PremieFeed: Investigating Preterm Infant Feeding Behaviors, Growth, and Caregiver Experiences in the First Weeks After NICU Discharge.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to longitudinally investigate the preterm infant feeding regimens, feeding behaviors, effect on infant growth, and caregiver perceptions and experiences with feeding in the first 4 weeks following hospital discharge. BACKGROUND: Preterm infants face high nutritional risk due to their underdeveloped gastrointestinal systems and feeding coordination. METHODS: Caregivers of preterm infants were recruited to participate in a weekly telephone survey for the first 4 weeks following the infant's hospital discharge. Responses for infant feeding behaviors and caregiver experiences were scored on a 3-point Likert scale. Growth and feeding data were collected from the infant's first neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) developmental follow-up visit. RESULTS: Twenty-four caregivers completed the study. Changes in feeding regimens were common (8/24 infants; 33%), with the percentage of infants receiving any human milk feedings decreasing from 70% at hospital discharge to 54% at 4 weeks post-discharge. Poor infant feeding skills were weakly associated with poor caregiver feeding experiences, and 46% of caregivers reported contacting their healthcare provider with feeding-related questions. Thirty-eight percent of infants required nutritional intervention at NICU developmental follow-up visit. Infants who received fortified feedings during the first 4 weeks after hospital discharge grew an average of 2.5 g/day faster than infants who did not receive fortified feedings. CONCLUSION: The postdischarge period for preterm infants is characterized by feeding regimen changes, a decrease in human milk use, and caregiver questions about feeding. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Future studies should further investigate the period after hospital discharge to enable better feeding support for preterm infants and their caregivers.

Experience of Induced Lactation in a Transgender Woman: Analysis of Human Milk and a Suggested Protocol.

Background: A growing number of diverse familial structures wish to colactate their infant. For transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, chestfeeding or breastfeeding may be within their goals of parenthood. There is limited evidence on how to induce lactation for a nongestational parent on gender affirming estrogen treatment. Case Presentation: We report the case of a transgender woman who successfully underwent lactation induction following a protocol using the galactogue domperidone plus use of a breast pump. The patient had modifications to her hormone therapy with estrogen and progesterone while remaining on antiandrogen therapy with spironolactone. A description of the protocol, medications, laboratory monitoring, human milk analysis including macronutrients, oligosaccharides, and hormones is presented. Discussion: This is the fourth case to date known in the literature of a transgender woman with successful lactation induction, and the third case to remain on antiandrogen therapy during this process. Our report is the second to demonstrate comparable macronutrients, and the first to report on human milk oligosaccharides and hormones in induced milk compared with term human milk of a gestational parent. Conclusions: The opportunity to chestfeed or breastfeed an infant can be profound for many parents. Further research is needed to meet the needs of TGD individuals who wish to induce lactation as part of their parental goals.

The Effects of Refrigerated Storage of Donor Human Milk with Limited Bacterial Presence After Holder Pasteurization on Nutrient Concentration and Bacterial Growth.

Background: The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA) sets the purity and quality standards for donor human milk (DHM) in the United States, which includes zero bacterial presence after Holder pasteurization. This study aimed to determine if nutrient and bacterial composition of DHM with limited bacterial presence after pasteurization change over 4 days of refrigerated storage. Methods: Twenty-five unique samples of DHM with limited bacterial growth postpasteurization were collected from two HMBANA milk banks. Infant formula was used as a comparison. Samples were stored in the refrigerator and a portion of milk was removed at 24-hour intervals beginning at hour 0 to 96 for analysis. Aerobic bacteria, protein, lactose, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) content were measured. Longitudinal changes between 0 and 96 hours were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and mixed models test. p < 0.05 was deemed significant. Results: There was no significant difference in lactose, protein, bacteria, or IgA content over storage duration (p = 0.649, p = 0.690, and p = 0.385, p = 0.805, respectively). Total aerobic bacteria were less than 102 colony-forming units (CFUs) in 81% of the time points tested for DHM samples. Total aerobic bacteria were too many to count (>300 CFUs) in the infant formula sample at all time points. Conclusion: In periods of high demand for DHM, DHM with low bacteria growth postpasteurization may be an option as a supplemental food for the growing number of healthy infants who receive DHM. Future studies should investigate the bacterial strains in this milk.

The Influence of Oligosaccharides when Measuring Lactose and Total Carbohydrates in Human Milk and Comparison of Methods.

BACKGROUND: Understanding how human milk impacts growth requires valid analytical methods for quantifying the composition. Lactose, the most abundant constituent in human milk and a predominant source of energy, is often assessed using methods borrowed from the bovine dairy industry. However, the carbohydrate matrices of bovine and human milk are quite different, especially as they relate to human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), each with a terminal lactose unit that may influence analytical methods. OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to determine the extent to which HMOs influence common analytical methods for measuring carbohydrates in human milk and to compare common methods for measuring lactose. METHODS: Two sets of experiments were performed. In the first set, native and HMO-spiked human milk samples (n = 16 each) were assessed and compared using 4 methods: AOAC 2006.06 (based on the Megazyme enzymatic assay), BioVision enzymatic assay, ultraperformance LC with MS, and infrared analysis. In the second set, human milk samples (n = 20) were assessed using 2 methods approved for measuring lactose in bovine milk: AOAC 984.22 that uses high-performance LC and refractive index detection and AOAC 2006.06 prepared using both volume and weighted dilutions. RESULTS: Native and HMO-spiked samples were not significantly different in lactose using AOAC 2006.06 and ultraperformance LC with MS but were significantly different using BioVision (mean difference = 0.2 g/dL; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.4; P = 0.005). Total carbohydrate measurements assessed using infrared were also higher after HMO spiking (mean difference = 0.4 g/dL; 95% CI: 0.3, 0.6; P < 0.001). Only AOAC methods 984.22 and 2006.06 for measuring lactose were very highly correlated (r > 0.90, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AOAC methods 984.22 and 2006.06 are comparable for measuring lactose in human milk and are not influenced by HMOs. HMOs influence other enzymatic methods as well as infrared analysis, which leads to an overestimate of energy values. J Nutr 2023;x:xx.

Donor Human Milk Use in Populations Other than the Preterm Infant: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Introduction: Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for an infant's first 6 months of life. If unable to breastfeed, expressed breast milk, including donor human milk (DHM), is recommended for optimal nutrition. Benefits of DHM in preterm infants have been established by extensive research. However, less is known about DHM use in other populations. Objective: To conduct a scoping review of the literature regarding DHM use in populations other than preterm infants. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were used to search for articles and clinical trials published between January 1, 2000 and February 29, 2020. In total, 182 articles and reports were identified and screened by 2 independent reviewers. Results: Twenty-six articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Studies were mostly observational in design and included infants born >35 weeks gestational age with health risks (9/26) and healthy infants (14/26). Most studies in infants with health risks (7/9) investigated clinical outcomes, with small, observational studies suggesting potential improvements in feeding tolerance and gastrointestinal health. Regarding healthy infants, no studies addressed growth, only one study measured clinical outcomes, and findings related to breastfeeding outcomes were conflicting. Over half of the studies reviewed (15/26) were not designed to establish a potential relationship between DHM use and relevant health-related outcomes. Conclusion: The current evidence of DHM use in populations other than preterm infants is limited by lack of direct health measures and infrequent use of randomized trials. More research is warranted to investigate clinical, growth, and breastfeeding outcomes.