Prehospital Active and Passive Warming in Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hypothermia is common among trauma patients and can lead to a serious rise in morbidity and mortality. This study was performed to investigate the effect of active and passive warming measures implemented in the prehospital phase on the body temperature of trauma patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, multinational prospective observational design, the effect of active and passive warming measures on the incidence of hypothermia was investigated. Adult trauma patients who were transported by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) or ground emergency medical services with an HEMS physician directly from the scene of injury were included. Four HEMS/ground emergency medical services programs from Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands participated. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (n = 20 per site) were included. Eleven percent had hypothermia on presentation, and the initial evaluation occurred predominantly within 60 minutes after injury. In-line fluid warmers and blankets were the most frequently used active and passive warming measures, respectively. Independent risk factors for a negative change in body temperature were transportation by ground ambulance (odds ratio = 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-11.49; P = .03) and being wet on initial presentation (odds ratio = 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-13.36; P = .05). CONCLUSION: For adult patients transported from the scene of injury to a trauma center, active and passive warming measures, most notably the removal of wet clothing, were associated with a favorable outcome, whereas wet patients and ground ambulance transport were associated with an unfavorable outcome with respect to temperature.

Prehospital body temperature measurement in trauma patients: A literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Accidental hypothermia in trauma patients can contribute to cardiorespiratory dysfunction, acidosis, and coagulopathy, causing increased morbidity and mortality. The early recognition of the clinical signs of hypothermia and the accurate measurement of body temperature by prehospital care providers are essential to avoid deterioration. This review provides an overview of studies that examine the reliability of different core temperature measurement options, with a focus on the prehospital setting. METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL using combinations of the Medical Subject Headings terms "ambulances," "emergency medical services," "thermometers," "body temperature," "hypothermia," and "body temperature regulation." Studies up to October 2021 were included, and different measurement options were listed and discussed. Eligible studies included those that identified the specific type of thermometer and focused on the out-of-hospital environment. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 521 studies, five of which met the eligibility criteria. Four studies focused on tympanic temperature measurement, and one focused on temporal artery temperature measurement. Among the noninvasive options, tympanic temperature measurement was most frequently identified as a reliable option for out-of-hospital use. CONCLUSION: A thermistor-based tympanic thermometer that features insulation of the ear and a temperature probe with a cap is likely the most suitable option for prehospital body temperature measurement in trauma patients. These results are based on outdated literature with currently more novel temperature measurement devices available. Future studies are necessary to provide strong recommendations regarding temperature measurement due to emerging technology, the lack of studies, and the heterogeneity of existing studies.

Evaluation of dried blood spot testing using the Abbott Alinity i.

BACKGROUND: The West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre currently uses the Abbott Architect for DBS serology. The new Abbott Alinity i will replace the Architect in our laboratory. In this study, mock and stored patient DBS samples were tested on both platforms and results compared. STUDY DESIGN: Mock DBS were made from whole blood where patient results were known (38 negative samples and 141 positive samples; 39 HIV Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab), 35 HCV IgG antibody (HCVG), 34 HBV core IgG (HBCG) and 33 HBsAg). Mock DBS were tested on both Abbott platforms. Stored patient DBS samples (132 negative and 263 positive: 9 HIVAg/Ab, 10 HBsAg, 52 HBCG and 60 HCVG) previously tested on the Architect were retested on the Alinity i. RESULTS: Mock DBS showed good correlation between the Architect and Alinity i for the HIV Ag/Ab,HBCG and HCVG assays. A poorer correlation occurred with HBsAg, the Alinity i reported HBsAg positives at a lower value compared to the Architect. The coefficient of variation for intra-assay variation was 1.69 % (HIVAg/Ab), 3.25 % (HCVG), 1.68 % (HBsAg) and 1.95 % (HBCG). The sensitivity and specificity was determined based on results from the mock and patient samples. At S/Co cut-off 1.0 both HIV and HBsAg had a sensitivity of 100 %. A cut-off 0.8 gave a sensitivity of 95.83 % (95 % CI 89.67%-98.85%) for HCVG and 0.3 gave a sensitivity of 98.8 % (CI 93.69%-99.97%) for HBCG. DISCUSSION: The alinity i compared well against the architect and can be used to test DBS samples.

Use of Online Dietary Recalls among Older UK Adults: A Feasibility Study of an Online Dietary Assessment Tool.

This study examined the feasibility of including myfood24, an online 24-hour dietary recall tool, in a cohort studies of older adults. Participants (n = 319) were recruited during follow-up visits for the CHARIOT-Pro Sub-study, a prospective study of cognitively healthy adults aged 60-85 years at baseline. Email invitations were sent over three consecutive months, with weekly reminders. Multivariable regression models were applied to examine the number of recalls completed in relation to technology readiness (TR) scores and demographic characteristics. Ninety-four percent of people agreed to participate. Among participants, 67% completed at least one recall, and 48% completed two or more. Participants who completed multiple recalls reported higher self-confidence with technology and received a higher TR score than those who did not complete any recalls. A one-point higher TR score was associated with higher odds of completing three recalls compared to zero recalls (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.96-3.01); this association was further attenuated after adjustment for demographic and other TR-related covariates (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.63-2.88). This study demonstrates reasonable participation rates for a single myfood24 recall among older adults participating in a cohort study but suggests that further support may be required to obtain multiple recalls in this population.

Paradoxical cyclosporine A requirements in pediatric renal transplants receiving high-dose steroids.

The potent immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CyA) is a mainstay of treatment in the renal transplant population. During episodes of acute allograft rejection, therapy also includes the pulse administration of high-dose steroids such as prednisone or methylprednisolone. Both steroids and CyA are metabolized by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme of the cytochrome P450 catalytic system. On a theoretical basis, high steroid concentrations during a rejection episode could competitively inhibit CyA metabolism, increasing its systemic concentration and decreasing its dose requirements. A database was compiled consisting of pediatric patients who had undergone an acute renal rejection event during the years 1993 to 2003. The severity of rejection events, as well as the CyA and prednisone dosing regimens used during rejection, were assessed using a comprehensive chart analysis. The presence or absence of additional medications that could potentially interact with CyA was also examined. Although some patients responded in the predicted manner, the authors also found that a subgroup of pediatric patients placed on highdose pulse steroid therapy for acute graft rejection required increased amounts of CyA to maintain therapeutic concentrations. The authors recommend monitoring of patients on high-dose steroids for paradoxical CyA requirements intermittently during high-dose steroid treatment to individualize CyA therapy appropriately during renal allograft rejection and thereby maximize efficacy while minimizing potential toxic side effects of CyA such as under-immunosuppression and organ rejection.

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin in paediatric renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify common factors that determine the dose of tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin in paediatric renal transplant recipients. METHODS: The concentration profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in blood were determined in 68 children who had received a renal transplant. To avoid disruption of therapy, measurements were made at 2-h intervals over an 8-h period during normal dosing regimens. Direct comparisons of the two drugs were made in 14 of the subjects who were switched from cyclosporin to tacrolimus. RESULTS: The ratio of peak to trough levels for tacrolimus was approximately twofold compared with over threefold for cyclosporin. Area under the curve (AUC) for tacrolimus remained relatively constant in each 2-h period of the dosage interval compared with the AUC for cyclosporin, which varied by over twofold in the same time period. In the 14 subjects who received both drugs, there was a poor correlation between C2/C0, C2, t(1/2) and AUC for tacrolimus and cyclosporin in the same individual. In a multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations for tacrolimus concentrations, AUC or C2/C0 with age, gender, calcium-channel blocker, quinolone or statin. For cyclosporin, there was some association for AUC with gender and quinolone use and a weak association with calcium-channel blocker or statin use. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin display a wide intra- and inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetic properties in young subjects. In the case of absorption represented by the peak-trough ratios, the values for tacrolimus are significantly less than those obtained with cyclosporin. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for one of these agents is not predictive for the behaviour of the other in young renal transplant recipients.