ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring requires a validated assay and appropriate conditions for sample shipment and storage based on the stability of the compound to be analyzed. This study evaluated the stability of 29 antimicrobial compounds in whole blood (WB) and plasma samples under various storage conditions. METHODS: The pre-analytical stability of 22 antibiotics (amoxicillin, aztreonam, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, cloxacillin, daptomycin, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, piperacillin, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim), 2 beta-lactamase inhibitors (avibactam, tazobactam), and 5 antituberculosis drugs (ethambutol, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, rifabutin, and rifampicin) was assessed by WB for up to 24 hours at room temperature (RT) and 72 hours at +4°C. The stability in plasma was evaluated for up to 6 hours at RT, 24 hours at +4°C, 1 month at -20°C, and 6 months at -80°C. RESULTS: Concerning WB stability, all investigated compounds were stable for 24 hours at RT, except meropenem and isoniazid, which were stable for 6 hours; however, for 24 hours at +4°C, all the compounds were stable. For storage durations of 48 and 72 hours at +4°C, all compounds were stable, except for ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, and isoniazid. Concerning stability in plasma, all compounds were stable for 6 hours at RT, and all except isoniazid were stable for 24 hours at +4°C. All the tested compounds were stable for 7 days at -20°C, except isoniazid, for which a degradation of approximately 20% was observed. An important degradation was observed for beta-lactam antibiotics after 1 month at -20°C. All compounds were stable at -80°C for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-analytical stabilities of several anti-infective compounds was described. The present results can be used to determine the appropriate conditions for shipping and storing samples dedicated to therapeutic drug monitoring of the investigated compounds.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided bone biopsies at the bedside of diabetic patients admitted for suspected foot osteitis not requiring surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric study, we compared the performance of ultrasound-guided (n = 29 consecutive patients, Dec.2020-Oct.2022) versus surgical (n = 24 consecutive patients, Jan.2018-Nov.2020) bone biopsies at confirming or ruling out diabetic foot osteitis (primary outcome). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in the two intervention groups, including arteritis prevalence (62.3 %), SINBAD score, and wound location (phalanges 36 %, metatarsus 43 %, and calcaneus 21 %). However, the ultrasound-guided group was older (67 ± 11 versus 60 ± 13 years respectively, P = 0.047) and had more type 2 diabetes (97 % versus 75 %, P = 0.038). Diagnostic performance (i.e., capacity to confirm or rule out suspected osteitis) was similar for ultrasound-guided (28/29 cases: 25 confirmations, 3 invalidations) and surgical (24 confirmations/24) biopsies, P = 0.358. No biopsy-related side effect or complication was observed for either intervention, even for patients on antiaggregation and/or anticoagulation therapy. The mean (± standard deviation) time necessary to perform the biopsy was shorter in the ultrasound-guided group (2.6 ± 3.0 versus 7.2 ± 5.8 days, respectively, P < 0.001) and wound evolution at three months was more favorable (83.3 versus 41.2 %, P = 0.005) (94.4 % versus 66.7 %, respectively, patients with new surgical procedure within six months excluded; P = 0.055). Even though not statistically significant, healing rates in terms of wound and osteitis at six months were also better in the ultrasound-guided group (wound: 40.9 % versus 36.8 %; P = 0.790, and osteitis: 81.8 vs 55.6 % P = 0.071). CONCLUSION: In diabetic patients with suspected foot osteitis not requiring surgery, bedside ultrasound-guided bone biopsies may constitute a promising alternative to surgical biopsies. This intervention provided excellent tolerance and microbiological documentation, short lead-times, and more favorable wound prognosis.