Facial fractures: The "bottom-up" approach.

Given the demands of a busy high-volume trauma center, trauma radiologists are expected to evaluate an enormous number of images covering a multitude of facial bones in a short period of time in severely traumatized patients. Therefore, a comprehensive checklist, search pattern, and practical approach become indispensable for evaluation. Moreover, fracture complex classification conveys abundant information in a succinct shorthand fashion, which can be a large asset in a busy high-volume trauma center: reliably helping clinicians communicate urgent findings, make early treatment decisions, and effectively plan surgical approaches. Traditionally, radiologists' approach the CT axial dataset in top-down fashion: navigating their descent craniocaudal. However, a bottom-up approach may be advantageous, especially when it comes to facial fracture complex classification. Four key anatomic landmarks of the face, when evaluated sequentially in bottom-up fashion, are favorable to rapid single-sweep facial fracture characterization: the mandible, the pterygoid plates, the zygoma, and the bony orbits. That is, when done in succession: 1. Clearing the mandible rules out a panfacial smash fracture. 2. Clearing the pterygoid plates effectively rules out a Le Fort I, II, and III fracture. 3. Clearing the zygoma effectively rules out a zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) type fracture. 4. Clearing the bony orbits effectively rules out a naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fracture. Following this process of exclusion and elimination; as one ascends through the face, fracture characterization becomes more manageable and straightforward. Besides identifying all of the fractures and using the appropriate classification system, the radiologist also needs to recognize key clinically relevant soft tissue injuries that may be associated with facial fractures and thus should address these in the report.

Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

The aim of this study was to assess for an association between radiologists' turnaround time (TAT) and report quality for emergency department (ED) abdominopelvic CT examinations. Reports of 60 consecutive ED abdominopelvic CT studies from five abdominal radiologists (300 total reports) were included. An ED radiologist, abdominal radiologist, and ED physician independently evaluated satisfaction with report content (1-10 scale), satisfaction with report clarity (1-10 scale), and extent to which the report advanced the patient on a previously published clinical spectrum scale (1-5 scale). TAT (time between completion of imaging and completion of the final report) and report quality were compared between radiologists using unpaired t tests; associations between TAT and report quality scores for individual radiologists were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. The five radiologists' mean TAT varied from 35 to 53 min. There were significant differences in report content in half of comparisons between radiologists by observer 1 (p ≤ 0.032) and in a minority of comparisons by observer 2 (p ≤ 0.047), in report clarity in majority of comparisons by observer 1 (p ≤ 0.031) and in a minority of comparisons by observer 2 (p ≤ 0.010), and in impact on patient care in a minority of comparisons for all observers (p ≤ 0.047). There were weak positive correlations between TAT and report content and clarity for three radiologists for observer 1 (r = 0.270-0.362) and no correlation between TAT and any report quality measure for remaining combinations of the five radiologists and three observers (r = -0.197 to +0.181). While both TAT and report quality vary between radiologists, these two factors were not associated for individual radiologists.

Recommendations for additional imaging on emergency department CT examinations: comparison of emergency- and organ-based subspecialty radiologists.

PURPOSE: Past studies have identified a high frequency of recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) for computed tomography (CT) studies performed in an emergency department (ED), thereby potentially contributing to increased imaging utilization and costs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of RAI within the ED setting between ED-based and organ-based subspecialty radiologists. METHODS: We identified 600 ED CT studies, comprising 200 head, chest, and abdominal CT studies, split equally between cases reviewed by ED-based and organ-based radiologists. Frequency of RAI for the three examinations was compared between these subspecialty groups. RESULTS: Frequencies of RAI were 21.5 %, 13.5 %, and 5.5 % for CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and brain, respectively. There was a significantly higher frequency of RAI for chest CT studies interpreted by chest radiologists than by ED radiologists (28.0 % vs. 15.0 %, respectively, p = 0.036), largely due to a higher rate of RAI for incidentally detected lung nodules and masses as well as other pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities by chest radiologists. There was no significant difference in RAI on brain or abdominal CT studies between the two groups (p = 0.426-1.0). However, on abdominal studies, only ED-based radiologists provided RAI for abnormalities of the bowel or uterus, while only organ-based radiologists provided RAI for pancreatic abnormalities. Only 25.6 % of RAI were subsequently performed at our institution. CONCLUSION: For chest CT studies performed at the authors' institution, differences in management of incidental pulmonary nodules contributed to a significantly higher frequency of RAI by chest radiologists than by ED-based radiologists. Further investigation of the impact of these differences on cost and patient outcomes is warranted.

Myelography: a primer.

Despite recent trends toward evaluation of back and neck pain with magnetic resonance imaging, myelography and postmyelography computed tomography continue to play an important role in the workup of many patients with spinal pathology. We present techniques for the safe and efficient performance of myelography, lumbar, and cervical puncture, which remain important skills to be mastered by radiology residents and fellows.