Guidelines for nutrition therapy in critical illness: are not they all the same?

In general, clinical guidelines identify, summarize, and evaluate the most current data concerning prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy and cost for a specific patient population. This paper will briefly describe the authors' point of view regarding controversial aspects of adult critical care nutrition therapy guidelines published by preeminent professional societies in the United States (US), Canada, and Europe. The US guidelines were developed by subject matter experts to offer recommendations for specialized nutrition therapy that are supported by review and analysis of the pertinent current literature, other national and international guidelines, and by a blend of expert opinion and clinical practicality. A similar strategy was used to compile all three guideline publications resulting in many areas of common agreement, but disparate substantive recommendations do exist regarding: indirect calorimetry versus predictive equations, prokinetics in the intensive care unit (ICU), arginine use in the ICU, probiotic use in the ICU, and acceptable gastric residual volumes in the ICU patient. All of the guidelines are based on high quality studies in patients with critical illness, but like any other therapeutic modality for an ICU patient, nutritional interventions require a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates institutional best practices, individual patient considerations, and above all, clinical judgment.

Positioning a safe gastric puncture point before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

To position a safe gastric puncture point prior to the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) a technique using an abdominal plain film with a gastric insufflation was assessed. After insufflated with 500 ml of air, an abdominal plain film was obtained before PEG in 84 patients. The body of the stomach near the angularis, equidistant from the greater and lesser curves, was defined as the optimal gastric puncture point. The location of the puncture points varied greatly, being situated over the right upper quadrant in 31% of patients, left upper in 59%, right lower in 5% and left lower quadrant in 5% of patients. The marked puncture points on abdominal film in some patients were shown to be partially covered by colon or small bowel loop, lie high under the costal margin, or low beneath the umbilicus. An abdominal plain film utilising a gastric insufflation technique prior to PEG may help to determine optimal gastric puncture site selection. Use this technique in clinical practice might hasten procedural time, provide better assurance to the clinical doctor, and provide an added margin of safety for the patient.

Validation the use of refractometer and mathematic equations to measure dietary formula contents for clinical application.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric residual volumes are widely used to evaluate gastric emptying for patients receiving enteral feeding, but controversy exists about what constitutes gastric residual volume. We have developed a method by using refractometer and derived mathematical equations to calculate the formula concentration, total residual volume (TRV), and formula volume. In this study, we like to validate these mathematical equations before they can be implemented for clinical patient care. METHODS: Four dietary formulas were evaluated in two consecutive validation experiments. Firstly, dietary formula volume of 50, 100, 200, and 400 ml were diluted with 50 ml water, and then the Brix value (BV) was measured by the refractometer. Secondly, 50 ml of water, then 100 ml of dietary formula were infused into a beaker, and followed by the BV measurement. After this, 50 ml of water was infused and followed by the second BV measurement. The entire procedure of infusing of dietary formula (100 ml) and waster (50 ml) was repeated twice and followed by the BV measurement. RESULTS: The formula contents (formula concentration, TRV, and formula volume) were calculated by mathematical equations. The calculated formula concentrations, TRVs, and formula volumes measured from mathematic equations were strongly close to the true values in the first and second validation experiments (R2>0.98, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Refractometer and the derived mathematical equations may be used to accurately measure the formula concentration, TRV, and formula volume and served as a tool to monitor gastric emptying for patients receiving enteral feeding.

Continuous nasogastric tube feeding: monitoring by combined use of refractometry and traditional gastric residual volumes.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Traditional use of gastric residual volumes (GRVs) is insensitive and cannot distinguish retained enteral formula from the large volume of endogenous secretions. We designed this prospective study to determine whether refractometry and Brix value (BV) measurements could be used to monitor gastric emptying and tolerance in patients receiving continuous enteral feeding. METHODS: Thirty-six patients on continuous nasogastric tube feeding were divided into two groups; patients with lower GRVs (<75 ml) in Group 1, patients with higher GRVs (>75 ml) in Group 2. Upon entry, all gastric contents were aspirated, the volume was recorded (Asp GRV), BV measurements were made by refractometry, and then the contents were reinstilled but diluted with 30 ml additional water. Finally, a small amount was reaspirated and repeat BV measurements were made. Three hours later, the entire procedure was repeated a second time. The BV ratio, calculated (Cal) GRV, and volume of formula remaining were calculated by derived equations. RESULTS: Mean BV ratios were significantly higher for those patients in Group 2 compared to those in Group 1. All but one of the 22 patients (95%) in Group 1 had a volume of formula remaining in the stomach estimated on both measurements to be less than the hourly infusion rate (all these patients had BV ratios <70%). In contrast, six of the 14 patients in Group 2 (43%) on both measurements were estimated to have volumes of formula remaining that were greater than the hourly infusion rate (all these patients had BV ratios >70%). Three of the Group 2 patients (21%) whose initial measurement showed evidence for retention of formula, improved on repeat follow-up measurement assuring adequate gastric emptying. The remaining five patients from Group 2 (35%) had a volume of formula remaining that was less than the hourly infusion rate on both measurements. The pattern of Asp GRVs and serial pre- and post-dilution BVs failed to differentiate these patients in Group 2 with potential emptying problems from those with sufficient gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Refractometry and measurement of the BV may improve the clinical utilization of GRVs, by its ability to identify the component of formula within gastric contents and track changes in that component related to gastric emptying.

Should indirect calorimetry be used as part of nutritional assessment?

The use of indirect calorimetry in the design of nutritional support regimens is poorly appreciated by clinicians, who fail to recognize the importance of providing a sufficient volume of enteral feeding to critically ill patients. In contrast to the overfeeding that routinely occurred in the past with the provision of total parenteral nutrition, patients placed on the enteral route of support tend to be underfed because of problems with intolerance and frequent cessation. Clearly identifying and coming as close as possible to the caloric goal may be required to achieve the therapeutic endpoints of enteral tube feeding (which include maintenance of gut integrity, attenuation of the stress response, prophylaxis against stress-induced gastropathy, and stimulation of immune function). Indirect calorimetry is a convenient, accessible, and highly accurate instrument for the measurement of caloric requirements and is a valuable tool for the optimization of nutritional support in the intensive care unit.

Dissecting the energy needs of the body.

The majority of the resting energy expenditure can be explained by the energy needs of a few highly metabolic organs, making up a small percentage of the body by weight. The relationship of the specific size, individual metabolism, and proportional contribution to the actual body weight and total energy expenditure for each of these organs is a dynamic process throughout growth and development, the onset of disease, and changes in nutritional status. Defining the energy needs of the individual tissues and organ systems immeasurably enhances our understanding of the body's response to these clinical processes, which otherwise could not easily be evaluated by focusing solely on total energy expenditure, fat-free mass, nitrogen imbalance, or actual body weight. Recently reported studies have served mainly to reinforce concepts described previously, and clarify some areas of controversy.

Mistakes on EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma: error in interpretation or deception from innate pathologic features?

BACKGROUND: Because endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) accuracy for staging gastrointestinal tract tumors is limited by many factors, this study was designed to analyze potential sources of error in the EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: All patients referred for EUS evaluation of colorectal carcinoma were staged prospectively by one ultrasonographer and retrospectively by two others with EUS videotape recordings. Pathologic staging was done independently in a blinded fashion. Deceptive pathologic features were defined for T staging by presence of inflammation extending beyond tumor or microscopic spread without inflammation extending to a level consistent with the next stage, and for N staging by large (> or = 10 mm) benign lymph nodes or small (< 10 mm) malignant lymph nodes. RESULTS: Of 22 patients entered into the study, an inflammatory reaction around microscopic tumor spread thought to actually enhance detection by EUS was present in 57.1% of cases. Nine deceptive pathologic lesions were present in 36.4% (8 of 22) of patients (5 T stage, 4 N stage lesions). Of 40 T and N stage mistakes made by the three physicians, 45% were made in the presence and 55% in the absence of deceptive pathologic lesions. Accuracy increased significantly from the presence to absence of deceptive pathologic lesions, from 53.3% to 83.7% (p = 0.029) for T stage, and 8.3% to 73. 1% for N stage (p = 0.0001). Confidence of T staging correlated significantly with accuracy, increasing from 63.3% when unsure to 88. 2% with staging certainty (p = 0.017), an effect not seen for N staging. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation and desmoplasia around colorectal carcinoma are often present, but may actually enhance EUS detection of microscopic tumor spread. Deceptive pathologic lesions are present in only one third of patients, but account for almost half (45%) of the errors in T and N staging by EUS. Diagnostic accuracy for EUS was increased with confidence in T stage assessment (but not N stage) and in the absence of deceptive pathologic lesions. Errors in interpretation still accounted for the majority of mistakes (55%) made in EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma.

Artificial nutrition in pancreatic disease: what lessons have we learned from the literature?

Acute pancreatitis is a disease process that begins with an initial injury to the pancreatic acinar cell due to the erroneous premature activation and intracellular release of digestive enzymes. The local injury is amplified through the induction of a systemic inflammatory response, mediated by the generation and release of cytokines and an aggressive inflammatory cell recruitment. Failure to maintain gut integrity may exacerbate the stress response and the systemic inflammatory reaction associated with this process, worsening the overall clinical severity of the pancreatitis and contributing further to complications of organ failure and nosocomial infection. Emphasis in the clinical nutritional management of these patients has shifted from efforts to minimize stimulation of the gland, to attaining enteral access, starting tube feeds low in the gastrointestinal tract, and monitoring tolerance. While clinical guidelines help identify those patients with acute pancreatitis at greatest need for aggressive nutritional support, the proper timing to initiate feeding, the optimal composition of the enteral formula, and whether or not enteral feeding is better than no nutritional therapy is still not clear from the current literature.

Infusion protocol improves delivery of enteral tube feeding in the critical care unit.

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors may impede the delivery of enteral tube feedings (ETF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We designed a prospective study to determine whether the use of an infusion protocol could improve the delivery of ETF in the ICU. METHODS: In a prior prospective study, we monitored all patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) or cardiac care unit (CCU) who were made nil per os and placed on ETF (control group). We found that critically ill patients received only 52% of their goal calories, primarily due to physician underordering (66% of goal), frequent cessations of ETF (22% of the time), and slow advancement (14% at goal by 72 hours). Based on these findings, we developed an ETF protocol that incorporated standardized physician ordering and nursing procedures, rapid advancement, and limited ETF interruption. After extensive educational sessions, the ETF protocol was begun. Again, all patients admitted to the MICU or CCU who were made nil per os and placed on ETF were prospectively followed (protocol group). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in the protocol group were followed during 312 days of ETF and compared with the control group (44 patients with 339 days of ETF). Despite efforts by the nutritional support team, the infusion protocol was used in only 18 patients (58%). The main reasons for noncompliance with the protocol were physician preference and system failure (ETF order sheet not placed in chart). When used, the infusion protocol improved physician ordering (control 66% of goal volume, noncompliant 68%, compliant 82%, p < .05); delivery of calories (control 52% of goal, noncompliant 55%, compliant 68%, p < .05); and advancement of ETF (control 14% at goal by 72 hours, noncompliant 31%, compliant 56%, p < .05). Although significant reduction in ETF cessation due to nursing care was noted, it represented only a fraction of the total time ETF were stopped. Cessation due to residual volumes, patient tolerance, and procedure continued to be a frequent occurrence and was often avoidable. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based infusion protocol improved the delivery of ETF in the ICU, primarily because of better physician ordering and more rapid advancement. The nursing staff rapidly assimilated these changes. However, physicians' reluctance to use the protocol limited its efficacy and will need continued educational efforts.

Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impeding adequate delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate those factors that impact on the delivery of enteral tube feeding. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Medical intensive care units (ICU) and coronary care units at two university-based hospitals. PATIENTS: Forty-four medical ICU/coronary care unit patients (mean age, 57.8 yrs; 70% male) who were to receive nothing by mouth and were placed on enteral tube feeding. INTERVENTIONS: Rate of enteral tube feeding ordered, actual volume delivered, patient position, residual volume, flush volume, presence of blue food coloring in oropharynx, and stool frequency were recorded every 4 hrs. Duration and reason for cessation of enteral tube feeding were documented. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians ordered a daily mean volume of enteral tube feeding that was 65.6% of goal requirements, but an average of only 78.1% of the volume ordered was actually infused. Thus, patients received a mean volume of enteral tube feeding for all 339 days of infusion that was 51.6% of goal (range, 15.1% to 87.1%). Only 14% of patients reached > or = 90% of goal feeding (for a single day) within 72 hrs of the start of enteral tube feeding infusion. Of 24 patients weighed before and after, 54% were noted to lose weight on enteral tube feeding. Declining albumin levels through the enteral tube feeding period correlated significantly with decreasing percent of goal calories infused (p = .042; r2 = .13). Diarrhea occurred in 23 patients (52.3%) for a mean 38.2% of enteral tube feeding days. In >1490 bedside evaluations, patients were observed to be in the supine position only 0.45%, residual volume of >200 mL was found 2.8%, and blue food coloring was found in the oropharynx 5.1% of the time. Despite this, cessation of enteral tube feeding occurred in 83.7% of patients for a mean 19.6% of the potential infusion time. Sixty-six percent of the enteral tube feeding cessations was judged to be attributable to avoidable causes. CONCLUSIONS: The current manner in which enteral tube feeding is delivered in the ICU results in grossly inadequate nutritional support. Barely one half of patient caloric requirements are met because of underordering by physicians and reduced delivery through frequent and often inappropriate cessation of feedings.

Indirect calorimetry: can this technology impact patient outcome?

This review of 23 papers involving indirect calorimetry published over the past 18 months shows how our understanding of the metabolic response to injury has changed, highlights the problems introduced by use of predictive equations and alterations in indirect calorimetry testing protocol, and emphasizes the need to monitor cumulative energy balance by comparing daily caloric intake to energy expenditure.

Preoperative issues in clinical nutrition.

Allowing a patient's nutritional state to deteriorate through the perioperative period adversely affects measureable outcome related to nosocomial infection, multiple organ dysfunction, wound healing, and functional recovery. Careful preoperative nutritional assessment should include a determination of the level of stress, an evaluation of the status of the GI tract, and the development of specific plans for securing enteral access. Patients already demonstrating compromise of nutritional status (defined by > 10% weight loss and serum albumin level < 2.5 g/dL) should be considered for a minimum of 7 to 10 days of nutritional repletion prior to surgery. Widespread use of total parenteral nutrition in unselected patients is unwarranted, may actually worsen outcome, and should be reserved for preoperative nutritional support only in severely malnourished patients in whom the GI tract is unavailable. Compared with the parenteral route, use of perioperative enteral feeding has been shown to provide more consistent and beneficial results, and can be expected to promote specific advantages in long-term morbidity and mortality.

Are patients fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements?

BACKGROUND: Specific morbidity related to underfeeding and overfeeding necessitates the design of nutrition support regimens that provide calories equal to those required on the basis of energy expenditure. This prospective multicenter trial was designed to determine what percent of patients in long-term acute care facilities receive feeding appropriate to their needs and whether accuracy of feeding has an impact on patient clinical status. METHODS: Patients on mechanical ventilation who were hospitalized at 32 Vencor Hospitals over a 9-week period and who were receiving only enteral nutrition by continuous infusion at a presumed goal rate were evaluated once by indirect calorimetry (IC) while on feeding. Caloric intake over the preceding 24 hours was determined by physician orders and by patient intake/output (I/O) record. Caloric requirements were defined by measured resting energy expenditure (REE) + 10% for activity. Degree of metabolism was defined by the ratio: (measured REE/Harris-Benedict predicted REE) x 100, and the degree of feeding by the ratio: (calories provided/calories required) x 100. RESULTS: IC was performed on 335 patients (mean, 11.2 patients per center; range, 1 to 32), of which 72 were excluded for nonphysiological results or failure to achieve steady state, 21 for receiving parenteral nutrition, and 29 for not being on mechanical ventilation at time of testing. The 213 study patients were 58.7% male with mean age 70.1 years (range, 20 to 90 years). Measured REE was <25 kcal/kg in 66.2% of patients and 25 to 35 kcal/kg in 28.6%. Barely half (48.4%) of this patient population was hypermetabolic. Based on physician orders, the majority of patients (58.2%) were overfed, receiving >110% of required calories, and 12.2% were underfed, receiving <90% of requirements. Discrepancies based on I/O records, however, suggested that 36.1% of patients received <90% of those calories ordered. By either basis, only about 25% of patients received feeding within 10% of required calories. The percent of patients being overfed varied between centers, ranging from 32.2% to 92.8%, and was not affected by years of facility IC experience or volume of IC studies per month. The pattern of caloric provision as measured by degree of feeding correlated inversely to degree of metabolism (p < .0001, R2 = .24). Accuracy of feeding had an impact on ventilatory status, as degree of feeding correlated inversely with minute ventilation (p = .001, R2 = .05). Degree of overfeeding also led to significant increases in azotemia (p = .033, R2 = .02). Extrapolating study data over 1 year, reduction in excess volume of enteral formula would have resulted in a cost savings of up to $1.3 million for the Vencor system. CONCLUSIONS: Because energy expenditure is difficult to predict on the basis of conventional equations, patients in long-term acute care facilities routinely are overfed and underfed, with only 25% receiving calories within 10% of required needs. Measuring a patient's energy requirement at least once by IC is important, because the degree of metabolism predicts how easily a patient will be underfed or overfed. The amount of infused calories should be compared with caloric requirements measured by IC, because the accuracy or degree of underfeeding or overfeeding has an impact on ventilatory status and the likelihood for developing azotemia. Although physician practice or bias may reduce the optimal clinical effect, the use of IC to determine caloric requirements may result in significant cost savings.

Nutritional management in acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Patients with severe pancreatitis, characterized by multiple organ failure and pancreatic necrosis on CT scan (identified by an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of > or = 10 with > or = 3 Ranson criteria), most likely require aggressive nutritional support. Use of the enteral route of feeding may help contain the hypermetabolic stress response, reduce morphologic change and atrophy of the gut, and theoretically decrease late complications of nosocomial infection and organ failure. Evidence that decreasing degrees of stimulation of the pancreas occur as the site of feeding descends in the gastrointestinal tract and evidence from perspective, randomized trials suggest that jejunal feeding appears at least as safe and well tolerated as total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis.

Pyogenic liver abscesses: a comparison of older and younger patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether older patients with pyogenic liver abscess have distinctive presenting features or if their management differs from that of younger patients. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of all cases occurring from 1982 to 1992. SETTING: A regional trauma centre and two large community hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 38 individuals with a final diagnosis of pyogenic liver abscess. Seventeen patients aged 70 or older comprised the study group and 21 patients under age 70 the comparison group. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical features, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions and outcomes were sought. The presumed aetiology of the abscess was determined. RESULTS: The study group had fewer men (47% vs 81%, P=0.028), less abdominal tenderness on physical examination (41% vs 76%, P=0.028) and fewer positive blood cultures in those sampled (31% vs 67%, P=0.04) than the comparison group. No study group patient had a history of trauma. Times to diagnosis were 3.2 and 5.9 days (P=0.14) and lengths of stay 21.6 and 29.3 days (P=0.08) for study and comparison groups, respectively. There were no differences in mortality or other demographic, clinical, laboratory or pathological variables. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with pyogenic liver abscess have some subtle differences in clinical and laboratory presentation, but these do not appear to delay diagnosis. Active management is tolerated well, with no difference in mortality.

Clinical nutrition in pancreatitis.

In patients with acute pancreatitis or an acute flare of chronic pancreatitis, a discrepancy exists between increased protein/calorie requirements induced by a hypermetabolic stress state and reduced ingestion/assimilation of exogenous nutrients, which promotes progressive nutritional deterioration. Patients with severe pancreatitis (defined by > or =3 Ranson criteria, an APACHE II score of > or =10, development of major organ failure, and/or presence of pancreatic necrosis) are more likely to require aggressive nutritional support than patients with mild disease. The type of formula and level of the gastrointestinal tract into which nutrients are infused determine the degree to which pancreatic exocrine secretion is stimulated. Animal studies and early prospective randomized controlled trials in humans suggest that total enteral nutrition via jejunal feeding may be the preferred route to parenteral alimentation in this disease setting.