Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pituitary ; 24(4): 499-506, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33469830

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the particle size, concentration, airborne duration and spread during endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery in actual patients in a theatre setting. METHODS: This observational study recruited a convenience sample of three patients. Procedures were performed in a positive pressure operating room. Particle image velocimetry and spectrometry with air sampling were used for aerosol detection. RESULTS: Intubation and extubation generated small particles (< 5 µm) in mean concentrations 12 times greater than background noise (p < 0.001). The mean particle concentrations during endonasal access were 4.5 times greater than background (p = 0.01). Particles were typically large (> 75 µm), remained airborne for up to 10 s and travelled up to 1.1 m. Use of a microdebrider generated mean aerosol concentrations 18 times above baseline (p = 0.005). High-speed drilling did not produce aerosols greater than baseline. Pituitary tumour resection generated mean aerosol concentrations less than background (p = 0.18). Surgical drape removal generated small and large particles in mean concentrations 6.4 times greater than background (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intubation and extubation generate large amounts of small particles that remain suspended in air for long durations and disperse through theatre. Endonasal access and pituitary tumour resection generate smaller concentrations of larger particles which are airborne for shorter periods and travel shorter distances.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/adverse effects , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Motion , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Operating Rooms , Particle Size , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26737881

ABSTRACT

The effect of miniaturizing the electrode lead for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy was investigated in this work. A direct comparison was made between a miniature lead (0.65 mm diameter) and a lead of standard size (1.3 mm). Acute in vivo implantation in two cat brains was performed to evaluate surgical trauma and confirm capacity to target thalamic nuclei. Insertion into a homogeneous gel model of neural tissue was used to compare insertion forces while visualizing the process. The standard size cannula, used first to guide lead insertion, required substantially higher insertion force compared with the miniature version and produced a significantly larger region of tissue disruption. The characteristic hemorrhage and edema extended 119-352 µm from the implanted track surface of the miniature lead and cannula, while these extended 311-571 µm for the standard size lead and cannula. A miniature DBS implant can reduce the extent of trauma and could potentially help improve neural function preservation after functional neurosurgery.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Animals , Brain/pathology , Brain/surgery , Cats , Geniculate Bodies/pathology , Microelectrodes , Neurosurgical Procedures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL