Who Says You can't go FAST at Night? Use of a Novel Ultrasound-Capable Night Vision Device for Prehospital Medical Personnel to Identify Noncompressible Truncal Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of abdominal hemorrhage via ultrasound has life-saving implications for military and civilian trauma. However, strict adherence to light discipline may prohibit the use of ultrasound devices in the deployed setting. Additionally, current night vision devices remain noncompatible with ultrasound technology. This study sought to assess an innovative night vision device with ultrasound capable picture-in-picture display via a intraabdominal hemorrhage model to identify noncompressible truncal hemorrhage in blackout conditions. METHODS: 8 post mortem fetal porcine specimens were used and divided into 2 groups: intrabdominal hemorrhage (n = 4) vs no hemorrhage (n = 4). Intrabdominal hemorrhage was modeled via direct injection of 200 mL of normal saline into the peritoneal cavity. Under blackout conditions, 5 participants performed a focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) exam on each model using the prototype ultrasound-capable night vision device. RESULTS: Of the 40 FAST exams performed, 95% (N = 38) resulted in the correct identification of intraabdominal hemorrhage. Of the incorrectly identified exams, both were false positives resulting in a 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 91% positive predictive value, and a 100% negative predictive value. All participants noted the novel device was easy to use and provided superior visualization for performing FAST exams under blackout conditions. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-enabled night vision prototype demonstrated promising results in identifying noncompressible truncal hemorrhage while maintaining strict light discipline in blackout conditions. Further research efforts should be directed at assessing the ability of providers to perform procedures in blackout conditions using the ultrasound-enabled prototype night vision device.

Hypothermia and the Global War on Terror: 18 Years of Minimal Progress.

INTRODUCTION: The association between hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis in trauma is well described. Hypothermia mitigation starts in the prehospital setting; however, it is often a secondary focus after other life-saving interventions. The deployed environment further compounds the problem due to prolonged evacuation times in rotary wing aircraft, resource limitations, and competing priorities. This analysis evaluates hypothermia in combat casualties and the relationship to resuscitation strategy with blood products. METHODS: Using the data from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma Registry from 2003 to 2021, a retrospective analysis was conducted on adult trauma patients. Inclusion criteria was arrival at the first military treatment facility (MTF) hypothermic (<95ºF). Study variables included: mortality, year, demographics, battle vs non-battle injury, mechanism, theater of operation, vitals, and labs. Subgroup analysis was performed on severely injured (15 < ISS < 75) hypothermic trauma patients resuscitated with whole blood (WB) vs only component therapy. RESULTS: Of the 69,364 patients included, 908 (1.3%) arrived hypothermic; the vast majority of whom (N = 847, 93.3%) arrived mildly hypothermic (90-94.9°F). Overall mortality rate was 14.8%. Rates of hypothermia varied by year from 0.7% in 2003 to 3.9% in 2014 (P <0.005). On subgroup analysis, mortality rates were similar between patients resuscitated with WB vs only component therapy; though base deficit values were higher in the WB cohort (-10 vs -6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite nearly 20 years of combat operations, hypothermia continues to be a challenge in military trauma and is associated with a high mortality rate. Mortality was similar between hypothermic trauma patients resuscitated with WB vs component therapy, despite greater physiologic derangements on arrival in patients who received WB. As the military has the potential to conduct missions in environments where the risk of hypothermia is high, further research into hypothermia mitigation techniques and resuscitation strategies in the deployed setting is warranted.

Quantifying the benefit of whole blood on mortality in trauma patients requiring emergent laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) transfusions in trauma represent an increasingly utilized resuscitation strategy in trauma patients. Previous reports suggest a probable mortality benefit with incorporating WB into massive transfusion protocols. However, questions surrounding optimal WB practices persist. We sought to assess the association between the proportion of WB transfused during the initial resuscitative period and its impact on early mortality outcomes for traumatically injured patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of severely injured patients requiring emergent laparotomy and ≥ 3 units of red blood cell containing products (WB or packed red blood cells) within the first hour from an ACS Level 1 Trauma Center (2019-2022). Patients were evaluated based on the proportion of WB they received compared to packed red blood cells during their initial resuscitation (high ratio cohort ≥50% WB vs low ratio cohort <50% WB). Multilevel Bayesian regression analyses were performed to calculate the posterior probabilities and risk ratios (RR) associated with a WB predominant resuscitation for early mortality outcomes. RESULTS: 266 patients were analyzed (81% male, mean age of 36 years old, 61% penetrating injury, mean ISS of 30). The mortality was 11% at 4-hours and 14% at 24-hours. The high ratio cohort demonstrated a 99% (RR 0.12; 95% CrI 0.02-0.53) and 99% (RR 0.22; 95% CrI 0.08-0.65) probability of decreased mortality at 4-hours and 24-hours, respectively, compared the low ratio cohort. There was a 94% and 88% probability of at least a 50% mortality relative risk reduction associated with the WB predominate strategy at 4 hours and 24 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preferential transfusion of WB during the initial resuscitation demonstrated a 99% probability of being superior to component predominant resuscitations with regards to 4 and 24-hour mortality suggesting that WB predominant resuscitations may be superior for improving early mortality. Prospective, randomized trials should be sought. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

Mortality in hypotensive combat casualties who require emergent laparotomy in the forward deployed environment.

INTRODUCTION: Mortality rates among hypotensive civilian patients requiring emergent laparotomy exceed 40%. Damage control (DCR) principles were incorporated into the military's Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) in 2008. We examined combat casualties requiring emergent laparotomy to characterize how mortality rates compare to hypotensive civilian trauma patients. METHODS: The DoD Trauma Registry (2004-2020) was queried for adults who underwent combat laparotomy. Patients who were hypotensive were compared to normotensive patients. Mortality was the outcome of interest. Mortality rates before (2004-2007) and after (2009-2020) DCR CPG implementation were analyzed. RESULTS: 1051 patients were studied. Overall mortality was 6.5% for normotensive casualties and 28.7% for hypotensive casualties. Mortality decreased in normotensive patients but remained unchanged in hypotensive patients following the implementation of the DCR CPG. CONCLUSION: Hypotensive combat casualties undergoing emergent laparotomy demonstrated a mortality rate of 29.5%. Despite many advances, mortality rates remain high in hypotensive patients requiring emergent laparotomy.