Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 136(4): 739-752, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234290

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to explore whether consuming the same high-fat/sugar beverage affects endothelial function differently depending on whether it is presented as "unhealthy" [accurate high calorie (kcal), fat, and sugar information displayed] versus "healthy" (inaccurate low kcal, fat, and sugar information displayed). Twenty-five, young (21 ± 2 yr), healthy, food-stress/shame-prone women completed three conditions: milkshake consumption (540 kcal, 80 g sugar, and 14 g fat) where correct, "unhealthy" nutritional information was shown to participants (milkshake condition), consumption of the same milkshake but with incorrect, "healthy" information shown to participants (100 kcal, 3 g sugar, and 4 g fat; sham-nutrishake condition), and water consumption (control condition). Pre- and postbeverage we assessed 1) endothelial function via standard brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD); 2) perceived shame, stress, beverage healthiness, and harm; and 3) blood (plasma) glucose, insulin, triglycerides and oral fluid cortisol, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) receptor binding. Glucose, triglycerides, and insulin increased in the milkshake and sham-nutrishake conditions (P < 0.05). The milkshake was perceived as less healthy (P < 0.001) and more harmful (P < 0.001) than the sham-nutrishake. Shame, stress, oral fluid cortisol and TNFα receptor binding did not increase postconsumption. FMD decreased after the milkshake condition (pre: 7.4 ± 3.3%; post-60 min: 4.9 ± 2.9%; post-90 min: 4.5 ± 3.1%, P < 0.001) but not the sham-nutrishake (pre: 5.7 ± 2.2%; post-60 min: 5.5 ± 2.6%; post-90 min: 5.0 ± 2.4%, P = 0.43) or control conditions (pre: 7.0 ± 2.6%; post-60 min: 6.6 ± 4.1%; post-90 min: 6.0 ± 3.2%, P = 0.29). Shear rate stimulus covariation did not alter FMD results. Lower perceived beverage healthiness was significantly associated with a greater reduction in FMD (ρ = 0.36, P = 0.002). In conclusion, a high-fat/sugar milkshake reduced FMD only when presented as high in fat, sugar, and calories. This suggests that perceptions about nutritional information contribute to the impact of food intake on endothelial function and that nocebo effects could be involved in cardiovascular disease etiology.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This was the first study to investigate how perceived nutritional content influences the impact of a high-sugar/fat beverage on endothelial function. We found that a high-sugar/fat beverage only reduced endothelial function when it was presented to participants as high in calories, fat, and sugar. This suggests that perceived nutritional information contributes to the impact of high sugar and fat intake on endothelial function.


Subject(s)
Hydrocortisone , Insulins , Humans , Female , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Eating , Triglycerides , Glucose , Beverages , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Brachial Artery/physiology
2.
Health Psychol Behav Med ; 11(1): 2268697, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37842010

ABSTRACT

Subjective social status (SSS) is an important independent predictor of health outcomes, however, the pathways through which it affects health are poorly understood. Chronic shame has previously been suggested as a potential mechanism but this has never been investigated and the relationship between chronic shame and health is under-researched. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore whether chronic shame explains a significant portion of the association between SSS and self rated health (SRH). Two-hundred American adults aged 30-55 years were recruited via a crowd-sourcing platform and were asked to provide information on their SSS, level of chronic shame, and SRH. Chronic shame significantly mediated the relationship between SSS and SRH. This pilot study provides initial evidence that shame explains a significant portion of the relationship between subjective social status and self-rated health. These findings support the initiation of larger, longitudinal investigations into chronic shame as a mediator of the subjective social status and self-rated health relationship.

4.
Exp Physiol ; 107(8): 978-993, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584040

ABSTRACT

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Shame is a form of social stress that involves internalizing social devaluations imposed by others. The aim of this study was to determine, for the first time, how acutely experienced shame impacts endothelial function. What is the main finding and its importance? Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, an index of endothelial function, was impaired after an intervention that acutely increased self-reported shame. This occurred without increases in cortisol or tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor binding. Frequent or prolonged shame-induced endothelial dysfunction could have important cardiovascular consequences. ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of a shame induction protocol on endothelial function. Fifteen participants (n = 7 men, n = 8 women) completed both a written shame induction protocol and a control protocol on two different experimental days. Pre- and post-protocol we assessed: (1) endothelial function and arterial shear rate via a standard brachial artery reactive hyperaemia flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) test across two post-intervention time points (15 and 35 min post); (2) perceived shame via the experiential shame scale (ESS); and (3) cortisol and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor (sTNFαRII) through oral fluid analysis. Shame increased after the shame induction protocol (pre, 2.9 ± 0.6 vs. post, 3.7 ± 0.5, P < 0.001) but not the control protocol (pre, 3.0 ± 0.5 vs. post, 2.8 ± 0.5, P = 0.15; protocol by time interaction, P < 0.001). When all three time points were included in the analysis, %FMD did not change over time. Considering only the lowest post time point, %FMD decreased significantly in response to the shame protocol (pre, 4.8 ± 1.9 vs. post, 3.2 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) but not the control protocol (pre, 4.2 ± 1.8 vs. post, 3.8 ± 1.5, P = 0.45; protocol by time interaction, P = 0.035). Covariation of the shear rate stimulus for FMD did not alter the FMD results. When including both the control and shame protocols, but not the shame protocol alone, increased shame was significantly associated with decreased FMD (r = -0.37, P < 0.046). There were no significant time by protocol interaction effects for cortisol or sTNFαRII. In conclusion, temporary increases in shame might cause transient endothelial dysfunction which, if chronically repeated, could manifest as reduced vasoprotection against atherosclerosis.


Subject(s)
Endothelium, Vascular , Hydrocortisone , Shame , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Brachial Artery/physiology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Vasodilation/physiology
5.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 121(11): 3017-3030, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251539

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of repeated, single leg heating on lower limb endothelial function. METHODS: Macrovascular function was assessed with superficial femoral artery (SFA) reactive hyperemia flow-mediated dilation (RH-FMD) and sustained stimulus FMD (SS-FMD). Calf microvascular function was assessed as the peak and area under the curve of SFA reactive hyperemia (RH). Participants (n = 13 females, 23 ± 2 yrs) had one leg randomized to the single leg heating intervention (EXP; other leg: control (CON)). The EXP leg underwent 8 weeks of single leg heating via immersion in 42.5 â„ƒ water for five 35-min sessions/week. At weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8, SFA RH-FMD, SS-FMD (shear stress increased via plantar flexion exercise), and SFA RH flow were measured. RESULTS: None of the variables changed with repeated, single leg heating (interaction week*limb RH-FMD: p = 0.076; SS-FMD: p = 0.958; RH flow p = 0.955). Covariation for the shear stress stimulus did not alter the FMD results. CONCLUSION: Eight weeks of single leg heating did not change SFA endothelial or calf microvascular function. These results are in contrast with previous findings that limb heating improves upper limb endothelial function.


Subject(s)
Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Femoral Artery/physiology , Hot Temperature , Leg/blood supply , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Female , Humans , Hyperemia , Young Adult
6.
Exp Physiol ; 106(6): 1389-1400, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866631

ABSTRACT

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? The purpose of this study was to determine intra-individual reproducibility of follicular phase changes in endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation) over two menstrual cycles in healthy, premenopausal women. What is the main finding and its importance? Phase changes in endothelial function were not consistent at the individual level across two menstrual cycles, which challenges the utility of interpreting individual responses over one cycle. ABSTRACT: Evidence regarding the impact of menstrual phase on endothelial function is conflicting, and studies to date have examined responses only over a single cycle. It is unknown whether the observed inter-individual variability of phase changes in endothelial function reflects stable, inter-individual differences in responses to oestrogen (E2 ; a primary female sex hormone). The purpose of this study was to examine changes in endothelial function from the early follicular (EF; low-E2 ) phase to the late follicular (LF; high-E2 ) phase over two consecutive cycles. Fourteen healthy, regularly menstruating women [22 ± 3 years of age (mean ± SD)] participated in four visits (EFVisit 1 , LFVisit 2 , EFVisit 3 and LFVisit 4 ) over two cycles. Ovulation testing was used to determine the time between the LF visit and ovulation. During each visit, endothelial function [brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)], E2 and progesterone were assessed. At the group level, there was no impact of phase or cycle on FMD (P = 0.48 and P = 0.65, respectively). The phase change in FMD in cycle 1 did not predict the phase change in cycle 2 (r = 0.03, P = 0.92). Using threshold-based classification (2 × typical error threshold), four of 14 participants (29%) exhibited directionally consistent phase changes in FMD across cycles. Oestrogen was not correlated between cycles, and this might have contributed to variability in the FMD response. The intra-individual variability in follicular fluctuation in FMD between menstrual cycles challenges the utility of interpreting individual responses to phase over a single menstrual cycle.


Subject(s)
Follicular Phase , Menstrual Cycle , Brachial Artery/physiology , Estradiol , Female , Follicular Phase/physiology , Humans , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Progesterone , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...