ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States. The majority of prostate cancer treatment occurs in the ambulatory setting, and patients and their caregivers take on significant responsibility for monitoring and managing treatment and disease-related toxicity. Digital health coaching has shown promise as a tool to positively influence outcomes. We completed a single-arm pilot study to assess the feasibility of digital health coaching in men with prostate cancer. METHODS: Men with a history of prostate cancer requiring treatment in the past 2 years were eligible for inclusion. Participants engaged in a 12-week health coaching program, consisting of a combination of at least one telephone call and up to four digital nudges (defined as content delivered via text, e-mail, or app on the basis of the participant's preference) per week. Prostate cancer-specific content addressed one of the following topics each week: fatigue, pain management, healthy eating, exercise, managing incontinence, sexual health, managing stress and anxiety, financial toxicity, goal setting during treatment, managing side effects, communicating with the health care team, and medication adherence. Services were provided at no cost to the participant. RESULTS: A hundred patients were consented for the study, and 88 enrolled. The feasibility threshold of 60% was met with 63 of the 88 enrolled individuals completing the 3-month program (proportion = 71.6%; 90% CI, 62.6 to 79.4; P = .016). CONCLUSION: Digital health coaching for men with prostate cancer is feasible. These findings support further evaluation of digital health coaching for men with prostate cancer in larger randomized controlled trials.
Subject(s)
Mentoring , Prostatic Neoplasms , Anxiety , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this case report is to describe the use of tibiofemoral joint mobilizations to improve knee flexion in a patient with arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and failed manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). CASE DESCRIPTION: A 62-year-old female presented to physical therapy 15 days after TKA with full knee extension, 45 deg of active knee flexion, 48 deg of passive knee flexion, pain, and a Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score of 28. INTERVENTIONS/OUTCOMES: A multimodal intervention strategy was used initially with minimal improvement in knee flexion. The patient was diagnosed with fibrosis and MUA was performed. Passive knee flexion was 80 deg before MUA and 75 deg after MUA. Focused grade III and IV tibiofemoral joint mobilizations were used after MUA. At discharge, the patient had 90 deg of active and 116 deg of passive knee flexion, no pain, and an LEFS score of 80. DISCUSSION: A conventional multimodal intervention approach was ineffective for a patient who developed arthrofibrosis following TKA. A focused intervention approach of grade III and IV tibiofemoral joint mobilizations improved knee flexion, pain, and function following TKA and failed MUA.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Fibrosis/etiology , Fibrosis/therapy , Manipulation, Orthopedic/methods , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Anesthesia , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, ArticularABSTRACT
Lateral ankle sprains are a common injury with an estimated occurrence rate of 23 000 per day in the USA. Prolonged immobilisation and delayed referral to physical therapy are associated with poorer outcomes. The patient was a 49-year-old woman working as a surgical technologist. She sustained an inversion injury to her left ankle while descending from a stool. Her primary care physician examined her, issued a Controlled Ankle Movement (CAM) walking boot and immobilised her ankle for 6 weeks. Patients with grade I and II lateral ankle sprains who are treated with early mobilisation and referral to physical therapy have demonstrated earlier return to function compared with patients who are treated with prolonged immobilisation and delayed referral. Nevertheless, it remains common for individuals who have sustained a lateral ankle sprain to be immobilised. This case study highlights the importance of early mobilisation and early physical therapy referral for patients with lateral ankle sprains.
