Food-related quality of life driven by hypervigilance and anxiety around eating in organic gastrointestinal conditions.

BACKGROUND: Food-related quality of life (FRQoL) measures the impact of diet, eating behaviours and food-related anxiety on quality of life. Patients often view food and eating as central to symptom management. This is the first study to examine FRQoL in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, celiac sprue, achalasia and eosinophilic oesophagitis. METHODS: A total of 289 adults aged ≥18 years completed self-report measures evaluating the use of dietary treatment, FRQoL and other psychosocial outcomes. Principal component factor analysis evaluated potential subscales within the Food-Related Quality of Life Scale (FRQoL-29), to date validated only with a total score. Univariate analyses investigated differences in FRQoL based on diagnosis, whereas correlations and hierarchical regression identified relationships between FRQoL and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed four subscales within the FRQoL-29, with hypervigilance around eating being the primary driver in total score. Patients reported substantial impacts of FRQoL, with those not using diet therapy scoring significantly higher for FRQoL than those on a diet with and without the support of a registered dietitian (RD). Both social (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) and physical (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) domains of health-related quality of life were higher in patients with greater FRQoL. CONCLUSION: FRQoL is significantly degraded in patients with organic gastrointestinal illness diseases, and hypervigilance around food appears to contribute most to this. Use of dietary treatment and meeting with an RD were associated with lower FRQoL, though it is unclear if patients sought RD assistance before FRQoL declined. Future studies on the relationship between dietary treatment, RD support and FRQoL are warranted.

Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms are frequent among inflammatory bowel disease patients of South Asian descent-A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress (PTS) is the psycho-physiological response to a traumatic or life-threatening event and is implicated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD-PTS is present in up to 30% of white, non-Hispanic patients. The rates of IBD in Asian populations are expanding, making the exploration of IBD-PTS in this population imperative. METHODS: Adult patients of South/Southeast (S/SE) Asian decent with IBD for more than 6 months were recruited online via social media and patient-support groups. Participants completed the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist-5 (PCL-5), the United States National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NIH-PROMIS) -43 profile and demographics. S/SE Asian participants were age and sex matched (1:2) with randomly selected white, non-Hispanic controls. Statistical analyses evaluated differences in IBD-PTS symptoms between groups, the relationship between disease severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and predictors of IBD-PTS severity. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of the 51 S/SE Asian participants met the diagnostic cut-off for PTSD on the PCL-5 compared to 13.6% of 110 IBD controls. The mean global score on the PCL-5 was three times higher in S/SE Asians. Patients of S/SE Asian decent were over five times more likely to have PTSD due to their IBD experiences than controls, nearly doubling when controlling for disease activity. More severe IBD-PTS was present in S/SE Asian patients with active disease and those with extraintestinal manifestations. Higher global levels of IBD-PTS were associated with poorer HRQoL in S/SE Asians where increased hyperarousal from IBD-PTS predicted more sleep disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: S/SE Asian patients are five times more likely to experience IBD-PTS than their white, non-Hispanic counterparts. Several cultural factors lead to IBD-PTS in S/SE Asian patients that must be considered by IBD providers. Preventing, screening for and treating IBD-PTS in this population appears warranted.

Hospitalization Experiences and Post-traumatic Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Opportunities for Change.

INTRODUCTION: Medical trauma related to IBD (IBD-PTS) affects approximately 25% of patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Prior studies identify common hospitalization experiences as potentially traumatic but have not measured risk relationships for the development of IBD-PTS. We aim to investigate what aspects of hospitalizations may increase the chance of medical trauma and IBD-PTS development. METHODS: Adult patients with IBD enrolled in the IBD Partners database were recruited. Study specific questionnaires included PTSD checklist, 5th edition (PCL-5), patient experience questionnaire, and items about the patient's most stressful hospitalization and nonhospital sources of medical trauma. Established criteria for the PCL-5 identified significant IBD-PTS symptoms (re-experiencing, avoidance, mood change, hyperarousal, global diagnosis). Select disease and treatment information was obtained from the main IBD Partners dataset. Univariate and multivariate statistics evaluated the relationships between hospitalization data and IBD-PTS. RESULTS: There were 639 participants with at least 1 hospitalization for IBD included. Approximately two-thirds had Crohn's disease; most were White, non-Hispanic, female, middle-aged, and reported their IBD as being in remission. Forty percent of patients stated a hospitalization was a source of IBD-PTS. Frequent anxiety while hospitalized increased the odds of IBD-PTS 2 to 4 times; similar relationships existed for pain/pain control. Higher quality communication, information, and listening skills reduced the odds of IBD-PTS, albeit marginally. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD consistently cite hospitalizations as potential sources of medical trauma. Poorly managed anxiety and pain demonstrate the greatest chance for IBD-PTS development. Gender and racial/ethnic differences emerged for these risks. Positive interactions with the medical team may help mitigate in-hospital IBD-PTS development.

This study finds IBD patients with the poorest hospital experiences and those with poor pain and anxiety control are at the highest risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms due to medical trauma. Medical staff behavior is an important consideration.

Psychological Considerations for Food Intolerances: Celiac Sprue, Eosinophilic Esophagitis, and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity.

Several chronic digestive conditions are physiologically based on food intolerance, including celiac disease, nonceliac gluten sensitivity, and eosinophilic esophagitis. Patients are expected to follow medically prescribed diets to eliminate identified food triggers to control symptoms. However, the psychological impacts of these dietary approaches are largely unaddressed in clinical practice. Hypervigilance and anxiety regarding food and symptoms, and disordered eating, may emerge and negatively affect outcomes. Clinicians working with pediatric and adult populations with food intolerances should be aware of these psychological comorbidities, and equally emphasize effective ways to help patients manage the mental and physical aspects of their condition.

Validation of the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a debilitating major motor disorder of the oesophagus. Hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety substantially impact dysphagia symptom reporting, and quality of life is a critical patient outcome. Earlier achalasia symptom scales did not consider these constructs in their psychometric development. AIM: To develop a new symptom measure, the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes (APRO) Questionnaire METHODS: Four gastroenterologists with achalasia expertise generated preliminary items. Patients reviewed items via cognitive interviews. Patients undergoing high-resolution manometry completed the APRO with Oesophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale, Northwestern Oesophageal Quality of Life Scale, and three measures of reflux and dysphagia. Full APRO psychometric assessment (reliability, validity, factor structure) was done. Cluster analysis evaluated APRO + symptom-anxiety/hypervigilance patient phenotypes. RESULTS: We included 961 patients with normal motility and 296 with achalasia. The APRO yielded three subscales: dysphagia, reflux, chest pain with two items for weight change and diet modifications. Reliability and validity were excellent. Twenty-five percent of achalasia patients may have high levels of anxiety/hypervigilance despite low symptoms, while 8% may report severe symptoms with low anxiety/hypervigilance. The APRO significantly predicted quality of life, but less cognitive-affective processes. CONCLUSIONS: The APRO is a reliable and valid measure of achalasia symptoms that addresses the limitations of existing questionnaires. Symptom anxiety and hypervigilance moderate the relationship between APRO and quality of life; 33% of patients with achalasia exhibit concerning patterns in symptom severity, anxiety and hypervigilance that may contribute to poorer outcomes.

Improving Patient Adherence to Lifestyle Changes for the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal illness with symptoms of heartburn, chest pain, and regurgitation. Management of GERD can involve medication use, lifestyle modification (eg, dietary modification), and surgical intervention depending on the individual patient and disease severity. Poor adherence to medication and recommended lifestyle changes may result in increased symptom severity and decreased quality of life. This paper aimed to systematically review the literature on lifestyle modification for the management of GERD. Fourteen articles were included based on search criteria. Following review and analysis, three types of lifestyle modifications were present in the literature and include medication use, dietary recommendations, and sleep recommendations. Despite being a pharmacological treatment, medication adherence was included in the review, as health behavior change can be used to improve adherence. Overall, the factors associated with adherence to modifications varied in terms of impact and directionality, depending on the type of lifestyle modification. Symptom severity emerged as important across all lifestyle modifications, and is associated with increased adherence to medication use, but decreased adherence to dietary guidelines. While patient-provider communication appeared to improve patient knowledge, it is unclear if increased knowledge translates to improved adherence. The review also demonstrated a lack of clear and standardized guidelines across lifestyle modifications, which may have an influence on adherence and adherence reporting. Future research in GERD treatment adherence would benefit from the use of validated measures to assess adherence. Specific recommendations to improving patient adherence are discussed.