Impact of Prior Abdominal Procedures on Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Outcomes: Findings From the North American Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Registry.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the United States participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis North American Catheter Registry. EXPOSURE: Prior abdominal procedure(s) defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time to the first of (1) abandonment of the PD catheter or (2) interruption/termination of PD. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time, and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 855 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31% had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least 1 PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84). Upper-abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Observational study and cohort limited to a sample of patients believed to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion. CONCLUSION: A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to PD. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-saving therapy for individuals with kidney failure that can be done at home. PD requires the placement of a tube, or catheter, into the abdomen to allow the exchange of dialysis fluid during treatment. There is concern that individuals who have undergone prior abdominal procedures and are referred for a catheter might have scarring that could affect catheter function. In some institutions, they might not even be offered PD therapy as an option. In this study, we found that a history of prior abdominal procedures did not increase the risk of PD catheter complications and should not dissuade patients from choosing PD or providers from recommending it.

The Association of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions with Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association of intra-abdominal adhesions with the risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter complications. METHODS: Individuals undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion were prospectively enrolled from eight centers in Canada and the United States. Patients were grouped based on the presence of adhesions observed during catheter insertion. The primary outcome was the composite of PD never starting, termination of PD, or the need for an invasive procedure caused by flow restriction or abdominal pain. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight individuals were enrolled, of whom 201 (27%) had adhesions during laparoscopic PD catheter insertion. The risk of the primary outcome occurred in 35 (17%) in the adhesion group compared with 58 (10%) in the no adhesion group (adjusted HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 2.55) within 6 months of insertion. Lower abdominal or pelvic adhesions had an adjusted HR of 1.80 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.98) compared with the no adhesion group. Invasive procedures were required in 26 (13%) and 47 (8%) of the adhesion and no adhesion groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 1.60: 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47) within 6 months of insertion. The adjusted odds ratio for adhesions for women was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.41), for body mass index per 5 kg/m 2 was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.003 to 1.34), and for prior abdominal surgery was 8.34 (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.34). Common abnormalities found during invasive procedures included PD catheter tip migration, occlusion of the lumen with fibrin, omental wrapping, adherence to the bowel, and the development of new adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: People with intra-abdominal adhesions undergoing PD catheter insertion were at higher risk for abdominal pain or flow restriction preventing PD from starting, PD termination, or requiring an invasive procedure. However, most patients, with or without adhesions, did not experience complications, and most complications did not lead to the termination of PD therapy.

The Association Between Serum Vancomycin Level and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Peritoneal Dialysis Associated Peritonitis.

Introduction: Intraperitoneal (IP) vancomycin is often first-line empiric therapy and then maintenance therapy for peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis. However, how vancomycin serum levels correlate with clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center adult cohort study of 98 patients with PD peritonitis treated with IP vancomycin between January 2016 and May 2022. The association between nadir vancomycin level and cure was evaluated in a logistic regression model, first unadjusted and then adjusted for age, sex, weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and total number of days on PD. Vancomycin was assessed both as a continuous exposure (per 1 mg/l increase) and as a categorical exposure (<15 mg/l vs. ≥15 mg/l). A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was created to explore nadir vancomycin level thresholds in an attempt to identify an optimal target level during treatment. Results: Of the patients, 81% achieved cure, and patients with nadir vancomycin level ≥15 mg/l were 7.5 times more likely to experience cure compared to those with a nadir level <15 mg/l (odds ratio [OR] 7.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-33.57, P = 0.008). Weight, GFR, days on PD, sex, and age were not independently associated with outcome. The vancomycin level with the greatest discriminatory capacity for cure on the ROC analysis was 14.4 mg/l. Conclusion: Increasing IP vancomycin serum levels are associated with increased odds of cure; and maintaining vancomycin serum levels above 14-15 mg/l throughout the course of PD peritonitis treatment is likely to improve clinical outcomes.

A Diagnostic Dilemma "Cured" by Dialysis: An Educational Case Report.

Rationale: The differential diagnosis for a patient with high-anion-gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) is broad; lactic acidosis is an important entity to screen for and treat. An elevated serum lactate is often used as a marker of inadequate tissue perfusion in critically ill patients but can also be indicative of decreased lactate utilization or poor hepatic clearance. Investigating for the underlying cause such as diabetic ketoacidosis, malignancy, or culprit medications is essential to establish the diagnosis and treatment plan. Presenting concerns of the patient: A 60-year-old man with a history of substance use and end-stage kidney disease treated with hemodialysis presented to hospital with confusion, altered level of consciousness, and hypothermia. Initial laboratory investigations were significant for a severe HAGMA with elevated serum lactate and ß-hydroxybutyrate levels, but toxicology screen was negative, and there was no clear underlying precipitant. Urgent hemodialysis was arranged to mitigate his severe acidosis. Diagnoses: He had an initial single dialysis treatment for 4 hours, with posthemodialysis labs showing significant improvement in his acidosis, serum lactate level, and clinical status (cognition, hypothermia). Given this rapid resolution, a sample from his predialysis blood work was sent for analysis of plasma metformin and returned significantly elevated at 60 mcg/mL (therapeutic range 1-2 mcg/mL). Interventions and outcomes: On careful medication reconciliation in the dialysis unit, the patient stated he had never heard of the medication metformin, and there was no record of a filled prescription at his pharmacy. Given his living situation with shared accommodations, it was presumed that he had taken medications that were prescribed to a roommate. Several of his other medications including his antihypertensives were subsequently given after dialysis on dialysis days to improve adherence. Teaching points: Maintain a broad differential diagnosis for patients presenting with a clinical syndrome consistent with an acute toxicity even if no culprit medications are identifiable on history, especially in patients with a suggestive social history.Anion-gap metabolic acidosis (AGMA) is common in hospitalized patients but sometimes requires further history and/or confirmatory testing to elucidate the root cause underlying typical causes of AGMA such as lactic acidosis or ketoacidosis.The main treatment of metformin toxicity is resuscitation and supportive care; however, metformin's biochemical properties make it readily dialyzable via either diffusion or convection.The Extracorporeal Treatments In Poisoning group recommends hemodialysis for metformin toxicity when there is a serum lactate >20 mmol/L, a blood pH <7.0, a failure of standard therapy, end-organ damage (hepatic or renal insufficiency), or a decreased level of consciousness.

Justification: Le diagnostic différentiel d'un patient présentant une acidose métabolique à trou anionique élevé (AMTAE) est large. L'acidose lactique est une entité importante à dépister et à traiter. Un taux élevé de lactate sérique est fréquemment utilisé comme marqueur d'une perfusion tissulaire inadéquate chez les patients gravement malades, mais il peut également indiquer une utilization réduite du lactate ou une insuffisance hépatique. La recherche de la cause sous-jacente (acidocétose diabétique, malignité ou médicaments responsables) est essentielle pour établir le diagnostic et décider du plan de traitement. Présentation du cas: Un homme de 60 ans atteint d'insuffisance rénale terminale traitée par hémodialyse et ayant des antécédents de toxicomanie qui s'était présenté à l'hôpital confus, avec une altération de l'état de conscience et souffrant d'hypothermie. Les premières analyses de laboratoire ont révélé une grave acidose métabolique à trou anionique élevé et une concentration élevée de lactate sérique et de ß-hydroxybutyrate. Cependant, le bilan toxicologique était négatif et aucun facteur déclenchant sous-jacent clair n'avait été identifié. Une hémodialyse d'urgence a été organisée afin d'atténuer l'acidose. Diagnostic: Le patient a reçu un traitement initial de dialyze pendant quatre heures; les analyses de laboratoire post-hémodialyse ont montré une amélioration significative de l'acidose, du taux de lactate sérique et de l'état clinique (cognition, hypothermie). Vu cette résolution rapide, un échantillon de sang prédialyse a été envoyé pour analyze du taux de metformine plasmatique; cette analyze a révélé un taux significativement élevé de 60 µg/ml (plage thérapeutique: 1-2 µg/ml). Interventions et résultats: Au cours d'une vérification minutieuse de la médication du patient à l'unité de dialyze, ce dernier a déclaré n'avoir jamais entendu parler de metformine; il n'y avait par ailleurs aucune trace d'ordonnance remplie à sa pharmacie pour ce médicament. Étant donné son mode de vie en logements partagés, on a présumé que le patient avait pris des médicaments qui avaient été prescrits à un colocataire. Afin d'améliorer l'observance du traitement, plusieurs des autres médicaments du patient, notamment ses antihypertenseurs, ont par la suite été administrés les jours de dialyze, après la séance. Enseignements tirés: Maintenir un diagnostic différentiel large pour les patients présentant un syndrome clinique compatible avec une intoxication aiguë, et ce, même si aucun médicament responsable n'est identifiable à l'anamnèse, en particulier chez les patients qui ont des antécédents sociaux évocateurs.L'acidose métabolique à trou anionique (AMTA) est fréquente chez les patients hospitalisés, mais nécessite parfois une analyze plus approfondie des antécédents et/ou des tests de confirmations pour parvenir à déterminer la cause fondamentale sous-tendant les causes habituelles de l'AMTA comme l'acidose lactique ou l'acidocétose.Le principal traitement pour contrer la toxicité de la metformine est la réanimation et les traitements de soutien. Les propriétés biochimiques de la metformine la rendent cependant facilement dialysable par diffusion ou convection.Le groupe de travail EXTRIP (EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning) recommande l'hémodialyse pour gérer la toxicité de la metformine en présence d'un taux de lactate sérique supérieur à 20 mmol/L, d'un pH sanguin inférieur à 7, d'un échec du traitement standard, de dommages aux organes cibles (insuffisance hépatique ou rénale) ou d'une altération de l'état de conscience.

Pre-Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis After Saline Infusion Sonohysterogram in a Patient With an Embedded Catheter: A Case Report.

Rationale: Clear guidelines currently exist regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) prior to common diagnostic procedures. However, these guidelines do not include patients with subcutaneously embedded PD catheters who are awaiting PD initiation although both these populations share a great deal of risk factors for infections. Issues regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and avoidable infections are bound to keep occurring if physicians are not conscious of the risks of infections shared by all patients suffering from renal failure. Presenting concerns: Two weeks after a saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS), a 48-year-old woman with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G5 ND, type 2 diabetes, a subcutaneously embedded PD catheter, and prior abnormal uterine bleeding presented to the emergency department complaining of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, and abdominal pain. The patient received no antibiotic prophylaxis prior to her SIS. Diagnoses: The final diagnosis of peritonitis was established after acute kidney injury, gastroenteritis, and small bowel obstruction were considered and ruled out. A delay in the final diagnosis occurred because of the complex presentation, the fact that the patient had not yet initiated PD, and the presence of concomitant anion gap metabolic acidosis and an acute elevation of the patient's creatinine. Interventions: The patient was started on broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics when the diagnosis of peritonitis was established. Insulin and intravenous bicarbonate infusions were used to correct the patient's anion gap metabolic acidosis. Surgical debridement of the necrotic subcutaneous tissue and removal of the embedded PD catheter were necessary. Outcomes: The patient's infection resolved completely as did her anion gap metabolic acidosis. The patient had to transfer permanently from PD to hemodialysis for her renal replacement therapy. Teaching points: This case report serves as a good reminder that physicians should keep in mind the possibility of peritonitis in patients with embedded PD catheters. As these patients are also at risk of infections, antibiotic prophylaxis should be used in patients with embedded catheters in the same way it is used for PD patients prior to obstetrical, gynecological, or gastrointestinal procedures.

Justification: Il existe des directives claires quant à la prophylaxie antibiotique à utiliser préalablement aux procédures de diagnostic courantes chez les patients sous dialyse péritonéale (DP). Les patients disposant d'un cathéter de DP implanté sous-cutané en attendant le début de la dialyse ne sont pas inclus dans ces recommandations, même si cette population partage plusieurs facteurs de risque d'infections avec les patients déjà sous DP. Des enjeux liés à la prophylaxie antibiotique et aux infections évitables continueront de se poser si les médecins ignorent les risques d'infections partagés par tous les patients souffrant d'insuffisance rénale. Présentation du cas: Une femme âgée de 48 ans atteinte d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) G5 ND et de diabète de type 2 s'étant présentée aux urgences deux semaines après une sono-hystérographie (SHG) avec infusion intra-utérine de solution saline. La patiente portait un cathéter de PD implanté sous-cutané et avait déjà eu des saignements utérins anormaux dans le passé. Elle se plaignait de nausées, de vomissements, de diarrhées, de faiblesse générale et de douleurs abdominales. Elle n'avait reçu aucune prophylaxie antibiotique avant la SHG. Diagnostic: Le diagnostic final de péritonite a été établi après que l'insuffisance rénale aiguë, la gastro-entérite et une obstruction de l'intestin grêle aient été envisagées et écartées. Le diagnostic final a été retardé en raison de la présentation complexe, du fait que la patiente n'avait pas encore amorcé la DP et de la présence concomitante d'une acidose métabolique à trou anionique et d'une élévation subite de la créatinine. Interventions: La patiente a reçu des antibiotiques à large specter par voie intraveineuse lorsque le diagnostic de péritonite a été établi. Des infusions d'insuline et de bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse ont été utilisées pour corriger l'acidose métabolique à trou anionique. Un débridement chirurgical des tissus sous-cutanés nécrosés et l'ablation du cathéter PD se sont avérés nécessaires. Résultats: L'infection a guéri complètement, tout comme l'acidose métabolique à trou anionique. La patiente a dû passer définitivement de la DP à l'hémodialyse pour son traitement de suppléance rénale. Enseignements tirés: Ce cas illustre bien que les médecins devraient toujours garder les risques de péritonite à l'esprit lorsqu'ils traitent des patients portant un cathéter de PD implanté sous-cutané. Puisque ces patients présentent eux aussi un risque d'infection, la prophylaxie antibiotique devrait leur être administrée avant les procédures obstétricales, gynécologiques ou gastro-intestinales, comme c'est le cas pour les patients sous DP.

Predictors of serum vancomycin levels in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (IP) vancomycin is often first-line empiric therapy for peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis; however, whether dosing should be adjusted for patient-specific characteristics remains unclear. We sought to identify factors associated with the day 3 vancomycin serum level in patients receiving vancomycin for PD peritonitis. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre adult cohort of 58 patients with PD peritonitis treated with IP vancomycin between January 2016 and May 2022. Linear regression was used to examine the association between day 3 vancomycin level and candidate predictors including age, sex, weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urea and creatinine clearance (total, residual, dialysate), PD modality, peritoneal solute transfer rate and initial vancomycin dose. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of achieving a level (≥15 mg/L) associated with these predictor variables. RESULTS: A 2-g loading dose was given in 51 cases, and 38 patients (66%) had a therapeutic day 3 level. Each 5 mg/kg increase in initial vancomycin dose was associated with a 1.38 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.52, 2.23) increase in day 3 level. Each 1 mL/min increase in GFR was associated with a 0.29 mg/L decrease (95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.52) in day 3 level. The likelihood of achieving a therapeutic level was approximately four times higher with an initial dose of ≥25 mg/kg compared to <25 mg/kg (odds ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval 1.05, 13.46). CONCLUSIONS: Following an average 2-g vancomycin loading dose for suspected PD peritonitis, one-third of patients were subtherapeutic on day 3. GFR and weight-based dosing were independently associated with day 3 vancomycin level, and their consideration could improve the likelihood of achieving an early therapeutic level.

Neobladder creation is still a conduit to peritoneal dialysis - Successful use of peritoneal dialysis after invasive bladder cancer.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is as safe and more cost-effective than haemodialysis (HD). It also allows patients to undergo renal replacement therapy (RRT) from home. However, PD remains underutilised in many parts of the world. This is true in part because of many perceived relative contraindications to PD, including a history of prior major abdominal surgery. Prior major abdominal surgery is a concern for standard bedside or surgical catheter placement since these patients are at risk of having adhesions, which can complicate catheter placement. However, with laparoscopic advancements, prior major abdominal surgery is no longer even a relative contraindication to PD for skilled and experienced surgeons. We report the case of a male in his 70s with a history of cystoprostatectomy which was curative for a muscle invasive bladder carcinoma 5 years prior to his RRT. The patient had longstanding chronic kidney disease which worsened gradually. After receiving RRT education, the patient favoured PD. The catheter was placed despite the surgeon noting abdominal adhesions and the patient successfully underwent 12 months of PD which had a positive impact on his quality of life. He transferred to HD after contracting a complex PD-associated peritonitis. Thus, new research should be conducted to better understand the real impact of prior abdominal surgeries as a contraindication to PD, especially in centres where the surgeons have experience with advanced laparoscopy.

Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists COVID-19 Rapid Response: Home and In-Center Dialysis Guidance.

PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM: This article provides guidance on optimizing the management of pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who will be or are being treated with any form of home or in-center dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goals are to provide the best possible care for pediatric patients with ESKD during the pandemic and ensure the health care team's safety. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The core of these rapid guidelines is derived from the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) consensus recommendations for adult patients recently published in the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD). We also consulted specific documents from other national and international agencies focused on pediatric kidney health. Additional information was obtained by formal review of the published academic literature relevant to pediatric home or in-center hemodialysis. METHODS: The Leadership of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists (CAPN), which is affiliated with the CSN, solicited a team of clinicians and researchers with expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis. The goal was to adapt the guidelines recently adopted for Canadian adult dialysis patients for pediatric-specific settings. These included specific COVID-19-related themes that apply to dialysis in a Canadian environment, as determined by a group of senior renal leaders. Expert clinicians and nurses with deep expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis reviewed the revised pediatric guidelines. KEY FINDINGS: We identified 7 broad areas of home dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) peritoneal dialysis catheter placement, (2) home dialysis training, (3) home dialysis management, (4) personal protective equipment, (5) product delivery, (6) minimizing direct health care providers and patient contact, and (7) caregivers support in the community. In addition, we identified 8 broad areas of in-center dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) identification of patients with COVID-19, (2) hemodialysis of patients with confirmed COVID-19, (3) hemodialysis of patients not yet known to have COVID-19, (4) management of visitors to the dialysis unit, (5) handling COVID-19 testing of patients and staff, (6) safe practices during resuscitation procedures in a pandemic, (7) routine hemodialysis care, and (8) hemodialysis care under fixed dialysis resources. We make specific suggestions and recommendations for each of these areas. LIMITATIONS: At the time when we started this work, we knew that evidence on the topic of pediatric dialysis and COVID-19 would be severely limited, and our resources were also limited. We did not, therefore, do formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. Thus, this article's advice and recommendations are primarily expert opinions and subject to the biases associated with this level of evidence. To expedite the publication of this work, we created a parallel review process that may not be as robust as standard arms' length peer-review processes. IMPLICATIONS: We intend these recommendations to help provide the best care possible for pediatric patients prescribed in-center or home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of altered priorities and reduced resources.

Growing home dialysis: The Ontario Renal Network Home Dialysis Initiative 2012-2019.

The Ontario Renal Network (ORN), a provincial government agency in Ontario, Canada, launched an initiative in 2012 to increase home dialysis use province-wide. The initiative included a new modality-based funding formula, a standard mandatory informatics system, targets for prevalent home dialysis rates, the development of a 'network' of renal programmes with commitment to home dialysis and a culture of accountability with frequent meetings between ORN and each renal programme leadership to review their results. It also included funding of home dialysis coordinators, encouragement and funding of assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), and support for catheter insertion and urgent start PD. Between 2012 and 2017, home dialysis use rose from 21.9% to 26.5% and then between 2017 and 2019 stabilised at 26% to 26.5%. Over 7 years, the absolute number of people on home dialysis increased 40% from 2222 to 3105, while the number on facility haemodialysis grew 11% from 7935 to 8767. PD prevalence rose from 16.6% to 20.9%, a relative increase of 25%. The initiative showed that a sustained multifaceted approach can increase home dialysis utilisation.

Multidisciplinary Team versus a "Phosphate-Counting" App for Serum Phosphate Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Hyperphosphatemia is almost universal in well-nourished patients with ESKD treated with dialysis due to an imbalance between dietary intake and phosphate removal via residual kidney function and dialysis. Although food phosphate content can vary dramatically between meals, the current standard is to prescribe a fixed dose of phosphate binder that may not match meal phosphate intake. The primary objective of our study was to determine if the use of an app that matches phosphate binder dose with food phosphate content would be associated with an improvement in serum phosphate and a reduction in calcium carbonate intake compared with the multidisciplinary renal team. Methods: Eighty patients with ESKD treated with peritoneal dialysis at a tertiary care hospital in Canada were randomized to the standard of care for serum phosphate management (multidisciplinary renal team) versus the OkKidney app. Serum phosphate was measured at baseline and then monthly for 3 months with adjustments to phosphate management as deemed necessary by the multidisciplinary team (control) or the phosphate binder multiplier in the OkKidney app (intervention) on the basis of the laboratory values. The primary analysis was an unpaired t test of the serum phosphate at study completion. Results: The participants were 56 (±14) years old, and 54% were men; the most common cause of ESKD was diabetes mellitus. The serum phosphate values were 1.96 (0.41) and 1.85 (0.44) mmol/L in the control and intervention groups, respectively, at the end of 3 months (P=0.30). The median elemental daily dose of calcium carbonate did not differ between the groups at study completion (587 mg [309-928] versus 799 mg [567-1183], P=0.29). Conclusions: The OkKidney app was associated with similar but not superior serum phosphate control to the standard of care, which included renal dietician support. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: US National Library Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01643486.

Canadian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Rapid Response Team Home Dialysis Recommendations.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: This paper will provide guidance on how to best manage patients with end-stage kidney disease who will be or are being treated with home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Program-specific documents, pre-existing, and related to COVID-19; documents from national and international kidney agencies; national and international webinars, including webinars that we hosted for input and feedback; with additional information from formal and informal review of published academic literature. METHODS: Members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) Board of Directors solicited a team of clinicians and administrators with expertise in home dialysis. Specific COVID-19-related themes in home dialysis were determined by the Canadian senior renal leaders community of practice, a group compromising medical and administrative leaders of provincial and health authority renal programs. We then developed consensus-based recommendations virtually by the CSN work-group with input from ethicists with nephrology training. The recommendations were further reviewed by community nephrologists and over a CSN-sponsored webinar, attended by 225 kidney health care professionals, for further peer input. The final consensus recommendations also incorporated review by the editors at the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD). KEY FINDINGS: We identified 7 broad areas of home dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) peritoneal dialysis catheter placement, (2) home dialysis training, (3) home dialysis management, (4) personal protective equipment, (5) product delivery, (6) minimizing direct health care provider and patient contact, and (7) assisted peritoneal dialysis in the community. We make specific suggestions and recommendations for each of these areas. LIMITATIONS: This suggestions and recommendations in this paper are expert opinion, and subject to the biases associated with this level of evidence. To expedite the publication of this work, a parallel review process was created that may not be as robust as standard arms' length peer-review processes. IMPLICATIONS: These recommendations are intended to provide the best care possible during a time of altered priorities and reduced resources.

Does Iodinated Contrast Affect Residual Renal Function in Dialysis Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is important for medical practitioners to be aware of the effect of iodinated contrast media on the residual renal function (RRF) of dialysis patients who require diagnostic or therapeutic imaging procedures. Preservation of RRF is important given that it is a robust predictor of higher survival. However, the absence of any effect would allow for easier diagnostic or therapeutic imaging tests to be performed. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review with meta-analysis will quantify the effect of intravascular administration of iodinated contrast on the residual function of adult dialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: The selection criteria included adult (age ≥ 18 years) populations undergoing dialysis, who have been administered an intravascular contrast. The primary outcome was the measurement of residual function. Secondary outcomes were disease progression from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis, hospitalization following contrast administration, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Nine studies including 434 patients met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed on 7 trials with complete quantitative data. The weighted difference in means was -0.16 mL/min (95% confidence interval -0.66 to 0.34 mL/min; p = 0.53), suggesting a small reduction in residual function following contrast administration. Significant heterogeneity in the data was observed, with a Cochran Q of 35.83 and an I2 of 83.25 (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of retrospective versus prospective study design resolved heterogeneity. Few data were reported for clinical outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size of included studies. CONCLUSION: Intravascularly administered contrast media may not result in a significant reduction of residual function in dialysis patients.

Quantifying the risk of insertion-related peritoneal dialysis catheter complications following laparoscopic placement: Results from the North American PD Catheter Registry.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a more cost-effective therapy to treat kidney failure than in-center hemodialysis, but successful therapy requires a functioning PD catheter that causes minimal complications. In 2015, the North American Chapter of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis established the North American PD Catheter Registry to improve practices and patient outcomes following PD catheter insertion. AIMS: The objective of this study is to propose a methodology for defining insertion-related complications that lead to significant adverse events and report the risk of these complications among patients undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion were enrolled at 14 participating centers in Canada and the United States and followed using a Web-based registry. Insertion-related complications were defined as flow restriction, exit-site leak, or abdominal pain at any point during follow-up. We also included infections or bleeding within 30 days of insertion, and any immediate postoperative complications. Adverse events were categorized as PD never starting or termination of PD therapy, delay in the start of PD therapy or interruption of PD therapy, an emergency department visit or hospitalization, or need for invasive procedures. Cause-specific cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate risk. RESULTS: Five hundred patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter insertion between 10 November 2015 and 24 July 2018. The cumulative risk of insertion-related complications 6 months from the date of insertion that led to an adverse event was 24%. The risk of flow restriction, exit-site leak, and pain at 6 months was 10.2%, 5.7%, and 5.3%, respectively. PD was never started or terminated in 6.4% of patients due to an insertion-related complication. Leaks and flow restrictions were most likely to delay or interrupt PD therapy. Flow restrictions were the primary cause of invasive procedures. Fifty percent of the complications occurred before the start of PD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion-related complications leading to significant adverse events following laparoscopic placement of PD catheters are common. Many complications occur before the start of PD. Insertion-related complications are an important area of focus for future research and quality improvement efforts.

Retrospective study of patients on hybrid dialysis: Single-center data from North America.

Hybrid dialysis involves combining peritoneal and hemodialysis (HD) in patients with end-stage renal disease. Its reported use is quite limited outside of Japan. We present a retrospective review of 18 patients at our center that received this therapy and describe their ultimate disposition. We observed that 39% of the population on hybrid dialysis ultimately transitioned to full in center HD, 28% continue until death, and 33% either transition to home HD or received a transplant. In our center, hybrid dialysis was successful as a bridging therapy or in balancing continuation of dialysis with quality of life among those with a limited prognosis.

Safety and Efficacy of Tinzaparin Anticoagulation during Nocturnal Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting among in-center extended duration nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) patients are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of tinzaparin, among INHD patients receiving 6-8 h hemodialysis, 3 times per week. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine antifactor Xa levels at time 0, 2 h, 4 h mid-hemodialysis (mid-HD), 6 h, and at end of each INHD session for 4 weeks and to determine extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting and bleeding events after switching from unfractionated heparin to tinzaparin, using a standard protocol of tinzaparin delivery at the initiation and midpoint of HD. RESULTS: All 16 patients in The Ottawa Hospital INHD program were converted to tinzaparin and followed for 177 INHD sessions. Mean antifactor Xa level at 2 h of HD was 0.41 ± 0.21 (SD) IU/mL, at 4 h (mid-HD) 0.19 ± 0.17 IU/mL, at 6 h 0.44 ± 0.21 IU/mL, and at dialysis end 0.26 ± 0.14 IU/mL. Antifactor Xa levels were undetectable at the start of INHD, suggesting no tinzaparin accumulation. Five patients required an increase in tinzaparin due to extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting. There were no bleeding events. One patient required a switch to fondaparinux due to an adverse reaction. CONCLUSION: Tinzaparin was safe and efficacious for most INHD patients without accumulation or bleeding. The conversion from unfractionated heparin to tinzaparin required an increased tinzaparin dose for 31% of INHD patients.

Alpha-Blocker Use and the Risk of Hypotension and Hypotension-Related Clinical Events in Women of Advanced Age.

Alpha-blockers (ABs) are commonly prescribed as part of a multidrug regimen in the management of hypertension. We set out to assess the risk of hypotension and related adverse events with AB use compared with other blood pressure (BP) lowering drugs using a population-based, retrospective cohort study of women (≥66 years) between 1995 and 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Cox proportional hazards examined the association of AB use and hypotension and related events (syncope, fall, and fracture) compared with other BP lowering drugs matched via a high dimensional propensity score. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalizations for hypotension and related events (syncope, fractures, and falls) within 1 year. From 734 907 eligible women, 14 106 were dispensed an AB (mean age, 75.7; standard deviation 6.9 years, median follow-up 1 year) and matched to 14 106 dispensed other BP lowering agents. The crude incidence rate of hypotension and related events was 95.7 (95% CI [confidence interval], 90.4-101.1, events 1214 [8.6%]) with AB and 79.8 (95% CI, 74.9-84.7 per 1000 person-years, events 1025 [7.3%]) with other BP lowering medications (incident rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). The risk was higher for hypotension (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20) and syncope (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18-1.75) with no difference in falls, fractures, adverse cardiac events, or all-cause mortality. Treatment of hypertension in women with ABs is associated with a higher risk of hypotension and hypotension-related events compared with other BP lowering agents. Our findings suggest that ABs should be used with caution, even as add on therapy for hypertension.

Successful Initiation of Dialysis with a 20-Year-Old Buried Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter: Case Report and Literature Review.

Buried peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are typically inserted several weeks or months before the anticipated need for dialysis. Occasionally, renal function unexpectedly stabilizes after the surgery, and a patient may go years before the catheter is needed. We report a case of successful initiation of PD with a twenty-year-old buried catheter. We outline the steps needed to optimize the catheter function and review the benefits of the buried PD catheter.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Exit Sites of Buried Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Cohort Study.

Buried peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are placed months before dialysis is needed and the exit site is created when the catheter is dissected out at the initiation of dialysis. In contrast, the exit site of an unburied catheter is created by the surgeon at the time of insertion. We reviewed all patients who initiated PD at our center over a 2-year period. At each clinic visit, exit sites were subjectively classified into standard predefined groups. Outcomes of interest were the frequency of perfect exit sites at 2, 6, and 12 months and rate of exit-site infections (ESIs) at 90 days. One hundred and seventy-seven patients initiated PD during the period of interest, and 169, 157, and 144 remained on PD at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Ninety-three patients had buried catheters, and 76 patients had unburied catheters. Both groups had similar frequency of perfect appearance of exit sites at 2, 6, and 12 months (37/93 vs 41/76 at 2 months; 54/87 vs 43/70 at 6 months; 50/ 81 vs 35/ 63 at 12 months in buried and unburied groups, respectively). More patients with buried catheters had ESIs in the first 3 months (7/93 vs 1/76, p = 0.059). We conclude that exit sites of buried PD catheters do not differ qualitatively from those of unburied catheters. The trend towards more ESIs with buried catheters suggests that there may be clinical consequences of the tissue trauma at time of exteriorization.

End-Stage Kidney Disease in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A 12-Year Study Based on the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, with afflicted patients often progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). As the timelines to ESKD are predictable over decades, it follows that ADPKD patients should be optimized regarding kidney transplantation, home dialysis therapies, and vascular access. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of kidney transplantation, dialysis modalities, and vascular access in ADPKD patients compared with a matched, non-ADPKD cohort. SETTING: Canadian patients from 2001-2012 excluding Quebec. PATIENTS: All adult incident ESKD patients who received dialysis or a kidney transplant. MEASUREMENTS: ADPKD as defined by the treating physician. METHODS: ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients were propensity score (PS) matched (1:4) using demographics, comorbidities, and lab values. Conditional logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations with kidney transplantation (preemptive or any), dialysis modality (peritoneal, short daily, home, or in-center hemodialysis [HD]), vascular access (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], permanent or temporary central venous catheter [CVC]), and dialysis survival. RESULTS: We matched 2120 ADPKD (99.9%) with 8283 non-ADPKD with no significant imbalances between the groups. ADPKD was significantly associated with preemptive kidney transplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 7.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.74-8.87), any kidney transplant (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.14-2.63), and initial therapy of nocturnal daily HD (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.38-5.44), whereas in-center intermittent HD was significantly less likely in the ADPKD population (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.54-0.65). There was no difference in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as initial RRT but lower use of any PD among the ADPKD group (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.95). ADPKD patients were significantly more likely to have an AVF (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.79-3.79) and less likely to have either a permanent (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78) or temporary (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.41-0.59) CVC as compared with the non-ADPKD cohort. Survival on either in-center HD or PD was better for ADPKD patients (HD: hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.44-0.53; PD: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88). LIMITATIONS: Conservative care patients were not captured; despite PS matching, the possibility of residual confounding remains. CONCLUSIONS: ADPKD patients were more likely to receive a kidney transplant, use home HD, dialyze with an AVF, and have better survival relative to non-ADPKD patients. Conversely, they were less likely to receive PD either as initial therapy or anytime during ESKD. This may be attributed to higher transplantation or clinical decision-making processes susceptible to education and intervention.

CONTEXTE: La maladie polykystique rénale autosomique dominante chez l'adulte (MPRAD) est la maladie rénale héréditaire la plus fréquente. Les patients qui en sont atteints développent souvent une insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT) et nécessitent une thérapie de remplacement rénal (TRR). Étant donné que l'évolution vers l'IRT est prévisible sur plusieurs décennies, on devrait préparer la voie vers la greffe rénale, la dialyse à domicile et l'accès vasculaire pour les patients atteints de la MPRAD. OBJECTIFS: L'étude visait à comparer l'association avec la greffe rénale, les modalités de dialyse et l'accès vasculaire entre les patients atteints et non atteints. CADRE DE L'ÉTUDE: L'étude s'est tenue entre 2001 et 2012 auprès de patients canadiens hors Québec. PATIENTS: Ont été inclus dans l'étude tous les patients adultes nouvellement atteints d'IRT qui ont reçu de la dialyse ou une greffe rénale. MESURES: La maladie polykystique autosomique dominante des reins, telle que diagnostiquée par le médecin traitant. MÉTHODOLOGIE: On a effectué l'appariement par scores de propension des patients MPRAD avec les sujets non-MPRAD (ratio 1:4) selon leur profil démographique, leurs comorbidités et leurs résultats de laboratoire. Avec des modèles conditionnels de régression logistique et de risques proportionnels de Cox, on a déterminé l'association avec la greffe rénale (préventive et tous types confondus), la modalité de dialyse (péritonéale, quotidienne courte, à domicile ou en centre), l'accès vasculaire (fistule artérioveineuse [FAV], cathéter veineux central [CVC] temporaire ou permanent) et de la survie du patient dialysé. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons jumelé 2 120 patients MPRAD (99,9 %) à 8 283 patients non-MPRAD. Les deux groupes ne présentaient aucun déséquilibre notable. La MPRAD a été associée de façon significative à la greffe rénale préemptive (RC : 7,13; IC 95 % : 5,74-8,87), à tout type de greffe rénale (RC : 2,37; IC 95 % : 2,14-2,63) et à une thérapie initiale par hémodialyse quotidienne nocturne (RC : 2,74; IC 95 % : 1,38-5,44); alors que l'hémodialyse intermittente en centre s'est avérée beaucoup moins probable chez les patients MPRAD (RC : 0,59; IC 95 % : 0,54-0,65). Aucune différence n'a été observée en ce qui concerne le recours à la dialyse péritonéale (DP) comme TRR initiale, mais l'utilisation de la DP chez les patients du groupe MPRAD était inférieure (RC : 0,85; IC 95 % : 0,77-0,95). Pour ce qui est de l'accès vasculaire, les patients MPRAD étaient significativement plus susceptibles d'avoir recours à une FAV (RC : 3,25; IC 95 % : 2,79-3,79) et moins enclins à choisir le CVC permanent (RC : 0,68; IC 95 % : 0,59-0,78) ou temporaire (RC : 0,49; IC 95 % : 0,41-0,59) que le groupe témoin. Les perspectives de survie des patients, que ce soit avec l'hémodialyse (HD) en centre ou avec la DP, étaient meilleures pour le groupe MPRAD (RR : 0,48; IC 95 % : 0,44-0,53 pour l'HD; RR : 0,73; IC 95 % : 0,60-0,88 pour la DP). LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: Les patients suivis pour des soins conservateurs n'ont pas été pris en compte; et bien que nous ayons jumelé les sujets par scores de propension, un facteur confusionnel résiduel pourrait subsister. CONCLUSION: Les patients atteints de la MPRAD sont plus susceptibles de recourir à une greffe rénale, à l'hémodialyse à domicile et à un accès vasculaire par FAV; ils ont aussi de meilleures chances de survie que les patients non-MPRAD. Inversement, ils étaient moins susceptibles d'être traités par dialyse péritonéale, tant comme traitement initial qu'à n'importe quel autre moment en IRT. Ceci pourrait être attribuable au plus grand nombre de greffes ou à des processus décisionnels cliniques davantage portés vers la formation et l'intervention.