The role of heart rate variability in predicting delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brain and heart interact through multiple ways. Heart rate variability, a non-invasive measurement is studied extensively as a predicting model for various health conditions including subarachnoid hemorrhage, cancer, and diabetes. There is limited evidence to predict delirium, an acute fluctuating disorder of brain dysfunction, as it poses a significant challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU) and post-operative setting. In this systematic review of 9 articles, heart rate variability indices were used to investigate the occurrence of post-operative and ICU delirium. This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal evidence of a strong predilection between postoperative and intensive care unit delirium and alterations in the heart rate variability, measured by mean differences for standard deviation of NN-intervals. Other heart rate variability indices [root mean squares of successive differences, low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF), and LF:HF ratio] showed lack of or very weak association. A non-invasive tool of brain and heart interaction may refine diagnostic predictions for acute brain dysfunctions like delirium in such population and would be an important step in delirium research.

How developing a point of need training tool for evidence synthesis can improve librarian support for researchers.

Medical and health sciences librarians who are involved in evidence synthesis projects will know that systematic reviews are intensely rigorous, requiring research teams to devote significant resources to the methodological process. As expert searchers, librarians are often identified as personnel to conduct the database searching portion and/or are approached as experts in the methodology to guide research teams through the lifecycle of the project. This research method has surged in popularity at our campus and demand for librarian participation is unsustainable. As a response to this, the library created self-directed learning objects in the form of roadmap to assist researchers in learning about the knowledge synthesis methodology in an expedient, self-directed manner. This paper will discuss the creation, implementation and feedback around our educational offering: Systematic & Scoping Reviews: Your Roadmap to Conducting an Evidence Synthesis.

Impact of bariatric surgery on anthropometric, metabolic, and reproductive outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in females. Modest weight loss improves reproductive and metabolic PCOS features. While lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapies remain first-line weight loss strategies, bariatric surgery is emerging as a potentially effective treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to examine the impact of bariatric surgery in PCOS to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for observational studies and trials comparing pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments to bariatric surgery in women with PCOS or bariatric surgery in women with or without PCOS. Anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes were included and, where possible, meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed. Ten studies were included involving 432 women with and 590 women without PCOS. Comparisons between bariatric surgery and pharmacologic or lifestyle treatments were only reported in one study each, and most reproductive outcomes were limited to a single study; therefore, meta-analyses could not be performed. Meta-analysis found that women with PCOS experience similar improvements in anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery compared to those without PCOS. Existing research is limited and of low quality with high risk of bias, especially in comparison to existing PCOS treatments and with respect to reproductive outcomes including pregnancy, highlighting the need for additional studies to inform clinical recommendations.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and can lead to delays in treatment for patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: A systematic literature search of biomedical databases, including Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase was performed on December 6, 2022 and updated on December 21, 2023 for peer reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results across studies. RESULTS: A total of 2636 studies were screened, and 11 were included in the review. Ten were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the included studies ranged from 0% to 18.9%. The pooled incidence rate of venous thromboembolism was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 13%). This remained significant when restricted to only studies with a low risk of bias (pooled incidence of 11%, 95% CI 9% to 14%). Body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 was a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism with a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.76) CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrated a 10% incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests that there may be a role for universal thromboprophylaxis in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022339602.

Time to Benefit of Surgery vs Targeted Medical Therapy for Patients With Primary Aldosteronism: A Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension, but the comparative outcomes of targeted treatment remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes in patients treated for primary aldosteronism over time. METHODS: Medline and EMBASE were searched. Original studies reporting the incidence of mortality, major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE), progression to chronic kidney disease, or diabetes following adrenalectomy vs medical therapy were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Standard meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate relative differences. Time to benefit meta-analyses were conducted by fitting Weibull survival curves to estimate absolute risk differences and pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: 15 541 patients (16 studies) with PA were included. Surgery was consistently associated with an overall lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.54) and MACE (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.84) compared with medical therapy. Surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.34-0.70) and progression to chronic kidney disease (HR 0.62 95% CI 0.39-0.98), and nonsignificant reductions in myocardial infarction and stroke. In absolute terms, 200 patients would need to be treated with surgery instead of medical therapy to prevent 1 death after 12.3 (95% CI 3.1-48.7) months. CONCLUSION: Surgery is associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE than medical therapy for PA. For most patients, the long-term surgical benefits outweigh the short-term perioperative risks.

Gender-affirming estrogen therapy route of administration and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Transgender women (individuals assigned male sex at birth who identify as women) and nonbinary and gender-diverse individuals receiving gender-affirming estrogen therapy (GAET) are at increased cardiovascular risk. Nonoral (i.e., patch, injectable) compared with oral estrogen exposure in cisgender women (individuals assigned female sex at birth who identify as women) may be associated with lower cardiovascular risk, though whether this applies to transgender women and/or gender-diverse individuals is unknown. We sought to determine the association between the route of estrogen exposure (nonoral compared with oral) and cardiovascular risk in transgender women and gender diverse individuals. Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO) and supporting relevant literature were searched from inception to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting cardiovascular outcomes, such as all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals using nonoral compared with oral gender-affirming estrogen therapy were included. The search strategy identified 3,113 studies, 5 of which met inclusion criteria (3 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 1 cross-sectional study; n = 259 participants, range of duration of exposure of 2 to 60 mo). One out of five studies reported on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality or adverse cardiovascular events. All five studies reported lipid levels [low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC)], whereas only two studies reported systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Limited studies have examined the effect of the route of GAET on all-cause cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, and risk factors. In addition, there is significant heterogeneity in studies examining the cardiovascular effects of GAET.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to summarize the potential effect of nonoral versus oral gender-affirming estrogen therapy use on cardiovascular risk factors in transgender women or nonbinary or gender-diverse individuals. Heterogeneity of studies in reporting gender-affirming estrogen therapy formulation, dose, and duration of exposure limits quantification of the effect of gender-affirming estrogen therapy on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk factors. This systematic review highlights the needs for large prospective cohort studies with appropriate stratification of gender-affirming estrogen therapy by dose, formulation, administration route, and sufficient follow-up and analyses to limit selection bias to optimize the cardiovascular care of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-diverse individuals.

Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations.

Facilitating team innovation is paramount to promoting progress in the science, technology, engineering, and math fields, as well as advancing national health, safety, prosperity, and welfare. However, innovation teams face a unique set of challenges due to the novelty and uncertainty that is core to the definition of innovation, as well as the paradoxical nature of idea generation and idea implementation processes. These and other challenges must be overcome for innovation teams to realize their full potential for producing change. The purpose of this review is, thus, to provide insight into the unique context that these teams function within and provide an integrative, evidence-based, and practically useful, organizing heuristic that focuses on the most important considerations for facilitating team innovation. Finally, we provide practical guidance for psychologists, organizations, practitioners, scientists, educators, policymakers, and others who employ teams to produce novel, innovative solutions to today's problems. (PsycINFO Database Record

Experience of Touch in Health Care: A Meta-Ethnography Across the Health Care Professions.

Touch mediates health professionals' interactions with patients. Different professionals have reported their practices but what is currently lacking is a well-theorized, interprofessional synthesis. We systematically searched eight databases, identified 41 studies in seven professions-nursing (27), medicine (4), physiotherapy (5), osteopathy (1), counseling (2), psychotherapy (1), dentistry (1)-and completed a meta-ethnographic line-of-argument synthesis. This found that touch is caring, exercises power, and demands safe space. Different professions express care through the medium of touch in different ways. They all, however, expect to initiate touch rather than for patients to do so. Various practices negotiate boundaries that define safe spaces between health care professions and patients. A metaphor-the waltz-integrates the practice of touch. Health care professionals connect physically with patients in ways that form strong relationships between them while "dance steps" help manage the risk that is inherent in such an intimate form of connection.

Comparing Subscription-Based Anatomy E-Resources for Collections Development.

This article describes a chart-based approach for health sciences libraries to compare anatomy e-resources. The features, functionalities, and user experiences of seven leading subscription-based e-resources were assessed using a chart that was iteratively developed by the investigators. Acland's Video Atlas of Human Anatomy, Thieme Winking Skull, and Visible Body were the preferred products as they respectively excel in cadaver-based videos, self-assessment, and 3D graphical manipulation. Moreover, each product affords a pleasant user experience. The investigative team found that resources specializing in one aspect of anatomy teaching are superior to those that contain a wealth of content for diverse audiences.

Evaluating effectiveness of small group information literacy instruction for Undergraduate Medical Education students using a pre- and post-survey study design.

BACKGROUND: The Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) programme at the University of Calgary is a three-year programme with a strong emphasis on small group learning. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine whether librarian led small group information literacy instruction, closely integrated with course content and faculty participation, but without a hands on component, was an effective means to convey EBM literacy skills. METHOD: Five 15-minute EBM information literacy sessions were delivered by three librarians to 12 practicing physician led small groups of 15 students. Students were asked to complete an online survey before and after the sessions. Data analysis was performed through simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 144 of 160 students responded to the pre-survey, and 112 students answered the post-survey. Instruction in a small group environment without a mandatory hands on component had a positive impact on student's evidence-based information literacy skills. Students were more likely to consult a librarian and had increased confidence in their abilities to search and find relevant information. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that student engagement and faculty involvement are effective tools for delivering information literacy skills when working with students in a small group setting outside of a computer classroom.