Remote Monitoring Compared With In-Office Surveillance of Blood Pressure in Patients With Pregnancy-Related Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of blood pressure ascertainment within 10 days of postpartum discharge among individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy randomized either to in-office blood pressure assessment or at-home monitoring. METHODS: This was a multisite randomized controlled trial of postpartum patients diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy before discharge between April 2021 and September 2021 and was performed at two academic training institutions. Patients were randomized to either an in-office blood pressure check or remote monitoring through a web-enabled smartphone platform. The primary outcome was the rate of any blood pressure ascertainment within 10 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes include rates of initiation of antihypertensive medication, readmission, and additional office or triage visits for hypertension. Assuming a 10-day postdischarge blood pressure ascertainment rate of 50% in the in-office arm, we estimated that 186 participants would provide 80% power to detect a 20% difference in the primary outcome between groups. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients were randomized (96 remote, 101 in-office). Patients with remote monitoring had higher rates of postpartum blood pressure ascertainment compared with in-office surveillance (91.7% [n=88] vs 58.4% [n=59]; P<.001). There were 11 (11.5%) patients in the intervention arm whose only qualifying blood pressure was a postdischarge in-person ascertainment, yielding a true remote monitoring uptake rate of 80.2%. In those with remote blood pressure uptake (n=77), the median number of blood pressure checks was 15 (interquartile range 6-26) and the median duration of remote monitoring use was 14 days (interquartile range 9-16). There were no differences in rates of readmission for hypertension (5.0% [n=5] vs 4.2% [n=4], P=.792) or initiation of antihypertensive medications after discharge (9.4% [n=9] vs 6.9% [n=7], P=.530). Rates of unscheduled visits were increased in the remote monitoring arm, but this did not reach statistical significance (5.0% [n=5] vs 12.5% [n=12], P=.059). When stratifying the primary outcome by race and randomization group, Black patients had lower rates of blood pressure ascertainment than White patients when assigned to in-office surveillance (41.2% [n=14] vs 69.5% [n=41], P=.007), but there was no difference in the remote management group (92.9% [n=26] vs 92.9% [n=52], P>.99). CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring can increase postpartum blood pressure ascertainment within 10 days of discharge for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and has the potential to promote health equity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04823949.

Risk of Stillbirth in Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes, Stratified by Fetal Growth.

OBJECTIVE: To compare stillbirth rates per week of expectant management stratified by birth weight in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pregestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A national population-based retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes or GDM was performed using national birth and death certificate data from 2014 to 2017. Stillbirth rates per 10,000 patients (stillbirth incidence at gestational age week/ongoing pregnancies-[0.5×live births at gestational age week]) were determined for each week of pregnancy from 34 to 39 completed weeks of gestation. Pregnancies were stratified by birth weight, categorized as having small-for-gestational-age (SGA), appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA), or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses, assigned by sex-based Fenton criteria. Relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for stillbirth were calculated for each gestational age week compared with the GDM-related AGA group. RESULTS: We included 834,631 pregnancies complicated by either GDM (86.9%) or pregestational diabetes (13.1%) in the analysis, with a total of 3,033 stillbirths. Stillbirth rates increased with advancing gestational age for pregnancies complicated by both GDM and pregestational diabetes regardless of birth weight. Compared with pregnancies with AGA fetuses, those with both SGA and LGA fetuses were significantly associated with an increased risk of stillbirth at all gestational ages. Ongoing pregnancies at 37 weeks of gestation complicated by pregestational diabetes with LGA or SGA fetuses had respective stillbirth rates of 64.9 and 40.1 per 10,000 patients. Pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes had an RR of stillbirth of 21.8 (95% CI 17.4-27.2) for LGA fetuses and 13.5 (95% CI 8.5-21.2) for SGA fetuses compared with GDM-related AGA at 37 weeks of gestation. The greatest absolute risk of stillbirth was in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes at 39 weeks of gestation with LGA fetuses (97/10,000). CONCLUSION: Pregnancies complicated by both GDM and pregestational diabetes affected by pathologic fetal growth have an increased risk of stillbirth with advancing gestational age. This risk is significantly higher with pregestational diabetes, especially pregestational diabetes with LGA fetuses.

Latency of late preterm steroid administration to delivery and risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.

BACKGROUND: Late preterm antenatal corticosteroid administration has been associated with an increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. The mechanism is thought to be secondary to transient fetal hyperinsulinemia, which may be more likely if delivery occurs during peak antenatal corticosteroid levels. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether there is a latency interval between antenatal corticosteroid administration and delivery that places neonates at the greatest risk of hypoglycemia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of pregnant women who received antenatal corticosteroid vs unexposed women between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2019. Unexposed women were those who did not receive antenatal corticosteroid matched according to gestational age at delivery, diabetes mellitus status, and maternal body mass index from 2010 to 2015. Latency periods from initial steroid administration to delivery were defined in grouped intervals until ≥72 hours. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia, defined as a neonatal glucose level of <40 mg/dL within 24 hours of life. Poisson regression was used to generate an adjusted relative risk of hypoglycemia for each latency period adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 812 women were included in the analysis (406 exposed and 406 unexposed). Women who received antenatal corticosteroids were more likely to be nulliparous (P=.009); moreover, the women were well matched on pregnancy complications and baseline demographics. Neonatal hypoglycemia was more frequently identified in women receiving antenatal corticosteroids than in women not receiving antenatal corticosteroids (42% vs 26%; P<.001). Severe hypoglycemia, defined as a glucose level of <20 mg/dL, was significantly more common in patients receiving antenatal corticosteroids than in patients not receiving antenatal corticosteroids (8.4% vs 2.7%; P<.001). Latency time intervals of 12 to 71 hours from antenatal corticosteroid administration were significantly associated with neonatal hypoglycemia in exposed women compared with unexposed women after adjustment; within this time frame, the highest risk was 24 to 47 hours after antenatal corticosteroid administration (adjusted relative risk, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.38). CONCLUSION: In the late preterm period, the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia is the greatest in the latency period of 12 to 71 hours between steroid administration and delivery. Neonates exposed to antenatal corticosteroids were more likely to experience severe hypoglycemia within 24 hours of life than unexposed neonates.

Indication Creep of Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids.

OBJECTIVE: While antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administered in the late preterm period have been shown to reduce respiratory morbidity, this finding was demonstrated in a well-designed randomized controlled trial (the Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery [ALPS]) with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that may differ from clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there has been indication creep since use of late preterm ACS became standard of care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who received late preterm ACS between 2016 and 2019 were identified and separated into epochs of 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019 based on year of exposure. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate ACS exposure, defined as nonadherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the ALPS trial. Secondary outcomes were rates of nonoptimal ACS exposure (delivery >7 days from ACS or term delivery). Logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) between epochs for the primary outcome adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: There were 660 women who received late preterm ACS during the study period with 229 (34.6 %) deemed inappropriate exposures. The most common reason for inappropriate treatment was preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM; 29.0%) with exclusionary cervical examination or contraction frequency. No difference was observed in inappropriate ACS exposure between epochs (aOR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.2). However, there was a reduction in nonoptimal exposure over time (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.97) . Women receiving inappropriate ACS were more likely to deliver at term if indicated for maternal/fetal status (50.0 vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001) and preterm labor (66.0 vs. 41.9%; p = 0.015). Further, inappropriate exposure in preterm labor had higher rates of exposure latency >7 days (62.3 vs. 39.1%, p = 0.006) with a longer latency to delivery (3 vs. 16 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Over one-third of women received late preterm ACS for an indication that could be classified as indication creep. Depending on indication, inappropriate administration is associated with higher rates of nonoptimal exposure. KEY POINTS: · There is potential for indication creep of ACS administration.. · One third of late preterm ACS exposures in our study were inappropriate.. · Utilizing clinical criteria can aid in identifying patients who best benefit from late preterm ACS..