Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 261
Filter
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 28(3): 290-292, 2024 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866651

ABSTRACT

Obtaining consent to care requires the radiation oncologist to provide loyal information and to ensure that the patient understands it. Proof of such an approach rests with the practitioner. The French Society for Radiation Oncology (SFRO) does not recommend the signature of a consent form by the patient but recommends that the radiation oncologist be able to provide all the elements demonstrating the reality of a complete information circuit.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent , Radiation Oncology , Humans , Consent Forms/standards , France , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Physician-Patient Relations , Radiotherapy/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 27(3): 206-213, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37149466

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm3. RESULTS: The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm3 was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Melanoma , Radiosurgery , Humans , Female , Radiosurgery/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Immunotherapy/methods
3.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 116-128, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953698

ABSTRACT

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Glioma/radiotherapy , Age Factors , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Clinical Decision-Making , France , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Glioma/genetics , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Organs at Risk , Radiation Oncology , Radiation Tolerance , Societies, Medical , Temozolomide/therapeutic use
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(1-2): 2-6, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953691

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the first two editions of the guidelines for external radiotherapy procedures, published in 2007 and 2016 respectively, was to issue recommendations aimed at optimising, harmonising and standardising practices. The purpose of this third edition, which includes brachytherapy, is identical while also taking into account recent technological improvements (intensity modulation radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and three-dimension brachytherapy) along with findings from literature. Part one describes the daily use of general principles (quality, security, image-guided radiation therapy); part two describes each treatment step for the main types of cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Age Factors , Brachytherapy/methods , Brachytherapy/standards , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Capacity Building , France , Humans , Oncology Nursing/standards , Proton Therapy , Radiation Oncology/education , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/standards , Radiotherapy/trends , Radiotherapy, Conformal/standards
5.
Cancer Radiother ; 25(5): 411-418, 2021 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875367

ABSTRACT

The French society of oncological radiotherapy (Société française de radiothérapie oncologique, SFRO) was created in 1990. On the occasion of its thirtieth annual congress, in October 2019, a session was devoted to it, with the objective of exposing its functioning, its actions and its productions during these three decades during which radiotherapy and oncology have undergone unprecedented transformations. We propose in this article to outline the content of this session.


Subject(s)
Anniversaries and Special Events , Radiation Oncology , Societies, Medical/history , Congresses as Topic/history , France , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(6-7): 523-533, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859467

ABSTRACT

Intracranial radiotherapy has been improved, primarily because of the development of stereotactic approaches. While intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy is mainly indicated for treatment of benign or malignant tumors, this procedure is also effective in the management of other neurological pathologies; it is delivered using GammaKnife® and linear accelerators. Thus, brain arteriovenous malformations in patients who are likely to experience permanent neurological sequelae can be managed by single session intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy, or radiosurgery, in specific situations, with an advantageous benefit/risk ratio. Radiosurgery can be recommended for patients with disabling symptoms, which are poorly controlled by medication, such as trigeminal neuralgia, and tremors, whether they are essential or secondary to Parkinson's disease. This literature review aims at defining the place of intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of patients suffering from non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies. It is clear that the multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced teams from Neurosurgery, Neurology, Neuroradiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics is needed for the procedures using high precision radiotherapy techniques, which deliver high doses to locations near functional brain areas.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery , Trigeminal Neuralgia/radiotherapy , Humans
8.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(1): 1-10, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992516

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective dosimetric study was to assess the dose distribution regarding the brain areas implied in cognitive functions using two approaches: volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were treated using a dual-arc VMAT approach for supratentorial glioblastoma between 2016 and 2018. The total dose of 60Gy in 30 daily fractions was administered to the planning target volume (PTV). The brain structures that play an important role in cognitive physiology, such as the hippocampi, corpus callosum, cerebellum, subventricular zones (SVZ), were delineated. For each patient, a new treatment plan in HT was determined by a second medical physicist in a blindly fashion according to the same dose constraints and priorities. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. RESULTS: Conformity indexes remained similar with both techniques. The mean values were 0.96 (0.19-1.00) for VMAT and 0.98 (range, 0.84-1.00) for HT, respectively (P=0.73). Significant D50% reductions were observed with VMAT compared to HT: 14.6Gy (3.8-28.0) versus 17.4Gy (12.1-25.0) for the normal brain (P=0.014); 32.5Gy (10.3-60.0) versus 35.6Gy (17.1-58.0) for the corpus callosum (P=0.038); 8.1Gy (0.4-34.0) versus 12.8Gy (0.8-27.0) for the cerebellum (P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The VMAT approach seemed to improve the sparing of the key brain areas implied in cognitive functions without jeopardizing PTV coverage.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain/radiation effects , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Sparing Treatments , Organs at Risk , Prospective Studies
9.
BMC Med Educ ; 18(1): 15, 2018 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little information is currently available concerning young medical students desire to pursue a career in oncology, or their career expectations. METHODS: This project is a cross-sectional epidemiological study. A voluntary and anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all young oncologists studying in France between the 2nd of October 2013 and the 23rd of February 2014. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 75.6%. A total of 505 young oncologists completed the questionnaire. The main determining factors in the decision to practice oncology were the cross-sectional nature of the field (70.8%), the depth and variety of human relations (56.3%) and the multi-disciplinary field of work (50.2%). Most residents would like to complete a rotation outside of their assigned region (59.2%) or abroad (70.2%) in order to acquire additional expertise (67.7%). In addition, most interns would like to undertake a fellowship involving care, teaching and research in order to hone their skills (85.7%) and forge a career in public hospitals (46.4%). Career prospects mainly involve salaried positions in public hospitals. Many young oncologists are concerned about their professional future, due to the shortage of openings (40.8%), the workload (52.8%) and the lack of work-life balance (33.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides a comprehensive profile of the reasons young oncologists chose to pursue a career in oncology, and their career prospects.


Subject(s)
Career Choice , Education, Medical, Graduate , Internship and Residency , Medical Oncology , Specialization , Students, Medical , Cross-Sectional Studies , Employment , France , Humans , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Cancer Radiother ; 21(5): 365-372, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28532617

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Dynamic conformal radiotherapy with helical TomoTherapy® (HT) offers a more quantitative paradigm for total body irradiation. Treatment planning, delivery, dose verification of the first French experiences of total body irradiation using helical TomoTherapy® are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients planned for total body irradiation at our institution from February 2012 to May 2013 were reported. Total body irradiation consisted in a single fraction of 2Gy. Planning target volume was divided in two due to the limited translation length of the table. Delivery quality assurance was performed with cylindrical phantom, ionization chamber and films. Thermoluminescent dosimeters and radiochromic films were used for in vivo dosimetry and junction region heterogeneity assessment. RESULTS: Six patients were included. One finally did not receive the treatment but dosimetric data were analyzed. Planned V95% was covered by D95% and V2% did not exceed D107% for five of the six patients. The mean relative difference between measured and calculated absolute dose of the Delivery quality assurance was always less than 2.5% (mean value±SD: 1%±0.67%). Gamma index (3%; 3mm) was less than 1 for at least 93% of the points (value±SD: 97.4±1.6% and 96.6±2.5% for upper and lower part of treatment respectively). Difference between in vivo measured and calculated dose was above 5% for only two out of 15 points (maximum: 10.2%, mean: 0.73±4.6%). Junction region heterogeneity was in average 5.8±1%. The total treatment session of total body irradiation lasted 120min, with a mean beam on time of 17.2±0.6 and 11.2±1.6min for upper and lower part of the body respectively. CONCLUSION: Total body irradiation using helical TomoTherapy® guaranteed high dose homogeneity throughout the body and dose verification was achievable, showing small difference between planned and delivered doses.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Whole-Body Irradiation , Adult , Aged , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
11.
Cancer Radiother ; 20 Suppl: S69-79, 2016 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521036

ABSTRACT

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. Treating these tumours is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk, infiltrating nature, and radioresistance. Clinical prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance status, tumour location, and treatments such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have long been recognized in the management of patients with gliomas. Molecular biomarkers are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. These practice guidelines aim at helping in choosing the best treatment, in particular radiation therapy.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Glioma/radiotherapy , Age Factors , Aged , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Cranial Irradiation/standards , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Glioma/pathology , Glioma/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Organs at Risk , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiotherapy Dosage
12.
Cancer Radiother ; 19(6-7): 603-9, 2015 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26278986

ABSTRACT

Linked to the difference of prognosis, the terms and conditions of the follow-up of low-grade and high-grade gliomas treated by irradiation differ highly. Patients treated for a low-grade glioma have prolonged survival. In this case, monitoring of toxicities linked to the treatment is a major objective. Opportunistic infections and depression are corticosteroids side effects widely underestimated. Radionecrosis search and differentiation with recurrent disease are done by MRI. Perfusion and spectroscopy showing a choline/creatine ratio increase are in favour of disease recurrence. Cognitive status and quality of life must be evaluated during the follow-up. They have to be evaluated by adapted scales. Cognitive rehabilitation improves interestingly the post-treatment cognitive status. Pseudoprogression rates for high-grade gliomas are near 20%. MRI is the benchmark imaging for its diagnosis. Diffusion weight imaging and spectroscopy are actually the most interesting techniques.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Glioma/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Grading
13.
Cancer Radiother ; 19(5): 331-3, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25858707

ABSTRACT

Despite the high incidence of prostate carcinoma, metastases of the uvea are very rare and the iris localization is even more. Only a few cases worldwide have been described so far. We report here the case of a 66-year-old man diagnosed with a metastatic prostate carcinoma. Nine months later, he developed brain and skin metastases. A couple of weeks later, the metastatic lesion appeared on his left iris. He has received whole brain radiation therapy including the iris lesion in the radiation fields. Through this case report and a literature review, we discuss the incidence, the different clinical presentations and the impact on the survival prognosis of this uncommon metastatic site.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Iris Neoplasms/secondary , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Cranial Irradiation , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Iris Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Male
16.
Cancer Radiother ; 18(5-6): 461-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25201633

ABSTRACT

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors. Their care is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk. The treatment of glioblastoma includes surgery followed by chemoradiation with the protocol of Stupp et al. The addition of bevacizumab allows an increase in progression-free survival by 4 months but it does not improve overall survival. This treatment is reserved for clinical trials. Intensity modulation radiotherapy may be useful to reduce the neurocognitive late effects in different types of gliomas. In elderly patients an accelerated radiotherapy 40 Gy in 15 fractions allows a similar survival to standard radiotherapy. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status may help to choose between chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is no standard for the treatment of recurrent gliomas. Re-irradiation in stereotactic conditions allows a median survival of 8 to 12.4 months. Anaplastic gliomas with 1p19q mutation have a greater sensibility to chemotherapy by procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine. Chemoradiotherapy in these patients has become the standard treatment. Many studies are underway testing targeted therapies, their place in the therapeutic management and new radiotherapy techniques.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Glioma/therapy , Age Factors , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/ultrastructure , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Glioma/genetics , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Lomustine/administration & dosage , Methylation , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Neurosurgical Procedures , O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase/metabolism , Procarbazine/administration & dosage , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Temozolomide , Treatment Outcome , Vincristine/administration & dosage
18.
Neurochirurgie ; 60(3): 63-140, 2014 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24856008

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: To review in the literature, all the epidemiological, clinical, radiological, histological and therapeutic data regarding chordomas as well as various notochordal entities: ecchordosis physaliphora, intradural and intraparenchymatous chordomas, benign notochordal cell tumors, parachordomas and extra-axial chordomas. To identify different types of chordomas, including familial forms, associations with tuberous sclerosis, Ollier's disease and Maffucci's syndrome, forms with metastasis and seeding. To assess the recent data regarding molecular biology and progress in targeted therapy. To compare the different types of radiotherapy, especially protontherapy and their therapeutic effects. To review the largest series of chordomas in their different localizations (skull base, sacrum and mobile spine) from the literature. MATERIALS: The series of 136 chordomas treated and followed up over 20 years (1972-2012) in the department of neurosurgery at Lariboisière hospital is reviewed. It includes: 58 chordomas of the skull base, 47 of the craniocervical junction, 23 of the cervical spine and 8 from the lombosacral region. Similarly, 31 chordomas in children (less than 18 years of age), observed in the departments of neurosurgery of les Enfants-Malades and Lariboisière hospitals, are presented. They were observed between 1976 and 2010 and were located intracranially (n=22 including 13 with cervical extension), 4 at the craniocervical junction level and 5 in the cervical spine. METHODS: In the entire Lariboisière series and in the different groups of localization, different parameters were analyzed: the delay of diagnosis, of follow-up, of occurrence of metastasis, recurrence and death, the number of primary patients and patients referred to us after progression or recurrence and the number of deaths, recurrences and metastases. The influence of the quality of resection (total, subtotal and partial) on the prognosis is also presented. Kaplan-Meier actuarial curves of overall survival and disease free survival were performed in the entire series, including the different groups of localization based on the following 4 parameters: age, primary and secondary patients, quality of resection and protontherapy. In the pediatric series, a similar analysis was carried-out but was limited by the small number of patients in the subgroups. RESULTS: In the Lariboisière series, the mean delay of diagnosis is 10 months and the mean follow-up is 80 months in each group. The delay before recurrence, metastasis and death is always better for the skull base chordomas and worse for those of the craniocervical junction, which have similar results to those of the cervical spine. Similar figures were observed as regards the number of deaths, metastases and recurrences. Quality of resection is the major factor of prognosis with 20.5 % of deaths and 28 % of recurrences after total resection as compared to 52.5 % and 47.5 % after subtotal resection. This is still more obvious in the group of skull base chordomas. Adding protontherapy to a total resection can still improve the results but there is no change after subtotal resection. The actuarial curve of overall survival shows a clear cut in the slope with some chordomas having a fast evolution towards recurrence and death in less than 4 years and others having a long survival of sometimes more than 20 years. Also, age has no influence on the prognosis. In primary patients, disease free survival is better than in secondary patients but not in overall survival. Protontherapy only improves the overall survival in the entire series and in the skull base group. Total resection improves both the overall and disease free survival in each group. Finally, the adjunct of protontherapy after total resection is clearly demonstrated. In the pediatric series, the median follow-up is 5.7 years. Overall survival and disease free survival are respectively 63 % and 54.3 %. Factors of prognosis are the histological type (atypical forms), localization (worse for the cervical spine and better for the clivus) and again it will depend on the quality of resection. CONCLUSIONS: Many different pathologies derived from the notochord can be observed: some are remnants, some may be precursors of chordomas and some have similar features but are probably not genuine chordomas. To-day, immuno-histological studies should permit to differentiate them from real chordomas. Improving knowledge of molecular biology raises hopes for complementary treatments but to date the quality of surgical resection is still the main factor of prognosis. Complementary protontherapy seems useful, especially in skull base chordomas, which have better overall results than those of the craniocervical junction and of the cervical spine. However, we are still lacking an intrinsic marker of evolution to differentiate the slow growing chordomas with an indolent evolution from aggressive types leading rapidly to recurrence and death on which more aggressive treatments should be applied.


Subject(s)
Chordoma/mortality , Chordoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Skull Base Neoplasms/mortality , Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Treatment Outcome
19.
Cancer Radiother ; 18(3): 222-8; quiz 245, 248, 2014 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24708940

ABSTRACT

Central neurocytoma is a rare primary central nervous system tumour of young adults with good prognosis. Typical and atypical forms are described according to various histologic and histopathologic parameters. Central neurocytoma develops in the periventricular areas and is revealed by increased intracranial pressure. The tumour exhibits typical characteristics on CT scan and MRI and a characteristic peak of glycine on spectroscopy-MRI. The main treatment is total resection, which is achievable only in half of the cases. External beam therapy improves local control of partially resected and/or atypical central neurocytoma. Many studies show that stereotactic radiotherapy can be used in the therapeutic management as exclusive treatment, in postoperatives residues and in case of distant recurrence. Chemotherapy is the last line of treatment in refractory forms, especially in the forms with extracranial and/or neuromeningeal spread and in recurrent forms after treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Neurocytoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Neurocytoma/pathology , Prognosis , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
20.
Cancer Radiother ; 18(2): 97-106, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439342

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness and toxicity levels of stereotactic radiation therapy without whole brain radiation therapy in patients with solitary brain metastases larger than 3cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2007 and March 2009, 12 patients received fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy and 24 patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. For the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, 3×7.7Gy were delivered to the planning target volume (PTV); median volume and diameter were 29.4 cm(3) and 4.4cm, respectively. For the stereotactic radiosurgery group, 14Gy were delivered to the PTV; median volume and diameter were 15.6 cm(3) and 3.7cm, respectively. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 218 days. For the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, local control rates were 100% at 360 days and 64% at 720 days; for the stereotactic radiosurgery group, rates were 58% at 360 days and 48% at 720 days (P=0.06). Median survival time was 504 days for the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group and 164 days for the stereotactic radiosurgery group (P=0.049). Two cases of grade 2 toxicity were observed in the fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy group, and 6 cases of grade 1-2 toxicity, in the stereotactic radiosurgery group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data to support that fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy without whole brain radiation therapy with a margin dose of 3 fractions of 7.7Gy for treatment of solitary large brain metastases is efficient and well-tolerated. Because of the significant improvement in overall survival, this schedule should be assessed in a randomized trial.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/secondary , Carcinoma/surgery , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/secondary , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL