Associations of sleep-related behaviors and the sleep environment at infant age one month with sleep patterns in infants five months later.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize family and environmental correlates of sleep patterns that may contribute to differences in infant sleep. METHODS: We studied 313 infants in the Rise & SHINE (Sleep Health in Infancy & Early Childhood study) cohort. Our main exposures were the parent-reported sleep environment, feeding method and sleep parenting strategies at infant age one month. The main outcomes were nighttime sleep duration, longest nighttime sleep and number of awakenings measured by actigraphy at age six months. We used multivariable linear regression models to examine associations, and secondarily also explored the role of sleep-related environmental exposures in mediating previously observed associations of racial/ethnicity and parental education with infant sleep characteristics. RESULTS: In adjusted models, a non-dark sleep environment (versus an always dark sleep location) and taking the baby to parent's bed when awake at night (versus no co-sleeping) were associated with 28 (95% CI, -45, -11) and 18 (95% CI, -33, -4) minutes less sleep at night, respectively. Bottle feeding at bedtime was associated with 62 (95% CI, 21, 103) minutes additional longest nighttime sleep period. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested a modest mediating role of a non-dark sleep environment on racial/ethnic and educational differences in sleep duration. CONCLUSIONS: Infant sleep duration was positively associated with a dark sleep environment and a focal feed at bedtime while taking the baby to the parent's bed was associated with reduced infant sleep. Modifying the sleep environment and practices may improve infant sleep and reduce sleep health disparities.

Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among Resident Physicians From 2001 to 2015 in the United States.

PURPOSE: Limited information exists about medical malpractice claims against physicians-in-training. Data on residents' involvement in malpractice actions may inform perceptions about medicolegal liability and influence clinical decision-making at a formative stage. This study aimed to characterize rates and payment amounts of paid malpractice claims on behalf of resident physicians in the United States. METHOD: Using data from the National Practitioner Data Bank, 1,248 paid malpractice claims against resident physicians (interns, residents, and fellows) from 2001 to 2015, representing 1,632,471 residents-years, were analyzed. Temporal trends in overall and specialty-specific paid claim rates, payment amounts, catastrophic (> $1 million) and small (< $100,000) payments, and other claim characteristics were assessed. Payment amounts were compared with attending physicians during the same time period. RESULTS: The overall paid malpractice claim rate was 0.76 per 1,000 resident-years from 2001 to 2015. Among 1,194 unique residents with paid claims, 95.7% had exactly 1 claim, while 4.3% had 2-4 claims during training. Specialty-specific paid claim rates ranged from 0.12 per 1,000 resident-years (pathology) to 2.96 (obstetrics and gynecology). Overall paid claim rates decreased by 52% from 2001-2005 to 2011-2015 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45, 0.59). Median inflation-adjusted payment amount was $199,024 (2015 dollars), not significantly different from payments made on behalf of attending physicians during the same period. Proportions of catastrophic (11.2%) and small (33.1%) claims did not significantly change over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: From 2001 to 2015, paid malpractice claim rates on behalf of resident physicians decreased by 52%, while median payment amounts were stable. Resident paid claim rates were lower than attending physicians, while payment amounts were similar.