Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychiatr Serv ; 62(5): 516-24, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21532078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Gender disparities in mental health highlight the need to include gender equity measures when planning, implementing, and evaluating mental health programs at national, state or provincial, and municipal levels. This study aimed to identify, select, and assess the feasibility of comparing gender-sensitive mental health indicators in a low- (Peru), middle- (Colombia), and high- (Canada) income country. METHODS: The indicators were selected by a multidisciplinary group of experts who used criteria and a framework proposed by the World Health Organization. Data from national, population-based databases from each country were used to measure the indicators. RESULTS: Seven indicators (12-month prevalence of the following: depression, psychological distress, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide attempts, alcohol dependence, mental health service use, and psychological impairment) were feasible for measurement in at least two countries. Only five indicators were comparable between two countries, and only one was comparable among all countries (suicide attempts). The indicators that showed the greatest inequities between men and women were depression, anxiety, suicide attempts, use of mental health services, and alcohol dependence. Female-to-male ratios for prevalence of mental illness ranged from .1 to 2.3, and ratios for service use ranged from 1.3 to 1.9. Significant trends were found when the indicators were considered by age, education, marital status, and income. CONCLUSIONS: Some of these indicators can be used to identify populations most vulnerable to gender inequities in mental health. The results from this study may provide useful information to program planners who aim to implement, improve, and monitor national mental health strategies that reduce gender inequities under different national conditions.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Health Status Indicators , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Colombia/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services , Middle Aged , Peru/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors
2.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 20(1): 145-53, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21190425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As gender is known to be a major determinant of health, monitoring gender equity in health systems remains a vital public health priority. Focusing on a low-income (Peru), middle-income (Colombia), and high-income (Canada) country in the Americas, this study aimed to (1) identify and select gender-sensitive health indicators and (2) assess the feasibility of measuring and comparing gender-sensitive health indicators among countries. METHODS: Gender-sensitive health indicators were selected by a multidisciplinary group of experts from each country. The most recent gender-sensitive health measures corresponding to selected indicators were identified through electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, LIPECS, Latindex, and BIREME) and expert consultation. Data from population-based studies were analyzed when indicator information was unavailable from reports. RESULTS: Twelve of the 17 selected gender-sensitive health indicators were feasible to measure in at least two countries, and 9 of these were comparable among all countries. Indicators that were available were not stratified or adjusted by age, education, marital status, or wealth. The largest between-country difference was maternal mortality, and the largest gender inequity was mortality from homicides. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that gender inequities in health exist in all countries, regardless of income level. Economic development seemed to confer advantages in the availability of such indicators; however, this finding was not consistent and needs to be further explored. Future initiatives should include identifying health system factors and risk factors associated with disparities as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of including the routine monitoring of gender inequities in health.


Subject(s)
Gender Identity , Health Status Indicators , Healthcare Disparities/standards , Women's Health , Women's Rights , Canada , Colombia , Databases, Bibliographic , Ethnicity/classification , Ethnicity/education , Family Characteristics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Housing/classification , Housing/standards , Humans , Male , Mortality/ethnology , Peru , Poverty , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL