Impact of the COVID-19 related border restrictions on influenza and other common respiratory viral infections in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: New Zealand's (NZ) complete absence of community transmission of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) after May 2020, likely due to COVID-19 elimination measures, provided a rare opportunity to assess the impact of border restrictions on common respiratory viral infections over the ensuing 2 years. METHODS: We collected the data from multiple surveillance systems, including hospital-based severe acute respiratory infection surveillance, SHIVERS-II, -III and -IV community cohorts for acute respiratory infection (ARI) surveillance, HealthStat sentinel general practice (GP) based influenza-like illness surveillance and SHIVERS-V sentinel GP-based ARI surveillance, SHIVERS-V traveller ARI surveillance and laboratory-based surveillance. We described the data on influenza, RSV and other respiratory viral infections in NZ before, during and after various stages of the COVID related border restrictions. RESULTS: We observed that border closure to most people, and mandatory government-managed isolation and quarantine on arrival for those allowed to enter, appeared to be effective in keeping influenza and RSV infections out of the NZ community. Border restrictions did not affect community transmission of other respiratory viruses such as rhinovirus and parainfluenza virus type-1. Partial border relaxations through quarantine-free travel with Australia and other countries were quickly followed by importation of RSV in 2021 and influenza in 2022. CONCLUSION: Our findings inform future pandemic preparedness and strategies to model and manage the impact of influenza and other respiratory viral threats.

Circulation of influenza and other respiratory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand, 2020-2021.

Objective: Circulation patterns of influenza and other respiratory viruses have been globally disrupted since the emergence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the introduction of public health and social measures (PHSMs) aimed at reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Methods: We reviewed respiratory virus laboratory data, Google mobility data and PHSMs in five geographically diverse regions in Australia and New Zealand. We also described respiratory virus activity from January 2017 to August 2021. Results: We observed a change in the prevalence of circulating respiratory viruses following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2020. Influenza activity levels were very low in all regions, lower than those recorded in 2017-2019, with less than 1% of laboratory samples testing positive for influenza virus. In contrast, rates of human rhinovirus infection were increased. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) activity was delayed; however, once it returned, most regions experienced activity levels well above those seen in 2017-2019. The timing of the resurgence in the circulation of both rhinovirus and RSV differed within and between the two countries. Discussion: The findings of this study suggest that as domestic and international borders are opened up and other COVID-19 PHSMs are lifted, clinicians and public health professionals should be prepared for resurgences in influenza and other respiratory viruses. Recent patterns in RSV activity suggest that these resurgences in non-COVID-19 viruses have the potential to occur out of season and with increased impact.

Trends in penicillin dispensing during an acute rheumatic fever prevention programme.

AIM: Acute rheumatic fever (ARF), a serious inflammatory condition, often leads to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Between 2011 and 2016, Aotearoa New Zealand implemented a rheumatic fever prevention programme (RFPP) to reduce high rates of ARF through improved community access to timely diagnosis and early treatment of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis, which has been shown to prevent subsequent ARF. This study aimed to quantify the change in penicillin antibiotic dispensing rates among children aged 18 years or younger during the RFPP. METHOD: This retrospective analysis utilised administrative data from the National Pharmaceutical Collection. Using a controlled, interrupted time series analysis, the effect of the RFPP on antibiotic dispensing rates was explored. Poisson regression models were used to assess the change in dispensing rates during the RFPP among control regions (those not in the RFPP) and regions participating in the RFPP. The primary measure was rate ratio (RR) for the difference between the observed versus counterfactual rates of penicillin dispensing. RESULT: A total of 12,154,872 dispensing records between 2005 and 2018 were included. Amoxicillin was the most frequently dispensed penicillin (57.7%), followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate (23.4%). Amoxicillin dispensing increased by 4.3% in regions operating the RFPP compared to the increase in control regions (p<0.001). The overall rate of penicillin dispensing decreased, driven by a rapid decline in amoxicillin-clavulanate dispensing. CONCLUSION: During the RFPP an increase in amoxicillin dispensing was seen in regions participating in the programme and regions outside of the programme, indicating the programmatic approach led to improved adherence to recommended first-line antibiotics.

Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of dried blood spots for serological testing of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C Elecsys assays on the Roche Cobas system.

This study was performed to validate a dried blood spot (DBS) method for the serological screening of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C. It included 250 paired DBS and serum samples and 116 unpaired DBS samples from 366 unique patients from two laboratories between 8 October and 2 November 2021. As determined by original test request, these were tested using a DBS method for HIV Ag/Ab (n=216), anti-treponemal Ab (n=166), hepatitis B sAg (n=100), and hepatitis C Ab (n=100) Elecsys assays on the Roche Cobas automated platform. Using the manufacturer's (serum) cut-off for reactivity ('positivity'), the sensitivity and specificity of DBS testing compared with serum were: for HIV Ag/Ab 100% and 100%, for anti-treponemal Ab 68.3% and 100%, for hepatitis B sAg 95.9% and 100%, and for hepatitis C Ab 84.0% and 100%, respectively. Adjusting the assay cut-off using receiver operator curve analysis increased sensitivity of DBS testing for anti-treponemal Ab to 90.0%, hepatitis B sAg to 97.9% and hepatitis C Ab to 94.0% whilst maintaining specificity of 98.8%, 100% and 100%, respectively. With optimisation of assay cut-off, DBS can perform comparably with serum for serological testing for HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C and may be a valuable tool in increasing access to testing in New Zealand.

A comparison of the performance of saliva and nasopharyngeal nucleic acid amplification testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in New Zealand.

AIM: To compare detection of SARS-CoV-2 from paired nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva using molecular methods in common use for testing swabs in New Zealand. METHOD: Samples from individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Auckland, Wellington and Dunedin were tested at the local laboratories using methods previously established for these sample types. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six paired samples from unique individuals were tested, with 46 (23%) positive from either sample type, of which 43/46 (93%) tested positive from NPS, and 42/46 (91%) from saliva, indicating no significant difference in performance between sample types (p=0.69). The average Δ Ct between saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs overall across the sample set was 0.22 cycles, indicating excellent concordance; however, the difference between NPS and saliva collected from the same individual was quite variable with up to 19 cycles difference between the sample types. CONCLUSION: We found that saliva is an equivalent sample type to nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in our laboratories using multiple assay combinations and is suitable for use as a diagnostic and surveillance test for selected groups of individuals.

Sensitivity and potential utility of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen and nucleic acid amplification tests in the context of an elimination approach.

AIM: To assess the sensitivity and potential utility of five RATs and the IDNow, Liat and Oxsed nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in our population. METHOD: 39 retrospective and contrived SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were tested in parallel by standard RT-PCR and RAT. A second group of 44 samples was tested by standard RT-PCR, rapid RT-PCR and two isothermal NAAT assays. Limit of detection was compared at RT-PCR cycle thresholds for all assays. RESULTS: We found that the Cobas Liat RT-PCR had 100% concordance with conventional RT-PCR, whereas the sensitivity of other rapid NAAT assays was less at lower viral loads indicated by Cts >30 (p=0.042) and the RATs at Cts >25 (p<0.001). When applied to New Zealand testing scenarios, IDNow or Oxsed NAAT could miss up to 12% and RATs up to 44.3% of COVID-19 cases compared with the RT-PCR currently used at our laboratory. CONCLUSION: We found that the POC Cobas Liat, a platform that delivers a sample answer in 20 minutes, demonstrated equivalent performance to standard RT-PCR. However, the RATs and isothermal NAAT assays demonstrated reduced sensitivity, limiting their utility in New Zealand's currently very low prevalence setting.

Lack of N2-gene amplification on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay and potential novel causative mutations: A case series from Auckland, New Zealand.

We describe three cases with viral strains that demonstrate impaired N2-gene detection on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay, with two previously undescribed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): C29197T and G29227T. We propose that these SNPs are likely responsible since they are in close proximity to the previously described C29200T/C29200A SNPs, already shown to abolish N2-gene detection by the Xpert assay. Whether these SNPs abolish N2-gene detection by the Xpert assay individually or only in combination requires more work to elucidate.

COVID-19 serology: use and interpretation in New Zealand.

Serology is now a well-established diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infections in New Zealand. Using local and international experience, we provide an overview of serological response to infection and vaccination as well as the use and interpretation of antibody tests in our setting. We also discuss the potential future role of post-vaccination serology testing as a correlate of immunity. We conclude that, given the pitfalls of testing, clinical microbiologist advice is necessary for interpretation of high-consequence cases.

COVID-19 serology: use and interpretation in New Zealand.

Serology is now a well-established diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infections in New Zealand. Using local and international experience, we provide an overview of serological response to infection and vaccination as well as the use and interpretation of antibody tests in our setting. We also discuss the potential future role of post-vaccination serology testing as a correlate of immunity. We conclude that, given the pitfalls of testing, clinical microbiologist advice is necessary for interpretation of high-consequence cases.

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the Southern Region of New Zealand, 2020.

During New Zealand's first outbreak in early 2020 the Southern Region had the highest per capita SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was initially limited by a narrow case definition and limited laboratory capacity, and cases may have been missed. Our objectives were to evaluate the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG nucleocapsid assay, alongside spike-based assays, and to determine the frequency of antibodies among PCR-confirmed and probable cases, and higher risk individuals in the Southern Region of New Zealand. Pre-pandemic sera (n=300) were used to establish assay specificity and sera from PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients (n=78) to establish sensitivity. For prevalence analysis, all samples (n=1214) were tested on the Abbott assay, and all PCR-confirmed cases (n=78), probable cases (n=9), and higher risk individuals with 'grey-zone' (n=14) or positive results (n=11) were tested on four additional SARS-CoV-2 serological assays. The median time from infection onset to serum collection for PCR-confirmed cases was 14 weeks (range 11-17 weeks). The Abbott assay demonstrated a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI 98.2-99.99%) and a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI 66.0-85.7%). Spike-based assays demonstrated superior sensitivity ranging 89.7-94.9%. Nine previously undiagnosed sero-positive individuals were identified, and all had epidemiological risk factors. Spike-based assays demonstrated higher sensitivity than the Abbott IgG assay, likely due to temporal differences in antibody persistence. No unexpected SARS-CoV-2 infections were found in the Southern Region of New Zealand, supporting the elimination status of the country at the time this study was conducted.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load dynamics and real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold interpretation in symptomatic non-hospitalised individuals in New Zealand: a multicentre cross sectional observational study.

We conducted a multicentre cross sectional observational study of laboratory, public health and hospitalisation data for PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases within the New Zealand Northern Region, between 12 February and 8 June 2020. The aim of this study was to describe population level SARS-CoV-2 upper respiratory tract (URT) viral load dynamics by stratifying positivity rates and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values of URT samples from COVID-19 cases by days since symptom onset, and to explore utility of Ct values in determining length of time post-infection and thus potential infectivity. Of 123,124 samples tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR, 579 samples (407 positive and 172 negative) from 368 symptomatic non-hospitalised individuals with PCR-confirmed infection were included. Sample positivity rate was 61.5% (8/13) for pre-symptomatic samples, rising to 93.2% (317/340) for samples collected during the purported symptomatic infectious period (days 0-10 post-symptom onset), and dropping to 36.3% (82/226) for post-infectious period samples (day 11 onwards). URT viral load peaked shortly after symptom onset, with median Ct values ranging 20.00-29.99 until 15 days post-symptom onset, and >30.00 after this time. Of samples with a Ct value of <20.00, 96.1% were collected during the symptomatic infectious period. However, of samples with a Ct value ≥30.00 and ≥35.00, 46.9% and 18.5%, respectively, were also collected during the symptomatic infectious period. The findings of this study indicate that at or soon after symptom onset represents the optimum time to test for SARS-CoV-2 in the URT, with median Ct values suggesting the useful testing window extends until around 15 days post-symptom onset. In asymptomatic individuals or those with unknown dates of symptom onset, Ct values <20.00 imply recent onset/potential infectivity, but Ct values ≥30.00 or ≥35.00 do not exclude recent onset/potential infectivity. Individual sample Ct values should not be used as an absolute marker of length of time post-infection or to exclude infectivity where date of symptom onset is unavailable.

Comprehensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES: Circulating antibodies are important markers of previous infection and immunity. Questions remain with respect to the durability and functionality of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. This study explored antibody responses in recovered COVID-19 patients in a setting where the probability of re-exposure is effectively nil, owing to New Zealand's successful elimination strategy. METHODS: A triplex bead-based assay that detects antibody isotype (IgG, IgM and IgA) and subclass (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4) responses against Nucleocapsid (N) protein, the receptor binding domain (RBD) and Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 was developed. After establishing baseline levels with pre-pandemic control sera (n = 113), samples from PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients with mild-moderate disease (n = 189) collected up to 8 months post-infection were examined. The relationship between antigen-specific antibodies and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) was explored with a surrogate neutralisation assay that quantifies inhibition of the RBD/hACE-2 interaction. RESULTS: While most individuals had broad isotype and subclass responses to each antigen shortly after infection, only RBD and S protein IgG, as well as NAbs, were relatively stable over the study period, with 99%, 96% and 90% of samples, respectively, having responses over baseline 4-8 months post-infection. Anti-RBD antibodies were strongly correlated with NAbs at all time points (Pearson's r ≥ 0.87), and feasibility of using finger prick sampling to accurately measure anti-RBD IgG was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 persist for up to 8 months following mild-to-moderate infection. This robust response can be attributed to the initial exposure without immune boosting given the lack of community transmission in our setting.

Demographic and behavioural factors associated with antimicrobial susceptibility to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Antimicrobial resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) is of global public health concern. The aim of this study was to explore demographic and behavioural factors associated with antimicrobial susceptibility of NG to ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Gonococcal isolates (n = 391) from clients attending the Auckland Sexual Health Service, New Zealand, from July 2014 - June 2015 (n = 206), and July 2017 - June 2018 (n = 185), were tested for susceptibility to ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Laboratory data were linked with behavioural and demographic data. Geometric mean azithromycin MICs increased across the two time periods (0.239 mg/L in 2014/15 to 0.347 mg/L in 2017/18, p < 0.001), and ceftriaxone MICs decreased (0.007 mg/L in 2014/15 to 0.005 mg/L in 2017/18, p < 0.001). Demographic and behavioural factors were not associated with differences in ceftriaxone MICs; however azithromycin MICs were higher in men who have sex with men (0.356 mg/L) compared with the heterosexual study population (0.192 mg/L, p < 0.001) and were lower in Pacific peoples (0.201 mg/L, p < 0.001) and Maori (0.244 mg/L, p = 0.05) compared with those of European ethnicity (0.321 mg/L). Our findings show that azithromycin MICs increased in our region between 2014 and 2018; associations were seen with sexual orientation and ethnicity.

Evaluation of extraction and amplification assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 at Auckland Hospital laboratory during the COVID-19 outbreak in New Zealand.

Utilising diverse molecular platforms has formed a solid foundation in New Zealand's COVID-19 response. We evaluated multiple extraction and PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. We included 65 positive samples which were run on the Panther Fusion using a laboratory developed test (LDT, E gene target). Where viral RNA was extracted by MagNA Pure (MP) 96 extraction platform or EpMotion 5075/Geneaid extraction kit, SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed on Light Cycler (LC) 480 using a LDT (E gene) or 3 commercial assays; Certest Viasure (Orf1ab, N genes) GenePro (E, RdRp genes) and A* Star Fortitude (proprietary target). Median Cts on LC 480 LDT for specimens (n = 9) extracted on MP 96 (26.6) were lower than on EpMotion (31.6) whereas median Cts for specimens (n = 10) extracted on the Panther Fusion LDT (23.1) were comparable with MP 96 /LC480 LDT (23.6). Specimens tested on Panther Fusion LDT (n = 28), extracted by MP 96, and amplified using commercial assays showed good concordance with a few exceptions; lower median Ct values were seen for 2 targets on GenePro (16.9, 21.5) and Viasure (19.5, 21.1) than for the Panther Fusion LDT (24.2) and A* Star Fortitude (25.6). Specimens tested on MP 96 (n = 18) had comparable results using commercial assays, with lower median Cts for Viasure (22.2, 23.7) compared with the LC 480 LDT (24.7), GenePro (24.7,25.7) and A*Fortitude (25.1) assays. The study provides an early assessment of the performance characteristics of 3 extraction methods for viral RNA and 5 PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Appropriateness of trimethoprim as empiric treatment for cystitis in 15-55 year-old women: an audit.

AIM: To assess whether trimethoprim remains an appropriate empiric treatment for uncomplicated cystitis in women 15-55 years old. METHODS: General practitioners in Auckland, Nelson-Marlborough, Otago and Southland were invited to participate in this audit of current practice. Participating general practitioners were asked to submit urine to the laboratory for microscopy and culture from any woman aged 15-55 years presenting with uncomplicated cystitis. Urine samples submitted as part of the audit were identified by a "copy to" code. Data on laboratory results were extracted from the laboratory information system. RESULTS: Data were collected from June 2016 to August 2018. Four hundred and eighty-one samples were submitted, of which 340 (70.7%) met the inclusion criteria of the audit. A urinary pathogen was identified in 181 (53.2%) specimens, of which 148 (81.8%) were E. coli, 13 (7.2%) other coliforms and 20 (11.0%) Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Of the E. coli isolates, 109 of 148 (73.6%, 95% CI 66.6-80.7) were susceptible to trimethoprim, 144 of 144 (100%, 95% CI 100-100) to nitrofurantoin and 143 of 148 (96.6%, 95% CI 93.7-99.5) to cefalexin. Of the urinary pathogens, 139 of 185 (75.1%, 95% CI 68.9-81.4) were susceptible to trimethoprim, 164 of 177 tested (92.7%, 95% CI 88.8-96.5) to nitrofurantoin and 166 of 178 tested (93.3%, 95% CI 89.6-96.9) to cefalexin. Overall, a uropathogen resistant to trimethoprim was detected in 13.5%, to nitrofurantoin in 3.8%, and to cefalexin in 3.5% of samples tested. CONCLUSION: Similar rates of resistance to trimethoprim were seen in women 15-55 years old presenting with cystitis compared with unselected samples submitted from the general community. Given the high rates of resistance, trimethoprim is no longer appropriate as an empiric treatment option for cystitis in this group. Nitrofurantoin or cefalexin are appropriate alternative empiric treatment options. Given the current recommendation that a urine sample should not be submitted to the laboratory from women with uncomplicated cystitis, ongoing audits will be required to ensure that empiric treatment recommendations remain appropriate.

An understanding of discordant SARS-CoV-2 test results: an examination of the data from a central Auckland laboratory.

AIM: The diagnostic sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test has not been determined. This has led to a degree of uncertainty in the interpretation of results, particularly in patients tested repeatedly. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of patients who initially tested negative, and subsequently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This retrospective observational study utilised data from the LabPlus Virology laboratory, Auckland City Hospital, to identify cases (hospital and community) with initial negative and subsequent positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results. Their clinical and laboratory characteristics were summarised. RESULTS: From 1 February to 13 April a total of 20,089 samples were received for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Of 2,011 samples from patients with multiple tests, 25 samples were positive. Nine samples were from patients who initially tested negative then tested positive. Reasons for the initial negative test results, which were all from upper respiratory tract samples, included pre-symptomatic presentation or late presentation. All patients had significant risk factors and ongoing or evolving symptoms, which warranted repeat testing. CONCLUSION: Few patients had discordant test results for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. For patients who have a significant risk factor and a negative test result, repeat testing should be performed.

Age-related differences in SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Northern Region of New Zealand.

AIM: There is concern the low incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children reflects under-testing in this population. This study sought to describe the age-distribution of SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Northern Region of New Zealand. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre review of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, between 12 February and 18 April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 22,333 tests were performed, with 313 (1.40%) positive results. The age-adjusted SARS-CoV-2 testing rate was three times higher in adults than in children. The overall proportion of positive tests was lower in children (0.86%) than adults (1.45%). However, within the paediatric population the proportion of tests positive differed significantly between those <10 years old (0.08%) and those 10-14 years old (2.6%). CONCLUSION: The lower proportion of tests positive in children <10 years of age suggests they are appropriately tested relative to their rates of disease. A large high school-associated cluster makes the higher proportion of tests positive in children 10-14 years old difficult to interpret. Older children may have a higher risk of infection and increasing testing in intermediate and high school aged children may be indicated.