Prevalence and spectrum of mutations causing G6PD deficiency in Indian populations.

BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is one of the most common human erythroenzymopathy affecting around 10% of the world population. India is endemic for malaria and antimalarial drugs are known to induce haemolysis in G6PD deficient individuals. Here we report the prevalence as well as the molecular diversity of G6PD deficiency in geographical regions of India. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 20,896 individuals (11,838 males and 9058 females) were screened by DPIP dye decolorisation method followed by quantitation of G6PD enzyme activity on the suspected samples. Molecular analysis was undertaken in a total of 350 G6PD deficient individuals by PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing. A structural characteristic of the novel variant was deduced by using DynaMut web-server. The prevalence rate of G6PD deficiency varied between 0.8 and 6.3% with an overall prevalence of 1.9%. A total of twelve mutations were identified. Of the total deleterious alleles detected G6PD Orissa (56.5%) was found to be the most predominant variant followed by G6PD Mediterranean (23.6%). G6PD Mediterranean, G6PD Kaiping and G6PD Mahidol were found to be severely deficient variant and 14.1% of them showed undetectable activity. A novel mutation c.544C➔G (R182G) in exon 6 was identified in one tribal male where substitution of arginine by glycine, likely causes the alteration in the alpha helix leading to disruption of secondary structure of the protein. CONCLUSION: There are large differences in the distribution of G6PD causal variants between Indian states, and this may have implications for the treatment in the malaria endemic areas.

Carrier screening for beta-thalassemia during pregnancy in India: a 7-year evaluation.

AIM: Premarital screening for beta-thalassemia is not widely acceptable in India; hence, we evaluated the effectiveness of antenatal screening and counseling over 7 years. METHODS: 61,935 pregnant women were screened using the single-tube osmotic fragility test during their first antenatal visit. Individuals who were positive were investigated further for diagnosis of beta-thalassemia and other abnormal hemoglobins. Spouses of carrier women were tested whenever available. Couples at risk were given the option of prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: Only 19% of the women registered at the antenatal clinic in the first trimester of pregnancy, and 14% of the women were positive per the osmotic fragility test; 1020 beta-thalassemia heterozygotes and 213 women with other hemoglobinopathies were identified, majority being in the second and third trimesters. Seven hundred and thirteen (69%) of their husbands could be tested, and 37 couples at risk were identified. Only 15 couples had a prenatal diagnosis done. Four couples with affected fetuses opted for termination of pregnancy. The remaining couples either did not respond after counseling or the pregnancies were advanced for prenatal intervention. CONCLUSION: This first large study shows that antenatal screening is acceptable in India; however, awareness generation is still a primary requisite to make women register early at antenatal clinics and bring their spouses for screening when required.