Examining missingness at the momentary level in clinical research using ecological momentary assessment: Implications for suicide research.

The use of intensive time sampling methods, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA), has increased in clinical, and specifically suicide, research during the past decade. While EMA can capture dynamic intraindividual processes, repeated assessments increase participant burden, potentially resulting in low compliance. This study aimed to shed light on study-level and psychological variables, including suicidal ideation (SI), that may predict momentary prompt (i.e., prompt-to-prompt) completion. We combined data from three EMA studies examining mental health difficulties (N = 103; 10,656 prompts; 7144 completed), using multilevel models and machine learning to determine how well we can predict prompt-to-prompt completion and which variables are most important. The two most important variables in prompt-to-prompt completion were hours since the last prompt and time in study. Psychological variables added little predictive validity; similarly, trait-level SI demonstrated a small effect on prompt-to-prompt completion. Our study showed how study-level characteristics can be used to explain prompt-to-prompt compliance rates in EMA research, highlighting the potential for developing adaptive assessment schedules to improve compliance.

Development and validation of the self-injury stigma scale.

Non-suicidal self-injury is a prevalent and concerning behavior. Negative beliefs and stereotypes about NSSI are associated with negative outcomes, and negative, self-referential beliefs (e.g., self-stigmatizing beliefs) related to engagement in NSSI may be particularly harmful. Despite this, there is no validated measure specifically designed to assess for NSSI self-stigma. As this significantly hinders the ability to understand and quantify the effect of NSSI self-stigma, this study sought to validate the newly developed Self-Injury Stigma Scale (SISS). It was hypothesized the SISS would follow a four-factor structure that parallels a widely cited theoretical model of stigma. It was also hypothesized measures of shame and help-seeking self-stigma would be moderately, negatively, correlated with the SISS subscales, supporting the measure's validity. Participants from Study 1 were college students (n = 264, 65.8% female) with at least one lifetime NSSI act. A series of factor analytic models revealed a one-factor structure for the Application of Stigma subscale (i.e., third step of the four-step model). As this was the only SISS subscale to achieve an appropriate model fit, this scale alone was retained as the final SISS. The factor structure was tested via confirmatory factor analysis on a second sample (i.e., community participants with at least one past month of NSSI act; n = 240, 41.3% female). An acceptable fit on most, but not all, indices was reached. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported. The SISS retrospectively predicted past 3 month NSSI frequency and method versatility, and lifetime NSSI versatility, but not lifetime NSSI frequency or disclosure. Thus, the clinical utility of the SISS was partially supported. Findings offering evidence in favor of the SISS's appropriateness and utility as a measure of self-stigma of NSSI. Future work using this measure has the potential to clarify the risk associated with NSSI self-stigma and inform behavioral interventions.

On the Selection of Item Scores or Composite Scores for Clinical Prediction.

Recent shifts to prioritize prediction, rather than explanation, in psychological science have increased applications of predictive modeling methods. However, composite predictors, such as sum scores, are still commonly used in practice. The motivations behind composite test scores are largely intertwined with reducing the influence of measurement error in answering explanatory questions. But this may be detrimental for predictive aims. The present paper examines the impact of utilizing composite or item-level predictors in linear regression. A mathematical examination of the bias-variance decomposition of prediction error in the presence of measurement error is provided. It is shown that prediction bias, which may be exacerbated by composite scoring, drives prediction error for linear regression. This may be particularly salient when composite scores are comprised of heterogeneous items such as in clinical scales where items correspond to symptoms. With sufficiently large training samples, the increased prediction variance associated with item scores becomes negligible even when composite scores are sufficient. Practical implications of predictor scoring are examined in an empirical example predicting suicidal ideation from various depression scales. Results show that item scores can markedly improve prediction particularly for symptom-based scales. Cross-validation methods can be used to empirically justify predictor scoring decisions.

Measurement invariance and response consistency of single-item assessments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

The present study aimed to expand the literature on single-item assessments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) by examining measurement invariance of commonly used single-item assessments of suicidal ideation (SI), planning (SP), and attempts (SA) with respect to race and ethnicity. Predictive invariance with respect to depression, and multi-item measures of passive and active SI were also explored. Measurement invariance was examined across (a) Black and White respondents and (b) Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic/-Latinx respondents. Participants (N = 1,624; 51.66% male) were recruited from Mechanical Turk and Prime Panels. Participants were administered four distinct single-item measures each for SI, SP, and SA across three timeframes (past month, past year, lifetime). Items were drawn from well-known large-scale studies (e.g., National Comorbidity Survey) and common suicide risk assessments. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine measurement invariance; regression with group by measure interactions were used to evaluate predictive invariance. Measurement invariance was observed for both Black (N = 534) and White (N = 1,089) respondents as well as Hispanic/Latinx (N = 335) and non-Hispanic/-Latinx (N = 1,288) respondents across single-item outcomes. Thus, SI, SP, and SA rates can be defensibly compared between Black and White and Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic/-Latinx respondents within studies; however, comparison of SI and SP rates across studies with differing assessment prompts should be met with caution. Multiple single-item STB measures demonstrated predictive bias across race and ethnicity suggesting potential differential screening capabilities. Elevated SI, SP, and SA rates for Hispanic/Latinx individuals were also observed. Findings reiterate the importance of minor language differences in single-item STB assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Comparing the role of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness in prospectively predicting active suicidal ideation.

OBJECTIVE: The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide has been foundational in guiding current suicide literature. Despite recent research underscoring fluctuations of suicidal ideation within hours, there have been few studies examining the key constructs of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness within an intensive framework. Thus, the current study aimed to add cumulative knowledge regarding the within-person relationship between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and active suicidal ideation as assessed within an ecological momentary assessment design. METHOD: A final sample of 35 individuals with a past-year history of suicidal thoughts or behaviors completed brief surveys four times per day for 30 days. RESULTS: Findings highlighted that the addition of covariates may offer small improvements in modeling subsequent suicidal ideation, while controlling for SI at the prior time. Further, both thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness were associated with next timepoint suicidal ideation, and their interaction added little incremental value. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate the potential importance of thwarted belongingness in predicting suicidal ideation. Further, results highlight that the main effects of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, rather than their interaction, may be more important to consider in relation to active suicidal ideation.

How we ask matters: The impact of question wording in single-item measurement of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

The present study aimed to extend prior literature on single-item assessment by examining response consistency (1) between several commonly used single-item assessments of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempts, and (2) across three timeframes (past month, past year, and lifetime) commonly employed in the literature. Participants (N = 613) were recruited from an online community, Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Participants were administered three sets of four distinct single-items assessing suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, and suicide attempt history, respecitvely. Items were drawn from well-known large-scale studies (e.g., National Comorbidity Survey; World Health Organization Mental Health Survey Initiative, Youth Risk Behavior Survey) and commonly used suicide risk assessments (i.e., Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview). Through examinations of intraclass correlations and confirmatory factor analyses, findings suggested mixed response agreement across most outcomes and timeframes. Response inconsistency among items assessing suicidal ideation and among items assessing suicidal planning were partly attributed to minor, yet important, language differences. Given findings that even minor language changes in suicidal ideation and planning items may inflate or restrict prevalence estimates in a meaningful way, it will be important for researchers and clinicians alike to pay close attention to the wording of single items in designing research studies, interpreting findings, and assessing patient risk.

A prospective examination of COVID-19-related social distancing practices on suicidal ideation.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred the implementation of several public safety measures to contain virus spread, most notably socially distancing policies. Prior research has linked similar public safety measures (i.e., quarantine) with suicide risk, in addition to supporting the role of social connection in suicidal thoughts and behaviors; consequently, there is a need to better understand the relationship between widespread social distancing policies and suicide risk. The current study aimed to examine the prospective association between COVID-19-related social distancing practices and suicidal ideation. METHODS: Participants (N = 472) completed measures of suicidal ideation and impacts of social distancing practices at baseline and two weeks later. RESULTS: After controlling for general psychosocial distress (i.e., depression, social connectedness), cross-lagged regression models identified prospective, bidirectional relationships between perceived impacts of social distancing on one's mental health and both passive and active suicidal ideation. The impact of social distancing on work/social routine was not associated with suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings suggest the importance of an individual's perception regarding the effect of social distancing on their mental health, rather than the disruption to work or social routine, in suicide risk. Findings highlight potential targets for suicide risk prevention and intervention.

Preliminary investigation of the association between COVID-19 and suicidal thoughts and behaviors in the U.S.

Evidence suggests that the negative consequences of COVID-19 may extend far beyond its considerable death toll, having a significant impact on psychological well-being. Despite work highlighting the link between previous epidemics and elevated suicide rates, there is limited research on the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Utilizing an online survey, the current study aimed to better understand the presence, and extent, of the association between COVID-19-related experiences and past-month suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adults in the United States recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (n = 907). Results support an association between several COVID-19-related experiences (i.e., general distress, fear of physical harm, effects of social distancing policies) and past-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Further, a significant proportion of those with recent suicidal ideation explicitly link their suicidal thoughts to COVID-19. Exploratory analyses highlight a potential additional link between COVID-19 and suicidal behavior, suggesting that a portion of individuals may be intentionally exposing themselves to the virus with intent to kill themselves. These findings underscore the need for suicide risk screening and access to mental health services during the current pandemic. Particular attention should be paid to employing public health campaigns to disseminate information on such services to reduce the enormity of distress and emotional impairment associated with COVID-19 in the United States.

Behavioral inhibition and posttrauma symptomatology: Moderating effects of safety behaviors and biological sex.

OBJECTIVES: Behavioral inhibition is a trait-level factor associated with posttraumatic stress. Safety behaviors may impact this link by interfering with anxiety habituation. The current study examined the unique and interactive effects of behavioral inhibition, safety behaviors, and participant sex on posttrauma symptom clusters. METHOD: Participants (N = 131; 75.6% female; M = 19.9 years) completed a trauma history interview and questionnaires assessing behavioral inhibition, safety behavior, and posttrauma symptom severity. RESULTS: Safety behaviors were associated with intrusion (partial correlations [pr] = 0.319), avoidance (pr = 0.274), cognition-mood (pr = 0.274), and arousal-reactivity (pr = 0.538) symptoms (all p ≤ 0.001). An interaction of sex and safety behaviors was noted for avoidance (p = 0.047, pr = -0.159) with a significant relation observed only among women ( p < 0.001, pr = 0.442). Safety behaviors also moderated the link between behavioral inhibition and arousal-reactivity (p = 0.002, pr = 0.272) with inhibition predicting symptoms at high levels of safety behavior (p = 0.024, pr = 0.171). CONCLUSION: Trauma-related safety behaviors are associated with greater posttrauma symptoms and evidence differential effects across individual symptom domains.