Structural bases for stoichiometry-selective calcium potentiation of a neuronal nicotinic receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors assemble in two stoichiometric forms, one of which is potentiated by calcium. The sites of calcium binding that underpin potentiation are not known. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To identify calcium binding sites, we applied cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to each stoichiometric form of the α4ß2 nACh receptor in the presence of calcium ions. To test whether the identified calcium sites are linked to potentiation, we generated mutants of anionic residues at the sites, expressed wild type and mutant receptors in clonal mammalian fibroblasts, and recorded ACh-elicited single-channel currents with or without calcium. KEY RESULTS: Both cryo-EM and MD simulations show calcium bound to a site between the extracellular and transmembrane domains of each α4 subunit (ECD-TMD site). Substituting alanine for anionic residues at the ECD-TMD site abolishes stoichiometry-selective calcium potentiation, as monitored by single-channel patch clamp electrophysiology. Additionally, MD simulation reveals calcium association at subunit interfaces within the extracellular domain. Substituting alanine for anionic residues at the ECD sites reduces or abolishes stoichiometry-selective calcium potentiation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Stoichiometry-selective calcium potentiation of the α4ß2 nACh receptor is achieved by calcium association with topographically distinct sites framed by anionic residues within the α4 subunit and between the α4 and ß2 subunits. Stoichiometry-selective calcium potentiation could result from the greater number of calcium sites in the stoichiometric form with three rather than two α4 subunits. The results are relevant to modulation of signalling via α4ß2 nACh receptors in physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

An analogue of the Prolactin Releasing Peptide reduces obesity and promotes adult neurogenesis.

Hypothalamic Adult Neurogenesis (hAN) has been implicated in regulating energy homeostasis. Adult-generated neurons and adult Neural Stem Cells (aNSCs) in the hypothalamus control food intake and body weight. Conversely, diet-induced obesity (DIO) by high fat diets (HFD) exerts adverse influence on hAN. However, the effects of anti-obesity compounds on hAN are not known. To address this, we administered a lipidized analogue of an anti-obesity neuropeptide, Prolactin Releasing Peptide (PrRP), so-called LiPR, to mice. In the HFD context, LiPR rescued the survival of adult-born hypothalamic neurons and increased the number of aNSCs by reducing their activation. LiPR also rescued the reduction of immature hippocampal neurons and modulated calcium dynamics in iPSC-derived human neurons. In addition, some of these neurogenic effects were exerted by another anti-obesity compound, Liraglutide. These results show for the first time that anti-obesity neuropeptides influence adult neurogenesis and suggest that the neurogenic process can serve as a target of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy.

Differentiation, Transcriptomic Profiling, and Calcium Imaging of Human Hypothalamic Neurons.

Neurons in the hypothalamus orchestrate homeostatic physiological processes and behaviors essential for life. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can be differentiated into many types of hypothalamic neurons, progenitors, and glia. This updated unit includes published studies and protocols with new advances in the differentiation, maturation, and interrogation by transcriptomic profiling and calcium imaging of human hypothalamic cell populations. Specifically, new methods to freeze and thaw hypothalamic progenitors after they have been patterned and before substantial neurogenesis has occurred are provided that will facilitate experimental flexibility and planning. Also included are updated recipes and protocols for neuronal maturation, with details on the equipment and methods for examining their transcriptomic response and cell-autonomous properties in culture in the presence of synaptic blockers. Together, these protocols facilitate the adoption and use of this model system for fundamental biological discovery and therapeutic translation to human diseases such as obesity, diabetes, sleep disorders, infertility, and chronic stress. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: hPSC maintenance Basic Protocol 2: Hypothalamic neuron differentiation Support Protocol 1: Cortical neuron (control) differentiation Basic Protocol 3: Neuronal maturation Support Protocol 2: Cryopreservation and thawing of neuronal progenitors Support Protocol 3: Quality control: Confirmation of hypothalamic patterning and neurogenesis Support Protocol 4: Bulk RNA sequencing of hypothalamic cultures Basic Protocol 4: Calcium imaging of hypothalamic neurons using Fura-2 AM Alternate Protocol: Calcium imaging of green fluorescent hypothalamic neurons using Rhod-3 AM.

Genetic Variant in Nicotinic Receptor α4-Subunit Causes Sleep-Related Hyperkinetic Epilepsy via Increased Channel Opening.

We describe genetic and molecular-level functional alterations in the α4ß2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) from a patient with sleep-related hyperkinetic epilepsy and a family history of epilepsy. Genetic sequencing revealed a heterozygous variant c.851C>G in the CHRNA4 gene encoding the α4 subunit, resulting in the missense mutation p.Ser284Trp. Patch clamp recordings from genetically engineered nAChRs incorporating the α4-Ser284Trp subunit revealed aberrant channel openings in the absence of agonist and markedly prolonged openings in its presence. Measurements of single channel current amplitude distinguished two pentameric stoichiometries of the variant nAChR containing either two or three copies of the α4-Ser284Trp subunit, each exhibiting aberrant spontaneous and prolonged agonist-elicited channel openings. The α4-Ser284 residue is highly conserved and located within the M2 transmembrane α-helix that lines the ion channel. When mapped onto the receptor's three-dimensional structure, the larger Trp substitution sterically clashes with the M2 α-helix from the neighboring subunit, promoting expansion of the pore and stabilizing the open relative to the closed conformation of the channel. Together, the clinical, genetic, functional, and structural observations demonstrate that α4-Ser284Trp enhances channel opening, predicting increased membrane excitability and a pathogenic seizure phenotype.

Stoichiometry-selective modulation of α4ß2 nicotinic ACh receptors by divalent cations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: α4ß2 nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) comprise the most abundant class of nAChRs in the nervous system. They assemble in two stoichiometric forms, each exhibiting distinct functional and pharmacological signatures. However, whether one or both forms are modulated by calcium or magnesium has not been established. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To assess the functional consequences of calcium and magnesium, each stoichiometric form was expressed in clonal mammalian fibroblasts and single-channel currents were recorded in the presence of a range of ACh concentrations. KEY RESULTS: In the absence of divalent cations, each stoichiometric form exhibits high unitary conductance and simple gating kinetics composed of solitary channel openings or short bursts of openings. However, in the presence of calcium and magnesium, the conductance and gating kinetics change in a stoichiometry-dependent manner. Calcium and magnesium reduce the conductance of both stoichiometric forms, with each cation producing an equivalent reduction, but the reduction is greater for the (α4)2 (ß2)3 form. Moreover, divalent cations promote efficient channel opening of the (α4)3 (ß2)2 stoichiometry, while minimally affecting the (α4)2 (ß2)3 stoichiometry. For the (α4)3 (ß2)2 stoichiometry, at high but not low ACh concentrations, calcium in synergy with magnesium promote clustering of channel openings into episodes of many openings in quick succession. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Modulation of the α4ß2 nAChR by divalent cations depends on the ACh concentration, the type of cation and the subunit stoichiometry. The functional consequences of modulation are expected to depend on the regional distributions of the stoichiometric forms and synaptic versus extrasynaptic locations of the receptors.

NACHO and 14-3-3 promote expression of distinct subunit stoichiometries of the α4ß2 acetylcholine receptor.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) belong to the superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels, and in neuronal tissues, are assembled from various types of α- and ß-subunits. Furthermore, the subunits α4 and ß2 assemble in two predominant stoichiometric forms, (α4)2(ß2)3 and (α4)3(ß2)2, forming receptors with dramatically different sensitivity to agonists and allosteric modulators. However, mechanisms by which the two stoichiometric forms are regulated are not known. Here, using heterologous expression in mammalian cells, single-channel patch-clamp electrophysiology, and calcium imaging, we show that the ER-resident protein NACHO selectively promotes the expression of the (α4)2(ß2)3 stoichiometry, whereas the cytosolic molecular chaperone 14-3-3η selectively promotes the expression of the (α4)3(ß2)2 stoichiometry. Thus, NACHO and 14-3-3η are potential physiological regulators of subunit stoichiometry, and are potential drug targets for re-balancing the stoichiometry in pathological conditions involving α4ß2 nAChRs such as nicotine dependence and epilepsy.

Structural basis for α-bungarotoxin insensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

The ten types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α-subunits show substantial sequence homology, yet some types confer high affinity for α-bungarotoxin, whereas others confer negligible affinity. Combining sequence alignments with structural data reveals three residues unique to α-toxin-refractory α-subunits that coalesce within the 3D structure of the α4ß2 receptor and are predicted to fit between loops I and II of α-bungarotoxin. Mutating any one of these residues, Lys189, Ile196 or Lys153, to the α-toxin-permissive counterpart fails to confer α-bungarotoxin binding. However, mutating both Lys189 and Ile196 affords α-bungarotoxin binding with an apparent dissociation constant of 104 nM, while combining mutation of Lys153 reduces the dissociation constant to 22 nM. Analogous residue substitutions also confer high affinity α-bungarotoxin binding upon α-toxin-refractory α2 and α3 subunits. α4ß2 receptors engineered to bind α-bungarotoxin exhibit slow rates of α-toxin association and dissociation, and competition by cholinergic ligands typical of muscle nicotinic receptors. Receptors engineered to bind α-bungarotoxin co-sediment with muscle nicotinic receptors on sucrose gradients, and mirror single channel signatures of their α-toxin-refractory counterparts. Thus the inability of α-bungarotoxin to bind to neuronal nicotinic receptors arises from three unique and interdependent residues that coalesce within the receptor's 3D structure.

Potentiation of a neuronal nicotinic receptor via pseudo-agonist site.

Neuronal nicotinic receptors containing α4 and ß2 subunits assemble in two pentameric stoichiometries, (α4)3(ß2)2 and (α4)2(ß2)3, each with distinct pharmacological signatures; (α4)3(ß2)2 receptors are strongly potentiated by the drug NS9283, whereas (α4)2(ß2)3 receptors are unaffected. Despite this stoichiometry-selective pharmacology, the molecular identity of the target for NS9283 remains elusive. Here, studying (α4)3(ß2)2 receptors, we show that mutations at either the principal face of the ß2 subunit or the complementary face of the α4 subunit prevent NS9283 potentiation of ACh-elicited single-channel currents, suggesting the drug targets the ß2-α4 pseudo-agonist sites, the α4-α4 agonist site, or both sites. To distinguish among these possibilities, we generated concatemeric receptors with mutations at specified subunit interfaces, and monitored the ability of NS9283 to potentiate ACh-elicited single-channel currents. We find that a mutation at the principal face of the ß2 subunit at either ß2-α4 pseudo-agonist site suppresses potentiation, whereas mutation at the complementary face of the α4 subunit at the α4-α4 agonist site allows a significant potentiation. Thus, monitoring potentiation of single concatemeric receptor channels reveals that the ß2-α4 pseudo-agonist sites are required for stoichiometry-selective drug action. Together with the recently determined structure of the (α4)3(ß2)2 receptor, the findings have implications for structure-guided drug design.

The fifth subunit of the (α4ß2)2 ß2 nicotinic ACh receptor modulates maximal ACh responses.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The fifth subunit in the (α4ß2)2 α4 nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR) plays a determining role in the pharmacology of this nAChR type. Here, we have examined the role of the fifth subunit in the ACh responses of the (α4ß2)2 ß2 nAChR type. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The role of the fifth subunit in receptor function was explored using two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology, along with subunit-targeted mutagenesis and the substituted cysteine scanning method applied to fully linked (α4ß2)2 ß2 receptors. KEY RESULTS: Covalent modification of the cysteine-substituted fifth subunit with a thiol-reactive agent (MTS) caused irreversible inhibition of receptor function. ACh reduced the rate of the reaction to MTS, but the competitive inhibitor dihydro-ß-erythroidine had no effect. Alanine substitution of conserved residues that line the core of the agonist sites on α4(+)/ß2(-) interfaces did not impair receptor function. However, impairment of agonist binding to α4(+)/ß2(-) agonist sites by mutagenesis modified the effect of ACh on the rate of the reaction to MTS. The extent of this effect was dependent on the position of the agonist site relative to the fifth subunit. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The fifth subunit in the (α4ß2)2 ß2 receptor isoform modulates maximal ACh responses. This effect appears to be driven by a modulatory, and asymmetric, association with the α4(+)/ß2(-) agonist sites. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.11/issuetoc.

α4ß2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SUBUNIT STOICHIOMETRY AND FUNCTION AT THE SINGLE CHANNEL LEVEL.

Acetylcholine receptors comprising α4 and ß2 subunits are the most abundant class of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the brain. They contribute to cognition, reward, mood, and nociception and are implicated in a range of neurological disorders. Previous measurements of whole-cell macroscopic currents showed that α4 and ß2 subunits assemble in two predominant pentameric stoichiometries, which differ in their sensitivity to agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators. Here we compare agonist-elicited single channel currents from receptors assembled with an excess of either the α4 or ß2 subunit, forming receptor populations biased toward one or the other stoichiometry, with currents from receptors composed of five concatemeric subunits in which the subunit stoichiometry is predetermined. Our results associate each subunit stoichiometry with a unique single channel conductance, mean open channel lifetime, and sensitivity to the allosteric potentiator 3-[3-(3-pyridinyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]benzonitrile (NS-9283). Receptors with the composition (α4ß2)2α4 exhibit high single channel conductance, brief mean open lifetime, and strong potentiation by NS-9283, whereas receptors with the composition (α4ß2)2ß2 exhibit low single channel conductance and long mean open lifetime and are not potentiated by NS-9283. Thus single channel current measurements reveal bases for the distinct functional and pharmacological properties endowed by different stoichiometries of α4 and ß2 subunits and establish pentameric concatemers as a means to delineate interactions between subunits that confer these properties.

Role of the Cys Loop and Transmembrane Domain in the Allosteric Modulation of α4ß2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.

Allosteric modulators of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels are thought to act on elements of the pathways that couple agonist binding to channel gating. Using α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the α4ß2-selective positive modulators 17ß-estradiol (ßEST) and desformylflustrabromine (dFBr), we have identified pathways that link the binding sites for these modulators to the Cys loop, a region that is critical for channel gating in all pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. Previous studies have shown that the binding site for potentiating ßEST is in the C-terminal (post-M4) region of the α4 subunit. Here, using homology modeling in combination with mutagenesis and electrophysiology, we identified the binding site for potentiating dFBr on the top half of a cavity between the third (M3) and fourth transmembrane (M4) α-helices of the α4 subunit. We found that the binding sites for ßEST and dFBr communicate with the Cys loop, through interactions between the last residue of post-M4 and Phe170 of the conserved FPF sequence of the Cys loop, and that these interactions affect potentiating efficacy. In addition, interactions between a residue in M3 (Tyr309) and Phe167, a residue adjacent to the Cys loop FPF motif, also affect dFBr potentiating efficacy. Thus, the Cys loop acts as a key control element in the allosteric transduction pathway for potentiating ßEST and dFBr. Overall, we propose that positive allosteric modulators that bind the M3-M4 cavity or post-M4 region increase the efficacy of channel gating through interactions with the Cys loop.

Non-equivalent ligand selectivity of agonist sites in (α4ß2)2α4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a key determinant of agonist efficacy.

The α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is the most abundant nAChR type in the brain, and this receptor type exists in alternate (α4ß2)2α4 and (α4ß2)2ß2 forms, which are activated by agonists with strikingly differing efficacies. Recent breakthroughs have identified an additional operational agonist binding site in the (α4ß2)2α4 nAChR that is responsible for the signature sensitivity of this receptor to activation by agonists, yet the structural mechanisms determining agonist efficacy at this receptor type are not yet fully understood. In this study, we characterized the ligand selectivity of the individual agonist sites of the (α4ß2)2α4 nAChR to determine whether differences in agonist selectivity influence agonist efficacy. Applying the substituted cysteine accessibility method to individual agonist sites in concatenated (α4ß2)2α4 receptors, we determined the agonist selectivity of the agonist sites of the (α4ß2)2α4 receptor. We show that (a) accessibility of substituted cysteines to covalent modification by methanesulfonate reagent depends on the agonist site at which the modification occurs and (b) that agonists such as sazetidine-A and TC-2559 are excluded from the site at the α4/α4 interface. Given that additional binding to the agonist site in the α4/α4 interface increases acetylcholine efficacy and that agonists excluded from the agonist site at the α4/α4 interface behave as partial agonists, we conclude that the ability to engage all agonist sites in (α4ß2)2α4 nAChRs is a key determinant of agonist efficacy. The findings add another level of complexity to the structural mechanisms that govern agonist efficacy in heteromeric nAChRs and related ligand-gated ion channels.

Allosteric modulators of α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a new direction for antidepressant drug discovery.

Allosteric modulation of ligand-gated ion channels has been intensively studied in the past three decades and is now an established strategy to control receptor function in numerous disease states. Allosteric sites on the GABA(A) receptor are targets for widely prescribed drugs that are used for a variety of pathophysiological states including insomnia and epilepsy. Modulators might be especially valuable to control receptors for which the design of selective orthosteric drugs has proven difficult due to safety issues (e.g., α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and might have several advantages over orthosteric ligands. Modulators influence the action of the endogenous agonist but generally have no effect of their own on the unoccupied receptor. Moreover, the higher subtype selectivity exerted by modulators and that the effects of modulators depend on the simultaneous presence of agonist help to overcome safety problems by preventing over-dosage compared with the administration of orthosteric drugs.

Additional acetylcholine (ACh) binding site at alpha4/alpha4 interface of (alpha4beta2)2alpha4 nicotinic receptor influences agonist sensitivity.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α4 and ß2 subunits assemble in two alternate stoichiometries to produce (α4ß2)(2)α4 and (α4ß2)(2)ß2, which display different agonist sensitivities. Functionally relevant agonist binding sites are thought to be located at α4(+)/ß2(-) subunit interfaces, but because these interfaces are present in both receptor isoforms, it is unlikely that they account for differences in agonist sensitivities. In contrast, incorporation of either α4 or ß2 as auxiliary subunits produces isoform-specific α4(+)/α4(-) or ß2(+)/ß2(-) interfaces. Using fully concatenated (α4ß2)(2)α4 nAChRs in conjunction with structural modeling, chimeric receptors, and functional mutagenesis, we have identified an additional site at the α4(+)/α4(-) interface that accounts for isoform-specific agonist sensitivity of the (α4ß2)(2)α4 nAChR. The additional site resides in a region that also contains a potentiating Zn(2+) site but is engaged by agonists to contribute to receptor activation. By engineering α4 subunits to provide a free cysteine in loop C at the α4(+)α4(-) interface, we demonstrated that the acetylcholine responses of the mutated receptors are attenuated or enhanced, respectively, following treatment with the sulfhydryl reagent [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate or aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate. The findings suggest that agonist occupation of the site at the α4(+)/(α4(-) interface leads to channel gating through a coupling mechanism involving loop C. Overall, we propose that the additional agonist site at the α4(+)/α4(-) interface, when occupied by agonist, contributes to receptor activation and that this additional contribution underlies the agonist sensitivity signature of (α4ß2)(2)α4 nAChRs.