Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vasa ; 48(3): 236-243, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526401

ABSTRACT

Background: The 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure (BP) guidelines generated controversies due to the new proposed BP cut-off values defining hypertension. We aimed to assess aortic stiffness of subjects who are reclassified as stage 1 hypertensive according to the new guidelines and compare them with the subjects of "elevated BP" category. Patients and methods. Data from the "Corinthia" study, an observational, cross-sectional survey of 2,043 participants were analyzed. Subjects were classified into 4 groups: group A: systolic pressure (SBP) 120-129 and diastolic pressure (DBP) < 80 mmHg, group B: SBP 130-139 or DBP 80-89 mmHg, group B1: SBP 130-139 and DBP < 80 mmHg and group B2: SBP 130-139 and DBP 80-89 mmHg. Aortic stiffness was assessed by carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). A value of PWV > 10m/s was consider indicative of asymptomatic organ damage while values of PWV exceeded the 90 % percentile for each age group were consider as abnormal. Results: Groups B, B1 and B2 have significantly increased PWV compared to group A, independently from age and other risk factors (PWV: 9.2 ± 2.8 vs 9.4 ± 2.7 vs 8.6 ± 2.5 vs 8.1 ± 2.3 m/s, p < 0.01, respectively). The prevalence of PWV > 10 m/s and abnormal PWV values in group A was significantly lower than the corresponding prevalence in randomly selected, age-matched subjects from group B (13.5 % vs 24.4 %, p = 0.027 and 5.6 % vs 14.2 %, p = 0.022, respectively). Conclusions: The reclassified subjects as stage 1 hypertensive by the new guidelines have a significantly increased aortic stiffness and greater prevalence in asymptomatic aortic damage compared to subjects with elevated BP. This finding may indirectly explain the increased cardiovascular risk of this group.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Vascular Stiffness , Blood Pressure , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pulse Wave Analysis
2.
Hellenic J Cardiol ; 57(3): 194-197, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27451913

ABSTRACT

Environmental factors constitute an important but underappreciated risk factor towards the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Environmental exposure to variable pollutants is implicated in the derangement or propagation of adverse pathophysiological processes linked with atherosclerosis, including genetic, hemodynamic, metabolic, oxidative and inflammation parameters. However, no data exist on environmental pollution in rural or semi-rural areas. Therefore, the purpose of the "Corinthia" study is to examine the impact of environmental pollution in indices of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. The Corinthia study began in October 2015 and is planned to recruit 1,500 individuals from different regions of Corinthia country with different environmental exposures to pollutants and different patterns of soil/ground and/or air pollution until December 2016. Baseline measurements will include lifestyle measurements, anthropometric characteristics and a comprehensive cardiovascular examination. The follow-up is planned to extend prospectively up to 10 years and this study is anticipated to provide valuable data on the distinct impact of soil and air pollution on early markers of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease and on the overall impact of environment pollution to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cross-Sectional Studies , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...