Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Travel Med ; 31(2)2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anaphylaxis after receipt of yellow fever (YF) vaccine is highly variable based upon previously published reports. Anaphylaxis after receiving the YF vaccine has been reported to range from 0 up to 22 per 1 000 000 doses. Our clinical experience suggested increased incidence, which prompted our investigation. We sought to evaluate the current incidence rate of anaphylaxis after receipt of the 17D-204 strain YF-VAX® brand reported in the US. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports of anaphylaxis after receiving the YF-VAX vaccine occurring between 1 October 1999 and 30 September 2018. We utilized the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition and inclusion determination was made by a board-certified allergist. We also obtained the total number of YF-VAX doses distributed across the US during this same time-period and then calculated an updated incidence rate of YF-VAX vaccine-associated anaphylaxis. RESULTS: We identified 132 potential cases of possible or probable anaphylaxis. Of these, 111 met inclusion criteria: level 1 (n = 51), level 2 (n = 59) and level 3 (n = 1). The manufacturer reported a total distribution of 7 624 160 doses of YF-VAX from 1 October 1999 to 30 September 2018. The calculated incidence rate of YF-VAX vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is estimated at 14.6 events per 1 000 000 doses. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude the estimated rate of anaphylaxis per VAERS reports is 14.6 events per 1 000 000 doses after YF-VAX vaccination. This is consistent with some previous reports and substantially higher than rates of anaphylaxis after other vaccines.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Yellow Fever Vaccine , Yellow Fever , Humans , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination/adverse effects , Yellow Fever/epidemiology , Yellow Fever/prevention & control , Yellow Fever Vaccine/adverse effects
2.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0283988, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37155666

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) Characterize the initial clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of smallpox vaccine-associated hypersensitivity myocarditis and pericarditis (MP) in United States service members. (2) Describe the process of case identification and adjudication using the 2003 CDC nationally defined myocarditis/pericarditis epidemiologic case definitions to include consideration of case-specific diversity and evolving evidence. BACKGROUND: Between 2002 and 2016, 2.546 million service members received a smallpox Vaccinia vaccine. Acute MP is associated with vaccinia, but the long-term outcomes have not been studied. METHODS: Records of vaccinia-associated MP reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System by vaccination date were adjudicated using the 2003 MP epidemiologic case definitions for inclusion in a retrospective observational cohort study. Descriptive statistics of clinical characteristics, presentation, cardiac complications, and time course of clinical and cardiac recovery were calculated with comparisons by gender, diagnosis and time to recovery. RESULTS: Out of over 5000 adverse event reports, 348 MP cases who survived the acute illness, including 276 myocarditis (99.6% probable/confirmed) and 72 pericarditis (29.2% probable/confirmed), were adjudicated for inclusion in the long-term follow-up. Demographics included a median age of 24 years (IQR 21,30) and male predominance (96%). Compared to background military population, the myocarditis and pericarditis cohort had a higher percentage of white males by 8.2% (95% CI: 5.6, 10.0) and age <40 years by 4.2% (95% CI: 1.7,5.8). Long-term follow-up documented full recovery in 267/306 (87.3%) with 74.9% recovered in less than a year (median ~3 months). Among patients with myocarditis, the percentage who had a delayed time to recovery at time of last follow-up was 12.8% (95% CI: 2.1,24.7) higher in those with an acute left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of ≤50% and 13.5% (95% CI: 2.4,25.7) higher in those with hypokinesis. Patient complications included 6 ventricular arrhythmias (2 received implanted defibrillators) and 14 with atrial arrhythmias (2 received radiofrequency ablation). Three of 6 patients (50%) diagnosed with cardiomyopathy had clinical recovery at their last follow-up date. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity myocarditis/pericarditis following the smallpox vaccine is associated with full clinical and functional ventricular recovery in over 87% of cases (74.9% <1 year). A minority of MP cases experienced prolonged or incomplete recovery beyond 1 year.


Subject(s)
Military Health Services , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Vaccinia , Humans , Male , United States , Adult , Female , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Myocarditis/etiology , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Vaccinia/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Vaccination , Pericarditis/epidemiology , Pericarditis/etiology , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Smallpox/prevention & control , Vaccinia virus
6.
Mil Med ; 184(Suppl 1): 126-132, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30901393

ABSTRACT

Herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) affects individuals (60+ years) by reactivation of varicella virus from primary infection. Approximately one-third of the general population will develop HZ and are at increased risk of stroke. Our objective was describing possible associations between self-reported HZ vaccination and stroke with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System, a cross-sectional nationwide telephone survey. Non-institutionalized U.S. adults answered items concerning health risk behaviors. 2014 survey data were from 265,568 adults 50-79 years old. Multivariable Cox regressions adjusted for standard demographics, body mass index, and coronary heart disease showed that HZ-vaccinated individuals had lower risk of reporting stroke those not vaccinated (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.73). After stratification of participants into six 5-year age groups, adjusted weighted binary logistic regressions were conducted for each age group with stroke as outcome. The HZ-vaccinated group aged 65-69 years reported stroke approximately 50% less than those unvaccinated (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.51; 99% confidence interval [CI]:1.21,1.88). Secondary analyses indicated that this benefit was among HZ-vaccinated whites (aOR = 1.6, 95%CI:1.4,2.0), but not African Americans or Hispanics. These possible protective effects are not detected 10 years after recommended vaccine uptake. Limitations include not following participants longitudinally and that time between stroke and vaccination could not be determined.


Subject(s)
Geriatrics/statistics & numerical data , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/therapeutic use , Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Geriatrics/methods , Geriatrics/standards , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
7.
Vaccine ; 35(9): 1238-1245, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28169076

ABSTRACT

An Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) is an adverse reaction to a vaccination that goes above and beyond the usual side effects associated with vaccinations. One serious AEFI related to the smallpox vaccine is myopericarditis. Metabolomics involves the study of the low molecular weight metabolite profile of cells, tissues, and biological fluids, and provides a functional readout of the phenotype. Metabolomics may help identify a particular metabolic signature in serum of subjects who are predisposed to developing AEFIs. The goal of this study was to identify metabolic markers that may predict the development of adverse events following smallpox vaccination. Serum samples were collected from military personnel prior to and following receipt of smallpox vaccine. The study population included five subjects who were clinically diagnosed with myopericarditis, 30 subjects with asymptomatic elevation of troponins, and 31 subjects with systemic symptoms following immunization, and 34 subjects with no AEFI, serving as controls. Two-hundred pre- and post-smallpox vaccination sera were analyzed by untargeted metabolomics using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Baseline (pre-) and post-vaccination samples from individuals who experienced clinically verified myocarditis or asymptomatic elevation of troponins were more metabolically distinguishable pre- and post-vaccination compared to individuals who only experienced systemic symptoms, or controls. Metabolomics profiles pre- and post-receipt of vaccine differed substantially when an AEFI resulted. This study is the first to describe pre- and post-vaccination metabolic profiles of subjects who developed an adverse event following immunization. The study demonstrates the promise of metabolites for determining mechanisms associated with subjects who develop AEFI and the potential to develop predictive biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Metabolomics , Vaccines/adverse effects , Adult , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Asymptomatic Diseases , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Myocarditis/blood , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Pericarditis/blood , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Troponin/blood , Vaccination/adverse effects
8.
PLoS One ; 10(3): e0118283, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25793705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although myocarditis/pericarditis (MP) has been identified as an adverse event following smallpox vaccine (SPX), the prospective incidence of this reaction and new onset cardiac symptoms, including possible subclinical injury, has not been prospectively defined. PURPOSE: The study's primary objective was to determine the prospective incidence of new onset cardiac symptoms, clinical and possible subclinical MP in temporal association with immunization. METHODS: New onset cardiac symptoms, clinical MP and cardiac specific troponin T (cTnT) elevations following SPX (above individual baseline values) were measured in a multi-center prospective, active surveillance cohort study of healthy subjects receiving either smallpox vaccine or trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). RESULTS: New onset chest pain, dyspnea, and/or palpitations occurred in 10.6% of SPX-vaccinees and 2.6% of TIV-vaccinees within 30 days of immunization (relative risk (RR) 4.0, 95% CI: 1.7-9.3). Among the 1081 SPX-vaccinees with complete follow-up, 4 Caucasian males were diagnosed with probable myocarditis and 1 female with suspected pericarditis. This indicates a post-SPX incidence rate more than 200-times higher than the pre-SPX background population surveillance rate of myocarditis/pericarditis (RR 214, 95% CI 65-558). Additionally, 31 SPX-vaccinees without specific cardiac symptoms were found to have over 2-fold increases in cTnT (>99th percentile) from baseline (pre-SPX) during the window of risk for clinical myocarditis/pericarditis and meeting a proposed case definition for possible subclinical myocarditis. This rate is 60-times higher than the incidence rate of overt clinical cases. No clinical or possible subclinical myocarditis cases were identified in the TIV-vaccinated group. CONCLUSIONS: Passive surveillance significantly underestimates the true incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis after smallpox immunization. Evidence of subclinical transient cardiac muscle injury post-vaccinia immunization is a finding that requires further study to include long-term outcomes surveillance. Active safety surveillance is needed to identify adverse events that are not well understood or previously recognized.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Pericarditis/epidemiology , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Adult , Cohort Studies , Demography , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Troponin T/metabolism , United States/epidemiology , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
9.
Chest ; 122(6): 2204-11, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12475864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Recent international emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines have recommended that health-care professionals allow family members to be present during resuscitation attempts. To assess whether critical care professionals support these recommendations, we surveyed health-care professionals for their opinions regarding family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR). METHODS: We surveyed health-care professionals attending the International Meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians in San Francisco, CA, from October 23 to 26, 2000, about their CPR experience, their opinions on FWR, and demographic characteristics. The opinions of physicians, nurses, and other allied health professionals were compared, and differences in opinions based on demographics were examined. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two professionals were surveyed. Fewer physicians (20%) than nurses and allied health-care workers combined (39%) would allow family member presence during adult CPR (p = 0.0037 [chi(2) test]). Fourteen percent of physicians and 17% of nurses would allow a family presence during pediatric CPR. There was a significant difference among the opinions of US professionals, based on regional location. Professionals practicing in the northeastern states were less likely than other US professionals to allow FWR during adult or pediatric resuscitations (p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively [chi(2) test]). Midwestern professionals were more likely than others to allow family members to be present during an adult resuscitation, when compared to professional in the rest of the nation (p = 0.002 [chi(2) test]). Health-care professionals disapproving of family member presence during CPR did so because of the fear of psychological trauma to family members, performance anxiety affecting the CPR team, medicolegal concerns, and a fear of distraction to the resuscitation team. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation indicated that the majority of critical care professionals surveyed do not support the current recommendations provided by the ECC and CPR guidelines of 2000.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Family , Adult , Child , Family/psychology , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...