ABSTRACT
Concerns about foodborne salmonellosis have led many countries to introduce microbiological criteria for certain food products. If such criteria are not well-grounded in science, they could be an unjustified obstacle to trade. Raw poultry products are an important part of the global food market. Import and export ambiguities and regulatory confusion resulting from different Salmonella requirements were the impetus for convening an international group of scientific experts from 16 countries to discuss the scientific and technical issues that affect the setting of a microbiological criterion for Salmonella contamination of raw chicken. A particular concern for the group was the use of criteria implying a zero tolerance for Salmonella and suggesting complete absence of the pathogen. The notion can be interpreted differently by various stakeholders and was considered inappropriate because there is neither an effective means of eliminating Salmonella from raw poultry nor any practical method for verifying its absence. Therefore, it may be more useful at present to set food safety metrics that involve reductions in hazard levels. Such terms as "zero tolerance" or "absence of a microbe" in relation to raw poultry should be avoided unless defined and explained by international agreement. Risk assessment provides a more meaningful approach than a zero tolerance philosophy, and new metrics, such as performance objectives that are linked to human health outcomes, should be utilized throughout the food chain to help define risk and identify ways to reduce adverse effects on public health.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Poultry/microbiology , Public Health , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Salmonella/growth & development , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Humans , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Salmonella/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
The occurrence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) phage types (PTs) in samples collected from healthy and diseased chickens, in outbreaks of human gastroenteritis related to the consumption of egg products, in samples of poultry meat, in pipped embryos of broiler chickens, in meat meal, in poultry-rearing environments, and in many foods (cheese, mayonnaise, cake, and bacon) is described for strains isolated from 1995 to 1997 in Brazil. SE strains were isolated, and the most common PT was found to be PT 4, followed by PTs 7, 21, 35, 6, 4a, 8, 30, 6a, 5a, 1, and 1b. Fourteen strains were classified as react-but-do-not-conform strains, and one strain was not typeable. The results of this study demonstrate that PT 4 has a wider distribution among the sources studied than do any other SE phage types and is the most important phage type in human salmonellosis.
Subject(s)
Bacteriophage Typing , Salmonella enteritidis/classification , Animals , Brazil , Chickens , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella PhagesABSTRACT
An assay is described for evaluating live-culture treatment material that may be given orally to chicks to prevent intestinal colonization by non-host-specific salmonellae. Both pre-treated and control chicks are challenged with ca 104 salmonellae/chick, using a strain bearing an antibiotic resistance marker. Chicks are examined 5 d after challenge to determine both the proportion of positive birds in treated and control groups and the levels of Salmonella in the caeca of infected individuals. The efficacy of the treatment is determined by calculation of values for Infection Factor and Protection Factor.
