with SPS, but have uniquely different neutrophil inclusions. Ultrastructural features of the neutrophil inclusions of the new variant are presented and compared with those found in other giant platelet disorders including classic SPS, FPS and the May-Hegglin anomaly, as well as the Chediak-Higashi syndrome.

Correlation between activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin times.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between clotting time tests and heparin concentration, the correlation between activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) results, and to compare the clinical decisions based on ACT results with those based on aPTT results. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of a large database containing heparin concentrations, ACT results (1 device), and aPTT results (3 different instruments: 2 bedside, 1 laboratory-based). Correlations between heparin concentrations and clotting time tests and between ACT results and aPTT results were determined. Clinical decisions regarding heparin dosage adjustments based on ACT results were compared with those based on aPTT results. RESULTS: Correlations between clotting time tests and heparin concentrations were r = 0.72 for ACT and r = 0.74-0.86 for the aPTT instruments. The laboratory-based aPTT had the highest correlation to heparin concentrations. The correlation between ACT and aPTT results ranged from r = 0.64-0.67. Heparin dosage adjustment decisions based on ACT results agreed with decisions based on aPTT results 59-63% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The laboratory-based aPTT has a stronger correlation to heparin concentration than the bedside-based aPTT and ACT. The correlation between ACT and aPTT was similar among 3 different aPTT instruments. Decisions to adjust heparin therapy based on ACT results differed from decisions based on aPTT results more than one-third of the time.