ABSTRACT
Background: Breast implant illness (BII) is a poorly understood heterogeneous disorder treated with implant removal; however, patient-reported symptoms and outcomes after treatment remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral breast implant removal related to BII by two surgeons at an academic medical center between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were surveyed using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction model with the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery BII survey extension. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient-associated factors. Results: Forty-seven patients were surveyed with a response rate of 51% (nâ =â 24). Of the 20 patients who completed the survey, the majority were White (85%), with 45% (nâ =â 9) having a documented history of psychiatric illness. Six (30%) patients had capsular contracture and four (20%) had documented implant rupture. Most implant removal procedures (nâ =â 12, 60%) were not covered by insurance. Fourteen (70%) patients reported a net improvement in their symptoms after implant removal, most commonly chest discomfort, muscle pain, fever, and headaches. Capsular contracture was predictive of reduced psychosocial, sexual, and breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.015). Self-pay was predictive of increased breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.009), but had no impact on symptomatic improvement. A reduced time to implant removal was predictive of fewer residual symptoms (P = 0.032). Psychiatric illness had no significant impact on the outcomes. Conclusions: In the setting of suspected or diagnosed BII, a reduced time to implant removal may decrease the risk of residual symptoms and improve overall patient satisfaction. In patients with capsular contracture, preoperative counseling should emphasize that implant removal may only improve physical symptoms.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to analyze the association between completion of research training and career success in American plastic surgery faculty to aid trainees in their decisions to perform research fellowships. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of attending academic plastic surgeons in the United States was conducted. Outcomes were compared between faculty who completed research training (research fellowship, PhD, or MPH) and those who did not. Outcomes included promotion to full professor and/or department chair, h-index, and attainment of National Institutes of Health funding. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-squared tests, t tests, and multivariable regressions. Results: A total of 949 plastic surgery faculty members were included, and of those, 185 (19.5%) completed dedicated research training, including 13.7% (n = 130) who completed a research fellowship. Surgeons who completed dedicated research training were significantly more likely to achieve full professorship (31.4% versus 24.1%, P = 0.01), obtain National Institutes of Health funding (18.4% versus 6.5%, P < 0.001), and have a higher mean h-index (15.6 versus 11.6, P < 0.001). Dedicated research fellowships were independently predictive of achieving full professorship (OR = 2.12, P = 0.002), increased h-index (ß = 4.86, P < 0.001), and attainment of National Institutes of Health funding (OR = 5.06, P = 0.01). Completion of dedicated research training did not predict an increased likelihood of becoming department chair. Conclusion: The performance of dedicated research training was predictive of improved markers of career success in plastic surgery and should be considered beneficial in both the short and long term.
ABSTRACT
In patients with recalcitrant mechanical thoracic duct obstruction, microsurgical lymphovenous bypass is an emerging therapeutic option. We herein discuss the preoperative workup, share our current operative technique, and evaluate preliminary outcomes with an emphasis on changes in physiology. Methods: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent thoracic duct lymphovenous bypass by a single surgeon and interventional radiologist from 2019 to 2022 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results: Nine patients were included in the study. Immediate postoperative heart rate increased significantly among this heterogeneous patient population, but within 4-6 hours the change in heart rate was no longer significant. Mean arterial pressure and oxygen requirement were not significantly different before and after bypass. Conclusions: Thoracic duct lymphovenous bypass seem to be well tolerated in the short-term even in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities. Further data are necessary to continue to better understand the resulting physiologic changes and to optimize patient outcomes.