ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) have been considered based on proteomic and lipidomic data from plasma and liver tissue without clinical benefits. This study evaluated proteomics-based plasma and liver tissue biomarkers collected simultaneously from patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). METHODS: Liver tissue and plasma samples were collected during liver biopsy to diagnose MASLD. Untargeted proteomics was performed on 64 patients. RESULTS: Twenty plasma proteins were up- or downregulated in patients with MASH compared with those without MASH. The potential biomarkers utilizing the best combinations of these plasma proteins had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.671 for detecting those with MASH compared with those without it. However, none of the 20 plasma proteins were represented among the significantly regulated liver tissue proteins in patients with MASH. Ten of them displayed a trend and relevance in liver tissue with MASLD progression. These 10 plasma proteins had an AUROC of 0.793 for MASH identification and higher positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: The plasma and liver protein expressions of patients with MASH were not directly comparable. Plasma protein biomarkers that are also expressed in liver tissue can help improve MASH detection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetes and obesity are associated with altered lipid metabolism and hepatic steatosis. Studies suggest that increases in lipid accumulation in these patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are not uniform for all lipid components. This study evaluates this variation. METHODS: A comprehensive lipidomic analysis of different lipid groups, were performed on liver tissue and plasma samples obtained at the time of histology from a well-defined cohort of 72 MASLD participants. The lipid profiles of controls were compared to those of MASLD patients with obesity, diabetes, or a combination of both. RESULTS: MASLD patients without obesity or diabetes exhibited distinct changes in the lipid profile of their liver tissue. The presence of diabetes or obesity further modified these lipid profiles (e.g., ceramide 47:7;4O), with positive or negative correlation (p < 0.05). A step-wise increase (long-chain fatty acids, triglycerides, and ceramides) or decrease (ultra-long fatty acids, diglycerides, and phospholipids) for lipid groups was observed compared to control among patients with MASLD without obesity or diabetes to MASLD patients with obesity as a single risk factor, and MASLD patients with obesity and diabetes. Changes in lipids observed in the plasma did not align with their corresponding liver tissue findings. CONCLUSION: The changes observed in the composition of lipids are not similar in patients with obesity and diabetes among those with MASLD. This highlights the different metabolic processes at play. The presence of obesity or diabetes in patients with MASLD exacerbates these lipid derangements, underscoring the potential for targeted intervention in MASLD patients.