Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ATS Sch ; 4(1): 76-86, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089683

ABSTRACT

Background: Airway clearance therapies (ACTs) are recommended as an integral part of the management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) to prevent inflammation, mucus accumulation, and infection that occur because of ineffective secretion clearance. Adherence to ACTs is low, in part because of perceived burden and a lack of standardization of education and training programs for patients. Poor adherence is associated with more frequent exacerbations, worse health outcomes, and worse quality of life. Structured educational programs increase adherence to ACT among people with cystic fibrosis and may show similar results for people with BE. Objective: This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, clinical utility, sustainability, and expert opinions of this educational program addressing gaps in ACT knowledge and skills in people with BE. Methods: The Individual Management of Patient Airway Clearance Therapy- Bronchiectasis (IMPACT BE) was implemented in nine BE centers with 100 patients. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from patients and providers. Results: The IMPACT BE program demonstrated good uptake in a clinic setting by multidisciplinary team members, with improvements in medical teams' evaluation of their ability to provide education to patients. All healthcare teams indicated that this program could become a sustainable part of their clinic. Qualitative responses from patients indicated the program was comprehensive and easy to use. Conclusion: In this pilot study, IMPACT BE was found to be useful in teaching airway clearance to people with BE. The open-access toolkit was well received by both patients and a diverse array of providers in a clinic setting.

2.
Schizophr Res ; 71(2-3): 435-44, 2004 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15474915

ABSTRACT

Persons with schizophrenia face elevated risk of infection with HIV. While HIV therapy is demanding, patients diagnosed with both conditions also require appropriate and consistent management of their psychiatric illness, for the same reasons that generally apply to persons with schizophrenia and because untreated psychiatric illness can interfere with full participation in HIV care. This study examines the correlates of use of and persistence on antipsychotic medications among HIV-infected individuals with schizophrenia, using merged New Jersey HIV/AIDS surveillance data and paid Medicaid claims. Persistence was defined as at least 2 months of medication use in a quarter. We identified 350 individuals who were dually diagnosed with HIV and schizophrenia. Overall, 81% of these beneficiaries had at least one claim for an antipsychotic medication at some point between 1992 and 1998. Multivariate techniques were used, including simple logistic regressions on use and robust longitudinal regressions that controlled for repeated observations on the same individual and treatment gaps. Among users of antipsychotic medications, persistence was very low at 37%. Racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to receive atypical antipsychotic medications. Use of atypical antipsychotics was associated with higher persistence. Our study confirmed past findings of racial disparities in the receipt of atypical antipsychotic medications. Findings suggest that use of atypical medications may benefit individuals dually diagnosed with HIV and serious mental illness.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Seropositivity/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence
3.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972) ; 58(3): 143-53, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12948105

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine temporal associations between obstetrics/gynecology (ob/gyn) care, substance abuse treatment (SAT), and antiretroviral therapy (ART) during and after pregnancy among HIV-infected women on Medicaid. METHOD: We identified 345 women, representing 378 deliveries, from merged New Jersey AIDS/HIV surveillance data and paid Medicaid claims data between 1992 and 1998. T-tests were used to analyze person-level differences in service use before and after delivery. Data were converted to person-months to predict SAT and receipt of ART in multivariate regressions that corrected for correlations among repeated observations. RESULTS: Compared to antepartum months there were significant reductions in ART and ob/gyn care in postpartum months and a significant increase in substance abuse. Multivariate analyses showed that compared to other months, women were more likely to obtain SAT during the postpartum period (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.74); conversely, women were more likely to receive ART in the antepartum period (OR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.43-2.17). Ob/gyn care predicted ART and SAT, regardless of the timing of care relative to delivery. African American women were least likely to receive SAT and ART. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that ob/gyn providers have a central position in pathways to care for a vulnerable population of women with multiple health care needs and that patterns of ART use and SAT shift markedly during the months before and after delivery. However, receipt of ob/gyn care during these months is not associated with the changes, suggesting that ob/gyn providers may have untapped opportunities during the ante- and postpartum months to educate women with HIV/AIDS about the importance of consistent use of ART and to provide SAT referrals as needed. These results may have implications for policy makers interested in promoting adherence to ART and decreasing substance abuse among women with HIV/AIDS.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Medicaid , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , New Jersey , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Substance-Related Disorders/complications
4.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 30(4): 429-39, 2002 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12138350

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study estimates the rate of zidovudine (ZDV) use during pregnancy among HIV-infected women receiving Medicaid. The rates of ZDV use during pregnancy are compared before (preperiod) and after (postperiod) the 1994 publication of US Public Service Task Force guidelines, recommending use of ZDV during pregnancy. The authors also compare and contrast the correlates of ZDV use during pregnancy in each of the preguideline and postguideline periods. METHODS: New Jersey AIDS/HIV surveillance data and paid Medicaid claims data between 1992 and 1996 were merged to examine ZDV use during pregnancy. Among ZDV users, the authors also examined persistence of ZDV use during the 3 months preceding delivery. In these analyses, the authors examined care received during pregnancy and differentiated routine medical care from pregnancy-specific care. Correlates of intrapregnancy ZDV use were examined using chi2 analysis and robust regression techniques that correct for correlation among repeated observations. RESULTS: Use of ZDV during pregnancy steadily increased from 13% in 1992 to 70% in 1996, with the upward trend beginning before the release of the guidelines. Averaged over the full preperiod (1992-1994), the rate was 29%, increasing to 57% during the full postperiod (1995-1996). Women with no health care during pregnancy did not receive any ZDV prophylaxis. Women who had some health care contacts, but did not receive pregnancy-specific care, had low rates of ZDV use that did not increase after the promulgation of the guidelines (21% in preperiod and 27% in postperiod). Women who received pregnancy-specific care, whether from obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) or other providers, substantially increased their use of ZDV in the postguideline period (from 37% to 63% for those who saw OB-GYNS, and from 20% to 59% for those who received pregnancy-specific care from other providers). However, among users of ZDV, only a minority (24%) used ZDV persistently during the 3 months preceding delivery. African American women were less likely to be persistent ZDV users, even after controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the underutilization of ZDV by women who did not receive pregnancy-related care, even after the publication of guidelines. Lack of pregnancy-specific medical care during pregnancy is an important barrier to ZDV prophylaxis. This study confirms that the receipt of prenatal care during pregnancy is a key intervening variable in the real world application of the PHS guidelines and underscores the importance of proactive efforts to provide prenatal care to pregnant women with HIV.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Zidovudine/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Medicaid , New Jersey , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...