Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 30(7): 554-9, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11482510

ABSTRACT

Benign osteoblastic and cystic lesions involving the anterior column and wall of the pelvis and acetabulum are technically difficult areas to approach and achieve successful surgical outcomes. Tumors in this area are rare, leaving little information in the literature regarding how best to surgically approach them. Previous authors have reported small series of patients treated using anteromedial, iliofemoral, and intracapsular dissections. The ilioinguinal approach has been extensively described and used in the modern-day treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures involving the anterior column and wall. Despite its use for acetabular trauma, application of the ilioinguinal approach in the treatment of benign pelvic and acetabular lesions has not been described. We reviewed the management of 5 patients with benign pelvic or acetabular tumors treated using the ilioinguinal approach. Diagnoses included aneurysmal bone cysts in 3 patients and osteoid osteomas in 2 patients, involving the pelvic anterior column and wall. The approach has permitted satisfactory exposure of the lesions for operative treatment. At an average follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-4 years), excellent functional outcome and no recurrences were noted. There were 2 patients with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsies, both of which resolved completely by 8 weeks. Encouraging results from our study demonstrate a new application for the ilioinguinal approach in the treatment of benign anterior column and wall lesions of the pelvis and acetabulum.


Subject(s)
Bone Cysts/surgery , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Osteoma, Osteoid/surgery , Pelvic Bones , Acetabulum , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Bone Cysts/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Child , Female , Humans , Inguinal Canal , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Osteoma, Osteoid/diagnostic imaging , Osteoma, Osteoid/pathology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Med Microbiol ; 16(2): 111-6, 1983 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6341594

ABSTRACT

A direct solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (Auszyme I) and a direct solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Austria II) for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were compared in tests with a panel of 347 human sera. Compared with RIA, EIA showed a sensitivity of 98% with 153 HBsAg-positive sera and a specificity of 99% with 194 HBsAg-negative sera. Sera that gave false negative and false positive results by EIA were re-examined by both RIA and EIA to confirm the initial result. Use of less than the recommended volume of serum for EIA produced results inconsistent with RIA in four of 27 sera examined. Quantitative correlation between RIA and EIA was low (r = 0.691). Positive controls used for EIA showed considerable variation from day to day, although intra-assay variation was much less. The sensitivity of the EIA method examined compares favourably with previously published EIA studies and with the RIA used in this study. Auszyme I EIA is a sensitive and specific third generation test for HBsAg that offers several advantages over currently used RIA techniques.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/analysis , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Radioimmunoassay , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...