Steerable needles for radio-frequency ablation in cirrhotic livers.

Accurate needle placement in deep-seated liver tumours can be difficult. In this work, we disclose two new manually controlled steerable needles for 17G radio-frequency ablation probe placement. The needles contain stylets with embedded compliant joints for active tip articulations, and concentric tubes for (curved-path) guidance. Needle steering was evaluated sequentially by intended users and in intended-use tissue types. Six interventional radiologists evaluated the needle in repeated ultrasound-guided steering tasks in liver-mimicking phantoms. Targets were located at a 100 mm depth and 20 mm lateral offset from the initial insertion line. The resulting mean absolute tip placement error was 1.0 ± 1.0 mm. Subsequently, steering-induced tissue damage was evaluated in fresh cirrhotic human liver explants. The surface area of puncture holes was estimated in scanned histology slides, using a connected-components analysis. The mean surface area was 0.26 ± 0.16 mm2 after steering with a median radius of curvature of 0.7 × 103 mm, versus 0.35 ± 0.15 mm2 after straight-path insertions with the steerable needle and 0.15 ± 0.09 mm2 after straight-path RFA probe insertions. The steering mechanisms proposed enable clinically relevant path corrections for 17G needles. Radiologists were quickly adept in curved-path RFA probe placement and the evaluation of histological tissue damage demonstrated a potentially safe use during liver interventions.

The Art of Electrosurgery: Trainees and Experts.

The benefits of electrosurgery have been acknowledged since the early 1920s, and nowadays more than 80% of surgical procedures involve devices that apply energy to tissues. Despite its widespread use, it is currently unknown how the operator's choices with regard to instrument selection and application technique are related to complications. As such, the manner in which electrosurgery is applied can have a serious influence on the outcome of the procedure and the well-being of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the variety of differences in usage of electrosurgical devices. Our approach is to measure these parameters to provide insight into application techniques. A sensor was developed that records the magnitude of electric current delivered to an electrosurgical device at a frequency of 10 Hz. The sensor is able to detect device activation times and a reliable estimate of the power-level settings. Data were recorded for 91 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by different surgeons and residents. Results of the current measurement data show differences in the way electrosurgery is applied by surgeons and residents during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Variations are seen in the number of activations, the activation time, and the approach for removal of the gallbladder. Analysis showed that experienced surgeons have a longer activation time than residents (3.01 vs 1.41 seconds, P < .001) and a lower number of activations (102 vs 123). This method offers the opportunity to relate application techniques to clinical outcome and to provide input for the development of a best practice model.

Where are my instruments? Hazards in delivery of surgical instruments.

BACKGROUND: Unavailability of instruments is recognised to cause delays and stress in the operating room, which can lead to additional risks for the patients. The aim was to provide an overview of the hazards in the entire delivery process of surgical instruments and to provide insight into how Information Technology (IT) could support this process in terms of information availability and exchange. METHODS: The process of delivery was described according to the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis methodology for two hospitals. The different means of information exchange and availability were listed. Then, hazards were identified and further analysed for each step of the process. RESULTS: For the first hospital, 172 hazards were identified, and 23 of hazards were classified as high risk. Only one hazard was considered as 'controlled' (when actions were taken to remove the hazard later in the process). Twenty-two hazards were 'tolerated' (when no actions were taken, and it was therefore accepted that adverse events may occur). For the second hospital, 158 hazards were identified, and 49 of hazards were classified as high risk. Eight hazards were 'controlled' and 41 were 'tolerated'. The means for information exchange and information systems were numerous for both cases, while there was not one system that provided an overview of all relevant information. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the high-risk hazards are expected to be controlled by the use of IT support. Centralised information and information availability for different parties reduce risks related to unavailability of instruments in the operating room.